Differences in the assessment of postoperative pain when evaluated by patients and doctors

This study was undertaken to compare the assessment of pain intensity by 59 patients and by their doctors according to a visual analogue scale (VAS) at rest and when coughing at 5 and 20 hr after major abdominal surgery. The rating given by the patients, who received epidural analgesia to relieve po...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of anesthesia 1993-07, Vol.7 (3), p.287-292
Hauptverfasser: Sakura, S, Nonoue, T, Nomura, T, Hara, K, Iwakura, H, Kosaka, Y
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 292
container_issue 3
container_start_page 287
container_title Journal of anesthesia
container_volume 7
creator Sakura, S
Nonoue, T
Nomura, T
Hara, K
Iwakura, H
Kosaka, Y
description This study was undertaken to compare the assessment of pain intensity by 59 patients and by their doctors according to a visual analogue scale (VAS) at rest and when coughing at 5 and 20 hr after major abdominal surgery. The rating given by the patients, who received epidural analgesia to relieve postoperative pain, was significantly above, and moreover, significantly correlated with that given by the doctors at any time or under any condition of the assessment. However, the correlation between the ratings given by patients and doctors at rest at 5 hr after surgery was low (r = 0.39, rs = 0.38) and significantly different from that when coughing at 20 hr after the operation (r = 0.79, rs = 0.80). Our findings indicate that the assessment of postoperative pain may be associated with some unreliability, especially during early periods, when using the subjective or objective-rated VAS at rest separately, and thus requires the combined use or the concomitant use of the VAS when coughing. Substitutional use of the objective-rated VAS for the subjective-rated VAS is not advised.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s0054030070287
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73500352</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>73500352</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c161t-baf9a77a863c38c0ef484fe248d04d3957dde293b3f98b85390f3c6784b7ed1a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkD1PwzAQhi0EoqWwMiJPbIFzLomdEZVPqRILLCyRE5_VoHyRc4v67wlqJcT0nl499w6PEJcKbhSAvmWANAGcToiNPhJzlaCJDKb5sZhDrjAyWWZm4oz5EwAypfBUzFQaa2MUzsXHfe09jdRVxLLuZFiTtMzE3FIXZO_l0HPoBxptqLckBztB32vqJG1ts7GBnCx3Ux3qiWdpOyddX4V-5HNx4m3DdHHIhXh_fHhbPker16eX5d0qqlSmQlRan1utrcmwQlMB-cQknuLEOEgc5ql2juIcS_S5KU2KOXisMm2SUpNTFhfier87jP3XhjgUbc0VNY3tqN9woTEFwDSewJs9WI0980i-GMa6teOuUFD82iz-25werg7Lm7Il94cf9OEPFkNwnw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73500352</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in the assessment of postoperative pain when evaluated by patients and doctors</title><source>SpringerLink</source><creator>Sakura, S ; Nonoue, T ; Nomura, T ; Hara, K ; Iwakura, H ; Kosaka, Y</creator><creatorcontrib>Sakura, S ; Nonoue, T ; Nomura, T ; Hara, K ; Iwakura, H ; Kosaka, Y</creatorcontrib><description>This study was undertaken to compare the assessment of pain intensity by 59 patients and by their doctors according to a visual analogue scale (VAS) at rest and when coughing at 5 and 20 hr after major abdominal surgery. The rating given by the patients, who received epidural analgesia to relieve postoperative pain, was significantly above, and moreover, significantly correlated with that given by the doctors at any time or under any condition of the assessment. However, the correlation between the ratings given by patients and doctors at rest at 5 hr after surgery was low (r = 0.39, rs = 0.38) and significantly different from that when coughing at 20 hr after the operation (r = 0.79, rs = 0.80). Our findings indicate that the assessment of postoperative pain may be associated with some unreliability, especially during early periods, when using the subjective or objective-rated VAS at rest separately, and thus requires the combined use or the concomitant use of the VAS when coughing. Substitutional use of the objective-rated VAS for the subjective-rated VAS is not advised.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0913-8668</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1438-8359</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s0054030070287</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15278813</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan</publisher><ispartof>Journal of anesthesia, 1993-07, Vol.7 (3), p.287-292</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c161t-baf9a77a863c38c0ef484fe248d04d3957dde293b3f98b85390f3c6784b7ed1a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15278813$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sakura, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nonoue, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nomura, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hara, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwakura, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosaka, Y</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in the assessment of postoperative pain when evaluated by patients and doctors</title><title>Journal of anesthesia</title><addtitle>J Anesth</addtitle><description>This study was undertaken to compare the assessment of pain intensity by 59 patients and by their doctors according to a visual analogue scale (VAS) at rest and when coughing at 5 and 20 hr after major abdominal surgery. The rating given by the patients, who received epidural analgesia to relieve postoperative pain, was significantly above, and moreover, significantly correlated with that given by the doctors at any time or under any condition of the assessment. However, the correlation between the ratings given by patients and doctors at rest at 5 hr after surgery was low (r = 0.39, rs = 0.38) and significantly different from that when coughing at 20 hr after the operation (r = 0.79, rs = 0.80). Our findings indicate that the assessment of postoperative pain may be associated with some unreliability, especially during early periods, when using the subjective or objective-rated VAS at rest separately, and thus requires the combined use or the concomitant use of the VAS when coughing. Substitutional use of the objective-rated VAS for the subjective-rated VAS is not advised.</description><issn>0913-8668</issn><issn>1438-8359</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkD1PwzAQhi0EoqWwMiJPbIFzLomdEZVPqRILLCyRE5_VoHyRc4v67wlqJcT0nl499w6PEJcKbhSAvmWANAGcToiNPhJzlaCJDKb5sZhDrjAyWWZm4oz5EwAypfBUzFQaa2MUzsXHfe09jdRVxLLuZFiTtMzE3FIXZO_l0HPoBxptqLckBztB32vqJG1ts7GBnCx3Ux3qiWdpOyddX4V-5HNx4m3DdHHIhXh_fHhbPker16eX5d0qqlSmQlRan1utrcmwQlMB-cQknuLEOEgc5ql2juIcS_S5KU2KOXisMm2SUpNTFhfier87jP3XhjgUbc0VNY3tqN9woTEFwDSewJs9WI0980i-GMa6teOuUFD82iz-25werg7Lm7Il94cf9OEPFkNwnw</recordid><startdate>199307</startdate><enddate>199307</enddate><creator>Sakura, S</creator><creator>Nonoue, T</creator><creator>Nomura, T</creator><creator>Hara, K</creator><creator>Iwakura, H</creator><creator>Kosaka, Y</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199307</creationdate><title>Differences in the assessment of postoperative pain when evaluated by patients and doctors</title><author>Sakura, S ; Nonoue, T ; Nomura, T ; Hara, K ; Iwakura, H ; Kosaka, Y</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c161t-baf9a77a863c38c0ef484fe248d04d3957dde293b3f98b85390f3c6784b7ed1a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sakura, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nonoue, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nomura, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hara, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwakura, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosaka, Y</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sakura, S</au><au>Nonoue, T</au><au>Nomura, T</au><au>Hara, K</au><au>Iwakura, H</au><au>Kosaka, Y</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in the assessment of postoperative pain when evaluated by patients and doctors</atitle><jtitle>Journal of anesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>J Anesth</addtitle><date>1993-07</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>287</spage><epage>292</epage><pages>287-292</pages><issn>0913-8668</issn><eissn>1438-8359</eissn><abstract>This study was undertaken to compare the assessment of pain intensity by 59 patients and by their doctors according to a visual analogue scale (VAS) at rest and when coughing at 5 and 20 hr after major abdominal surgery. The rating given by the patients, who received epidural analgesia to relieve postoperative pain, was significantly above, and moreover, significantly correlated with that given by the doctors at any time or under any condition of the assessment. However, the correlation between the ratings given by patients and doctors at rest at 5 hr after surgery was low (r = 0.39, rs = 0.38) and significantly different from that when coughing at 20 hr after the operation (r = 0.79, rs = 0.80). Our findings indicate that the assessment of postoperative pain may be associated with some unreliability, especially during early periods, when using the subjective or objective-rated VAS at rest separately, and thus requires the combined use or the concomitant use of the VAS when coughing. Substitutional use of the objective-rated VAS for the subjective-rated VAS is not advised.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pmid>15278813</pmid><doi>10.1007/s0054030070287</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0913-8668
ispartof Journal of anesthesia, 1993-07, Vol.7 (3), p.287-292
issn 0913-8668
1438-8359
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73500352
source SpringerLink
title Differences in the assessment of postoperative pain when evaluated by patients and doctors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T11%3A22%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20the%20assessment%20of%20postoperative%20pain%20when%20evaluated%20by%20patients%20and%20doctors&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20anesthesia&rft.au=Sakura,%20S&rft.date=1993-07&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=287&rft.epage=292&rft.pages=287-292&rft.issn=0913-8668&rft.eissn=1438-8359&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s0054030070287&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73500352%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73500352&rft_id=info:pmid/15278813&rfr_iscdi=true