Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps

This study used a low lesion prevalence population reflective of the screening setting to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of computerized tomographic (CT) colonography for detection of colorectal polyps. This prospective, blinded study comprised 703 asymptomatic persons at higher-than-avera...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943) N.Y. 1943), 2003-08, Vol.125 (2), p.311-319
Hauptverfasser: Johnson, C.Daniel, Harmsen, William S, Wilson, Lynn A, Maccarty, Robert L, Welch, Timothy J, Ilstrup, Duane M, Ahlquist, David A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 319
container_issue 2
container_start_page 311
container_title Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943)
container_volume 125
creator Johnson, C.Daniel
Harmsen, William S
Wilson, Lynn A
Maccarty, Robert L
Welch, Timothy J
Ilstrup, Duane M
Ahlquist, David A
description This study used a low lesion prevalence population reflective of the screening setting to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of computerized tomographic (CT) colonography for detection of colorectal polyps. This prospective, blinded study comprised 703 asymptomatic persons at higher-than-average risk for colorectal cancer who underwent CT colonography followed by same-day colonoscopy. Two of 3 experienced readers interpreted each CT colonography examination. Overall lesion prevalence for adenomas ≥1 cm in diameter was 5%. Seventy percent of all lesions were proximal to the descending colon. With colonoscopy serving as the gold standard, CT colonography detected 34%, 32%, 73%, and 63% of the 59 polyps ≥1 cm for readers 1, 2, 3, and double-reading, respectively; and 35%, 29%, 57%, and 54% of the 94 polyps 5–9 mm for readers 1, 2, 3, and double-reading, respectively. Specificity for CT colonography ranged from 95% to 98% and 86% to 95% for >1 cm and 5–9-mm polyps, respectively. Interobserver variability was high for CT colonography with κ statistic values ranging from −0.67 to 0.89. In a low prevalence setting, polyp detection rates at CT colonography are well below those at colonoscopy. These rates are less than previous reports based largely on high lesion prevalence cohorts. High interobserver variability warrants further investigation but may be due to the low prevalence of polyps in this cohort and the high impact on total sensitivity of each missed polyp. Specificity, based on large numbers, is high and exhibits excellent agreement among observers.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0016-5085(03)00894-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73511532</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016508503008941</els_id><sourcerecordid>73511532</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-8fd14f81dbd99e89413782c55f5b62802f061e783a530b007492e5fece4100fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFFP5CAQgInR6N7qT9D0RXP3UB3asqVPxhj1TEw0UZ8JhcHjQksP2k3238u6e_roC2SGb4aZj5BjCucU6OLiGdKZM-DsJ5S_AHhT5XSHzCgreJ7eil0y-0QOyI8Y_wJAU3K6Tw5owRvKSpiR7in4OKAa7RKz1tleo85wKd0kR-v7zJtM-W6YxpQefeffghz-WJWSzvebaJUZH7KoAmKfaRzXzf5XOh9SKF02eLca4iHZM9JFPNrec_J6e_Ny_Tt_eLy7v756yFXF6jHnRtPKcKpb3TSYNqNlzQvFmGHtouBQGFhQrHkp0w4tQF01BTKDCisKYNpyTs42fYfg_00YR9HZqNA52aOfoqhLRtP-RQLZBlRJQwxoxBBsJ8NKUBBrz-LDs1hLFFCKD8-CprqT7QdT26H-qtqKTcDpFpBRSWeC7JWNXxxLU9cNS9zlhsOkY2kxiKgs9gq1XZsT2ttvRnkHz5mbrA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73511532</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Johnson, C.Daniel ; Harmsen, William S ; Wilson, Lynn A ; Maccarty, Robert L ; Welch, Timothy J ; Ilstrup, Duane M ; Ahlquist, David A</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnson, C.Daniel ; Harmsen, William S ; Wilson, Lynn A ; Maccarty, Robert L ; Welch, Timothy J ; Ilstrup, Duane M ; Ahlquist, David A</creatorcontrib><description>This study used a low lesion prevalence population reflective of the screening setting to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of computerized tomographic (CT) colonography for detection of colorectal polyps. This prospective, blinded study comprised 703 asymptomatic persons at higher-than-average risk for colorectal cancer who underwent CT colonography followed by same-day colonoscopy. Two of 3 experienced readers interpreted each CT colonography examination. Overall lesion prevalence for adenomas ≥1 cm in diameter was 5%. Seventy percent of all lesions were proximal to the descending colon. With colonoscopy serving as the gold standard, CT colonography detected 34%, 32%, 73%, and 63% of the 59 polyps ≥1 cm for readers 1, 2, 3, and double-reading, respectively; and 35%, 29%, 57%, and 54% of the 94 polyps 5–9 mm for readers 1, 2, 3, and double-reading, respectively. Specificity for CT colonography ranged from 95% to 98% and 86% to 95% for &gt;1 cm and 5–9-mm polyps, respectively. Interobserver variability was high for CT colonography with κ statistic values ranging from −0.67 to 0.89. In a low prevalence setting, polyp detection rates at CT colonography are well below those at colonoscopy. These rates are less than previous reports based largely on high lesion prevalence cohorts. High interobserver variability warrants further investigation but may be due to the low prevalence of polyps in this cohort and the high impact on total sensitivity of each missed polyp. Specificity, based on large numbers, is high and exhibits excellent agreement among observers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5085</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-0012</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0016-5085(03)00894-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12891530</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GASTAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colonic Polyps - diagnosis ; Colonography, Computed Tomographic - methods ; Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Digestive system ; Female ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Observer Variation ; Prospective Studies ; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943), 2003-08, Vol.125 (2), p.311-319</ispartof><rights>2003 American Gastroenterological Association</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-8fd14f81dbd99e89413782c55f5b62802f061e783a530b007492e5fece4100fb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-8fd14f81dbd99e89413782c55f5b62802f061e783a530b007492e5fece4100fb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016508503008941$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15007795$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12891530$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnson, C.Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harmsen, William S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Lynn A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maccarty, Robert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welch, Timothy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ilstrup, Duane M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahlquist, David A</creatorcontrib><title>Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps</title><title>Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943)</title><addtitle>Gastroenterology</addtitle><description>This study used a low lesion prevalence population reflective of the screening setting to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of computerized tomographic (CT) colonography for detection of colorectal polyps. This prospective, blinded study comprised 703 asymptomatic persons at higher-than-average risk for colorectal cancer who underwent CT colonography followed by same-day colonoscopy. Two of 3 experienced readers interpreted each CT colonography examination. Overall lesion prevalence for adenomas ≥1 cm in diameter was 5%. Seventy percent of all lesions were proximal to the descending colon. With colonoscopy serving as the gold standard, CT colonography detected 34%, 32%, 73%, and 63% of the 59 polyps ≥1 cm for readers 1, 2, 3, and double-reading, respectively; and 35%, 29%, 57%, and 54% of the 94 polyps 5–9 mm for readers 1, 2, 3, and double-reading, respectively. Specificity for CT colonography ranged from 95% to 98% and 86% to 95% for &gt;1 cm and 5–9-mm polyps, respectively. Interobserver variability was high for CT colonography with κ statistic values ranging from −0.67 to 0.89. In a low prevalence setting, polyp detection rates at CT colonography are well below those at colonoscopy. These rates are less than previous reports based largely on high lesion prevalence cohorts. High interobserver variability warrants further investigation but may be due to the low prevalence of polyps in this cohort and the high impact on total sensitivity of each missed polyp. Specificity, based on large numbers, is high and exhibits excellent agreement among observers.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colonic Polyps - diagnosis</subject><subject>Colonography, Computed Tomographic - methods</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Digestive system</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0016-5085</issn><issn>1528-0012</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkFFP5CAQgInR6N7qT9D0RXP3UB3asqVPxhj1TEw0UZ8JhcHjQksP2k3238u6e_roC2SGb4aZj5BjCucU6OLiGdKZM-DsJ5S_AHhT5XSHzCgreJ7eil0y-0QOyI8Y_wJAU3K6Tw5owRvKSpiR7in4OKAa7RKz1tleo85wKd0kR-v7zJtM-W6YxpQefeffghz-WJWSzvebaJUZH7KoAmKfaRzXzf5XOh9SKF02eLca4iHZM9JFPNrec_J6e_Ny_Tt_eLy7v756yFXF6jHnRtPKcKpb3TSYNqNlzQvFmGHtouBQGFhQrHkp0w4tQF01BTKDCisKYNpyTs42fYfg_00YR9HZqNA52aOfoqhLRtP-RQLZBlRJQwxoxBBsJ8NKUBBrz-LDs1hLFFCKD8-CprqT7QdT26H-qtqKTcDpFpBRSWeC7JWNXxxLU9cNS9zlhsOkY2kxiKgs9gq1XZsT2ttvRnkHz5mbrA</recordid><startdate>20030801</startdate><enddate>20030801</enddate><creator>Johnson, C.Daniel</creator><creator>Harmsen, William S</creator><creator>Wilson, Lynn A</creator><creator>Maccarty, Robert L</creator><creator>Welch, Timothy J</creator><creator>Ilstrup, Duane M</creator><creator>Ahlquist, David A</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030801</creationdate><title>Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps</title><author>Johnson, C.Daniel ; Harmsen, William S ; Wilson, Lynn A ; Maccarty, Robert L ; Welch, Timothy J ; Ilstrup, Duane M ; Ahlquist, David A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-8fd14f81dbd99e89413782c55f5b62802f061e783a530b007492e5fece4100fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colonic Polyps - diagnosis</topic><topic>Colonography, Computed Tomographic - methods</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Digestive system</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, C.Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harmsen, William S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Lynn A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maccarty, Robert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welch, Timothy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ilstrup, Duane M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahlquist, David A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, C.Daniel</au><au>Harmsen, William S</au><au>Wilson, Lynn A</au><au>Maccarty, Robert L</au><au>Welch, Timothy J</au><au>Ilstrup, Duane M</au><au>Ahlquist, David A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps</atitle><jtitle>Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943)</jtitle><addtitle>Gastroenterology</addtitle><date>2003-08-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>125</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>311</spage><epage>319</epage><pages>311-319</pages><issn>0016-5085</issn><eissn>1528-0012</eissn><coden>GASTAB</coden><abstract>This study used a low lesion prevalence population reflective of the screening setting to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of computerized tomographic (CT) colonography for detection of colorectal polyps. This prospective, blinded study comprised 703 asymptomatic persons at higher-than-average risk for colorectal cancer who underwent CT colonography followed by same-day colonoscopy. Two of 3 experienced readers interpreted each CT colonography examination. Overall lesion prevalence for adenomas ≥1 cm in diameter was 5%. Seventy percent of all lesions were proximal to the descending colon. With colonoscopy serving as the gold standard, CT colonography detected 34%, 32%, 73%, and 63% of the 59 polyps ≥1 cm for readers 1, 2, 3, and double-reading, respectively; and 35%, 29%, 57%, and 54% of the 94 polyps 5–9 mm for readers 1, 2, 3, and double-reading, respectively. Specificity for CT colonography ranged from 95% to 98% and 86% to 95% for &gt;1 cm and 5–9-mm polyps, respectively. Interobserver variability was high for CT colonography with κ statistic values ranging from −0.67 to 0.89. In a low prevalence setting, polyp detection rates at CT colonography are well below those at colonoscopy. These rates are less than previous reports based largely on high lesion prevalence cohorts. High interobserver variability warrants further investigation but may be due to the low prevalence of polyps in this cohort and the high impact on total sensitivity of each missed polyp. Specificity, based on large numbers, is high and exhibits excellent agreement among observers.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>12891530</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0016-5085(03)00894-1</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-5085
ispartof Gastroenterology (New York, N.Y. 1943), 2003-08, Vol.125 (2), p.311-319
issn 0016-5085
1528-0012
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73511532
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Colonic Polyps - diagnosis
Colonography, Computed Tomographic - methods
Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis
Digestive system
Female
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Observer Variation
Prospective Studies
Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry
Sensitivity and Specificity
title Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T00%3A40%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prospective%20blinded%20evaluation%20of%20computed%20tomographic%20colonography%20for%20screen%20detection%20of%20colorectal%20polyps&rft.jtitle=Gastroenterology%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.%201943)&rft.au=Johnson,%20C.Daniel&rft.date=2003-08-01&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=311&rft.epage=319&rft.pages=311-319&rft.issn=0016-5085&rft.eissn=1528-0012&rft.coden=GASTAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0016-5085(03)00894-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73511532%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73511532&rft_id=info:pmid/12891530&rft_els_id=S0016508503008941&rfr_iscdi=true