The missing link: on the line between C and E
In this paper it is argued that the separation of elements associated with the time spent by the patient is not conducted in a consistent way. This is the case for income (for which there at least has been some attention) and for other time elements like lost unpaid work, leisure and role‐functionin...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Health economics 2003-08, Vol.12 (8), p.629-636 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 636 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 629 |
| container_title | Health economics |
| container_volume | 12 |
| creator | Brouwer, Werner B.F. Rutten, Frans F.H. |
| description | In this paper it is argued that the separation of elements associated with the time spent by the patient is not conducted in a consistent way. This is the case for income (for which there at least has been some attention) and for other time elements like lost unpaid work, leisure and role‐functioning. The use of general rather than specific preferences in health state assessments makes the separation of time‐elements into costs and effects difficult. While costs are calculated specifically for the patient group under study, effects are normally derived from preferences in the general public. The characteristics of these two groups in terms of (the opportunity of) spending time on activities need not coincide. The use of specific time‐group valuations of health states may be a good alternative to using general health state valuations. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/hec.764 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73520996</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>73520996</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5404-bb746e18ea0f5684d5fcd7008009a7bcbd01b4d0fca7181d08dc025ad47363cd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVpyFdD_0ExPTSH4nQkWZKdW1g2X4QUypYehSyNu0689sbydrP_vrN400Ch9DAaafQweucVY-85nHEA8WWO_szo7A075FAUKQcFb7d7ZdJCSDhgRzE-ANAd6H12wEVe5FrzQ5bO5pgs6hjr9mfS1O3jedK1yUBFOmBS4rBGbJNJ4tqQTN-xvco1EU92-Zh9v5zOJtfp3derm8nFXepVBllalibTyHN0UCmdZ0FVPhiAnAQ4U_oyAC-zAJV3huc8QB48COVCZqSWPshj9mnsu-y7pxXGwZJEj03jWuxW0RqpBM2i_wsqA5JGNgR-_At86FZ9S0NYIQWoQkpB0OkI-b6LscfKLvt64fqN5WC3Plvy2ZLPRN6OZI9LKr1g62Yzb4Yt9MtKxwUtGwoBICnVFDnFkkKLwmqp7XxYULMPO22rcoHh9dHdLxHweQTWdYObf4my19PJqC0d6ToO-PyHdv2jJSOMsj_ur-zsG1e3wtxbKX8DMyKqeQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>232059332</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The missing link: on the line between C and E</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>RePEc</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Brouwer, Werner B.F. ; Rutten, Frans F.H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brouwer, Werner B.F. ; Rutten, Frans F.H.</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper it is argued that the separation of elements associated with the time spent by the patient is not conducted in a consistent way. This is the case for income (for which there at least has been some attention) and for other time elements like lost unpaid work, leisure and role‐functioning. The use of general rather than specific preferences in health state assessments makes the separation of time‐elements into costs and effects difficult. While costs are calculated specifically for the patient group under study, effects are normally derived from preferences in the general public. The characteristics of these two groups in terms of (the opportunity of) spending time on activities need not coincide. The use of specific time‐group valuations of health states may be a good alternative to using general health state valuations. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-9230</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hec.764</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12898661</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Absenteeism ; Attitude to Health ; Cost effectiveness ; Cost of Illness ; Cost-Benefit Analysis - methods ; cost-effectiveness analysis ; Efficiency ; Health care ; Health economics ; Health Services Research - methods ; Health Status Indicators ; Humans ; Leisure Activities - economics ; methodology ; Patients ; Quality-Adjusted Life Years ; Studies ; time costs ; Time perspectives ; Workload - economics ; Workload - statistics & numerical data</subject><ispartof>Health economics, 2003-08, Vol.12 (8), p.629-636</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Periodicals Inc. Aug 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5404-bb746e18ea0f5684d5fcd7008009a7bcbd01b4d0fca7181d08dc025ad47363cd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5404-bb746e18ea0f5684d5fcd7008009a7bcbd01b4d0fca7181d08dc025ad47363cd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhec.764$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhec.764$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,3993,27903,27904,30978,30979,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12898661$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/wlyhlthec/v_3a12_3ay_3a2003_3ai_3a8_3ap_3a629-636.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brouwer, Werner B.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutten, Frans F.H.</creatorcontrib><title>The missing link: on the line between C and E</title><title>Health economics</title><addtitle>Health Econ</addtitle><description>In this paper it is argued that the separation of elements associated with the time spent by the patient is not conducted in a consistent way. This is the case for income (for which there at least has been some attention) and for other time elements like lost unpaid work, leisure and role‐functioning. The use of general rather than specific preferences in health state assessments makes the separation of time‐elements into costs and effects difficult. While costs are calculated specifically for the patient group under study, effects are normally derived from preferences in the general public. The characteristics of these two groups in terms of (the opportunity of) spending time on activities need not coincide. The use of specific time‐group valuations of health states may be a good alternative to using general health state valuations. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Absenteeism</subject><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Cost effectiveness</subject><subject>Cost of Illness</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis - methods</subject><subject>cost-effectiveness analysis</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health economics</subject><subject>Health Services Research - methods</subject><subject>Health Status Indicators</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Leisure Activities - economics</subject><subject>methodology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>time costs</subject><subject>Time perspectives</subject><subject>Workload - economics</subject><subject>Workload - statistics & numerical data</subject><issn>1057-9230</issn><issn>1099-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVpyFdD_0ExPTSH4nQkWZKdW1g2X4QUypYehSyNu0689sbydrP_vrN400Ch9DAaafQweucVY-85nHEA8WWO_szo7A075FAUKQcFb7d7ZdJCSDhgRzE-ANAd6H12wEVe5FrzQ5bO5pgs6hjr9mfS1O3jedK1yUBFOmBS4rBGbJNJ4tqQTN-xvco1EU92-Zh9v5zOJtfp3derm8nFXepVBllalibTyHN0UCmdZ0FVPhiAnAQ4U_oyAC-zAJV3huc8QB48COVCZqSWPshj9mnsu-y7pxXGwZJEj03jWuxW0RqpBM2i_wsqA5JGNgR-_At86FZ9S0NYIQWoQkpB0OkI-b6LscfKLvt64fqN5WC3Plvy2ZLPRN6OZI9LKr1g62Yzb4Yt9MtKxwUtGwoBICnVFDnFkkKLwmqp7XxYULMPO22rcoHh9dHdLxHweQTWdYObf4my19PJqC0d6ToO-PyHdv2jJSOMsj_ur-zsG1e3wtxbKX8DMyKqeQ</recordid><startdate>200308</startdate><enddate>200308</enddate><creator>Brouwer, Werner B.F.</creator><creator>Rutten, Frans F.H.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200308</creationdate><title>The missing link: on the line between C and E</title><author>Brouwer, Werner B.F. ; Rutten, Frans F.H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5404-bb746e18ea0f5684d5fcd7008009a7bcbd01b4d0fca7181d08dc025ad47363cd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Absenteeism</topic><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Cost effectiveness</topic><topic>Cost of Illness</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis - methods</topic><topic>cost-effectiveness analysis</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health economics</topic><topic>Health Services Research - methods</topic><topic>Health Status Indicators</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Leisure Activities - economics</topic><topic>methodology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>time costs</topic><topic>Time perspectives</topic><topic>Workload - economics</topic><topic>Workload - statistics & numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brouwer, Werner B.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutten, Frans F.H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Health economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brouwer, Werner B.F.</au><au>Rutten, Frans F.H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The missing link: on the line between C and E</atitle><jtitle>Health economics</jtitle><addtitle>Health Econ</addtitle><date>2003-08</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>629</spage><epage>636</epage><pages>629-636</pages><issn>1057-9230</issn><eissn>1099-1050</eissn><abstract>In this paper it is argued that the separation of elements associated with the time spent by the patient is not conducted in a consistent way. This is the case for income (for which there at least has been some attention) and for other time elements like lost unpaid work, leisure and role‐functioning. The use of general rather than specific preferences in health state assessments makes the separation of time‐elements into costs and effects difficult. While costs are calculated specifically for the patient group under study, effects are normally derived from preferences in the general public. The characteristics of these two groups in terms of (the opportunity of) spending time on activities need not coincide. The use of specific time‐group valuations of health states may be a good alternative to using general health state valuations. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>12898661</pmid><doi>10.1002/hec.764</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1057-9230 |
| ispartof | Health economics, 2003-08, Vol.12 (8), p.629-636 |
| issn | 1057-9230 1099-1050 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73520996 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; RePEc; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Absenteeism Attitude to Health Cost effectiveness Cost of Illness Cost-Benefit Analysis - methods cost-effectiveness analysis Efficiency Health care Health economics Health Services Research - methods Health Status Indicators Humans Leisure Activities - economics methodology Patients Quality-Adjusted Life Years Studies time costs Time perspectives Workload - economics Workload - statistics & numerical data |
| title | The missing link: on the line between C and E |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T01%3A23%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20missing%20link:%20on%20the%20line%20between%20C%20and%20E&rft.jtitle=Health%20economics&rft.au=Brouwer,%20Werner%20B.F.&rft.date=2003-08&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=629&rft.epage=636&rft.pages=629-636&rft.issn=1057-9230&rft.eissn=1099-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hec.764&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73520996%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=232059332&rft_id=info:pmid/12898661&rfr_iscdi=true |