Antecedents of injury among youth in agricultural settings: A longitudinal examination of safety consciousness, dangerous risk taking, and safety knowledge
Problem: Injuries are the leading cause of death for adolescents in the United States. Methods: This study longitudinally examined three psychological mediators of injury among 3,081 youths in agricultural settings: (a) safety consciousness, (b) dangerous risk taking, and (c) safety knowledge. These...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of safety research 2003-08, Vol.34 (3), p.227-240 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 240 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 227 |
| container_title | Journal of safety research |
| container_volume | 34 |
| creator | Westaby, James D Lee, Barbara C |
| description | Problem: Injuries are the leading cause of death for adolescents in the United States.
Methods: This study longitudinally examined three psychological mediators of injury among 3,081 youths in agricultural settings: (a) safety consciousness, (b) dangerous risk taking, and (c) safety knowledge. These variables are examined within a nomological network of contextual variables.
Results: Cross-sectional results revealed that safety consciousness and dangerous risk taking were the strongest predictors of reported injury at Time 1 and Time 2. Safety knowledge had an unexpected negative association with injury, albeit weak. As predicted, participating in safety activities was positively associated with safety consciousness, and time spent working was strongly associated with safety knowledge. Furthermore, self-esteem had both positive and negative safety outcomes, suggesting a more complex functioning. Males exhibited fewer safety cognitions than females as predicted. Longitudinal data also revealed that injury at Time 1 and dangerous risk taking were the strongest predictors of Time 2 injury.
Impact on Industry: Results from this study emphasize the importance of assessing dangerous risk-taking perceptions when attempting to predict future injuries. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0022-4375(03)00030-6 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73556999</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022437503000306</els_id><sourcerecordid>73556999</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-8a4d404163ab8f3eba7eb20fe0ef44f37cf0b7e261859d8af2ab513db7c60f613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctu1DAUhi0EokPhEUAWCwRSA3bsOAkbNKq4SZVYAGvLsY-DZzJ2azu08yy8LE5nAIlNV7595z_W-RB6SslrSqh485WQuq44a5uXhL0ihDBSiXtoRbu2r2jN2_to9Rc5QY9S2hRINJQ-RCe07gUjol-hX2ufQYMBnxMOFju_meMeq13wI96HOf8oV1iN0el5ynNUE06Qs_NjeovXeCqYy7NxvjzAjdqVTXbBL1FJWch7rINP2oU5eUjpDBvlR4jliKNLW5zVtmSdYeXNn4KtD9cTmBEeowdWTQmeHNdT9P3D-2_nn6qLLx8_n68vKs1pn6tOccMJp4KpobMMBtXCUBMLBCznlrXakqGFWtCu6U2nbK2GhjIztFoQKyg7RS8OuZcxXM2Qsty5pGGalIfyUdmyphF9398J0q6jLecL-Pw_cBPmWGaUZE07JhrWiAI1B0jHkFIEKy-j26m4l5TIxbG8dSwXgZIweetYLnXPjuHzsAPzr-ootQDvDgCUof10EGURAL5YdhF0lia4O1r8BrgMudU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218365356</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antecedents of injury among youth in agricultural settings: A longitudinal examination of safety consciousness, dangerous risk taking, and safety knowledge</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Westaby, James D ; Lee, Barbara C</creator><creatorcontrib>Westaby, James D ; Lee, Barbara C</creatorcontrib><description>Problem: Injuries are the leading cause of death for adolescents in the United States.
Methods: This study longitudinally examined three psychological mediators of injury among 3,081 youths in agricultural settings: (a) safety consciousness, (b) dangerous risk taking, and (c) safety knowledge. These variables are examined within a nomological network of contextual variables.
Results: Cross-sectional results revealed that safety consciousness and dangerous risk taking were the strongest predictors of reported injury at Time 1 and Time 2. Safety knowledge had an unexpected negative association with injury, albeit weak. As predicted, participating in safety activities was positively associated with safety consciousness, and time spent working was strongly associated with safety knowledge. Furthermore, self-esteem had both positive and negative safety outcomes, suggesting a more complex functioning. Males exhibited fewer safety cognitions than females as predicted. Longitudinal data also revealed that injury at Time 1 and dangerous risk taking were the strongest predictors of Time 2 injury.
Impact on Industry: Results from this study emphasize the importance of assessing dangerous risk-taking perceptions when attempting to predict future injuries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4375</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1247</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0022-4375(03)00030-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12963069</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSFRAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adolescent Behavior - psychology ; Adult ; Agricultural settings ; Agriculture ; Child ; Child Behavior - psychology ; Consciousness ; Female ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Injuries ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Occupational safety ; Risk factors ; Risk taking ; Safety ; Safety consciousness ; Safety knowledge ; Safety research ; Teenagers ; United States - epidemiology ; Wounds and Injuries - epidemiology ; Wounds and Injuries - psychology ; Youth</subject><ispartof>Journal of safety research, 2003-08, Vol.34 (3), p.227-240</ispartof><rights>2003 National Safety Council and Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Aug 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-8a4d404163ab8f3eba7eb20fe0ef44f37cf0b7e261859d8af2ab513db7c60f613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-8a4d404163ab8f3eba7eb20fe0ef44f37cf0b7e261859d8af2ab513db7c60f613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437503000306$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12963069$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Westaby, James D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Barbara C</creatorcontrib><title>Antecedents of injury among youth in agricultural settings: A longitudinal examination of safety consciousness, dangerous risk taking, and safety knowledge</title><title>Journal of safety research</title><addtitle>J Safety Res</addtitle><description>Problem: Injuries are the leading cause of death for adolescents in the United States.
Methods: This study longitudinally examined three psychological mediators of injury among 3,081 youths in agricultural settings: (a) safety consciousness, (b) dangerous risk taking, and (c) safety knowledge. These variables are examined within a nomological network of contextual variables.
Results: Cross-sectional results revealed that safety consciousness and dangerous risk taking were the strongest predictors of reported injury at Time 1 and Time 2. Safety knowledge had an unexpected negative association with injury, albeit weak. As predicted, participating in safety activities was positively associated with safety consciousness, and time spent working was strongly associated with safety knowledge. Furthermore, self-esteem had both positive and negative safety outcomes, suggesting a more complex functioning. Males exhibited fewer safety cognitions than females as predicted. Longitudinal data also revealed that injury at Time 1 and dangerous risk taking were the strongest predictors of Time 2 injury.
Impact on Industry: Results from this study emphasize the importance of assessing dangerous risk-taking perceptions when attempting to predict future injuries.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adolescent Behavior - psychology</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Agricultural settings</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Behavior - psychology</subject><subject>Consciousness</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Occupational safety</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Risk taking</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Safety consciousness</subject><subject>Safety knowledge</subject><subject>Safety research</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><subject>Wounds and Injuries - epidemiology</subject><subject>Wounds and Injuries - psychology</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>0022-4375</issn><issn>1879-1247</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctu1DAUhi0EokPhEUAWCwRSA3bsOAkbNKq4SZVYAGvLsY-DZzJ2azu08yy8LE5nAIlNV7595z_W-RB6SslrSqh485WQuq44a5uXhL0ihDBSiXtoRbu2r2jN2_to9Rc5QY9S2hRINJQ-RCe07gUjol-hX2ufQYMBnxMOFju_meMeq13wI96HOf8oV1iN0el5ynNUE06Qs_NjeovXeCqYy7NxvjzAjdqVTXbBL1FJWch7rINP2oU5eUjpDBvlR4jliKNLW5zVtmSdYeXNn4KtD9cTmBEeowdWTQmeHNdT9P3D-2_nn6qLLx8_n68vKs1pn6tOccMJp4KpobMMBtXCUBMLBCznlrXakqGFWtCu6U2nbK2GhjIztFoQKyg7RS8OuZcxXM2Qsty5pGGalIfyUdmyphF9398J0q6jLecL-Pw_cBPmWGaUZE07JhrWiAI1B0jHkFIEKy-j26m4l5TIxbG8dSwXgZIweetYLnXPjuHzsAPzr-ootQDvDgCUof10EGURAL5YdhF0lia4O1r8BrgMudU</recordid><startdate>200308</startdate><enddate>200308</enddate><creator>Westaby, James D</creator><creator>Lee, Barbara C</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200308</creationdate><title>Antecedents of injury among youth in agricultural settings: A longitudinal examination of safety consciousness, dangerous risk taking, and safety knowledge</title><author>Westaby, James D ; Lee, Barbara C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-8a4d404163ab8f3eba7eb20fe0ef44f37cf0b7e261859d8af2ab513db7c60f613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adolescent Behavior - psychology</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Agricultural settings</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Behavior - psychology</topic><topic>Consciousness</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Occupational safety</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Risk taking</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Safety consciousness</topic><topic>Safety knowledge</topic><topic>Safety research</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><topic>Wounds and Injuries - epidemiology</topic><topic>Wounds and Injuries - psychology</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Westaby, James D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Barbara C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of safety research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Westaby, James D</au><au>Lee, Barbara C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antecedents of injury among youth in agricultural settings: A longitudinal examination of safety consciousness, dangerous risk taking, and safety knowledge</atitle><jtitle>Journal of safety research</jtitle><addtitle>J Safety Res</addtitle><date>2003-08</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>227</spage><epage>240</epage><pages>227-240</pages><issn>0022-4375</issn><eissn>1879-1247</eissn><coden>JSFRAV</coden><abstract>Problem: Injuries are the leading cause of death for adolescents in the United States.
Methods: This study longitudinally examined three psychological mediators of injury among 3,081 youths in agricultural settings: (a) safety consciousness, (b) dangerous risk taking, and (c) safety knowledge. These variables are examined within a nomological network of contextual variables.
Results: Cross-sectional results revealed that safety consciousness and dangerous risk taking were the strongest predictors of reported injury at Time 1 and Time 2. Safety knowledge had an unexpected negative association with injury, albeit weak. As predicted, participating in safety activities was positively associated with safety consciousness, and time spent working was strongly associated with safety knowledge. Furthermore, self-esteem had both positive and negative safety outcomes, suggesting a more complex functioning. Males exhibited fewer safety cognitions than females as predicted. Longitudinal data also revealed that injury at Time 1 and dangerous risk taking were the strongest predictors of Time 2 injury.
Impact on Industry: Results from this study emphasize the importance of assessing dangerous risk-taking perceptions when attempting to predict future injuries.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>12963069</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0022-4375(03)00030-6</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-4375 |
| ispartof | Journal of safety research, 2003-08, Vol.34 (3), p.227-240 |
| issn | 0022-4375 1879-1247 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73556999 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Adolescent Adolescent Behavior - psychology Adult Agricultural settings Agriculture Child Child Behavior - psychology Consciousness Female Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Humans Injuries Longitudinal Studies Male Occupational safety Risk factors Risk taking Safety Safety consciousness Safety knowledge Safety research Teenagers United States - epidemiology Wounds and Injuries - epidemiology Wounds and Injuries - psychology Youth |
| title | Antecedents of injury among youth in agricultural settings: A longitudinal examination of safety consciousness, dangerous risk taking, and safety knowledge |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T03%3A14%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antecedents%20of%20injury%20among%20youth%20in%20agricultural%20settings:%20A%20longitudinal%20examination%20of%20safety%20consciousness,%20dangerous%20risk%20taking,%20and%20safety%20knowledge&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20safety%20research&rft.au=Westaby,%20James%20D&rft.date=2003-08&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=227&rft.epage=240&rft.pages=227-240&rft.issn=0022-4375&rft.eissn=1879-1247&rft.coden=JSFRAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0022-4375(03)00030-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73556999%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218365356&rft_id=info:pmid/12963069&rft_els_id=S0022437503000306&rfr_iscdi=true |