Comfort and pressure profiles of two auto-adjustable positive airway pressure devices: a technical report
Study objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare comfort parameters and pressure profiles of the AutoSet TM (Resmed) and the SOMNOsmart TM (Weinmann), two auto-adjustable positive airway pressure (APAP) devices. Setting: The sleep disorders center of a university hospital. Design: A single...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Respiratory medicine 2003-08, Vol.97 (8), p.903-908 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 908 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 903 |
| container_title | Respiratory medicine |
| container_volume | 97 |
| creator | Hertegonne, Katrien B. Proot, Pascal M. Pauwels, Romain A. Pevernagie, Dirk A. |
| description | Study objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare comfort parameters and pressure profiles of the AutoSet
TM (Resmed) and the SOMNOsmart
TM (Weinmann), two auto-adjustable positive airway pressure (APAP) devices.
Setting: The sleep disorders center of a university hospital.
Design: A single-blind randomized trial protocol was applied. A split night procedure allowed each patient to be treated in a crossover fashion with both APAP devices during one overnight study.
Patients and methods: Fifty consecutive obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients were recruited. Each patient filled out an evaluation form for both devices after the study night. Visual analogue scales were used to score four comfort measures. Three CPAP outcomes generated by the devices (
P
50,
P
95 and
P
max) were assessed, compared with each other and correlated with the individually predicted CPAP (
P
pred).
Results: Forty-five males and 5 females, mean age 53.0 years, body mass index 31.0, were included. The mean apnea-hypopnea index was 58.7, the mean arousal index was 54.3. Mean CPAP-compliance before the titration study was 4.9
h per night. Comparison of the two devices regarding the effect on the subjective sleep quality parameters showed no differences. The AutoSet
TM pressure outcomes correlated significantly better with
P
pred in comparison with the SOMNOsmart
TM. The
P
50 and
P
95 but not the
P
max values were significantly lower in the SOMNOsmart™ as compared with the AutoSet
TM (
P
50: 5.1±1.3 vs 7.1±1.9
mbar,
P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0954-6111(03)00113-6 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73564939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0954611103001136</els_id><sourcerecordid>2745019861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-f6410e620c99d027d47118d5ffe5bc17506e86775e45017659f78f2941885533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV2LEzEUhoMobq3-BCUginsxejL5mIk3IkV3Fxa8cO9DmpxgynRSk5ku--9Nt8WCN17lQJ73fLwvIa8ZfGTA1KefoKVoFGPsA_BLAMZ4o56QBZO8bTgo8ZQs_iIX5EUpGwDQQsBzcsFa3QrJ1ILEVdqGlCdqR093GUuZM9YihThgoSnQ6T5RO0-psX4zl8muh_qfSpziHqmN-d4-nIUe99Fh-UwtndD9GqOzA824qxNekmfBDgVfnd4lufv-7W513dz-uLpZfb1tnFBqaoISDFC14LT20HZedIz1XoaAcu1YJ0Fhr7pOopDAOiV16PrQasH6XkrOl-T9sW294feMZTLbWBwOgx0xzcV0XCqhua7g23_ATZrzWFczDLgE0R-4JZFHyuVUSsZgdjlubX6okDkEYR6DMAeXDXDzGIRRVffm1H1eb9GfVSfnK_DuBNhSTQrZji6WMydbJTvZV-7LkcPq2T5iNsVFHB36mNFNxqf4n1X-AA4Do_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1035048649</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comfort and pressure profiles of two auto-adjustable positive airway pressure devices: a technical report</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Hertegonne, Katrien B. ; Proot, Pascal M. ; Pauwels, Romain A. ; Pevernagie, Dirk A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hertegonne, Katrien B. ; Proot, Pascal M. ; Pauwels, Romain A. ; Pevernagie, Dirk A.</creatorcontrib><description>Study objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare comfort parameters and pressure profiles of the AutoSet
TM (Resmed) and the SOMNOsmart
TM (Weinmann), two auto-adjustable positive airway pressure (APAP) devices.
Setting: The sleep disorders center of a university hospital.
Design: A single-blind randomized trial protocol was applied. A split night procedure allowed each patient to be treated in a crossover fashion with both APAP devices during one overnight study.
Patients and methods: Fifty consecutive obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients were recruited. Each patient filled out an evaluation form for both devices after the study night. Visual analogue scales were used to score four comfort measures. Three CPAP outcomes generated by the devices (
P
50,
P
95 and
P
max) were assessed, compared with each other and correlated with the individually predicted CPAP (
P
pred).
Results: Forty-five males and 5 females, mean age 53.0 years, body mass index 31.0, were included. The mean apnea-hypopnea index was 58.7, the mean arousal index was 54.3. Mean CPAP-compliance before the titration study was 4.9
h per night. Comparison of the two devices regarding the effect on the subjective sleep quality parameters showed no differences. The AutoSet
TM pressure outcomes correlated significantly better with
P
pred in comparison with the SOMNOsmart
TM. The
P
50 and
P
95 but not the
P
max values were significantly lower in the SOMNOsmart™ as compared with the AutoSet
TM (
P
50: 5.1±1.3 vs 7.1±1.9
mbar,
P<0.0001;
P
95: 7.8±3.0 vs 9.6±1.9
mbar,
P<0.0005;
P
max: 10.0±3.4 vs 10.8±1.8
mbar, NS).
Conclusion: While the subjective tolerance of the two APAP machines was comparable, these devices were characterized by different pressure profiles. The pressure parameters of the AutoSet
TM correlated better with
P
pred than those of the SOMNOsmart
TM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0954-6111</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-3064</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0954-6111(03)00113-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12924516</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Airway management ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; APAP ; Auto-adjustable positive airway pressure ; AutoSet TM ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body Mass Index ; CPAP ; Cross-Over Studies ; Emergency and intensive respiratory care ; Female ; Humans ; Intensive care medicine ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neck ; Obstructive sleep apnea ; Patient Satisfaction ; Positive-Pressure Respiration - instrumentation ; Positive-Pressure Respiration - standards ; Pressure ; Single-Blind Method ; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive - therapy ; Sleep disorders ; SOMNOsmart TM ; Studies ; Ventilators, Mechanical - standards</subject><ispartof>Respiratory medicine, 2003-08, Vol.97 (8), p.903-908</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-f6410e620c99d027d47118d5ffe5bc17506e86775e45017659f78f2941885533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-f6410e620c99d027d47118d5ffe5bc17506e86775e45017659f78f2941885533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0954-6111(03)00113-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15265758$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12924516$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hertegonne, Katrien B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proot, Pascal M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauwels, Romain A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pevernagie, Dirk A.</creatorcontrib><title>Comfort and pressure profiles of two auto-adjustable positive airway pressure devices: a technical report</title><title>Respiratory medicine</title><addtitle>Respir Med</addtitle><description>Study objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare comfort parameters and pressure profiles of the AutoSet
TM (Resmed) and the SOMNOsmart
TM (Weinmann), two auto-adjustable positive airway pressure (APAP) devices.
Setting: The sleep disorders center of a university hospital.
Design: A single-blind randomized trial protocol was applied. A split night procedure allowed each patient to be treated in a crossover fashion with both APAP devices during one overnight study.
Patients and methods: Fifty consecutive obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients were recruited. Each patient filled out an evaluation form for both devices after the study night. Visual analogue scales were used to score four comfort measures. Three CPAP outcomes generated by the devices (
P
50,
P
95 and
P
max) were assessed, compared with each other and correlated with the individually predicted CPAP (
P
pred).
Results: Forty-five males and 5 females, mean age 53.0 years, body mass index 31.0, were included. The mean apnea-hypopnea index was 58.7, the mean arousal index was 54.3. Mean CPAP-compliance before the titration study was 4.9
h per night. Comparison of the two devices regarding the effect on the subjective sleep quality parameters showed no differences. The AutoSet
TM pressure outcomes correlated significantly better with
P
pred in comparison with the SOMNOsmart
TM. The
P
50 and
P
95 but not the
P
max values were significantly lower in the SOMNOsmart™ as compared with the AutoSet
TM (
P
50: 5.1±1.3 vs 7.1±1.9
mbar,
P<0.0001;
P
95: 7.8±3.0 vs 9.6±1.9
mbar,
P<0.0005;
P
max: 10.0±3.4 vs 10.8±1.8
mbar, NS).
Conclusion: While the subjective tolerance of the two APAP machines was comparable, these devices were characterized by different pressure profiles. The pressure parameters of the AutoSet
TM correlated better with
P
pred than those of the SOMNOsmart
TM.</description><subject>Airway management</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>APAP</subject><subject>Auto-adjustable positive airway pressure</subject><subject>AutoSet TM</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>CPAP</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive respiratory care</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neck</subject><subject>Obstructive sleep apnea</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Positive-Pressure Respiration - instrumentation</subject><subject>Positive-Pressure Respiration - standards</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Sleep Apnea, Obstructive - therapy</subject><subject>Sleep disorders</subject><subject>SOMNOsmart TM</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Ventilators, Mechanical - standards</subject><issn>0954-6111</issn><issn>1532-3064</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV2LEzEUhoMobq3-BCUginsxejL5mIk3IkV3Fxa8cO9DmpxgynRSk5ku--9Nt8WCN17lQJ73fLwvIa8ZfGTA1KefoKVoFGPsA_BLAMZ4o56QBZO8bTgo8ZQs_iIX5EUpGwDQQsBzcsFa3QrJ1ILEVdqGlCdqR093GUuZM9YihThgoSnQ6T5RO0-psX4zl8muh_qfSpziHqmN-d4-nIUe99Fh-UwtndD9GqOzA824qxNekmfBDgVfnd4lufv-7W513dz-uLpZfb1tnFBqaoISDFC14LT20HZedIz1XoaAcu1YJ0Fhr7pOopDAOiV16PrQasH6XkrOl-T9sW294feMZTLbWBwOgx0xzcV0XCqhua7g23_ATZrzWFczDLgE0R-4JZFHyuVUSsZgdjlubX6okDkEYR6DMAeXDXDzGIRRVffm1H1eb9GfVSfnK_DuBNhSTQrZji6WMydbJTvZV-7LkcPq2T5iNsVFHB36mNFNxqf4n1X-AA4Do_A</recordid><startdate>20030801</startdate><enddate>20030801</enddate><creator>Hertegonne, Katrien B.</creator><creator>Proot, Pascal M.</creator><creator>Pauwels, Romain A.</creator><creator>Pevernagie, Dirk A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030801</creationdate><title>Comfort and pressure profiles of two auto-adjustable positive airway pressure devices: a technical report</title><author>Hertegonne, Katrien B. ; Proot, Pascal M. ; Pauwels, Romain A. ; Pevernagie, Dirk A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-f6410e620c99d027d47118d5ffe5bc17506e86775e45017659f78f2941885533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Airway management</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>APAP</topic><topic>Auto-adjustable positive airway pressure</topic><topic>AutoSet TM</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>CPAP</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive respiratory care</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neck</topic><topic>Obstructive sleep apnea</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Positive-Pressure Respiration - instrumentation</topic><topic>Positive-Pressure Respiration - standards</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Sleep Apnea, Obstructive - therapy</topic><topic>Sleep disorders</topic><topic>SOMNOsmart TM</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Ventilators, Mechanical - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hertegonne, Katrien B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proot, Pascal M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauwels, Romain A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pevernagie, Dirk A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Respiratory medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hertegonne, Katrien B.</au><au>Proot, Pascal M.</au><au>Pauwels, Romain A.</au><au>Pevernagie, Dirk A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comfort and pressure profiles of two auto-adjustable positive airway pressure devices: a technical report</atitle><jtitle>Respiratory medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Respir Med</addtitle><date>2003-08-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>903</spage><epage>908</epage><pages>903-908</pages><issn>0954-6111</issn><eissn>1532-3064</eissn><abstract>Study objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare comfort parameters and pressure profiles of the AutoSet
TM (Resmed) and the SOMNOsmart
TM (Weinmann), two auto-adjustable positive airway pressure (APAP) devices.
Setting: The sleep disorders center of a university hospital.
Design: A single-blind randomized trial protocol was applied. A split night procedure allowed each patient to be treated in a crossover fashion with both APAP devices during one overnight study.
Patients and methods: Fifty consecutive obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients were recruited. Each patient filled out an evaluation form for both devices after the study night. Visual analogue scales were used to score four comfort measures. Three CPAP outcomes generated by the devices (
P
50,
P
95 and
P
max) were assessed, compared with each other and correlated with the individually predicted CPAP (
P
pred).
Results: Forty-five males and 5 females, mean age 53.0 years, body mass index 31.0, were included. The mean apnea-hypopnea index was 58.7, the mean arousal index was 54.3. Mean CPAP-compliance before the titration study was 4.9
h per night. Comparison of the two devices regarding the effect on the subjective sleep quality parameters showed no differences. The AutoSet
TM pressure outcomes correlated significantly better with
P
pred in comparison with the SOMNOsmart
TM. The
P
50 and
P
95 but not the
P
max values were significantly lower in the SOMNOsmart™ as compared with the AutoSet
TM (
P
50: 5.1±1.3 vs 7.1±1.9
mbar,
P<0.0001;
P
95: 7.8±3.0 vs 9.6±1.9
mbar,
P<0.0005;
P
max: 10.0±3.4 vs 10.8±1.8
mbar, NS).
Conclusion: While the subjective tolerance of the two APAP machines was comparable, these devices were characterized by different pressure profiles. The pressure parameters of the AutoSet
TM correlated better with
P
pred than those of the SOMNOsmart
TM.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>12924516</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0954-6111(03)00113-6</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0954-6111 |
| ispartof | Respiratory medicine, 2003-08, Vol.97 (8), p.903-908 |
| issn | 0954-6111 1532-3064 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73564939 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Airway management Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy APAP Auto-adjustable positive airway pressure AutoSet TM Biological and medical sciences Body Mass Index CPAP Cross-Over Studies Emergency and intensive respiratory care Female Humans Intensive care medicine Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Neck Obstructive sleep apnea Patient Satisfaction Positive-Pressure Respiration - instrumentation Positive-Pressure Respiration - standards Pressure Single-Blind Method Sleep Apnea, Obstructive - therapy Sleep disorders SOMNOsmart TM Studies Ventilators, Mechanical - standards |
| title | Comfort and pressure profiles of two auto-adjustable positive airway pressure devices: a technical report |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T03%3A54%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comfort%20and%20pressure%20profiles%20of%20two%20auto-adjustable%20positive%20airway%20pressure%20devices:%20a%20technical%20report&rft.jtitle=Respiratory%20medicine&rft.au=Hertegonne,%20Katrien%20B.&rft.date=2003-08-01&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=903&rft.epage=908&rft.pages=903-908&rft.issn=0954-6111&rft.eissn=1532-3064&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0954-6111(03)00113-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2745019861%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1035048649&rft_id=info:pmid/12924516&rft_els_id=S0954611103001136&rfr_iscdi=true |