Optimal defibrillation response intervals for maximum out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival rates

Study objective: Many centers optimize their emergency medical services (EMS) systems to achieve a target defibrillation response interval of “call received by dispatch” to “arrival at scene by responder with defibrillator” in 8 minutes or less for at least 90% of cardiac arrest cases. The objective...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of emergency medicine 2003-08, Vol.42 (2), p.242-250
Hauptverfasser: De Maio, Valerie J., Stiell, Ian G., Wells, George A., Spaite, Daniel W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 250
container_issue 2
container_start_page 242
container_title Annals of emergency medicine
container_volume 42
creator De Maio, Valerie J.
Stiell, Ian G.
Wells, George A.
Spaite, Daniel W.
description Study objective: Many centers optimize their emergency medical services (EMS) systems to achieve a target defibrillation response interval of “call received by dispatch” to “arrival at scene by responder with defibrillator” in 8 minutes or less for at least 90% of cardiac arrest cases. The objective of this study was to analyze survival as a function of time to test the evidence for this standard. Methods: This prospective cohort study included all adult, cardiac etiology, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases from phases I and II of the Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support (OPALS) study. Patients in the 21 Ontario study communities received a basic life support level of care with defibrillation by ambulance and firefighters but no advanced life support. Survival was plotted as a function of the defibrillation response interval. The equation of the curve, generated by means of logistic regression, was used to estimate survival at various defibrillation response interval cutoff points. Results: From January 1, 1991, to December 31, 1997, there were 392 (4.2%) survivors overall among the 9,273 patients treated. The defibrillation response interval mean was 6.2 minutes, and the 90th percentile was 9.3 minutes. There was a steep decrease in the first 5 minutes of the survival curve, beyond which the slope gradually leveled off. Controlling for known covariates, the decrement in the odds of survival with increasing response interval was 0.77 per minute (95% confidence interval 0.74 to 0.83). The survival function predicts, for successive 90th percentile cutoff points, both survival rates and additional lives saved per year in the OPALS communities compared with the 8-minute standard: 9 minutes (4.6%; −18 lives), 8 minutes (5.9%; 0 lives), 7 minutes (7.5%; 23 lives), 6 minutes (9.5%; 51 lives), and 5 minutes (12.0%; 86 lives). Conclusion: The 8-minute target established in many communities is not supported by our data as the optimal EMS defibrillation response interval for cardiac arrest. EMS system leaders should consider the effect of decreasing the 90th percentile defibrillation response interval to less than 8 minutes. [Ann Emerg Med. 2003;42:242-250.]
doi_str_mv 10.1067/mem.2003.266
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73524641</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0196064403003937</els_id><sourcerecordid>73524641</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-e47aed228a5ed72ef003861d08df5c21bde9facc645ee4a7ac81dc5e769075973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkD1PwzAURS0EoqWwMSNPTKTYjmMnI6r4kip1gdly7RdhlMTBdir497hqJRamt5x79e5B6JqSJSVC3vfQLxkh5ZIJcYLmlDSyEFKQUzQntBEFEZzP0EWMn4SQhjN6jmaU1XVZUTZHZjMm1-sOW2jdNriu08n5AQeIox8iYDckCDvdRdz6gHv97fqpx35KhW-LDx9Hl3La6GCdNliHHEw4TmHncggHnSBeorM2F8DV8S7Q-9Pj2-qlWG-eX1cP68KUJU8FcKnBMlbrCqxk0OZRtaCW1LatDKNbC02rjRG8AuBaalNTayqQoiGyamS5QLeH3jH4ryn_oXoXDeRJA_gpKllWjAtOM3h3AE3wMQZo1RiyhPCjKFF7qSpLVXupKkvN-M2xd9r2YP_go8UMiAMAed3OQVDROBgMWBfAJGW9-7_5F2SZh-0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73524641</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimal defibrillation response intervals for maximum out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival rates</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>De Maio, Valerie J. ; Stiell, Ian G. ; Wells, George A. ; Spaite, Daniel W.</creator><creatorcontrib>De Maio, Valerie J. ; Stiell, Ian G. ; Wells, George A. ; Spaite, Daniel W. ; For the Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support Study Group ; Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>Study objective: Many centers optimize their emergency medical services (EMS) systems to achieve a target defibrillation response interval of “call received by dispatch” to “arrival at scene by responder with defibrillator” in 8 minutes or less for at least 90% of cardiac arrest cases. The objective of this study was to analyze survival as a function of time to test the evidence for this standard. Methods: This prospective cohort study included all adult, cardiac etiology, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases from phases I and II of the Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support (OPALS) study. Patients in the 21 Ontario study communities received a basic life support level of care with defibrillation by ambulance and firefighters but no advanced life support. Survival was plotted as a function of the defibrillation response interval. The equation of the curve, generated by means of logistic regression, was used to estimate survival at various defibrillation response interval cutoff points. Results: From January 1, 1991, to December 31, 1997, there were 392 (4.2%) survivors overall among the 9,273 patients treated. The defibrillation response interval mean was 6.2 minutes, and the 90th percentile was 9.3 minutes. There was a steep decrease in the first 5 minutes of the survival curve, beyond which the slope gradually leveled off. Controlling for known covariates, the decrement in the odds of survival with increasing response interval was 0.77 per minute (95% confidence interval 0.74 to 0.83). The survival function predicts, for successive 90th percentile cutoff points, both survival rates and additional lives saved per year in the OPALS communities compared with the 8-minute standard: 9 minutes (4.6%; −18 lives), 8 minutes (5.9%; 0 lives), 7 minutes (7.5%; 23 lives), 6 minutes (9.5%; 51 lives), and 5 minutes (12.0%; 86 lives). Conclusion: The 8-minute target established in many communities is not supported by our data as the optimal EMS defibrillation response interval for cardiac arrest. EMS system leaders should consider the effect of decreasing the 90th percentile defibrillation response interval to less than 8 minutes. [Ann Emerg Med. 2003;42:242-250.]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-0644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6760</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1067/mem.2003.266</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12883512</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Electric Countershock - methods ; Electric Countershock - standards ; Emergency Medical Services - methods ; Emergency Medical Services - standards ; Female ; Heart Arrest - complications ; Heart Arrest - etiology ; Heart Arrest - mortality ; Heart Arrest - therapy ; Humans ; Life Support Care - methods ; Life Support Care - standards ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Odds Ratio ; Ontario - epidemiology ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Seasons ; Survival Rate ; Tachycardia, Ventricular - complications ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Ventricular Fibrillation - complications</subject><ispartof>Annals of emergency medicine, 2003-08, Vol.42 (2), p.242-250</ispartof><rights>2003 American College of Emergency Physicians</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-e47aed228a5ed72ef003861d08df5c21bde9facc645ee4a7ac81dc5e769075973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-e47aed228a5ed72ef003861d08df5c21bde9facc645ee4a7ac81dc5e769075973</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mem.2003.266$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12883512$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Maio, Valerie J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stiell, Ian G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wells, George A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spaite, Daniel W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>For the Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Optimal defibrillation response intervals for maximum out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival rates</title><title>Annals of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Ann Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Study objective: Many centers optimize their emergency medical services (EMS) systems to achieve a target defibrillation response interval of “call received by dispatch” to “arrival at scene by responder with defibrillator” in 8 minutes or less for at least 90% of cardiac arrest cases. The objective of this study was to analyze survival as a function of time to test the evidence for this standard. Methods: This prospective cohort study included all adult, cardiac etiology, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases from phases I and II of the Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support (OPALS) study. Patients in the 21 Ontario study communities received a basic life support level of care with defibrillation by ambulance and firefighters but no advanced life support. Survival was plotted as a function of the defibrillation response interval. The equation of the curve, generated by means of logistic regression, was used to estimate survival at various defibrillation response interval cutoff points. Results: From January 1, 1991, to December 31, 1997, there were 392 (4.2%) survivors overall among the 9,273 patients treated. The defibrillation response interval mean was 6.2 minutes, and the 90th percentile was 9.3 minutes. There was a steep decrease in the first 5 minutes of the survival curve, beyond which the slope gradually leveled off. Controlling for known covariates, the decrement in the odds of survival with increasing response interval was 0.77 per minute (95% confidence interval 0.74 to 0.83). The survival function predicts, for successive 90th percentile cutoff points, both survival rates and additional lives saved per year in the OPALS communities compared with the 8-minute standard: 9 minutes (4.6%; −18 lives), 8 minutes (5.9%; 0 lives), 7 minutes (7.5%; 23 lives), 6 minutes (9.5%; 51 lives), and 5 minutes (12.0%; 86 lives). Conclusion: The 8-minute target established in many communities is not supported by our data as the optimal EMS defibrillation response interval for cardiac arrest. EMS system leaders should consider the effect of decreasing the 90th percentile defibrillation response interval to less than 8 minutes. [Ann Emerg Med. 2003;42:242-250.]</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Electric Countershock - methods</subject><subject>Electric Countershock - standards</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Services - methods</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Services - standards</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart Arrest - complications</subject><subject>Heart Arrest - etiology</subject><subject>Heart Arrest - mortality</subject><subject>Heart Arrest - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Support Care - methods</subject><subject>Life Support Care - standards</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Ontario - epidemiology</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Tachycardia, Ventricular - complications</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ventricular Fibrillation - complications</subject><issn>0196-0644</issn><issn>1097-6760</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkD1PwzAURS0EoqWwMSNPTKTYjmMnI6r4kip1gdly7RdhlMTBdir497hqJRamt5x79e5B6JqSJSVC3vfQLxkh5ZIJcYLmlDSyEFKQUzQntBEFEZzP0EWMn4SQhjN6jmaU1XVZUTZHZjMm1-sOW2jdNriu08n5AQeIox8iYDckCDvdRdz6gHv97fqpx35KhW-LDx9Hl3La6GCdNliHHEw4TmHncggHnSBeorM2F8DV8S7Q-9Pj2-qlWG-eX1cP68KUJU8FcKnBMlbrCqxk0OZRtaCW1LatDKNbC02rjRG8AuBaalNTayqQoiGyamS5QLeH3jH4ryn_oXoXDeRJA_gpKllWjAtOM3h3AE3wMQZo1RiyhPCjKFF7qSpLVXupKkvN-M2xd9r2YP_go8UMiAMAed3OQVDROBgMWBfAJGW9-7_5F2SZh-0</recordid><startdate>200308</startdate><enddate>200308</enddate><creator>De Maio, Valerie J.</creator><creator>Stiell, Ian G.</creator><creator>Wells, George A.</creator><creator>Spaite, Daniel W.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200308</creationdate><title>Optimal defibrillation response intervals for maximum out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival rates</title><author>De Maio, Valerie J. ; Stiell, Ian G. ; Wells, George A. ; Spaite, Daniel W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-e47aed228a5ed72ef003861d08df5c21bde9facc645ee4a7ac81dc5e769075973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Electric Countershock - methods</topic><topic>Electric Countershock - standards</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Services - methods</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Services - standards</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart Arrest - complications</topic><topic>Heart Arrest - etiology</topic><topic>Heart Arrest - mortality</topic><topic>Heart Arrest - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Support Care - methods</topic><topic>Life Support Care - standards</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Ontario - epidemiology</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Tachycardia, Ventricular - complications</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ventricular Fibrillation - complications</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Maio, Valerie J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stiell, Ian G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wells, George A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spaite, Daniel W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>For the Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Maio, Valerie J.</au><au>Stiell, Ian G.</au><au>Wells, George A.</au><au>Spaite, Daniel W.</au><aucorp>For the Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support Study Group</aucorp><aucorp>Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimal defibrillation response intervals for maximum out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival rates</atitle><jtitle>Annals of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2003-08</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>242</spage><epage>250</epage><pages>242-250</pages><issn>0196-0644</issn><eissn>1097-6760</eissn><abstract>Study objective: Many centers optimize their emergency medical services (EMS) systems to achieve a target defibrillation response interval of “call received by dispatch” to “arrival at scene by responder with defibrillator” in 8 minutes or less for at least 90% of cardiac arrest cases. The objective of this study was to analyze survival as a function of time to test the evidence for this standard. Methods: This prospective cohort study included all adult, cardiac etiology, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases from phases I and II of the Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support (OPALS) study. Patients in the 21 Ontario study communities received a basic life support level of care with defibrillation by ambulance and firefighters but no advanced life support. Survival was plotted as a function of the defibrillation response interval. The equation of the curve, generated by means of logistic regression, was used to estimate survival at various defibrillation response interval cutoff points. Results: From January 1, 1991, to December 31, 1997, there were 392 (4.2%) survivors overall among the 9,273 patients treated. The defibrillation response interval mean was 6.2 minutes, and the 90th percentile was 9.3 minutes. There was a steep decrease in the first 5 minutes of the survival curve, beyond which the slope gradually leveled off. Controlling for known covariates, the decrement in the odds of survival with increasing response interval was 0.77 per minute (95% confidence interval 0.74 to 0.83). The survival function predicts, for successive 90th percentile cutoff points, both survival rates and additional lives saved per year in the OPALS communities compared with the 8-minute standard: 9 minutes (4.6%; −18 lives), 8 minutes (5.9%; 0 lives), 7 minutes (7.5%; 23 lives), 6 minutes (9.5%; 51 lives), and 5 minutes (12.0%; 86 lives). Conclusion: The 8-minute target established in many communities is not supported by our data as the optimal EMS defibrillation response interval for cardiac arrest. EMS system leaders should consider the effect of decreasing the 90th percentile defibrillation response interval to less than 8 minutes. [Ann Emerg Med. 2003;42:242-250.]</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>12883512</pmid><doi>10.1067/mem.2003.266</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-0644
ispartof Annals of emergency medicine, 2003-08, Vol.42 (2), p.242-250
issn 0196-0644
1097-6760
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73524641
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Aged
Electric Countershock - methods
Electric Countershock - standards
Emergency Medical Services - methods
Emergency Medical Services - standards
Female
Heart Arrest - complications
Heart Arrest - etiology
Heart Arrest - mortality
Heart Arrest - therapy
Humans
Life Support Care - methods
Life Support Care - standards
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Odds Ratio
Ontario - epidemiology
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Risk Factors
Seasons
Survival Rate
Tachycardia, Ventricular - complications
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Ventricular Fibrillation - complications
title Optimal defibrillation response intervals for maximum out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival rates
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T18%3A24%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimal%20defibrillation%20response%20intervals%20for%20maximum%20out-of-hospital%20cardiac%20arrest%20survival%20rates&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=De%20Maio,%20Valerie%20J.&rft.aucorp=For%20the%20Ontario%20Prehospital%20Advanced%20Life%20Support%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2003-08&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=242&rft.epage=250&rft.pages=242-250&rft.issn=0196-0644&rft.eissn=1097-6760&rft_id=info:doi/10.1067/mem.2003.266&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73524641%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73524641&rft_id=info:pmid/12883512&rft_els_id=S0196064403003937&rfr_iscdi=true