The effect of supplemental enteral glutamine on plasma levels, gut function, and outcome in severe burns: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND: This research was conducted to evaluate the effect of enterally administered glutamine (gln) dipeptide on metabolic, gastrointestinal, and outcome parameters after severe burn injury. METHODS: Forty thermally injured patients with total body surface burns ranging between 50% and 80%, and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition 2003-07, Vol.27 (4), p.241-245
Hauptverfasser: Zhou, YP, Jiang, ZM, Sun, YH, Wang, XR, Ma, EL, Wilmore, D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 245
container_issue 4
container_start_page 241
container_title JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition
container_volume 27
creator Zhou, YP
Jiang, ZM
Sun, YH
Wang, XR
Ma, EL
Wilmore, D
description BACKGROUND: This research was conducted to evaluate the effect of enterally administered glutamine (gln) dipeptide on metabolic, gastrointestinal, and outcome parameters after severe burn injury. METHODS: Forty thermally injured patients with total body surface burns ranging between 50% and 80%, and third-degree burns ranging between 20% and 40% and without respiratory injuries, were randomized into a prospective, double-blind, controlled clinical trial. One group received gln-enriched enteral nutrition and the other group received the standard enteral formulation. Tube feedings were initiated on postburn day 1 (PBD +1), and isocaloric and isonitrogenous feedings were administered to both groups until PBD +12. The gln was given as the dipeptide of alanyl-gln (Ajinomoto, Tokyo, Japan), which provided 0.35 g gln/kg body weight/d. Plasma amino acid profiles, serum endotoxin concentrations, and the lactulose/mannitol absorption ratio (which reflects gut permeability) were measured at specific times throughout the clinical course. Wound healing at day 30 was assessed, and length of hospital stay and total costs were determined at discharge. RESULTS: The 2 groups were similar in terms of age and extent of injury. Plasma gln concentrations were approximately 300 umol/L in both groups on PBD +1 and remained low in the control group (399 +/- 40 umol/L, mean +/- SD) but increased toward normal in the supplemented group to 591 +/- 74 (p = .048). Lactulose/mannitol ratios were increased above normal on POD +1 (control, 0.221 +/- 0.169; gln, 0.268 +/- 0.202; not significant), reflecting increased intestinal permeability after burn injury. On POD +3, the ratio in the gln group was lower than control (0.025 +/- 0.008 versus 0.049 +/- 0.016; p = .0001), and both groups returned toward normal ratios with time. Endotoxin levels on PBD +1 were elevated in both groups (control, 0.089 +/- 0.023 EU/mL; gln, 0.103 +/- 0.037 EU/mL; NS) but decreased significantly on PBD +3 in the patients receiving gln. Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the gln group than controls (67 +/- 4 days versus 73 +/- 6; p = .026). On day 30, wound healing was 86% +/- 2% complete in the gln group compared with 72% +/- 3% in controls (p = .041). Total cost of hospitalization was 62794 +/- 6178 RMB (dollar 7593 +/- 747 US dollars) in the gln group and 68996 +/- 8620RMB (dollar 8343 +/- 1042, p = .031) in controls, although the cost of the enteral nutrition was higher in the gln-supplemented patient
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0148607103027004241
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73546901</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>sage_journals_10_1177_0148607103027004241</sage_id><sourcerecordid>73546901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5151-bad06d995b232e396b523bec0ab03ac95ad91b07dbcc6cdec504b87f315ea36d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkduKFDEQhoMo7rj6BIIEQa-mtdLpU7yTZT2xqBfrdZND9ZglnYxJR1lfxlc1Qw8MiIg3KZJ8VX9V_YQ8ZvCCsb5_CawZOugZcKh7gKZu2B2yYaJhVd00zV2yORDVATkjD1K6AQDeAdwnZ6wWwIeh25Bf11-R4jShXmiYaMr7vcMZ_SIdLSfGEncuL3K2HmnwdO9kmiV1-B1d2tJdXuiUvV5s8FsqvaEhLzrMSK2nqUARqcrRp1dU0lj-w2x_otlSE7JyWClnfbnp4JcYnENDdXmxusgu0Ur3kNybpEv46BjPyZc3l9cX76qrT2_fX7y-qnTLWlYpaaAzQrSq5jVy0am25go1SAVcatFKI5iC3iitO21Qt9CooZ84a1HyzvBz8nytu4_hW8a0jLNNGp2THkNOY8_bphPACvj0D_AmlPlKb2NdjGBD10OB-ArpGFKKOI37aGcZb0cG48G88S_mlawnx9JZzWhOOUe3CvDsCMhUNjSVfWqbTlwjhp4NB3mxcj-sw9v_0R4_fL78CGsTsOYmucPTbP_q-zcI-sE4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230218670</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of supplemental enteral glutamine on plasma levels, gut function, and outcome in severe burns: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Zhou, YP ; Jiang, ZM ; Sun, YH ; Wang, XR ; Ma, EL ; Wilmore, D</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhou, YP ; Jiang, ZM ; Sun, YH ; Wang, XR ; Ma, EL ; Wilmore, D</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND: This research was conducted to evaluate the effect of enterally administered glutamine (gln) dipeptide on metabolic, gastrointestinal, and outcome parameters after severe burn injury. METHODS: Forty thermally injured patients with total body surface burns ranging between 50% and 80%, and third-degree burns ranging between 20% and 40% and without respiratory injuries, were randomized into a prospective, double-blind, controlled clinical trial. One group received gln-enriched enteral nutrition and the other group received the standard enteral formulation. Tube feedings were initiated on postburn day 1 (PBD +1), and isocaloric and isonitrogenous feedings were administered to both groups until PBD +12. The gln was given as the dipeptide of alanyl-gln (Ajinomoto, Tokyo, Japan), which provided 0.35 g gln/kg body weight/d. Plasma amino acid profiles, serum endotoxin concentrations, and the lactulose/mannitol absorption ratio (which reflects gut permeability) were measured at specific times throughout the clinical course. Wound healing at day 30 was assessed, and length of hospital stay and total costs were determined at discharge. RESULTS: The 2 groups were similar in terms of age and extent of injury. Plasma gln concentrations were approximately 300 umol/L in both groups on PBD +1 and remained low in the control group (399 +/- 40 umol/L, mean +/- SD) but increased toward normal in the supplemented group to 591 +/- 74 (p = .048). Lactulose/mannitol ratios were increased above normal on POD +1 (control, 0.221 +/- 0.169; gln, 0.268 +/- 0.202; not significant), reflecting increased intestinal permeability after burn injury. On POD +3, the ratio in the gln group was lower than control (0.025 +/- 0.008 versus 0.049 +/- 0.016; p = .0001), and both groups returned toward normal ratios with time. Endotoxin levels on PBD +1 were elevated in both groups (control, 0.089 +/- 0.023 EU/mL; gln, 0.103 +/- 0.037 EU/mL; NS) but decreased significantly on PBD +3 in the patients receiving gln. Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the gln group than controls (67 +/- 4 days versus 73 +/- 6; p = .026). On day 30, wound healing was 86% +/- 2% complete in the gln group compared with 72% +/- 3% in controls (p = .041). Total cost of hospitalization was 62794 +/- 6178 RMB (dollar 7593 +/- 747 US dollars) in the gln group and 68996 +/- 8620RMB (dollar 8343 +/- 1042, p = .031) in controls, although the cost of the enteral nutrition was higher in the gln-supplemented patients. CONCLUSION: Enteral gln supplementation using a commercially available dipeptide supported plasma gln levels, improved gut permeability, and initially decreased plasma endotoxin levels in severely thermally injured patients. These alterations were associated with a reduction in the length of hospitalization and lower costs. The supplementation of enteral alanyl-glutamine dipeptide for 12 days after severe burn injury at a dose of 0.5g/kg/day in 20 patients supported plasma glutamine levels, improved gut permeability, and initially decreased plasma endotoxin levels. These results were compared with those of patients not receiving glutamine dipeptide supplementation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-6071</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-2444</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0148607103027004241</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12903886</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPENDU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Burns - microbiology ; Burns - physiopathology ; Burns - therapy ; China ; Dietary Supplements ; Digestive System - physiopathology ; Double-Blind Method ; Emergency and intensive care: metabolism and nutrition disorders. Enteral and parenteral nutrition ; Endotoxins - blood ; Enteral Nutrition ; Escherichia coli Infections - epidemiology ; Food, Formulated ; Glutamine - administration &amp; dosage ; Glutamine - blood ; Humans ; Intensive care medicine ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Pseudomonas Infections - epidemiology ; Staphylococcal Infections - epidemiology ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Weight Loss ; Wound Healing ; Wound Infection - epidemiology ; Wound Infection - microbiology ; Wound Infection - prevention &amp; control</subject><ispartof>JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 2003-07, Vol.27 (4), p.241-245</ispartof><rights>2003 by The American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Jul/Aug 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5151-bad06d995b232e396b523bec0ab03ac95ad91b07dbcc6cdec504b87f315ea36d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1177%2F0148607103027004241$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1177%2F0148607103027004241$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14987180$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12903886$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhou, YP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, ZM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, YH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, XR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, EL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilmore, D</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of supplemental enteral glutamine on plasma levels, gut function, and outcome in severe burns: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial</title><title>JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition</title><addtitle>JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND: This research was conducted to evaluate the effect of enterally administered glutamine (gln) dipeptide on metabolic, gastrointestinal, and outcome parameters after severe burn injury. METHODS: Forty thermally injured patients with total body surface burns ranging between 50% and 80%, and third-degree burns ranging between 20% and 40% and without respiratory injuries, were randomized into a prospective, double-blind, controlled clinical trial. One group received gln-enriched enteral nutrition and the other group received the standard enteral formulation. Tube feedings were initiated on postburn day 1 (PBD +1), and isocaloric and isonitrogenous feedings were administered to both groups until PBD +12. The gln was given as the dipeptide of alanyl-gln (Ajinomoto, Tokyo, Japan), which provided 0.35 g gln/kg body weight/d. Plasma amino acid profiles, serum endotoxin concentrations, and the lactulose/mannitol absorption ratio (which reflects gut permeability) were measured at specific times throughout the clinical course. Wound healing at day 30 was assessed, and length of hospital stay and total costs were determined at discharge. RESULTS: The 2 groups were similar in terms of age and extent of injury. Plasma gln concentrations were approximately 300 umol/L in both groups on PBD +1 and remained low in the control group (399 +/- 40 umol/L, mean +/- SD) but increased toward normal in the supplemented group to 591 +/- 74 (p = .048). Lactulose/mannitol ratios were increased above normal on POD +1 (control, 0.221 +/- 0.169; gln, 0.268 +/- 0.202; not significant), reflecting increased intestinal permeability after burn injury. On POD +3, the ratio in the gln group was lower than control (0.025 +/- 0.008 versus 0.049 +/- 0.016; p = .0001), and both groups returned toward normal ratios with time. Endotoxin levels on PBD +1 were elevated in both groups (control, 0.089 +/- 0.023 EU/mL; gln, 0.103 +/- 0.037 EU/mL; NS) but decreased significantly on PBD +3 in the patients receiving gln. Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the gln group than controls (67 +/- 4 days versus 73 +/- 6; p = .026). On day 30, wound healing was 86% +/- 2% complete in the gln group compared with 72% +/- 3% in controls (p = .041). Total cost of hospitalization was 62794 +/- 6178 RMB (dollar 7593 +/- 747 US dollars) in the gln group and 68996 +/- 8620RMB (dollar 8343 +/- 1042, p = .031) in controls, although the cost of the enteral nutrition was higher in the gln-supplemented patients. CONCLUSION: Enteral gln supplementation using a commercially available dipeptide supported plasma gln levels, improved gut permeability, and initially decreased plasma endotoxin levels in severely thermally injured patients. These alterations were associated with a reduction in the length of hospitalization and lower costs. The supplementation of enteral alanyl-glutamine dipeptide for 12 days after severe burn injury at a dose of 0.5g/kg/day in 20 patients supported plasma glutamine levels, improved gut permeability, and initially decreased plasma endotoxin levels. These results were compared with those of patients not receiving glutamine dipeptide supplementation.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Burns - microbiology</subject><subject>Burns - physiopathology</subject><subject>Burns - therapy</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Dietary Supplements</subject><subject>Digestive System - physiopathology</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive care: metabolism and nutrition disorders. Enteral and parenteral nutrition</subject><subject>Endotoxins - blood</subject><subject>Enteral Nutrition</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Food, Formulated</subject><subject>Glutamine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Glutamine - blood</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pseudomonas Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Weight Loss</subject><subject>Wound Healing</subject><subject>Wound Infection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Wound Infection - microbiology</subject><subject>Wound Infection - prevention &amp; control</subject><issn>0148-6071</issn><issn>1941-2444</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkduKFDEQhoMo7rj6BIIEQa-mtdLpU7yTZT2xqBfrdZND9ZglnYxJR1lfxlc1Qw8MiIg3KZJ8VX9V_YQ8ZvCCsb5_CawZOugZcKh7gKZu2B2yYaJhVd00zV2yORDVATkjD1K6AQDeAdwnZ6wWwIeh25Bf11-R4jShXmiYaMr7vcMZ_SIdLSfGEncuL3K2HmnwdO9kmiV1-B1d2tJdXuiUvV5s8FsqvaEhLzrMSK2nqUARqcrRp1dU0lj-w2x_otlSE7JyWClnfbnp4JcYnENDdXmxusgu0Ur3kNybpEv46BjPyZc3l9cX76qrT2_fX7y-qnTLWlYpaaAzQrSq5jVy0am25go1SAVcatFKI5iC3iitO21Qt9CooZ84a1HyzvBz8nytu4_hW8a0jLNNGp2THkNOY8_bphPACvj0D_AmlPlKb2NdjGBD10OB-ArpGFKKOI37aGcZb0cG48G88S_mlawnx9JZzWhOOUe3CvDsCMhUNjSVfWqbTlwjhp4NB3mxcj-sw9v_0R4_fL78CGsTsOYmucPTbP_q-zcI-sE4</recordid><startdate>200307</startdate><enddate>200307</enddate><creator>Zhou, YP</creator><creator>Jiang, ZM</creator><creator>Sun, YH</creator><creator>Wang, XR</creator><creator>Ma, EL</creator><creator>Wilmore, D</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>ASPEN</general><general>American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200307</creationdate><title>The effect of supplemental enteral glutamine on plasma levels, gut function, and outcome in severe burns: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial</title><author>Zhou, YP ; Jiang, ZM ; Sun, YH ; Wang, XR ; Ma, EL ; Wilmore, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5151-bad06d995b232e396b523bec0ab03ac95ad91b07dbcc6cdec504b87f315ea36d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Burns - microbiology</topic><topic>Burns - physiopathology</topic><topic>Burns - therapy</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Dietary Supplements</topic><topic>Digestive System - physiopathology</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive care: metabolism and nutrition disorders. Enteral and parenteral nutrition</topic><topic>Endotoxins - blood</topic><topic>Enteral Nutrition</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Food, Formulated</topic><topic>Glutamine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Glutamine - blood</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pseudomonas Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Weight Loss</topic><topic>Wound Healing</topic><topic>Wound Infection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Wound Infection - microbiology</topic><topic>Wound Infection - prevention &amp; control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhou, YP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, ZM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, YH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, XR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, EL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilmore, D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhou, YP</au><au>Jiang, ZM</au><au>Sun, YH</au><au>Wang, XR</au><au>Ma, EL</au><au>Wilmore, D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of supplemental enteral glutamine on plasma levels, gut function, and outcome in severe burns: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition</jtitle><addtitle>JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr</addtitle><date>2003-07</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>241</spage><epage>245</epage><pages>241-245</pages><issn>0148-6071</issn><eissn>1941-2444</eissn><coden>JPENDU</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND: This research was conducted to evaluate the effect of enterally administered glutamine (gln) dipeptide on metabolic, gastrointestinal, and outcome parameters after severe burn injury. METHODS: Forty thermally injured patients with total body surface burns ranging between 50% and 80%, and third-degree burns ranging between 20% and 40% and without respiratory injuries, were randomized into a prospective, double-blind, controlled clinical trial. One group received gln-enriched enteral nutrition and the other group received the standard enteral formulation. Tube feedings were initiated on postburn day 1 (PBD +1), and isocaloric and isonitrogenous feedings were administered to both groups until PBD +12. The gln was given as the dipeptide of alanyl-gln (Ajinomoto, Tokyo, Japan), which provided 0.35 g gln/kg body weight/d. Plasma amino acid profiles, serum endotoxin concentrations, and the lactulose/mannitol absorption ratio (which reflects gut permeability) were measured at specific times throughout the clinical course. Wound healing at day 30 was assessed, and length of hospital stay and total costs were determined at discharge. RESULTS: The 2 groups were similar in terms of age and extent of injury. Plasma gln concentrations were approximately 300 umol/L in both groups on PBD +1 and remained low in the control group (399 +/- 40 umol/L, mean +/- SD) but increased toward normal in the supplemented group to 591 +/- 74 (p = .048). Lactulose/mannitol ratios were increased above normal on POD +1 (control, 0.221 +/- 0.169; gln, 0.268 +/- 0.202; not significant), reflecting increased intestinal permeability after burn injury. On POD +3, the ratio in the gln group was lower than control (0.025 +/- 0.008 versus 0.049 +/- 0.016; p = .0001), and both groups returned toward normal ratios with time. Endotoxin levels on PBD +1 were elevated in both groups (control, 0.089 +/- 0.023 EU/mL; gln, 0.103 +/- 0.037 EU/mL; NS) but decreased significantly on PBD +3 in the patients receiving gln. Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the gln group than controls (67 +/- 4 days versus 73 +/- 6; p = .026). On day 30, wound healing was 86% +/- 2% complete in the gln group compared with 72% +/- 3% in controls (p = .041). Total cost of hospitalization was 62794 +/- 6178 RMB (dollar 7593 +/- 747 US dollars) in the gln group and 68996 +/- 8620RMB (dollar 8343 +/- 1042, p = .031) in controls, although the cost of the enteral nutrition was higher in the gln-supplemented patients. CONCLUSION: Enteral gln supplementation using a commercially available dipeptide supported plasma gln levels, improved gut permeability, and initially decreased plasma endotoxin levels in severely thermally injured patients. These alterations were associated with a reduction in the length of hospitalization and lower costs. The supplementation of enteral alanyl-glutamine dipeptide for 12 days after severe burn injury at a dose of 0.5g/kg/day in 20 patients supported plasma glutamine levels, improved gut permeability, and initially decreased plasma endotoxin levels. These results were compared with those of patients not receiving glutamine dipeptide supplementation.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>12903886</pmid><doi>10.1177/0148607103027004241</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-6071
ispartof JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 2003-07, Vol.27 (4), p.241-245
issn 0148-6071
1941-2444
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73546901
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Burns - microbiology
Burns - physiopathology
Burns - therapy
China
Dietary Supplements
Digestive System - physiopathology
Double-Blind Method
Emergency and intensive care: metabolism and nutrition disorders. Enteral and parenteral nutrition
Endotoxins - blood
Enteral Nutrition
Escherichia coli Infections - epidemiology
Food, Formulated
Glutamine - administration & dosage
Glutamine - blood
Humans
Intensive care medicine
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Pseudomonas Infections - epidemiology
Staphylococcal Infections - epidemiology
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Weight Loss
Wound Healing
Wound Infection - epidemiology
Wound Infection - microbiology
Wound Infection - prevention & control
title The effect of supplemental enteral glutamine on plasma levels, gut function, and outcome in severe burns: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T03%3A03%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20supplemental%20enteral%20glutamine%20on%20plasma%20levels,%20gut%20function,%20and%20outcome%20in%20severe%20burns:%20a%20randomized,%20double-blind,%20controlled%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=JPEN.%20Journal%20of%20parenteral%20and%20enteral%20nutrition&rft.au=Zhou,%20YP&rft.date=2003-07&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=241&rft.epage=245&rft.pages=241-245&rft.issn=0148-6071&rft.eissn=1941-2444&rft.coden=JPENDU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0148607103027004241&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73546901%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230218670&rft_id=info:pmid/12903886&rft_sage_id=sage_journals_10_1177_0148607103027004241&rfr_iscdi=true