Return to fertility after removal of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device and Nova-T

In a European randomized multicenter study, the efficacy and safety of an intrauterine contraceptive device releasing 20 microgram levonorgestrel/24 hours (LNG-IUD) have been evaluated and compared to the Nova-T. Because the LNG-IUD has a strongly suppressive effect on the endometrium and in some wo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Contraception (Stoneham) 1992-12, Vol.46 (6), p.575-584
Hauptverfasser: Andersson, Kerstin, Batar, Istvan, Rybo, Gr̈an
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 584
container_issue 6
container_start_page 575
container_title Contraception (Stoneham)
container_volume 46
creator Andersson, Kerstin
Batar, Istvan
Rybo, Gr̈an
description In a European randomized multicenter study, the efficacy and safety of an intrauterine contraceptive device releasing 20 microgram levonorgestrel/24 hours (LNG-IUD) have been evaluated and compared to the Nova-T. Because the LNG-IUD has a strongly suppressive effect on the endometrium and in some women affects ovarian function, the return to fertility after removal of the IUD was studied. Two-hundred-nine women (71 in the Nova-T and 138 in the LNG-IUD group), who had their IUDs removed because of planning pregnancy, were followed at least 24 months or until termination of pregnancy. For the Nova-T, the cumulative conception gross rate was 71.2 100 women after 12 months (79.7 after 24 months) and for the LNG-IUD 79.1 (86.6 after 24 months). The difference between the devices is not statistically significant, and in spite of the endometrial suppression during use of LNG-IUD, there is no delay of return to fertility and in both groups 96% of the pregnancies occurred during the first year after removal of the device. Eighty-four % of the pregnancies in the Nova-T group and eighty-six % in the LNG-IUD group ended in live births. The results suggest that the endometrium recovers quickly, normal ovulations are established and the fertility seems to be unaffected after use of an LNG-IUD.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0010-7824(92)90122-A
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73482031</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>001078249290122A</els_id><sourcerecordid>73482031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-5fe2a8782065d18057964c8389b2efc612b6f45dc7589c0b5cce69434a0e2f883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLHDEYhoNU7Gr9Bwo5lGIP0yaZZJJcCou0VRALxV4N2cwXSZlNNMks-O-bdRe99RBy-J735eVB6IySL5TQ4SshlHRSMX6h2WdNKGPd8gAtqJK6I4Kqd2jxirxHx6X8JYRILeQROqJc95LKBbr_DXXOEdeEPeQaplCfsfUVMs6wThs74eSxxRNsUkz5AUrNMHXtgS0hPuAQa7Zz40MEPMImOMA2jvi2Zbu7D-jQ26nA6f4_QX9-fL-7vOpufv28vlzedI4PtHbCA7OqDSWDGKkiQuqBO9UrvWLg3UDZavBcjE4KpR1ZCedg0LznlgDzSvUn6NOu9zGnp7mNNOtQHEyTjZDmYmTPW3lPG8h3oMuplAzePOawtvnZUGK2Ws3Wmdk6M5qZF61m2WLn-_55tYbxLbTz2O4f93dbnJ18ttGF8opxwbgYSMO-7TBoLjYBsikuQHQwhgyumjGF_-_4B7r_k8Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73482031</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Return to fertility after removal of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device and Nova-T</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Andersson, Kerstin ; Batar, Istvan ; Rybo, Gr̈an</creator><creatorcontrib>Andersson, Kerstin ; Batar, Istvan ; Rybo, Gr̈an</creatorcontrib><description>In a European randomized multicenter study, the efficacy and safety of an intrauterine contraceptive device releasing 20 microgram levonorgestrel/24 hours (LNG-IUD) have been evaluated and compared to the Nova-T. Because the LNG-IUD has a strongly suppressive effect on the endometrium and in some women affects ovarian function, the return to fertility after removal of the IUD was studied. Two-hundred-nine women (71 in the Nova-T and 138 in the LNG-IUD group), who had their IUDs removed because of planning pregnancy, were followed at least 24 months or until termination of pregnancy. For the Nova-T, the cumulative conception gross rate was 71.2 100 women after 12 months (79.7 after 24 months) and for the LNG-IUD 79.1 (86.6 after 24 months). The difference between the devices is not statistically significant, and in spite of the endometrial suppression during use of LNG-IUD, there is no delay of return to fertility and in both groups 96% of the pregnancies occurred during the first year after removal of the device. Eighty-four % of the pregnancies in the Nova-T group and eighty-six % in the LNG-IUD group ended in live births. The results suggest that the endometrium recovers quickly, normal ovulations are established and the fertility seems to be unaffected after use of an LNG-IUD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-7824</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(92)90122-A</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1493717</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CCPTAY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Birth control ; Female ; Fertility ; Fertilization ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Intrauterine Devices, Copper - adverse effects ; Intrauterine Devices, Medicated - adverse effects ; Levonorgestrel ; Life Tables ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Other methods of contraception. Sterilization ; Population ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Contraception (Stoneham), 1992-12, Vol.46 (6), p.575-584</ispartof><rights>1992</rights><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-5fe2a8782065d18057964c8389b2efc612b6f45dc7589c0b5cce69434a0e2f883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-5fe2a8782065d18057964c8389b2efc612b6f45dc7589c0b5cce69434a0e2f883</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/001078249290122A$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4524560$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1493717$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Andersson, Kerstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batar, Istvan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rybo, Gr̈an</creatorcontrib><title>Return to fertility after removal of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device and Nova-T</title><title>Contraception (Stoneham)</title><addtitle>Contraception</addtitle><description>In a European randomized multicenter study, the efficacy and safety of an intrauterine contraceptive device releasing 20 microgram levonorgestrel/24 hours (LNG-IUD) have been evaluated and compared to the Nova-T. Because the LNG-IUD has a strongly suppressive effect on the endometrium and in some women affects ovarian function, the return to fertility after removal of the IUD was studied. Two-hundred-nine women (71 in the Nova-T and 138 in the LNG-IUD group), who had their IUDs removed because of planning pregnancy, were followed at least 24 months or until termination of pregnancy. For the Nova-T, the cumulative conception gross rate was 71.2 100 women after 12 months (79.7 after 24 months) and for the LNG-IUD 79.1 (86.6 after 24 months). The difference between the devices is not statistically significant, and in spite of the endometrial suppression during use of LNG-IUD, there is no delay of return to fertility and in both groups 96% of the pregnancies occurred during the first year after removal of the device. Eighty-four % of the pregnancies in the Nova-T group and eighty-six % in the LNG-IUD group ended in live births. The results suggest that the endometrium recovers quickly, normal ovulations are established and the fertility seems to be unaffected after use of an LNG-IUD.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Fertilization</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intrauterine Devices, Copper - adverse effects</subject><subject>Intrauterine Devices, Medicated - adverse effects</subject><subject>Levonorgestrel</subject><subject>Life Tables</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Other methods of contraception. Sterilization</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0010-7824</issn><issn>1879-0518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFLHDEYhoNU7Gr9Bwo5lGIP0yaZZJJcCou0VRALxV4N2cwXSZlNNMks-O-bdRe99RBy-J735eVB6IySL5TQ4SshlHRSMX6h2WdNKGPd8gAtqJK6I4Kqd2jxirxHx6X8JYRILeQROqJc95LKBbr_DXXOEdeEPeQaplCfsfUVMs6wThs74eSxxRNsUkz5AUrNMHXtgS0hPuAQa7Zz40MEPMImOMA2jvi2Zbu7D-jQ26nA6f4_QX9-fL-7vOpufv28vlzedI4PtHbCA7OqDSWDGKkiQuqBO9UrvWLg3UDZavBcjE4KpR1ZCedg0LznlgDzSvUn6NOu9zGnp7mNNOtQHEyTjZDmYmTPW3lPG8h3oMuplAzePOawtvnZUGK2Ws3Wmdk6M5qZF61m2WLn-_55tYbxLbTz2O4f93dbnJ18ttGF8opxwbgYSMO-7TBoLjYBsikuQHQwhgyumjGF_-_4B7r_k8Q</recordid><startdate>19921201</startdate><enddate>19921201</enddate><creator>Andersson, Kerstin</creator><creator>Batar, Istvan</creator><creator>Rybo, Gr̈an</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19921201</creationdate><title>Return to fertility after removal of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device and Nova-T</title><author>Andersson, Kerstin ; Batar, Istvan ; Rybo, Gr̈an</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-5fe2a8782065d18057964c8389b2efc612b6f45dc7589c0b5cce69434a0e2f883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Fertilization</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intrauterine Devices, Copper - adverse effects</topic><topic>Intrauterine Devices, Medicated - adverse effects</topic><topic>Levonorgestrel</topic><topic>Life Tables</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Other methods of contraception. Sterilization</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andersson, Kerstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batar, Istvan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rybo, Gr̈an</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Contraception (Stoneham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andersson, Kerstin</au><au>Batar, Istvan</au><au>Rybo, Gr̈an</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Return to fertility after removal of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device and Nova-T</atitle><jtitle>Contraception (Stoneham)</jtitle><addtitle>Contraception</addtitle><date>1992-12-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>575</spage><epage>584</epage><pages>575-584</pages><issn>0010-7824</issn><eissn>1879-0518</eissn><coden>CCPTAY</coden><abstract>In a European randomized multicenter study, the efficacy and safety of an intrauterine contraceptive device releasing 20 microgram levonorgestrel/24 hours (LNG-IUD) have been evaluated and compared to the Nova-T. Because the LNG-IUD has a strongly suppressive effect on the endometrium and in some women affects ovarian function, the return to fertility after removal of the IUD was studied. Two-hundred-nine women (71 in the Nova-T and 138 in the LNG-IUD group), who had their IUDs removed because of planning pregnancy, were followed at least 24 months or until termination of pregnancy. For the Nova-T, the cumulative conception gross rate was 71.2 100 women after 12 months (79.7 after 24 months) and for the LNG-IUD 79.1 (86.6 after 24 months). The difference between the devices is not statistically significant, and in spite of the endometrial suppression during use of LNG-IUD, there is no delay of return to fertility and in both groups 96% of the pregnancies occurred during the first year after removal of the device. Eighty-four % of the pregnancies in the Nova-T group and eighty-six % in the LNG-IUD group ended in live births. The results suggest that the endometrium recovers quickly, normal ovulations are established and the fertility seems to be unaffected after use of an LNG-IUD.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>1493717</pmid><doi>10.1016/0010-7824(92)90122-A</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-7824
ispartof Contraception (Stoneham), 1992-12, Vol.46 (6), p.575-584
issn 0010-7824
1879-0518
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73482031
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Birth control
Female
Fertility
Fertilization
Follow-Up Studies
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Intrauterine Devices, Copper - adverse effects
Intrauterine Devices, Medicated - adverse effects
Levonorgestrel
Life Tables
Male
Medical sciences
Other methods of contraception. Sterilization
Population
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
Time Factors
title Return to fertility after removal of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device and Nova-T
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T17%3A43%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Return%20to%20fertility%20after%20removal%20of%20a%20levonorgestrel-releasing%20intrauterine%20device%20and%20Nova-T&rft.jtitle=Contraception%20(Stoneham)&rft.au=Andersson,%20Kerstin&rft.date=1992-12-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=575&rft.epage=584&rft.pages=575-584&rft.issn=0010-7824&rft.eissn=1879-0518&rft.coden=CCPTAY&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0010-7824(92)90122-A&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73482031%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73482031&rft_id=info:pmid/1493717&rft_els_id=001078249290122A&rfr_iscdi=true