STD Program Activity in State Policy Processes, 1995 and 2000
Background: Generating state policy support for sexually transmitted disease (STD) prevention is crucial; however, little is known about policy activity by STD programs. Goals: The goals of the study were to identify state-level policy behaviors by state STD programs and to examine the association b...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Sexually transmitted diseases 2003-08, Vol.30 (8), p.614-619 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 619 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 614 |
| container_title | Sexually transmitted diseases |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | MEYERSON, BETH E. CHU, BONG-CHUL RAPHAEL, THERESA L. |
| description | Background: Generating state policy support for sexually transmitted disease (STD) prevention is crucial; however, little is known about policy activity by STD programs. Goals: The goals of the study were to identify state-level policy behaviors by state STD programs and to examine the association between policy behavior and selected state characteristics. Study Design: Information was gathered through a survey of STD directors in 2001. Policy activities were recalled for 1995 and 2000 and compared with several state characteristics. Results: A majority of state STD programs reported at least one policy behavior in the state policy process for 1995 and for 2000. An increase was observed with the provision of state legislative testimony, participation in STD coalitions, and dissemination of information to policy-makers by STD programs. Conclusion: Reported policy activity may be evidence of an emerging environment enabling state STD directors to engage in public policy activity. An opportunity exists to improve state and local support for STD prevention. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1097/01.OLQ.0000085182.97442.75 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73513841</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44966277</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44966277</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-65887cc248d4decfa143920dbedcd15d39e04fb1c5390111922e48fdab6daaf73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0FtLwzAYBuAgis7pT1CKoFe25suhSQQvxDMMpqjXIUtS6ehaTTph_97MDQfmJoQ8X97wInQCuACsxAWGYjx6KfBySQ6SFEowRgrBt9AAOBU54wS20QADkzkXIPbQfoxTvDxj2EV7QKQSpSQDdPX6dps9h-4jmFl2bfv6u-4XWd1mr73pffbcNbVdLIH1Mfp4noFSPDOty0hKP0A7lWmiP1zvQ_R-f_d285iPxg9PN9ej3DJW9nnJpRTWEiYdc95WBhhVBLuJd9YBd1R5zKoJWE4VBgBFiGeycmZSOmMqQYfobPXuZ-i-5j72elZH65vGtL6bRy0oByoZJHjyD067eWjT3zQhhIoUyxK6XCEbuhiDr_RnqGcmLDRgvWxYY9CpYb1pWP82rAVPw8frhPlk5t1mdF1pAqdrYKI1TRVMa-u4cRxzrjBN7mjlprHvwt89Y6osiRD0B0Ufim8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>222373924</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>STD Program Activity in State Policy Processes, 1995 and 2000</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>MEYERSON, BETH E. ; CHU, BONG-CHUL ; RAPHAEL, THERESA L.</creator><creatorcontrib>MEYERSON, BETH E. ; CHU, BONG-CHUL ; RAPHAEL, THERESA L.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Generating state policy support for sexually transmitted disease (STD) prevention is crucial; however, little is known about policy activity by STD programs. Goals: The goals of the study were to identify state-level policy behaviors by state STD programs and to examine the association between policy behavior and selected state characteristics. Study Design: Information was gathered through a survey of STD directors in 2001. Policy activities were recalled for 1995 and 2000 and compared with several state characteristics. Results: A majority of state STD programs reported at least one policy behavior in the state policy process for 1995 and for 2000. An increase was observed with the provision of state legislative testimony, participation in STD coalitions, and dissemination of information to policy-makers by STD programs. Conclusion: Reported policy activity may be evidence of an emerging environment enabling state STD directors to engage in public policy activity. An opportunity exists to improve state and local support for STD prevention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-5717</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-4521</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.OLQ.0000085182.97442.75</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12897682</identifier><identifier>CODEN: STRDDM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Government Programs - statistics & numerical data ; Government Programs - trends ; Health Care Surveys - statistics & numerical data ; Health Care Surveys - trends ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Physician Executives ; Policy Making ; Politics ; Prevention ; Prevention and actions ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Public policy ; Sexually transmitted diseases ; Sexually Transmitted Diseases - prevention & control ; Specific populations (family, woman, child, elderly...) ; State government ; STD ; United States</subject><ispartof>Sexually transmitted diseases, 2003-08, Vol.30 (8), p.614-619</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2003 American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Aug 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-65887cc248d4decfa143920dbedcd15d39e04fb1c5390111922e48fdab6daaf73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-65887cc248d4decfa143920dbedcd15d39e04fb1c5390111922e48fdab6daaf73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44966277$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44966277$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,30980,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15055903$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12897682$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MEYERSON, BETH E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHU, BONG-CHUL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAPHAEL, THERESA L.</creatorcontrib><title>STD Program Activity in State Policy Processes, 1995 and 2000</title><title>Sexually transmitted diseases</title><addtitle>Sex Transm Dis</addtitle><description>Background: Generating state policy support for sexually transmitted disease (STD) prevention is crucial; however, little is known about policy activity by STD programs. Goals: The goals of the study were to identify state-level policy behaviors by state STD programs and to examine the association between policy behavior and selected state characteristics. Study Design: Information was gathered through a survey of STD directors in 2001. Policy activities were recalled for 1995 and 2000 and compared with several state characteristics. Results: A majority of state STD programs reported at least one policy behavior in the state policy process for 1995 and for 2000. An increase was observed with the provision of state legislative testimony, participation in STD coalitions, and dissemination of information to policy-makers by STD programs. Conclusion: Reported policy activity may be evidence of an emerging environment enabling state STD directors to engage in public policy activity. An opportunity exists to improve state and local support for STD prevention.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Government Programs - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Government Programs - trends</subject><subject>Health Care Surveys - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Health Care Surveys - trends</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Physician Executives</subject><subject>Policy Making</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Prevention and actions</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Sexually transmitted diseases</subject><subject>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - prevention & control</subject><subject>Specific populations (family, woman, child, elderly...)</subject><subject>State government</subject><subject>STD</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0148-5717</issn><issn>1537-4521</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0FtLwzAYBuAgis7pT1CKoFe25suhSQQvxDMMpqjXIUtS6ehaTTph_97MDQfmJoQ8X97wInQCuACsxAWGYjx6KfBySQ6SFEowRgrBt9AAOBU54wS20QADkzkXIPbQfoxTvDxj2EV7QKQSpSQDdPX6dps9h-4jmFl2bfv6u-4XWd1mr73pffbcNbVdLIH1Mfp4noFSPDOty0hKP0A7lWmiP1zvQ_R-f_d285iPxg9PN9ej3DJW9nnJpRTWEiYdc95WBhhVBLuJd9YBd1R5zKoJWE4VBgBFiGeycmZSOmMqQYfobPXuZ-i-5j72elZH65vGtL6bRy0oByoZJHjyD067eWjT3zQhhIoUyxK6XCEbuhiDr_RnqGcmLDRgvWxYY9CpYb1pWP82rAVPw8frhPlk5t1mdF1pAqdrYKI1TRVMa-u4cRxzrjBN7mjlprHvwt89Y6osiRD0B0Ufim8</recordid><startdate>20030801</startdate><enddate>20030801</enddate><creator>MEYERSON, BETH E.</creator><creator>CHU, BONG-CHUL</creator><creator>RAPHAEL, THERESA L.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><general>Lippincott</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030801</creationdate><title>STD Program Activity in State Policy Processes, 1995 and 2000</title><author>MEYERSON, BETH E. ; CHU, BONG-CHUL ; RAPHAEL, THERESA L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-65887cc248d4decfa143920dbedcd15d39e04fb1c5390111922e48fdab6daaf73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Government Programs - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Government Programs - trends</topic><topic>Health Care Surveys - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Health Care Surveys - trends</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Physician Executives</topic><topic>Policy Making</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Prevention and actions</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Sexually transmitted diseases</topic><topic>Sexually Transmitted Diseases - prevention & control</topic><topic>Specific populations (family, woman, child, elderly...)</topic><topic>State government</topic><topic>STD</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MEYERSON, BETH E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHU, BONG-CHUL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAPHAEL, THERESA L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Sexually transmitted diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MEYERSON, BETH E.</au><au>CHU, BONG-CHUL</au><au>RAPHAEL, THERESA L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>STD Program Activity in State Policy Processes, 1995 and 2000</atitle><jtitle>Sexually transmitted diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Sex Transm Dis</addtitle><date>2003-08-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>614</spage><epage>619</epage><pages>614-619</pages><issn>0148-5717</issn><eissn>1537-4521</eissn><coden>STRDDM</coden><abstract>Background: Generating state policy support for sexually transmitted disease (STD) prevention is crucial; however, little is known about policy activity by STD programs. Goals: The goals of the study were to identify state-level policy behaviors by state STD programs and to examine the association between policy behavior and selected state characteristics. Study Design: Information was gathered through a survey of STD directors in 2001. Policy activities were recalled for 1995 and 2000 and compared with several state characteristics. Results: A majority of state STD programs reported at least one policy behavior in the state policy process for 1995 and for 2000. An increase was observed with the provision of state legislative testimony, participation in STD coalitions, and dissemination of information to policy-makers by STD programs. Conclusion: Reported policy activity may be evidence of an emerging environment enabling state STD directors to engage in public policy activity. An opportunity exists to improve state and local support for STD prevention.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>12897682</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.OLQ.0000085182.97442.75</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0148-5717 |
| ispartof | Sexually transmitted diseases, 2003-08, Vol.30 (8), p.614-619 |
| issn | 0148-5717 1537-4521 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73513841 |
| source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy |
| subjects | Biological and medical sciences Government Programs - statistics & numerical data Government Programs - trends Health Care Surveys - statistics & numerical data Health Care Surveys - trends Humans Medical sciences Physician Executives Policy Making Politics Prevention Prevention and actions Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Public policy Sexually transmitted diseases Sexually Transmitted Diseases - prevention & control Specific populations (family, woman, child, elderly...) State government STD United States |
| title | STD Program Activity in State Policy Processes, 1995 and 2000 |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T23%3A15%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=STD%20Program%20Activity%20in%20State%20Policy%20Processes,%201995%20and%202000&rft.jtitle=Sexually%20transmitted%20diseases&rft.au=MEYERSON,%20BETH%20E.&rft.date=2003-08-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=614&rft.epage=619&rft.pages=614-619&rft.issn=0148-5717&rft.eissn=1537-4521&rft.coden=STRDDM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.OLQ.0000085182.97442.75&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44966277%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=222373924&rft_id=info:pmid/12897682&rft_jstor_id=44966277&rfr_iscdi=true |