Comparison of interphase FISH and metaphase cytogenetics to study myelodysplastic syndrome: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) study
Cytogenetic analysis can be important in determining the prognosis and diagnosis of a number of hematological disorders, including myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Here, we compared metaphase chromosomal analyses on bone marrow aspirates from MDS patients with interphase fluorescence in situ hybridi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Leukemia research 2003-12, Vol.27 (12), p.1085-1090 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1090 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1085 |
container_title | Leukemia research |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Cherry, Athena M. Brockman, Stephanie R. Paternoster, Sarah F. Hicks, Gary A. Neuberg, Donna Higgins, Rodney R. Bennett, John M. Greenberg, Peter L. Miller, Kenneth Tallman, Martin S. Rowe, Jacob Dewald, Gordon W. |
description | Cytogenetic analysis can be important in determining the prognosis and diagnosis of a number of hematological disorders, including myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Here, we compared metaphase chromosomal analyses on bone marrow aspirates from MDS patients with interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using probes specific for chromosomes nos. 5, 7, 8, 11, 13 and 20. Forty-three patients enrolled in ECOG protocol E1996 for low risk MDS and five patients enrolled in ECOG protocol E3996 for high risk MDS were studied by both metaphase chromosomal analysis and interphase FISH. Excluding those with a clonal loss of the Y chromosome, an abnormal clone was detected by cytogenetic analysis in 18 of 48 samples (37.5%). In comparison, our FISH panel detected an abnormal clone in 17 of 48 samples (35.4%). Twenty-nine of 30 samples with apparently normal karyotypes, including those with a missing Y chromosome, were also normal by our FISH panel. One patient had an occult deletion of chromosome 11 that was detected by FISH. These results indicate that around 60% of patients with MDS do not have abnormalities that are detectable by either chromosomal or FISH studies. In addition, it appears that interphase FISH studies are nearly as sensitive as cytogenetic analyses and can be a useful tool in studying bone marrow aspirates where cytogenetic analysis is not possible. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0145-2126(03)00104-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73567421</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0145212603001048</els_id><sourcerecordid>73567421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-a9aef81f3816379d0934ebb8f85384f8e4e17104e8b18f04fb8a4604d20c22a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EokvhEUA-ofYQsGMncbhUKNpuK1XaQ-FsOfa4GCV2sJ1KeQmembRZwZHTSDPfP6P5f4TeU_KJElp_vieUV0VJy_qCsEtCKOGFeIF2VDSsqASrXqLdX-QMvUnpJyGkamn7Gp3Rsi1py_kO_e7COKnoUvA4WOx8hjj9UAnw9e39DVbe4BGy2lp6yeEBPGSnE84BpzybBY8LDMEsaRpUWic4Ld7EMMKXVY33aw-ix10IE0SV3SPgo9dhCA8LPsQwT_hi3x0Pl9uyt-iVVUOCd6d6jr5f7791N8Xd8XDbfb0rNKtpLlSrwApqmaA1a1pDWsah74UVFRPcCuBAm9URED0VlnDbC8Vrwk1JdFmqip2jj9veKYZfM6QsR5c0DIPyEOYkG1bVDS_pClYbqGNIKYKVU3SjioukRD4FIZ-DkE8uS8LkcxBSrLoPpwNzP4L5pzo5vwJXGwDrm48OokzagddgXASdpQnuPyf-AM2GmcM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73567421</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of interphase FISH and metaphase cytogenetics to study myelodysplastic syndrome: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Cherry, Athena M. ; Brockman, Stephanie R. ; Paternoster, Sarah F. ; Hicks, Gary A. ; Neuberg, Donna ; Higgins, Rodney R. ; Bennett, John M. ; Greenberg, Peter L. ; Miller, Kenneth ; Tallman, Martin S. ; Rowe, Jacob ; Dewald, Gordon W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cherry, Athena M. ; Brockman, Stephanie R. ; Paternoster, Sarah F. ; Hicks, Gary A. ; Neuberg, Donna ; Higgins, Rodney R. ; Bennett, John M. ; Greenberg, Peter L. ; Miller, Kenneth ; Tallman, Martin S. ; Rowe, Jacob ; Dewald, Gordon W.</creatorcontrib><description>Cytogenetic analysis can be important in determining the prognosis and diagnosis of a number of hematological disorders, including myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Here, we compared metaphase chromosomal analyses on bone marrow aspirates from MDS patients with interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using probes specific for chromosomes nos. 5, 7, 8, 11, 13 and 20. Forty-three patients enrolled in ECOG protocol E1996 for low risk MDS and five patients enrolled in ECOG protocol E3996 for high risk MDS were studied by both metaphase chromosomal analysis and interphase FISH. Excluding those with a clonal loss of the Y chromosome, an abnormal clone was detected by cytogenetic analysis in 18 of 48 samples (37.5%). In comparison, our FISH panel detected an abnormal clone in 17 of 48 samples (35.4%). Twenty-nine of 30 samples with apparently normal karyotypes, including those with a missing Y chromosome, were also normal by our FISH panel. One patient had an occult deletion of chromosome 11 that was detected by FISH. These results indicate that around 60% of patients with MDS do not have abnormalities that are detectable by either chromosomal or FISH studies. In addition, it appears that interphase FISH studies are nearly as sensitive as cytogenetic analyses and can be a useful tool in studying bone marrow aspirates where cytogenetic analysis is not possible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0145-2126</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5835</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0145-2126(03)00104-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12921944</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use ; Bone Marrow - pathology ; Chromosome ; Chromosome Aberrations ; Chromosome Banding ; Chromosomes, Human ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Cytogenetics ; DNA Probes ; FISH ; Hematology ; Humans ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence ; Interphase - genetics ; Karyotyping ; Metaphase - genetics ; Myelodysplastic syndrome ; Myelodysplastic Syndromes - genetics ; Myelodysplastic Syndromes - pathology</subject><ispartof>Leukemia research, 2003-12, Vol.27 (12), p.1085-1090</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-a9aef81f3816379d0934ebb8f85384f8e4e17104e8b18f04fb8a4604d20c22a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-a9aef81f3816379d0934ebb8f85384f8e4e17104e8b18f04fb8a4604d20c22a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145212603001048$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12921944$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cherry, Athena M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brockman, Stephanie R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paternoster, Sarah F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hicks, Gary A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neuberg, Donna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgins, Rodney R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenberg, Peter L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tallman, Martin S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowe, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewald, Gordon W.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of interphase FISH and metaphase cytogenetics to study myelodysplastic syndrome: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) study</title><title>Leukemia research</title><addtitle>Leuk Res</addtitle><description>Cytogenetic analysis can be important in determining the prognosis and diagnosis of a number of hematological disorders, including myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Here, we compared metaphase chromosomal analyses on bone marrow aspirates from MDS patients with interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using probes specific for chromosomes nos. 5, 7, 8, 11, 13 and 20. Forty-three patients enrolled in ECOG protocol E1996 for low risk MDS and five patients enrolled in ECOG protocol E3996 for high risk MDS were studied by both metaphase chromosomal analysis and interphase FISH. Excluding those with a clonal loss of the Y chromosome, an abnormal clone was detected by cytogenetic analysis in 18 of 48 samples (37.5%). In comparison, our FISH panel detected an abnormal clone in 17 of 48 samples (35.4%). Twenty-nine of 30 samples with apparently normal karyotypes, including those with a missing Y chromosome, were also normal by our FISH panel. One patient had an occult deletion of chromosome 11 that was detected by FISH. These results indicate that around 60% of patients with MDS do not have abnormalities that are detectable by either chromosomal or FISH studies. In addition, it appears that interphase FISH studies are nearly as sensitive as cytogenetic analyses and can be a useful tool in studying bone marrow aspirates where cytogenetic analysis is not possible.</description><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Bone Marrow - pathology</subject><subject>Chromosome</subject><subject>Chromosome Aberrations</subject><subject>Chromosome Banding</subject><subject>Chromosomes, Human</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Cytogenetics</subject><subject>DNA Probes</subject><subject>FISH</subject><subject>Hematology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</subject><subject>Interphase - genetics</subject><subject>Karyotyping</subject><subject>Metaphase - genetics</subject><subject>Myelodysplastic syndrome</subject><subject>Myelodysplastic Syndromes - genetics</subject><subject>Myelodysplastic Syndromes - pathology</subject><issn>0145-2126</issn><issn>1873-5835</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EokvhEUA-ofYQsGMncbhUKNpuK1XaQ-FsOfa4GCV2sJ1KeQmembRZwZHTSDPfP6P5f4TeU_KJElp_vieUV0VJy_qCsEtCKOGFeIF2VDSsqASrXqLdX-QMvUnpJyGkamn7Gp3Rsi1py_kO_e7COKnoUvA4WOx8hjj9UAnw9e39DVbe4BGy2lp6yeEBPGSnE84BpzybBY8LDMEsaRpUWic4Ld7EMMKXVY33aw-ix10IE0SV3SPgo9dhCA8LPsQwT_hi3x0Pl9uyt-iVVUOCd6d6jr5f7791N8Xd8XDbfb0rNKtpLlSrwApqmaA1a1pDWsah74UVFRPcCuBAm9URED0VlnDbC8Vrwk1JdFmqip2jj9veKYZfM6QsR5c0DIPyEOYkG1bVDS_pClYbqGNIKYKVU3SjioukRD4FIZ-DkE8uS8LkcxBSrLoPpwNzP4L5pzo5vwJXGwDrm48OokzagddgXASdpQnuPyf-AM2GmcM</recordid><startdate>20031201</startdate><enddate>20031201</enddate><creator>Cherry, Athena M.</creator><creator>Brockman, Stephanie R.</creator><creator>Paternoster, Sarah F.</creator><creator>Hicks, Gary A.</creator><creator>Neuberg, Donna</creator><creator>Higgins, Rodney R.</creator><creator>Bennett, John M.</creator><creator>Greenberg, Peter L.</creator><creator>Miller, Kenneth</creator><creator>Tallman, Martin S.</creator><creator>Rowe, Jacob</creator><creator>Dewald, Gordon W.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031201</creationdate><title>Comparison of interphase FISH and metaphase cytogenetics to study myelodysplastic syndrome: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) study</title><author>Cherry, Athena M. ; Brockman, Stephanie R. ; Paternoster, Sarah F. ; Hicks, Gary A. ; Neuberg, Donna ; Higgins, Rodney R. ; Bennett, John M. ; Greenberg, Peter L. ; Miller, Kenneth ; Tallman, Martin S. ; Rowe, Jacob ; Dewald, Gordon W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-a9aef81f3816379d0934ebb8f85384f8e4e17104e8b18f04fb8a4604d20c22a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Bone Marrow - pathology</topic><topic>Chromosome</topic><topic>Chromosome Aberrations</topic><topic>Chromosome Banding</topic><topic>Chromosomes, Human</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Cytogenetics</topic><topic>DNA Probes</topic><topic>FISH</topic><topic>Hematology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</topic><topic>Interphase - genetics</topic><topic>Karyotyping</topic><topic>Metaphase - genetics</topic><topic>Myelodysplastic syndrome</topic><topic>Myelodysplastic Syndromes - genetics</topic><topic>Myelodysplastic Syndromes - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cherry, Athena M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brockman, Stephanie R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paternoster, Sarah F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hicks, Gary A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neuberg, Donna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgins, Rodney R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenberg, Peter L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tallman, Martin S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowe, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewald, Gordon W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Leukemia research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cherry, Athena M.</au><au>Brockman, Stephanie R.</au><au>Paternoster, Sarah F.</au><au>Hicks, Gary A.</au><au>Neuberg, Donna</au><au>Higgins, Rodney R.</au><au>Bennett, John M.</au><au>Greenberg, Peter L.</au><au>Miller, Kenneth</au><au>Tallman, Martin S.</au><au>Rowe, Jacob</au><au>Dewald, Gordon W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of interphase FISH and metaphase cytogenetics to study myelodysplastic syndrome: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) study</atitle><jtitle>Leukemia research</jtitle><addtitle>Leuk Res</addtitle><date>2003-12-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1085</spage><epage>1090</epage><pages>1085-1090</pages><issn>0145-2126</issn><eissn>1873-5835</eissn><abstract>Cytogenetic analysis can be important in determining the prognosis and diagnosis of a number of hematological disorders, including myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Here, we compared metaphase chromosomal analyses on bone marrow aspirates from MDS patients with interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using probes specific for chromosomes nos. 5, 7, 8, 11, 13 and 20. Forty-three patients enrolled in ECOG protocol E1996 for low risk MDS and five patients enrolled in ECOG protocol E3996 for high risk MDS were studied by both metaphase chromosomal analysis and interphase FISH. Excluding those with a clonal loss of the Y chromosome, an abnormal clone was detected by cytogenetic analysis in 18 of 48 samples (37.5%). In comparison, our FISH panel detected an abnormal clone in 17 of 48 samples (35.4%). Twenty-nine of 30 samples with apparently normal karyotypes, including those with a missing Y chromosome, were also normal by our FISH panel. One patient had an occult deletion of chromosome 11 that was detected by FISH. These results indicate that around 60% of patients with MDS do not have abnormalities that are detectable by either chromosomal or FISH studies. In addition, it appears that interphase FISH studies are nearly as sensitive as cytogenetic analyses and can be a useful tool in studying bone marrow aspirates where cytogenetic analysis is not possible.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>12921944</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0145-2126(03)00104-8</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0145-2126 |
ispartof | Leukemia research, 2003-12, Vol.27 (12), p.1085-1090 |
issn | 0145-2126 1873-5835 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73567421 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use Bone Marrow - pathology Chromosome Chromosome Aberrations Chromosome Banding Chromosomes, Human Clinical Trials as Topic Cytogenetics DNA Probes FISH Hematology Humans In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence Interphase - genetics Karyotyping Metaphase - genetics Myelodysplastic syndrome Myelodysplastic Syndromes - genetics Myelodysplastic Syndromes - pathology |
title | Comparison of interphase FISH and metaphase cytogenetics to study myelodysplastic syndrome: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T10%3A13%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20interphase%20FISH%20and%20metaphase%20cytogenetics%20to%20study%20myelodysplastic%20syndrome:%20an%20Eastern%20Cooperative%20Oncology%20Group%20(ECOG)%20study&rft.jtitle=Leukemia%20research&rft.au=Cherry,%20Athena%20M.&rft.date=2003-12-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1085&rft.epage=1090&rft.pages=1085-1090&rft.issn=0145-2126&rft.eissn=1873-5835&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0145-2126(03)00104-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73567421%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73567421&rft_id=info:pmid/12921944&rft_els_id=S0145212603001048&rfr_iscdi=true |