Comparison of Grass and Legume Silages for Milk Production. 1. Production Responses with Different Levels of Concentrate
Silages prepared from pure stands of ryegrass, alfalfa, white clover, and red clover over two successive year were offered to lactating dairy cows in two feeding experiments. Proportional mixtures of all cuts prepared in a yr were used to ensure that the forage treatments were representative of the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of dairy science 2003-08, Vol.86 (8), p.2598-2611 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2611 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 2598 |
container_title | Journal of dairy science |
container_volume | 86 |
creator | Dewhurst, R.J. Fisher, W.J. Tweed, J.K.S. Wilkins, R.J. |
description | Silages prepared from pure stands of ryegrass, alfalfa, white clover, and red clover over two successive year were offered to lactating dairy cows in two feeding experiments. Proportional mixtures of all cuts prepared in a yr were used to ensure that the forage treatments were representative of the crop. Additional treatments involved mixtures of grass silage with either white clover silage or red clover silage (50/50, on a DM basis). Silages were prepared in round bales, using a biological inoculant additive, and wilting for up to 48h. Although the legumes were less suited to silage-making than grass, because of their higher buffering capacity and lower water-soluble carbohydrate content, all silages were well-fermented. A standard concentrate was offered at a flat-rate (8 kg/d in yr 1, and 4 or 8 kg/d in yr 2). All of the legume silages led to higher DM intake and milk yields than for the grass silage, with little effect on milk composition. Intake and production responses to legumes were similar at the two levels of concentrate feeding and with forage mixtures they were intermediate to those for the separate forages. An additional benefit of the clover silages, particularly red clover silage, was the increase in levels of polyunsaturated fatty acids, particularly α-linolenic acid, in milk. Legume silages also led to a lower palmitic acid percentage in milk. The efficiency of conversion of feed N into milk N declined with increasing levels of legume silage. White clover silage led to a higher N-use efficiency when the effect of N intake level is taken into account. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73855-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73583795</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022030203738557</els_id><sourcerecordid>73583795</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-4ac3069043cf0a190cf068c2d4187b41b035b3e881f696898b588c3f170f11283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc2O0zAURiMEYjoDrwAGCQSLFP_Eib1EGRiQikCUWVuOY7cuSVx8kxl4e5xpRRErNrZsHX_3Xp8se0bwkpFSvNm1sFxjTGmOGaavMHtdMcF5Xt3LFoRTnjMixf1s8Qc5y84BdulIKOYPszNCJZNYFIvsZx36vY4ewoCCQ1dRAyA9tGhlN1Nv0dp3emMBuRDRJ999R19iaCcz-jAsEVn-dURfLezDAAm-9eMWXXrnbLTDmKJubAdzfB0Gk26iHu2j7IHTHdjHx_0iu37_7lv9IV99vvpYv13lhrNyzAttGC4lLphxWBOJ01YKQ9uCiKopSIMZb5gVgrhSlkKKhgthmCMVdoRQwS6yl4fcfQw_Jguj6j0Y23V6sGECVTEuWCV5Ap__A-7CFIfUmyKSCyyorBIkD5CJASBap_bR9zr-UgSr2Y1KbtSdGzV_fFrUnRs1v31yLDA1vW1PL48yEvDiCGgwunNRD8bDieOYpF6L00hbv9ne-mgV9LrrUiyZy4tSCUW5nGd_egCdDkpvkmV1vaaYMIwl45zNPdUHIgmyN95GBcbbJKlNsWZUbfD_Mdlv8T3DQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195808297</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Grass and Legume Silages for Milk Production. 1. Production Responses with Different Levels of Concentrate</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Dewhurst, R.J. ; Fisher, W.J. ; Tweed, J.K.S. ; Wilkins, R.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dewhurst, R.J. ; Fisher, W.J. ; Tweed, J.K.S. ; Wilkins, R.J.</creatorcontrib><description>Silages prepared from pure stands of ryegrass, alfalfa, white clover, and red clover over two successive year were offered to lactating dairy cows in two feeding experiments. Proportional mixtures of all cuts prepared in a yr were used to ensure that the forage treatments were representative of the crop. Additional treatments involved mixtures of grass silage with either white clover silage or red clover silage (50/50, on a DM basis). Silages were prepared in round bales, using a biological inoculant additive, and wilting for up to 48h. Although the legumes were less suited to silage-making than grass, because of their higher buffering capacity and lower water-soluble carbohydrate content, all silages were well-fermented. A standard concentrate was offered at a flat-rate (8 kg/d in yr 1, and 4 or 8 kg/d in yr 2). All of the legume silages led to higher DM intake and milk yields than for the grass silage, with little effect on milk composition. Intake and production responses to legumes were similar at the two levels of concentrate feeding and with forage mixtures they were intermediate to those for the separate forages. An additional benefit of the clover silages, particularly red clover silage, was the increase in levels of polyunsaturated fatty acids, particularly α-linolenic acid, in milk. Legume silages also led to a lower palmitic acid percentage in milk. The efficiency of conversion of feed N into milk N declined with increasing levels of legume silage. White clover silage led to a higher N-use efficiency when the effect of N intake level is taken into account.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0302</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3198</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73855-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12939084</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JDSCAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Savoy, IL: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>alfalfa ; alfalfa silage ; animal feeding ; Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena ; Animal productions ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cattle - metabolism ; Cattle - physiology ; chemical composition ; clover ; cow feeding ; Cross-Over Studies ; cultivars ; dairy cows ; Dairying - methods ; digestibility ; dry matter intake ; Fabaceae - chemistry ; Fats - analysis ; fatty acid ; fatty acid composition ; feed concentrates ; feed conversion ; Female ; fertilizer rates ; Food industries ; forage and feed science ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; grass silage ; harvest date ; Lactation - metabolism ; Lactobacillus plantarum ; Lolium ; maturity stage ; mechanical harvesting ; Medicago sativa ; Milk - chemistry ; Milk - secretion ; Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams ; milk composition ; Milk production ; Milk Proteins - analysis ; milk yield ; Nitrogen - metabolism ; Poaceae - chemistry ; protein concentrates ; Random Allocation ; silage ; Silage - analysis ; silage additives ; silage fermentation ; silage making ; Terrestrial animal productions ; Trifolium pratense ; Trifolium repens ; Vertebrates</subject><ispartof>Journal of dairy science, 2003-08, Vol.86 (8), p.2598-2611</ispartof><rights>2003 American Dairy Science Association</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Dairy Science Association Aug 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-4ac3069043cf0a190cf068c2d4187b41b035b3e881f696898b588c3f170f11283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-4ac3069043cf0a190cf068c2d4187b41b035b3e881f696898b588c3f170f11283</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030203738557$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15015834$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12939084$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dewhurst, R.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, W.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tweed, J.K.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkins, R.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Grass and Legume Silages for Milk Production. 1. Production Responses with Different Levels of Concentrate</title><title>Journal of dairy science</title><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><description>Silages prepared from pure stands of ryegrass, alfalfa, white clover, and red clover over two successive year were offered to lactating dairy cows in two feeding experiments. Proportional mixtures of all cuts prepared in a yr were used to ensure that the forage treatments were representative of the crop. Additional treatments involved mixtures of grass silage with either white clover silage or red clover silage (50/50, on a DM basis). Silages were prepared in round bales, using a biological inoculant additive, and wilting for up to 48h. Although the legumes were less suited to silage-making than grass, because of their higher buffering capacity and lower water-soluble carbohydrate content, all silages were well-fermented. A standard concentrate was offered at a flat-rate (8 kg/d in yr 1, and 4 or 8 kg/d in yr 2). All of the legume silages led to higher DM intake and milk yields than for the grass silage, with little effect on milk composition. Intake and production responses to legumes were similar at the two levels of concentrate feeding and with forage mixtures they were intermediate to those for the separate forages. An additional benefit of the clover silages, particularly red clover silage, was the increase in levels of polyunsaturated fatty acids, particularly α-linolenic acid, in milk. Legume silages also led to a lower palmitic acid percentage in milk. The efficiency of conversion of feed N into milk N declined with increasing levels of legume silage. White clover silage led to a higher N-use efficiency when the effect of N intake level is taken into account.</description><subject>alfalfa</subject><subject>alfalfa silage</subject><subject>animal feeding</subject><subject>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cattle - metabolism</subject><subject>Cattle - physiology</subject><subject>chemical composition</subject><subject>clover</subject><subject>cow feeding</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>cultivars</subject><subject>dairy cows</subject><subject>Dairying - methods</subject><subject>digestibility</subject><subject>dry matter intake</subject><subject>Fabaceae - chemistry</subject><subject>Fats - analysis</subject><subject>fatty acid</subject><subject>fatty acid composition</subject><subject>feed concentrates</subject><subject>feed conversion</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>fertilizer rates</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>forage and feed science</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>grass silage</subject><subject>harvest date</subject><subject>Lactation - metabolism</subject><subject>Lactobacillus plantarum</subject><subject>Lolium</subject><subject>maturity stage</subject><subject>mechanical harvesting</subject><subject>Medicago sativa</subject><subject>Milk - chemistry</subject><subject>Milk - secretion</subject><subject>Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams</subject><subject>milk composition</subject><subject>Milk production</subject><subject>Milk Proteins - analysis</subject><subject>milk yield</subject><subject>Nitrogen - metabolism</subject><subject>Poaceae - chemistry</subject><subject>protein concentrates</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>silage</subject><subject>Silage - analysis</subject><subject>silage additives</subject><subject>silage fermentation</subject><subject>silage making</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>Trifolium pratense</subject><subject>Trifolium repens</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><issn>0022-0302</issn><issn>1525-3198</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc2O0zAURiMEYjoDrwAGCQSLFP_Eib1EGRiQikCUWVuOY7cuSVx8kxl4e5xpRRErNrZsHX_3Xp8se0bwkpFSvNm1sFxjTGmOGaavMHtdMcF5Xt3LFoRTnjMixf1s8Qc5y84BdulIKOYPszNCJZNYFIvsZx36vY4ewoCCQ1dRAyA9tGhlN1Nv0dp3emMBuRDRJ999R19iaCcz-jAsEVn-dURfLezDAAm-9eMWXXrnbLTDmKJubAdzfB0Gk26iHu2j7IHTHdjHx_0iu37_7lv9IV99vvpYv13lhrNyzAttGC4lLphxWBOJ01YKQ9uCiKopSIMZb5gVgrhSlkKKhgthmCMVdoRQwS6yl4fcfQw_Jguj6j0Y23V6sGECVTEuWCV5Ap__A-7CFIfUmyKSCyyorBIkD5CJASBap_bR9zr-UgSr2Y1KbtSdGzV_fFrUnRs1v31yLDA1vW1PL48yEvDiCGgwunNRD8bDieOYpF6L00hbv9ne-mgV9LrrUiyZy4tSCUW5nGd_egCdDkpvkmV1vaaYMIwl45zNPdUHIgmyN95GBcbbJKlNsWZUbfD_Mdlv8T3DQw</recordid><startdate>20030801</startdate><enddate>20030801</enddate><creator>Dewhurst, R.J.</creator><creator>Fisher, W.J.</creator><creator>Tweed, J.K.S.</creator><creator>Wilkins, R.J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Am Dairy Sci Assoc</general><general>American Dairy Science Association</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030801</creationdate><title>Comparison of Grass and Legume Silages for Milk Production. 1. Production Responses with Different Levels of Concentrate</title><author>Dewhurst, R.J. ; Fisher, W.J. ; Tweed, J.K.S. ; Wilkins, R.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-4ac3069043cf0a190cf068c2d4187b41b035b3e881f696898b588c3f170f11283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>alfalfa</topic><topic>alfalfa silage</topic><topic>animal feeding</topic><topic>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cattle - metabolism</topic><topic>Cattle - physiology</topic><topic>chemical composition</topic><topic>clover</topic><topic>cow feeding</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>cultivars</topic><topic>dairy cows</topic><topic>Dairying - methods</topic><topic>digestibility</topic><topic>dry matter intake</topic><topic>Fabaceae - chemistry</topic><topic>Fats - analysis</topic><topic>fatty acid</topic><topic>fatty acid composition</topic><topic>feed concentrates</topic><topic>feed conversion</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>fertilizer rates</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>forage and feed science</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>grass silage</topic><topic>harvest date</topic><topic>Lactation - metabolism</topic><topic>Lactobacillus plantarum</topic><topic>Lolium</topic><topic>maturity stage</topic><topic>mechanical harvesting</topic><topic>Medicago sativa</topic><topic>Milk - chemistry</topic><topic>Milk - secretion</topic><topic>Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams</topic><topic>milk composition</topic><topic>Milk production</topic><topic>Milk Proteins - analysis</topic><topic>milk yield</topic><topic>Nitrogen - metabolism</topic><topic>Poaceae - chemistry</topic><topic>protein concentrates</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>silage</topic><topic>Silage - analysis</topic><topic>silage additives</topic><topic>silage fermentation</topic><topic>silage making</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>Trifolium pratense</topic><topic>Trifolium repens</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dewhurst, R.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, W.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tweed, J.K.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkins, R.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dewhurst, R.J.</au><au>Fisher, W.J.</au><au>Tweed, J.K.S.</au><au>Wilkins, R.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Grass and Legume Silages for Milk Production. 1. Production Responses with Different Levels of Concentrate</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><date>2003-08-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2598</spage><epage>2611</epage><pages>2598-2611</pages><issn>0022-0302</issn><eissn>1525-3198</eissn><coden>JDSCAE</coden><abstract>Silages prepared from pure stands of ryegrass, alfalfa, white clover, and red clover over two successive year were offered to lactating dairy cows in two feeding experiments. Proportional mixtures of all cuts prepared in a yr were used to ensure that the forage treatments were representative of the crop. Additional treatments involved mixtures of grass silage with either white clover silage or red clover silage (50/50, on a DM basis). Silages were prepared in round bales, using a biological inoculant additive, and wilting for up to 48h. Although the legumes were less suited to silage-making than grass, because of their higher buffering capacity and lower water-soluble carbohydrate content, all silages were well-fermented. A standard concentrate was offered at a flat-rate (8 kg/d in yr 1, and 4 or 8 kg/d in yr 2). All of the legume silages led to higher DM intake and milk yields than for the grass silage, with little effect on milk composition. Intake and production responses to legumes were similar at the two levels of concentrate feeding and with forage mixtures they were intermediate to those for the separate forages. An additional benefit of the clover silages, particularly red clover silage, was the increase in levels of polyunsaturated fatty acids, particularly α-linolenic acid, in milk. Legume silages also led to a lower palmitic acid percentage in milk. The efficiency of conversion of feed N into milk N declined with increasing levels of legume silage. White clover silage led to a higher N-use efficiency when the effect of N intake level is taken into account.</abstract><cop>Savoy, IL</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>12939084</pmid><doi>10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73855-7</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0302 |
ispartof | Journal of dairy science, 2003-08, Vol.86 (8), p.2598-2611 |
issn | 0022-0302 1525-3198 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73583795 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | alfalfa alfalfa silage animal feeding Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena Animal productions Animals Biological and medical sciences Cattle - metabolism Cattle - physiology chemical composition clover cow feeding Cross-Over Studies cultivars dairy cows Dairying - methods digestibility dry matter intake Fabaceae - chemistry Fats - analysis fatty acid fatty acid composition feed concentrates feed conversion Female fertilizer rates Food industries forage and feed science Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology grass silage harvest date Lactation - metabolism Lactobacillus plantarum Lolium maturity stage mechanical harvesting Medicago sativa Milk - chemistry Milk - secretion Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams milk composition Milk production Milk Proteins - analysis milk yield Nitrogen - metabolism Poaceae - chemistry protein concentrates Random Allocation silage Silage - analysis silage additives silage fermentation silage making Terrestrial animal productions Trifolium pratense Trifolium repens Vertebrates |
title | Comparison of Grass and Legume Silages for Milk Production. 1. Production Responses with Different Levels of Concentrate |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T14%3A25%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Grass%20and%20Legume%20Silages%20for%20Milk%20Production.%201.%20Production%20Responses%20with%20Different%20Levels%20of%20Concentrate&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dairy%20science&rft.au=Dewhurst,%20R.J.&rft.date=2003-08-01&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2598&rft.epage=2611&rft.pages=2598-2611&rft.issn=0022-0302&rft.eissn=1525-3198&rft.coden=JDSCAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73855-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73583795%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195808297&rft_id=info:pmid/12939084&rft_els_id=S0022030203738557&rfr_iscdi=true |