Feasibility of neuroprotective agent administration by prehospital personnel in an urban setting

Studies have demonstrated the importance of early stroke treatment. If a neuroprotective agent (NA) clinical trial is successful, the greatest benefit might be attained with early prehospital administration. This study determined the potential reduction in time to treatment of stroke patients when N...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Stroke (1970) 2003-08, Vol.34 (8), p.1918-1922
Hauptverfasser: CROCCO, Todd, GULLETT, Travis, CHENIER, Thomas, DAVIS, Stephen M, FLORES, Nicole, SAUERBECK, Laura, JAUCH, Edward, THRELKELD, Billie, PIO, Brian, OTTAWAY, Michael, PANCIOLI, Arthur
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1922
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1918
container_title Stroke (1970)
container_volume 34
creator CROCCO, Todd
GULLETT, Travis
CHENIER, Thomas
DAVIS, Stephen M
FLORES, Nicole
SAUERBECK, Laura
JAUCH, Edward
THRELKELD, Billie
PIO, Brian
OTTAWAY, Michael
PANCIOLI, Arthur
description Studies have demonstrated the importance of early stroke treatment. If a neuroprotective agent (NA) clinical trial is successful, the greatest benefit might be attained with early prehospital administration. This study determined the potential reduction in time to treatment of stroke patients when NAs were administered in the prehospital setting. Twenty-three urban emergency medical services (EMS) agencies participated in this study. Prehospital personnel completed a stroke assessment checklist on any potential stroke victim. The checklist collected clinical inclusion/exclusion criteria for NA administration and event/decision times. Patients meeting the hypothetical clinical inclusion criteria were enrolled into this study. Time data included scene arrival/departure, emergency department (ED) arrival, and estimated time of theoretical NA administration. The reduction in time to stroke treatment was calculated as the difference between the time of ED arrival and the reported time of NA administration. The t test and simple linear regression were used to probe for differences in treatment time reduction between selected subgroups. EMS personnel's ability to obtain informed consent for theoretical NA administration was calculated. Two hundred twenty-two patients were enrolled in this study; of these, 75 were deemed eligible for hypothetical NA administration and had complete time data. On average, EMS personnel documented the theoretical time of NA administration at 12.04+/-2.07 minutes before arrival at the ED (17.06+/-1.74 minutes when the NA was given on scene [n=43]; 6.65+/-1.14 minutes when the NA was given en route [n=32]). Prehospital NA administration can potentially significantly reduce the time to first intervention in stroke patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1161/01.STR.0000080943.59701.0D
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73517219</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>73517219</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-146ff4988c0e34b043e14cf6366f6d3a448187dbeb2a46b81a280594126a69613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkNtqGzEQQEVoiF0nv1BEoH1bVyNpZSlvJamTQiCQy7OiXc-mKmvtVtIG_PdVaoPnYQaGMxcOIZfAlgAKvjNYPj0_LtlHaGakWNZmVZrs5oTMoeaykorrT2TOmDAVl8bMyOeU_hScC12fkRlwLYWQek5e1-iSb3zv844OHQ04xWGMQ8Y2-3ek7g1Dpm6z9cGnHF32Q6DNjo4Rfw9p9Nn1dMSYhhCwpz5QF-gUm5IT5uzD2zk57Vyf8OJQF-Rl_fP5-q66f7j9df3jvmrLJ7kCqbpOGq1bhkI2TAoE2XZKKNWpjXBSatCrTYMNd1I1GhzXrDYSuHLKKBAL8m2_tzz_d8KU7danFvveBRymZFeihhUHU8CrPdjGIaWInR2j37q4s8Dsh1_LwBa_9ujX_vdr2U0Z_nK4MjVb3BxHD0IL8PUAuNS6vosutD4duZoJpRUT_wCnKITq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73517219</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feasibility of neuroprotective agent administration by prehospital personnel in an urban setting</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Heart Association Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>CROCCO, Todd ; GULLETT, Travis ; CHENIER, Thomas ; DAVIS, Stephen M ; FLORES, Nicole ; SAUERBECK, Laura ; JAUCH, Edward ; THRELKELD, Billie ; PIO, Brian ; OTTAWAY, Michael ; PANCIOLI, Arthur</creator><creatorcontrib>CROCCO, Todd ; GULLETT, Travis ; CHENIER, Thomas ; DAVIS, Stephen M ; FLORES, Nicole ; SAUERBECK, Laura ; JAUCH, Edward ; THRELKELD, Billie ; PIO, Brian ; OTTAWAY, Michael ; PANCIOLI, Arthur</creatorcontrib><description>Studies have demonstrated the importance of early stroke treatment. If a neuroprotective agent (NA) clinical trial is successful, the greatest benefit might be attained with early prehospital administration. This study determined the potential reduction in time to treatment of stroke patients when NAs were administered in the prehospital setting. Twenty-three urban emergency medical services (EMS) agencies participated in this study. Prehospital personnel completed a stroke assessment checklist on any potential stroke victim. The checklist collected clinical inclusion/exclusion criteria for NA administration and event/decision times. Patients meeting the hypothetical clinical inclusion criteria were enrolled into this study. Time data included scene arrival/departure, emergency department (ED) arrival, and estimated time of theoretical NA administration. The reduction in time to stroke treatment was calculated as the difference between the time of ED arrival and the reported time of NA administration. The t test and simple linear regression were used to probe for differences in treatment time reduction between selected subgroups. EMS personnel's ability to obtain informed consent for theoretical NA administration was calculated. Two hundred twenty-two patients were enrolled in this study; of these, 75 were deemed eligible for hypothetical NA administration and had complete time data. On average, EMS personnel documented the theoretical time of NA administration at 12.04+/-2.07 minutes before arrival at the ED (17.06+/-1.74 minutes when the NA was given on scene [n=43]; 6.65+/-1.14 minutes when the NA was given en route [n=32]). Prehospital NA administration can potentially significantly reduce the time to first intervention in stroke patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-2499</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4628</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000080943.59701.0D</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12843348</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SJCCA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Aged ; Algorithms ; Biological and medical sciences ; Emergency Medical Services - standards ; Emergency Medical Services - utilization ; Emergency Medical Technicians ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Health Services Research ; Humans ; Informed Consent ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Neuropharmacology ; Neuroprotective agent ; Neuroprotective Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Stroke - drug therapy ; Time and Motion Studies ; Transportation of Patients - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Urban Health Services - standards ; Urban Health Services - utilization</subject><ispartof>Stroke (1970), 2003-08, Vol.34 (8), p.1918-1922</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-146ff4988c0e34b043e14cf6366f6d3a448187dbeb2a46b81a280594126a69613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-146ff4988c0e34b043e14cf6366f6d3a448187dbeb2a46b81a280594126a69613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3674,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15036860$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12843348$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>CROCCO, Todd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GULLETT, Travis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHENIER, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAVIS, Stephen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FLORES, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAUERBECK, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JAUCH, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THRELKELD, Billie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PIO, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OTTAWAY, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PANCIOLI, Arthur</creatorcontrib><title>Feasibility of neuroprotective agent administration by prehospital personnel in an urban setting</title><title>Stroke (1970)</title><addtitle>Stroke</addtitle><description>Studies have demonstrated the importance of early stroke treatment. If a neuroprotective agent (NA) clinical trial is successful, the greatest benefit might be attained with early prehospital administration. This study determined the potential reduction in time to treatment of stroke patients when NAs were administered in the prehospital setting. Twenty-three urban emergency medical services (EMS) agencies participated in this study. Prehospital personnel completed a stroke assessment checklist on any potential stroke victim. The checklist collected clinical inclusion/exclusion criteria for NA administration and event/decision times. Patients meeting the hypothetical clinical inclusion criteria were enrolled into this study. Time data included scene arrival/departure, emergency department (ED) arrival, and estimated time of theoretical NA administration. The reduction in time to stroke treatment was calculated as the difference between the time of ED arrival and the reported time of NA administration. The t test and simple linear regression were used to probe for differences in treatment time reduction between selected subgroups. EMS personnel's ability to obtain informed consent for theoretical NA administration was calculated. Two hundred twenty-two patients were enrolled in this study; of these, 75 were deemed eligible for hypothetical NA administration and had complete time data. On average, EMS personnel documented the theoretical time of NA administration at 12.04+/-2.07 minutes before arrival at the ED (17.06+/-1.74 minutes when the NA was given on scene [n=43]; 6.65+/-1.14 minutes when the NA was given en route [n=32]). Prehospital NA administration can potentially significantly reduce the time to first intervention in stroke patients.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Services - standards</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Services - utilization</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Technicians</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Services Research</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Informed Consent</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neuropharmacology</subject><subject>Neuroprotective agent</subject><subject>Neuroprotective Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Stroke - drug therapy</subject><subject>Time and Motion Studies</subject><subject>Transportation of Patients - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Urban Health Services - standards</subject><subject>Urban Health Services - utilization</subject><issn>0039-2499</issn><issn>1524-4628</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkNtqGzEQQEVoiF0nv1BEoH1bVyNpZSlvJamTQiCQy7OiXc-mKmvtVtIG_PdVaoPnYQaGMxcOIZfAlgAKvjNYPj0_LtlHaGakWNZmVZrs5oTMoeaykorrT2TOmDAVl8bMyOeU_hScC12fkRlwLYWQek5e1-iSb3zv844OHQ04xWGMQ8Y2-3ek7g1Dpm6z9cGnHF32Q6DNjo4Rfw9p9Nn1dMSYhhCwpz5QF-gUm5IT5uzD2zk57Vyf8OJQF-Rl_fP5-q66f7j9df3jvmrLJ7kCqbpOGq1bhkI2TAoE2XZKKNWpjXBSatCrTYMNd1I1GhzXrDYSuHLKKBAL8m2_tzz_d8KU7danFvveBRymZFeihhUHU8CrPdjGIaWInR2j37q4s8Dsh1_LwBa_9ujX_vdr2U0Z_nK4MjVb3BxHD0IL8PUAuNS6vosutD4duZoJpRUT_wCnKITq</recordid><startdate>20030801</startdate><enddate>20030801</enddate><creator>CROCCO, Todd</creator><creator>GULLETT, Travis</creator><creator>CHENIER, Thomas</creator><creator>DAVIS, Stephen M</creator><creator>FLORES, Nicole</creator><creator>SAUERBECK, Laura</creator><creator>JAUCH, Edward</creator><creator>THRELKELD, Billie</creator><creator>PIO, Brian</creator><creator>OTTAWAY, Michael</creator><creator>PANCIOLI, Arthur</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030801</creationdate><title>Feasibility of neuroprotective agent administration by prehospital personnel in an urban setting</title><author>CROCCO, Todd ; GULLETT, Travis ; CHENIER, Thomas ; DAVIS, Stephen M ; FLORES, Nicole ; SAUERBECK, Laura ; JAUCH, Edward ; THRELKELD, Billie ; PIO, Brian ; OTTAWAY, Michael ; PANCIOLI, Arthur</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-146ff4988c0e34b043e14cf6366f6d3a448187dbeb2a46b81a280594126a69613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Services - standards</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Services - utilization</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Technicians</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Services Research</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Informed Consent</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neuropharmacology</topic><topic>Neuroprotective agent</topic><topic>Neuroprotective Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Stroke - drug therapy</topic><topic>Time and Motion Studies</topic><topic>Transportation of Patients - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Urban Health Services - standards</topic><topic>Urban Health Services - utilization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CROCCO, Todd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GULLETT, Travis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHENIER, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAVIS, Stephen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FLORES, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAUERBECK, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JAUCH, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THRELKELD, Billie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PIO, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OTTAWAY, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PANCIOLI, Arthur</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Stroke (1970)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CROCCO, Todd</au><au>GULLETT, Travis</au><au>CHENIER, Thomas</au><au>DAVIS, Stephen M</au><au>FLORES, Nicole</au><au>SAUERBECK, Laura</au><au>JAUCH, Edward</au><au>THRELKELD, Billie</au><au>PIO, Brian</au><au>OTTAWAY, Michael</au><au>PANCIOLI, Arthur</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feasibility of neuroprotective agent administration by prehospital personnel in an urban setting</atitle><jtitle>Stroke (1970)</jtitle><addtitle>Stroke</addtitle><date>2003-08-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1918</spage><epage>1922</epage><pages>1918-1922</pages><issn>0039-2499</issn><eissn>1524-4628</eissn><coden>SJCCA7</coden><abstract>Studies have demonstrated the importance of early stroke treatment. If a neuroprotective agent (NA) clinical trial is successful, the greatest benefit might be attained with early prehospital administration. This study determined the potential reduction in time to treatment of stroke patients when NAs were administered in the prehospital setting. Twenty-three urban emergency medical services (EMS) agencies participated in this study. Prehospital personnel completed a stroke assessment checklist on any potential stroke victim. The checklist collected clinical inclusion/exclusion criteria for NA administration and event/decision times. Patients meeting the hypothetical clinical inclusion criteria were enrolled into this study. Time data included scene arrival/departure, emergency department (ED) arrival, and estimated time of theoretical NA administration. The reduction in time to stroke treatment was calculated as the difference between the time of ED arrival and the reported time of NA administration. The t test and simple linear regression were used to probe for differences in treatment time reduction between selected subgroups. EMS personnel's ability to obtain informed consent for theoretical NA administration was calculated. Two hundred twenty-two patients were enrolled in this study; of these, 75 were deemed eligible for hypothetical NA administration and had complete time data. On average, EMS personnel documented the theoretical time of NA administration at 12.04+/-2.07 minutes before arrival at the ED (17.06+/-1.74 minutes when the NA was given on scene [n=43]; 6.65+/-1.14 minutes when the NA was given en route [n=32]). Prehospital NA administration can potentially significantly reduce the time to first intervention in stroke patients.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>12843348</pmid><doi>10.1161/01.STR.0000080943.59701.0D</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0039-2499
ispartof Stroke (1970), 2003-08, Vol.34 (8), p.1918-1922
issn 0039-2499
1524-4628
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73517219
source MEDLINE; American Heart Association Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Aged
Algorithms
Biological and medical sciences
Emergency Medical Services - standards
Emergency Medical Services - utilization
Emergency Medical Technicians
Feasibility Studies
Female
Health Services Research
Humans
Informed Consent
Male
Medical sciences
Neuropharmacology
Neuroprotective agent
Neuroprotective Agents - administration & dosage
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Stroke - drug therapy
Time and Motion Studies
Transportation of Patients - statistics & numerical data
Urban Health Services - standards
Urban Health Services - utilization
title Feasibility of neuroprotective agent administration by prehospital personnel in an urban setting
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T02%3A29%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feasibility%20of%20neuroprotective%20agent%20administration%20by%20prehospital%20personnel%20in%20an%20urban%20setting&rft.jtitle=Stroke%20(1970)&rft.au=CROCCO,%20Todd&rft.date=2003-08-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1918&rft.epage=1922&rft.pages=1918-1922&rft.issn=0039-2499&rft.eissn=1524-4628&rft.coden=SJCCA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/01.STR.0000080943.59701.0D&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73517219%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73517219&rft_id=info:pmid/12843348&rfr_iscdi=true