Measuring of distortion product otoacoustic emissions using multiple tone pairs
In order to reduce the examination time of the Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAE) test, we investigated the applicability of the multiple-tone pairs method by comparing the DPOAE evoked by 4- and 3-tone pairs (Sim) with the conventional 1-tone pair (Seq) in 116 ears of human adults wit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology 2003-08, Vol.260 (7), p.395-400 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 400 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 395 |
container_title | European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology |
container_volume | 260 |
creator | KASTANIOUDAKIS, Ioannis ZIAVRA, Nausica ANASTASOPOULOS, Dimitrios SKEVAS, Antonios |
description | In order to reduce the examination time of the Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAE) test, we investigated the applicability of the multiple-tone pairs method by comparing the DPOAE evoked by 4- and 3-tone pairs (Sim) with the conventional 1-tone pair (Seq) in 116 ears of human adults with normal hearing (NH) and 86 ears with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). We found that: (1) DPOAE amplitudes in the NH group obtained with the Sim method were strongly correlated with those of Seq. (2) DPOAE amplitude and noise level mean values obtained with the Seq method were significantly higher than those obtained with Sim. (3) DPOAE amplitude was independent of the stimulation side (right vs. left ears). (4) Both methods can equally distinguish ears with NH and a low degree of SNHL from those with higher degrees of SNHL. (5) Examination time was shorter with the Sim method in both groups. In conclusion, the Sim method produces results similar to those of Seq. However, a significant difference between the two methods in relation to DPOAE amplitudes and noise levels was found. Because of this, normal data for both the DPOAE amplitude and noise level are required to improve the sensitivity of the Sim method. The mean examination time in both groups (NH and SNHL) was shorter with the Sim method. Therefore, the multiple-tone pairs stimulation method seems to be more suitable when it is used as an auditory screening test. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00405-003-0596-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73568535</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>73568535</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-a4e799c63fdd85a26b3c3d3f53e0dc9e5421c5e8a2b1326cc7a7879f6d9e1fd13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwA1hQFtgC59iO6xEhvqSiLjBbru0gozQOPmfg3-OqlTrdcM979-oh5JrCPQWQDwjAQdQArAah2lqdkDnljNdcNu0pmYNisuZcyhm5QPwBAMEVOycz2pSNomJO1h_e4JTC8F3FrnIBc0w5xKEaU3STzVXM0dg4YQ628tuAWJZYTbhLbKc-h7H3VY6Dr0YTEl6Ss8706K8Oc0G-Xp4_n97q1fr1_elxVVvWyFwb7qVStmWdc0thmnbDLHOsE8yDs8oL3lAr_NI0G8qa1lpp5FKqrnXK085RtiB3-7ul5-_kMevSzfq-N4MvbbVkol0KJgpI96BNETH5To8pbE360xT0zqLeW9TFot5Z1Kpkbg7Hp83Wu2PioK0AtwfAoDV9l8xgAx45AZJDef8PF5d8Ew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73568535</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring of distortion product otoacoustic emissions using multiple tone pairs</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>KASTANIOUDAKIS, Ioannis ; ZIAVRA, Nausica ; ANASTASOPOULOS, Dimitrios ; SKEVAS, Antonios</creator><creatorcontrib>KASTANIOUDAKIS, Ioannis ; ZIAVRA, Nausica ; ANASTASOPOULOS, Dimitrios ; SKEVAS, Antonios</creatorcontrib><description>In order to reduce the examination time of the Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAE) test, we investigated the applicability of the multiple-tone pairs method by comparing the DPOAE evoked by 4- and 3-tone pairs (Sim) with the conventional 1-tone pair (Seq) in 116 ears of human adults with normal hearing (NH) and 86 ears with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). We found that: (1) DPOAE amplitudes in the NH group obtained with the Sim method were strongly correlated with those of Seq. (2) DPOAE amplitude and noise level mean values obtained with the Seq method were significantly higher than those obtained with Sim. (3) DPOAE amplitude was independent of the stimulation side (right vs. left ears). (4) Both methods can equally distinguish ears with NH and a low degree of SNHL from those with higher degrees of SNHL. (5) Examination time was shorter with the Sim method in both groups. In conclusion, the Sim method produces results similar to those of Seq. However, a significant difference between the two methods in relation to DPOAE amplitudes and noise levels was found. Because of this, normal data for both the DPOAE amplitude and noise level are required to improve the sensitivity of the Sim method. The mean examination time in both groups (NH and SNHL) was shorter with the Sim method. Therefore, the multiple-tone pairs stimulation method seems to be more suitable when it is used as an auditory screening test.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0937-4477</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-4726</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00405-003-0596-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12937915</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Springer</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Audiometry, Pure-Tone ; Auditory Threshold ; Biological and medical sciences ; Ear, auditive nerve, cochleovestibular tract, facial nerve: diseases, semeiology ; Female ; Hearing ; Hearing Disorders - diagnosis ; Hearing Disorders - physiopathology ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Non tumoral diseases ; Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous ; Otorhinolaryngology functional investigation (larynx, voice, audiometry, vestibular function, equilibration...) ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</subject><ispartof>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology, 2003-08, Vol.260 (7), p.395-400</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-a4e799c63fdd85a26b3c3d3f53e0dc9e5421c5e8a2b1326cc7a7879f6d9e1fd13</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15074085$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12937915$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KASTANIOUDAKIS, Ioannis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZIAVRA, Nausica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ANASTASOPOULOS, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SKEVAS, Antonios</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring of distortion product otoacoustic emissions using multiple tone pairs</title><title>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology</title><addtitle>Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><description>In order to reduce the examination time of the Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAE) test, we investigated the applicability of the multiple-tone pairs method by comparing the DPOAE evoked by 4- and 3-tone pairs (Sim) with the conventional 1-tone pair (Seq) in 116 ears of human adults with normal hearing (NH) and 86 ears with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). We found that: (1) DPOAE amplitudes in the NH group obtained with the Sim method were strongly correlated with those of Seq. (2) DPOAE amplitude and noise level mean values obtained with the Seq method were significantly higher than those obtained with Sim. (3) DPOAE amplitude was independent of the stimulation side (right vs. left ears). (4) Both methods can equally distinguish ears with NH and a low degree of SNHL from those with higher degrees of SNHL. (5) Examination time was shorter with the Sim method in both groups. In conclusion, the Sim method produces results similar to those of Seq. However, a significant difference between the two methods in relation to DPOAE amplitudes and noise levels was found. Because of this, normal data for both the DPOAE amplitude and noise level are required to improve the sensitivity of the Sim method. The mean examination time in both groups (NH and SNHL) was shorter with the Sim method. Therefore, the multiple-tone pairs stimulation method seems to be more suitable when it is used as an auditory screening test.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Audiometry, Pure-Tone</subject><subject>Auditory Threshold</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Ear, auditive nerve, cochleovestibular tract, facial nerve: diseases, semeiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hearing</subject><subject>Hearing Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hearing Disorders - physiopathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Non tumoral diseases</subject><subject>Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology functional investigation (larynx, voice, audiometry, vestibular function, equilibration...)</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</subject><issn>0937-4477</issn><issn>1434-4726</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwA1hQFtgC59iO6xEhvqSiLjBbru0gozQOPmfg3-OqlTrdcM979-oh5JrCPQWQDwjAQdQArAah2lqdkDnljNdcNu0pmYNisuZcyhm5QPwBAMEVOycz2pSNomJO1h_e4JTC8F3FrnIBc0w5xKEaU3STzVXM0dg4YQ628tuAWJZYTbhLbKc-h7H3VY6Dr0YTEl6Ss8706K8Oc0G-Xp4_n97q1fr1_elxVVvWyFwb7qVStmWdc0thmnbDLHOsE8yDs8oL3lAr_NI0G8qa1lpp5FKqrnXK085RtiB3-7ul5-_kMevSzfq-N4MvbbVkol0KJgpI96BNETH5To8pbE360xT0zqLeW9TFot5Z1Kpkbg7Hp83Wu2PioK0AtwfAoDV9l8xgAx45AZJDef8PF5d8Ew</recordid><startdate>20030801</startdate><enddate>20030801</enddate><creator>KASTANIOUDAKIS, Ioannis</creator><creator>ZIAVRA, Nausica</creator><creator>ANASTASOPOULOS, Dimitrios</creator><creator>SKEVAS, Antonios</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030801</creationdate><title>Measuring of distortion product otoacoustic emissions using multiple tone pairs</title><author>KASTANIOUDAKIS, Ioannis ; ZIAVRA, Nausica ; ANASTASOPOULOS, Dimitrios ; SKEVAS, Antonios</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-a4e799c63fdd85a26b3c3d3f53e0dc9e5421c5e8a2b1326cc7a7879f6d9e1fd13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Audiometry, Pure-Tone</topic><topic>Auditory Threshold</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Ear, auditive nerve, cochleovestibular tract, facial nerve: diseases, semeiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hearing</topic><topic>Hearing Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hearing Disorders - physiopathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Non tumoral diseases</topic><topic>Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology functional investigation (larynx, voice, audiometry, vestibular function, equilibration...)</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KASTANIOUDAKIS, Ioannis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZIAVRA, Nausica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ANASTASOPOULOS, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SKEVAS, Antonios</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KASTANIOUDAKIS, Ioannis</au><au>ZIAVRA, Nausica</au><au>ANASTASOPOULOS, Dimitrios</au><au>SKEVAS, Antonios</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring of distortion product otoacoustic emissions using multiple tone pairs</atitle><jtitle>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><date>2003-08-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>260</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>395</spage><epage>400</epage><pages>395-400</pages><issn>0937-4477</issn><eissn>1434-4726</eissn><abstract>In order to reduce the examination time of the Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAE) test, we investigated the applicability of the multiple-tone pairs method by comparing the DPOAE evoked by 4- and 3-tone pairs (Sim) with the conventional 1-tone pair (Seq) in 116 ears of human adults with normal hearing (NH) and 86 ears with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). We found that: (1) DPOAE amplitudes in the NH group obtained with the Sim method were strongly correlated with those of Seq. (2) DPOAE amplitude and noise level mean values obtained with the Seq method were significantly higher than those obtained with Sim. (3) DPOAE amplitude was independent of the stimulation side (right vs. left ears). (4) Both methods can equally distinguish ears with NH and a low degree of SNHL from those with higher degrees of SNHL. (5) Examination time was shorter with the Sim method in both groups. In conclusion, the Sim method produces results similar to those of Seq. However, a significant difference between the two methods in relation to DPOAE amplitudes and noise levels was found. Because of this, normal data for both the DPOAE amplitude and noise level are required to improve the sensitivity of the Sim method. The mean examination time in both groups (NH and SNHL) was shorter with the Sim method. Therefore, the multiple-tone pairs stimulation method seems to be more suitable when it is used as an auditory screening test.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>12937915</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00405-003-0596-9</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0937-4477 |
ispartof | European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology, 2003-08, Vol.260 (7), p.395-400 |
issn | 0937-4477 1434-4726 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73568535 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Acoustic Stimulation Adolescent Adult Aged Audiometry, Pure-Tone Auditory Threshold Biological and medical sciences Ear, auditive nerve, cochleovestibular tract, facial nerve: diseases, semeiology Female Hearing Hearing Disorders - diagnosis Hearing Disorders - physiopathology Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Non tumoral diseases Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous Otorhinolaryngology functional investigation (larynx, voice, audiometry, vestibular function, equilibration...) Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology |
title | Measuring of distortion product otoacoustic emissions using multiple tone pairs |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T23%3A37%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20of%20distortion%20product%20otoacoustic%20emissions%20using%20multiple%20tone%20pairs&rft.jtitle=European%20archives%20of%20oto-rhino-laryngology&rft.au=KASTANIOUDAKIS,%20Ioannis&rft.date=2003-08-01&rft.volume=260&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=395&rft.epage=400&rft.pages=395-400&rft.issn=0937-4477&rft.eissn=1434-4726&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00405-003-0596-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73568535%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73568535&rft_id=info:pmid/12937915&rfr_iscdi=true |