Surgical technique and survival in patients having a curative resection for colon cancer

This study was performed to determine whether the adoption of a standardized technique for resection of colon cancer, based on mobilization along anatomic planes, resulted in improved survival after adjustment for other known prognostic factors. Patients undergoing a potentially curative, elective c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diseases of the colon & rectum 2003-07, Vol.46 (7), p.860-866
Hauptverfasser: BOKEY, E. L, CHAPUIS, P. H, DENT, O. F, MANDER, B. J, BISSETT, I. P, NEWLAND, R. C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 866
container_issue 7
container_start_page 860
container_title Diseases of the colon & rectum
container_volume 46
creator BOKEY, E. L
CHAPUIS, P. H
DENT, O. F
MANDER, B. J
BISSETT, I. P
NEWLAND, R. C
description This study was performed to determine whether the adoption of a standardized technique for resection of colon cancer, based on mobilization along anatomic planes, resulted in improved survival after adjustment for other known prognostic factors. Patients undergoing a potentially curative, elective colonic resection at Concord Hospital from 1971 to 1995 were included. None received adjuvant therapy. Data were recorded prospectively. Overall survival and colon-cancer-specific survival were examined by the Kaplan-Meier method and proportional-hazards regression in relation to patient and tumor characteristics and the introduction of a standardized surgical technique in 1980. Overall five-year survival rose from 48.1 percent before 1980 to 63.7 percent after 1980 (P < 0.0001); cancer-specific survival rose from 66.4 percent to 76.6 percent (P = 0.002). Factors that did not change significantly before and after 1980 were patient age and gender, tumor site, stage, grade, serosal surface involvement, and apical node metastases. The proportion of tumors > or =5 cm in diameter decreased after 1980 (61.9 to 49.2 percent, P = 0.001) but survival was unrelated to size. Venous invasion rose after 1980 (9 to 15.8 percent, P = 0.014). Multiple regression with adjustment for age, stage, grade, venous invasion, serosal surface involvement, and apical node metastases showed significantly shorter overall survival before the introduction of the standardized technique (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.2-1.8) and significantly shorter colon-cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio, 1.7; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.3-2.2). The proportion of patients having a noncurative operation because of residual tumor in a line of resection (excluded from the survival analyses) fell from 10.6 percent (confidence interval, 7-15.3 percent) before 1980 to 3.2 percent (confidence interval, 2-4.9 percent) after 1980. As in rectal cancer surgery, mobilization of the colon along anatomic planes is an important principle that influences outcome and needs to be emphasized.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10350-004-6673-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73453652</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>829198471</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-4ea67700a27ed845109c279981cdef32ebeb9da4add6d39502e5bd4e88d9f4a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMtKxDAUhoMoOl4ewI0EQXfVk1vTLkW8geBCBXchk5xqpJOOSTvg2xuZAcFNLj_f-Tl8hBwzuGAA-jIzEAoqAFnVtRaV2CIzpkRJhGq2yQyA8UpoqPfIfs6f5Qsc9C7ZY7yRWig9I2_PU3oPzvZ0RPcRw9eE1EZP85RWYVXiEOnSjgHjmOmHXYX4Ti11UyrZCmnCjG4MQ6TdkKgb-vJyNjpMh2Sns33Go819QF5vb16u76vHp7uH66vHygklx0qirbUGsFyjb6Ri0Dqu27ZhzmMnOM5x3norrfe1F60CjmruJTaNbztppTgg5-veZRrK8nk0i5Ad9r2NOEzZaCGVqBUv4Ok_8HOYUiy7Gc4k1KwcBWJryKUh54SdWaawsOnbMDC_zs3auSnOza9zI8rMyaZ4mi_Q_01sJBfgbAPYXEx3qQgK-Y-TbVM6mfgBDFGJvA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214061140</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surgical technique and survival in patients having a curative resection for colon cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>BOKEY, E. L ; CHAPUIS, P. H ; DENT, O. F ; MANDER, B. J ; BISSETT, I. P ; NEWLAND, R. C</creator><creatorcontrib>BOKEY, E. L ; CHAPUIS, P. H ; DENT, O. F ; MANDER, B. J ; BISSETT, I. P ; NEWLAND, R. C</creatorcontrib><description>This study was performed to determine whether the adoption of a standardized technique for resection of colon cancer, based on mobilization along anatomic planes, resulted in improved survival after adjustment for other known prognostic factors. Patients undergoing a potentially curative, elective colonic resection at Concord Hospital from 1971 to 1995 were included. None received adjuvant therapy. Data were recorded prospectively. Overall survival and colon-cancer-specific survival were examined by the Kaplan-Meier method and proportional-hazards regression in relation to patient and tumor characteristics and the introduction of a standardized surgical technique in 1980. Overall five-year survival rose from 48.1 percent before 1980 to 63.7 percent after 1980 (P &lt; 0.0001); cancer-specific survival rose from 66.4 percent to 76.6 percent (P = 0.002). Factors that did not change significantly before and after 1980 were patient age and gender, tumor site, stage, grade, serosal surface involvement, and apical node metastases. The proportion of tumors &gt; or =5 cm in diameter decreased after 1980 (61.9 to 49.2 percent, P = 0.001) but survival was unrelated to size. Venous invasion rose after 1980 (9 to 15.8 percent, P = 0.014). Multiple regression with adjustment for age, stage, grade, venous invasion, serosal surface involvement, and apical node metastases showed significantly shorter overall survival before the introduction of the standardized technique (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.2-1.8) and significantly shorter colon-cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio, 1.7; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.3-2.2). The proportion of patients having a noncurative operation because of residual tumor in a line of resection (excluded from the survival analyses) fell from 10.6 percent (confidence interval, 7-15.3 percent) before 1980 to 3.2 percent (confidence interval, 2-4.9 percent) after 1980. As in rectal cancer surgery, mobilization of the colon along anatomic planes is an important principle that influences outcome and needs to be emphasized.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-3706</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0358</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-6673-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12847357</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DICRAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Secaucus, NJ: Springer</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colectomy - methods ; Colectomy - standards ; Colonic Neoplasms - mortality ; Colonic Neoplasms - surgery ; Dissection - standards ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the digestive system ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome ; Tropical medicine</subject><ispartof>Diseases of the colon &amp; rectum, 2003-07, Vol.46 (7), p.860-866</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-4ea67700a27ed845109c279981cdef32ebeb9da4add6d39502e5bd4e88d9f4a43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14980351$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12847357$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BOKEY, E. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHAPUIS, P. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DENT, O. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MANDER, B. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BISSETT, I. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NEWLAND, R. C</creatorcontrib><title>Surgical technique and survival in patients having a curative resection for colon cancer</title><title>Diseases of the colon &amp; rectum</title><addtitle>Dis Colon Rectum</addtitle><description>This study was performed to determine whether the adoption of a standardized technique for resection of colon cancer, based on mobilization along anatomic planes, resulted in improved survival after adjustment for other known prognostic factors. Patients undergoing a potentially curative, elective colonic resection at Concord Hospital from 1971 to 1995 were included. None received adjuvant therapy. Data were recorded prospectively. Overall survival and colon-cancer-specific survival were examined by the Kaplan-Meier method and proportional-hazards regression in relation to patient and tumor characteristics and the introduction of a standardized surgical technique in 1980. Overall five-year survival rose from 48.1 percent before 1980 to 63.7 percent after 1980 (P &lt; 0.0001); cancer-specific survival rose from 66.4 percent to 76.6 percent (P = 0.002). Factors that did not change significantly before and after 1980 were patient age and gender, tumor site, stage, grade, serosal surface involvement, and apical node metastases. The proportion of tumors &gt; or =5 cm in diameter decreased after 1980 (61.9 to 49.2 percent, P = 0.001) but survival was unrelated to size. Venous invasion rose after 1980 (9 to 15.8 percent, P = 0.014). Multiple regression with adjustment for age, stage, grade, venous invasion, serosal surface involvement, and apical node metastases showed significantly shorter overall survival before the introduction of the standardized technique (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.2-1.8) and significantly shorter colon-cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio, 1.7; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.3-2.2). The proportion of patients having a noncurative operation because of residual tumor in a line of resection (excluded from the survival analyses) fell from 10.6 percent (confidence interval, 7-15.3 percent) before 1980 to 3.2 percent (confidence interval, 2-4.9 percent) after 1980. As in rectal cancer surgery, mobilization of the colon along anatomic planes is an important principle that influences outcome and needs to be emphasized.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colectomy - methods</subject><subject>Colectomy - standards</subject><subject>Colonic Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Colonic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Dissection - standards</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the digestive system</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tropical medicine</subject><issn>0012-3706</issn><issn>1530-0358</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkMtKxDAUhoMoOl4ewI0EQXfVk1vTLkW8geBCBXchk5xqpJOOSTvg2xuZAcFNLj_f-Tl8hBwzuGAA-jIzEAoqAFnVtRaV2CIzpkRJhGq2yQyA8UpoqPfIfs6f5Qsc9C7ZY7yRWig9I2_PU3oPzvZ0RPcRw9eE1EZP85RWYVXiEOnSjgHjmOmHXYX4Ti11UyrZCmnCjG4MQ6TdkKgb-vJyNjpMh2Sns33Go819QF5vb16u76vHp7uH66vHygklx0qirbUGsFyjb6Ri0Dqu27ZhzmMnOM5x3norrfe1F60CjmruJTaNbztppTgg5-veZRrK8nk0i5Ad9r2NOEzZaCGVqBUv4Ok_8HOYUiy7Gc4k1KwcBWJryKUh54SdWaawsOnbMDC_zs3auSnOza9zI8rMyaZ4mi_Q_01sJBfgbAPYXEx3qQgK-Y-TbVM6mfgBDFGJvA</recordid><startdate>20030701</startdate><enddate>20030701</enddate><creator>BOKEY, E. L</creator><creator>CHAPUIS, P. H</creator><creator>DENT, O. F</creator><creator>MANDER, B. J</creator><creator>BISSETT, I. P</creator><creator>NEWLAND, R. C</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030701</creationdate><title>Surgical technique and survival in patients having a curative resection for colon cancer</title><author>BOKEY, E. L ; CHAPUIS, P. H ; DENT, O. F ; MANDER, B. J ; BISSETT, I. P ; NEWLAND, R. C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-4ea67700a27ed845109c279981cdef32ebeb9da4add6d39502e5bd4e88d9f4a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colectomy - methods</topic><topic>Colectomy - standards</topic><topic>Colonic Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Colonic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Dissection - standards</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the digestive system</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tropical medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BOKEY, E. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHAPUIS, P. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DENT, O. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MANDER, B. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BISSETT, I. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NEWLAND, R. C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Diseases of the colon &amp; rectum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BOKEY, E. L</au><au>CHAPUIS, P. H</au><au>DENT, O. F</au><au>MANDER, B. J</au><au>BISSETT, I. P</au><au>NEWLAND, R. C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surgical technique and survival in patients having a curative resection for colon cancer</atitle><jtitle>Diseases of the colon &amp; rectum</jtitle><addtitle>Dis Colon Rectum</addtitle><date>2003-07-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>860</spage><epage>866</epage><pages>860-866</pages><issn>0012-3706</issn><eissn>1530-0358</eissn><coden>DICRAG</coden><abstract>This study was performed to determine whether the adoption of a standardized technique for resection of colon cancer, based on mobilization along anatomic planes, resulted in improved survival after adjustment for other known prognostic factors. Patients undergoing a potentially curative, elective colonic resection at Concord Hospital from 1971 to 1995 were included. None received adjuvant therapy. Data were recorded prospectively. Overall survival and colon-cancer-specific survival were examined by the Kaplan-Meier method and proportional-hazards regression in relation to patient and tumor characteristics and the introduction of a standardized surgical technique in 1980. Overall five-year survival rose from 48.1 percent before 1980 to 63.7 percent after 1980 (P &lt; 0.0001); cancer-specific survival rose from 66.4 percent to 76.6 percent (P = 0.002). Factors that did not change significantly before and after 1980 were patient age and gender, tumor site, stage, grade, serosal surface involvement, and apical node metastases. The proportion of tumors &gt; or =5 cm in diameter decreased after 1980 (61.9 to 49.2 percent, P = 0.001) but survival was unrelated to size. Venous invasion rose after 1980 (9 to 15.8 percent, P = 0.014). Multiple regression with adjustment for age, stage, grade, venous invasion, serosal surface involvement, and apical node metastases showed significantly shorter overall survival before the introduction of the standardized technique (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.2-1.8) and significantly shorter colon-cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio, 1.7; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.3-2.2). The proportion of patients having a noncurative operation because of residual tumor in a line of resection (excluded from the survival analyses) fell from 10.6 percent (confidence interval, 7-15.3 percent) before 1980 to 3.2 percent (confidence interval, 2-4.9 percent) after 1980. As in rectal cancer surgery, mobilization of the colon along anatomic planes is an important principle that influences outcome and needs to be emphasized.</abstract><cop>Secaucus, NJ</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>12847357</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10350-004-6673-3</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-3706
ispartof Diseases of the colon & rectum, 2003-07, Vol.46 (7), p.860-866
issn 0012-3706
1530-0358
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73453652
source MEDLINE; Springer Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Colectomy - methods
Colectomy - standards
Colonic Neoplasms - mortality
Colonic Neoplasms - surgery
Dissection - standards
Female
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgery of the digestive system
Survival Analysis
Treatment Outcome
Tropical medicine
title Surgical technique and survival in patients having a curative resection for colon cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T07%3A29%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surgical%20technique%20and%20survival%20in%20patients%20having%20a%20curative%20resection%20for%20colon%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Diseases%20of%20the%20colon%20&%20rectum&rft.au=BOKEY,%20E.%20L&rft.date=2003-07-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=860&rft.epage=866&rft.pages=860-866&rft.issn=0012-3706&rft.eissn=1530-0358&rft.coden=DICRAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10350-004-6673-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E829198471%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214061140&rft_id=info:pmid/12847357&rfr_iscdi=true