Surgical technique and survival in patients having a curative resection for colon cancer
This study was performed to determine whether the adoption of a standardized technique for resection of colon cancer, based on mobilization along anatomic planes, resulted in improved survival after adjustment for other known prognostic factors. Patients undergoing a potentially curative, elective c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diseases of the colon & rectum 2003-07, Vol.46 (7), p.860-866 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 866 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 860 |
container_title | Diseases of the colon & rectum |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | BOKEY, E. L CHAPUIS, P. H DENT, O. F MANDER, B. J BISSETT, I. P NEWLAND, R. C |
description | This study was performed to determine whether the adoption of a standardized technique for resection of colon cancer, based on mobilization along anatomic planes, resulted in improved survival after adjustment for other known prognostic factors.
Patients undergoing a potentially curative, elective colonic resection at Concord Hospital from 1971 to 1995 were included. None received adjuvant therapy. Data were recorded prospectively. Overall survival and colon-cancer-specific survival were examined by the Kaplan-Meier method and proportional-hazards regression in relation to patient and tumor characteristics and the introduction of a standardized surgical technique in 1980.
Overall five-year survival rose from 48.1 percent before 1980 to 63.7 percent after 1980 (P < 0.0001); cancer-specific survival rose from 66.4 percent to 76.6 percent (P = 0.002). Factors that did not change significantly before and after 1980 were patient age and gender, tumor site, stage, grade, serosal surface involvement, and apical node metastases. The proportion of tumors > or =5 cm in diameter decreased after 1980 (61.9 to 49.2 percent, P = 0.001) but survival was unrelated to size. Venous invasion rose after 1980 (9 to 15.8 percent, P = 0.014). Multiple regression with adjustment for age, stage, grade, venous invasion, serosal surface involvement, and apical node metastases showed significantly shorter overall survival before the introduction of the standardized technique (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.2-1.8) and significantly shorter colon-cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio, 1.7; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.3-2.2). The proportion of patients having a noncurative operation because of residual tumor in a line of resection (excluded from the survival analyses) fell from 10.6 percent (confidence interval, 7-15.3 percent) before 1980 to 3.2 percent (confidence interval, 2-4.9 percent) after 1980.
As in rectal cancer surgery, mobilization of the colon along anatomic planes is an important principle that influences outcome and needs to be emphasized. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10350-004-6673-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73453652</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>829198471</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-4ea67700a27ed845109c279981cdef32ebeb9da4add6d39502e5bd4e88d9f4a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMtKxDAUhoMoOl4ewI0EQXfVk1vTLkW8geBCBXchk5xqpJOOSTvg2xuZAcFNLj_f-Tl8hBwzuGAA-jIzEAoqAFnVtRaV2CIzpkRJhGq2yQyA8UpoqPfIfs6f5Qsc9C7ZY7yRWig9I2_PU3oPzvZ0RPcRw9eE1EZP85RWYVXiEOnSjgHjmOmHXYX4Ti11UyrZCmnCjG4MQ6TdkKgb-vJyNjpMh2Sns33Go819QF5vb16u76vHp7uH66vHygklx0qirbUGsFyjb6Ri0Dqu27ZhzmMnOM5x3norrfe1F60CjmruJTaNbztppTgg5-veZRrK8nk0i5Ad9r2NOEzZaCGVqBUv4Ok_8HOYUiy7Gc4k1KwcBWJryKUh54SdWaawsOnbMDC_zs3auSnOza9zI8rMyaZ4mi_Q_01sJBfgbAPYXEx3qQgK-Y-TbVM6mfgBDFGJvA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214061140</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surgical technique and survival in patients having a curative resection for colon cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>BOKEY, E. L ; CHAPUIS, P. H ; DENT, O. F ; MANDER, B. J ; BISSETT, I. P ; NEWLAND, R. C</creator><creatorcontrib>BOKEY, E. L ; CHAPUIS, P. H ; DENT, O. F ; MANDER, B. J ; BISSETT, I. P ; NEWLAND, R. C</creatorcontrib><description>This study was performed to determine whether the adoption of a standardized technique for resection of colon cancer, based on mobilization along anatomic planes, resulted in improved survival after adjustment for other known prognostic factors.
Patients undergoing a potentially curative, elective colonic resection at Concord Hospital from 1971 to 1995 were included. None received adjuvant therapy. Data were recorded prospectively. Overall survival and colon-cancer-specific survival were examined by the Kaplan-Meier method and proportional-hazards regression in relation to patient and tumor characteristics and the introduction of a standardized surgical technique in 1980.
Overall five-year survival rose from 48.1 percent before 1980 to 63.7 percent after 1980 (P < 0.0001); cancer-specific survival rose from 66.4 percent to 76.6 percent (P = 0.002). Factors that did not change significantly before and after 1980 were patient age and gender, tumor site, stage, grade, serosal surface involvement, and apical node metastases. The proportion of tumors > or =5 cm in diameter decreased after 1980 (61.9 to 49.2 percent, P = 0.001) but survival was unrelated to size. Venous invasion rose after 1980 (9 to 15.8 percent, P = 0.014). Multiple regression with adjustment for age, stage, grade, venous invasion, serosal surface involvement, and apical node metastases showed significantly shorter overall survival before the introduction of the standardized technique (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.2-1.8) and significantly shorter colon-cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio, 1.7; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.3-2.2). The proportion of patients having a noncurative operation because of residual tumor in a line of resection (excluded from the survival analyses) fell from 10.6 percent (confidence interval, 7-15.3 percent) before 1980 to 3.2 percent (confidence interval, 2-4.9 percent) after 1980.
As in rectal cancer surgery, mobilization of the colon along anatomic planes is an important principle that influences outcome and needs to be emphasized.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-3706</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0358</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-6673-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12847357</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DICRAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Secaucus, NJ: Springer</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colectomy - methods ; Colectomy - standards ; Colonic Neoplasms - mortality ; Colonic Neoplasms - surgery ; Dissection - standards ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the digestive system ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome ; Tropical medicine</subject><ispartof>Diseases of the colon & rectum, 2003-07, Vol.46 (7), p.860-866</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-4ea67700a27ed845109c279981cdef32ebeb9da4add6d39502e5bd4e88d9f4a43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14980351$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12847357$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BOKEY, E. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHAPUIS, P. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DENT, O. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MANDER, B. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BISSETT, I. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NEWLAND, R. C</creatorcontrib><title>Surgical technique and survival in patients having a curative resection for colon cancer</title><title>Diseases of the colon & rectum</title><addtitle>Dis Colon Rectum</addtitle><description>This study was performed to determine whether the adoption of a standardized technique for resection of colon cancer, based on mobilization along anatomic planes, resulted in improved survival after adjustment for other known prognostic factors.
Patients undergoing a potentially curative, elective colonic resection at Concord Hospital from 1971 to 1995 were included. None received adjuvant therapy. Data were recorded prospectively. Overall survival and colon-cancer-specific survival were examined by the Kaplan-Meier method and proportional-hazards regression in relation to patient and tumor characteristics and the introduction of a standardized surgical technique in 1980.
Overall five-year survival rose from 48.1 percent before 1980 to 63.7 percent after 1980 (P < 0.0001); cancer-specific survival rose from 66.4 percent to 76.6 percent (P = 0.002). Factors that did not change significantly before and after 1980 were patient age and gender, tumor site, stage, grade, serosal surface involvement, and apical node metastases. The proportion of tumors > or =5 cm in diameter decreased after 1980 (61.9 to 49.2 percent, P = 0.001) but survival was unrelated to size. Venous invasion rose after 1980 (9 to 15.8 percent, P = 0.014). Multiple regression with adjustment for age, stage, grade, venous invasion, serosal surface involvement, and apical node metastases showed significantly shorter overall survival before the introduction of the standardized technique (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.2-1.8) and significantly shorter colon-cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio, 1.7; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.3-2.2). The proportion of patients having a noncurative operation because of residual tumor in a line of resection (excluded from the survival analyses) fell from 10.6 percent (confidence interval, 7-15.3 percent) before 1980 to 3.2 percent (confidence interval, 2-4.9 percent) after 1980.
As in rectal cancer surgery, mobilization of the colon along anatomic planes is an important principle that influences outcome and needs to be emphasized.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colectomy - methods</subject><subject>Colectomy - standards</subject><subject>Colonic Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Colonic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Dissection - standards</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the digestive system</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tropical medicine</subject><issn>0012-3706</issn><issn>1530-0358</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkMtKxDAUhoMoOl4ewI0EQXfVk1vTLkW8geBCBXchk5xqpJOOSTvg2xuZAcFNLj_f-Tl8hBwzuGAA-jIzEAoqAFnVtRaV2CIzpkRJhGq2yQyA8UpoqPfIfs6f5Qsc9C7ZY7yRWig9I2_PU3oPzvZ0RPcRw9eE1EZP85RWYVXiEOnSjgHjmOmHXYX4Ti11UyrZCmnCjG4MQ6TdkKgb-vJyNjpMh2Sns33Go819QF5vb16u76vHp7uH66vHygklx0qirbUGsFyjb6Ri0Dqu27ZhzmMnOM5x3norrfe1F60CjmruJTaNbztppTgg5-veZRrK8nk0i5Ad9r2NOEzZaCGVqBUv4Ok_8HOYUiy7Gc4k1KwcBWJryKUh54SdWaawsOnbMDC_zs3auSnOza9zI8rMyaZ4mi_Q_01sJBfgbAPYXEx3qQgK-Y-TbVM6mfgBDFGJvA</recordid><startdate>20030701</startdate><enddate>20030701</enddate><creator>BOKEY, E. L</creator><creator>CHAPUIS, P. H</creator><creator>DENT, O. F</creator><creator>MANDER, B. J</creator><creator>BISSETT, I. P</creator><creator>NEWLAND, R. C</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030701</creationdate><title>Surgical technique and survival in patients having a curative resection for colon cancer</title><author>BOKEY, E. L ; CHAPUIS, P. H ; DENT, O. F ; MANDER, B. J ; BISSETT, I. P ; NEWLAND, R. C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-4ea67700a27ed845109c279981cdef32ebeb9da4add6d39502e5bd4e88d9f4a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colectomy - methods</topic><topic>Colectomy - standards</topic><topic>Colonic Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Colonic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Dissection - standards</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the digestive system</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tropical medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BOKEY, E. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHAPUIS, P. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DENT, O. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MANDER, B. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BISSETT, I. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NEWLAND, R. C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Diseases of the colon & rectum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BOKEY, E. L</au><au>CHAPUIS, P. H</au><au>DENT, O. F</au><au>MANDER, B. J</au><au>BISSETT, I. P</au><au>NEWLAND, R. C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surgical technique and survival in patients having a curative resection for colon cancer</atitle><jtitle>Diseases of the colon & rectum</jtitle><addtitle>Dis Colon Rectum</addtitle><date>2003-07-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>860</spage><epage>866</epage><pages>860-866</pages><issn>0012-3706</issn><eissn>1530-0358</eissn><coden>DICRAG</coden><abstract>This study was performed to determine whether the adoption of a standardized technique for resection of colon cancer, based on mobilization along anatomic planes, resulted in improved survival after adjustment for other known prognostic factors.
Patients undergoing a potentially curative, elective colonic resection at Concord Hospital from 1971 to 1995 were included. None received adjuvant therapy. Data were recorded prospectively. Overall survival and colon-cancer-specific survival were examined by the Kaplan-Meier method and proportional-hazards regression in relation to patient and tumor characteristics and the introduction of a standardized surgical technique in 1980.
Overall five-year survival rose from 48.1 percent before 1980 to 63.7 percent after 1980 (P < 0.0001); cancer-specific survival rose from 66.4 percent to 76.6 percent (P = 0.002). Factors that did not change significantly before and after 1980 were patient age and gender, tumor site, stage, grade, serosal surface involvement, and apical node metastases. The proportion of tumors > or =5 cm in diameter decreased after 1980 (61.9 to 49.2 percent, P = 0.001) but survival was unrelated to size. Venous invasion rose after 1980 (9 to 15.8 percent, P = 0.014). Multiple regression with adjustment for age, stage, grade, venous invasion, serosal surface involvement, and apical node metastases showed significantly shorter overall survival before the introduction of the standardized technique (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.2-1.8) and significantly shorter colon-cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio, 1.7; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.3-2.2). The proportion of patients having a noncurative operation because of residual tumor in a line of resection (excluded from the survival analyses) fell from 10.6 percent (confidence interval, 7-15.3 percent) before 1980 to 3.2 percent (confidence interval, 2-4.9 percent) after 1980.
As in rectal cancer surgery, mobilization of the colon along anatomic planes is an important principle that influences outcome and needs to be emphasized.</abstract><cop>Secaucus, NJ</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>12847357</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10350-004-6673-3</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0012-3706 |
ispartof | Diseases of the colon & rectum, 2003-07, Vol.46 (7), p.860-866 |
issn | 0012-3706 1530-0358 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73453652 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Aged Biological and medical sciences Colectomy - methods Colectomy - standards Colonic Neoplasms - mortality Colonic Neoplasms - surgery Dissection - standards Female Humans Male Medical sciences Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgery of the digestive system Survival Analysis Treatment Outcome Tropical medicine |
title | Surgical technique and survival in patients having a curative resection for colon cancer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T07%3A29%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surgical%20technique%20and%20survival%20in%20patients%20having%20a%20curative%20resection%20for%20colon%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Diseases%20of%20the%20colon%20&%20rectum&rft.au=BOKEY,%20E.%20L&rft.date=2003-07-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=860&rft.epage=866&rft.pages=860-866&rft.issn=0012-3706&rft.eissn=1530-0358&rft.coden=DICRAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10350-004-6673-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E829198471%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214061140&rft_id=info:pmid/12847357&rfr_iscdi=true |