Effect of Massage Technique on Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Cancer of the Breast
Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping has substantially changed the nature of surgery for cancer of the breast. Variables such as tracer type, volume, injection site, timing, and surgical experience have all been extensively evaluated. However, little attention has been paid to the technique of massage...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American surgeon 2003-06, Vol.69 (6), p.520-522 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 522 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 520 |
container_title | The American surgeon |
container_volume | 69 |
creator | Haynes, Georgia Garske, Diane Case, Doug Shen, Perry Levine, Edward A. Perrier, Nancy D. |
description | Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping has substantially changed the nature of surgery for cancer of the breast. Variables such as tracer type, volume, injection site, timing, and surgical experience have all been extensively evaluated. However, little attention has been paid to the technique of massage for SLN procedures. We sought to evaluate the effects of three different massage techniques on mapping success or accuracy of SLN mapping for breast cancer. All lymphatic mapping procedures for breast cancer at our tertiary-care center were performed by three experienced surgeons using both colloid and dye followed by a 5-minute massage. All data pertaining to SLN identification, histopathology, tumor characteristics, and patient demographics were entered into the Breast Care Center database. Consistent and uniquely differing massage techniques classified as resuscitative, buffer, or knead-like were each used by a specific surgeon. The last 25 consecutive cases performed by two surgeons and the last 24 by one surgeon were evaluated. The overall rate of SLN identification was 97 per cent, and the overall accuracy was 98.7 per cent. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of SLN identification or accuracy between techniques. The proportions of blue-stained SLNs were similar, but the resuscitative technique yielded fewer hot SLNs (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.02). This method also yielded one false negative case. The three different massage techniques yielded a similar number of blue-stained SLNs. The resuscitative technique yielded fewer hot SLNs than the kneading and buffer methods. Our results failed to demonstrate a superior breast massage technique for identifying sentinel nodes. A larger randomized trial is needed to confirm these findings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/000313480306900612 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73444340</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_000313480306900612</sage_id><sourcerecordid>425114101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-2ba6dfc11653b00c5840bdf7ffb075d6cf0b34e13445a871dfd32fbee575015b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1LwzAUhoMobk7_gBcSBL2rO2mSflzqmB8w9WLzuqTpydbRtTXpLvbvTdlgoODVIfC857w8IeSawQNjcTwGAM64SIBDlAJELDwhQyalDNIk5Kdk2ANBTwzIhXNr_xSRZOdkwMJEhpKxIZlPjUHd0cbQd-WcWiJdoF7V5fcWaVPTOdZdWWNFZ7tNu6IfTYEebNuyXlLTWDpRtUbbx7sV0ieLynWX5MyoyuHVYY7I1_N0MXkNZp8vb5PHWaB5GnVBmKuoMJqxSPIcQMtEQF6Y2JgcYllE2kDOBfr-QqokZoUpeGhyRBlLYDLnI3K_39vaxtd1XbYpncaqUjU2W5fFPim4AA_e_gLXzdbWvlsWehXepRQeCveQto1zFk3W2nKj7C5jkPW-s7--fejmsHmbb7A4Rg6CPXB3AJTTqjLW-yrdkRNpmkKUeG685_ovONb75_QPUuyS1A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212817754</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Massage Technique on Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Cancer of the Breast</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Haynes, Georgia ; Garske, Diane ; Case, Doug ; Shen, Perry ; Levine, Edward A. ; Perrier, Nancy D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Haynes, Georgia ; Garske, Diane ; Case, Doug ; Shen, Perry ; Levine, Edward A. ; Perrier, Nancy D.</creatorcontrib><description>Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping has substantially changed the nature of surgery for cancer of the breast. Variables such as tracer type, volume, injection site, timing, and surgical experience have all been extensively evaluated. However, little attention has been paid to the technique of massage for SLN procedures. We sought to evaluate the effects of three different massage techniques on mapping success or accuracy of SLN mapping for breast cancer. All lymphatic mapping procedures for breast cancer at our tertiary-care center were performed by three experienced surgeons using both colloid and dye followed by a 5-minute massage. All data pertaining to SLN identification, histopathology, tumor characteristics, and patient demographics were entered into the Breast Care Center database. Consistent and uniquely differing massage techniques classified as resuscitative, buffer, or knead-like were each used by a specific surgeon. The last 25 consecutive cases performed by two surgeons and the last 24 by one surgeon were evaluated. The overall rate of SLN identification was 97 per cent, and the overall accuracy was 98.7 per cent. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of SLN identification or accuracy between techniques. The proportions of blue-stained SLNs were similar, but the resuscitative technique yielded fewer hot SLNs (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.02). This method also yielded one false negative case. The three different massage techniques yielded a similar number of blue-stained SLNs. The resuscitative technique yielded fewer hot SLNs than the kneading and buffer methods. Our results failed to demonstrate a superior breast massage technique for identifying sentinel nodes. A larger randomized trial is needed to confirm these findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-1348</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-9823</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/000313480306900612</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12852511</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMSUAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Axilla ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Female ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Lymph Nodes - surgery ; Lymphatic system ; Mammary gland diseases ; Massage ; Massage - methods ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Radiopharmaceuticals ; Rosaniline Dyes ; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland ; Technetium Tc 99m Sulfur Colloid ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>The American surgeon, 2003-06, Vol.69 (6), p.520-522</ispartof><rights>2003 Southeastern Surgical Congress</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright The Southeastern Surgical Congress Jun 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-2ba6dfc11653b00c5840bdf7ffb075d6cf0b34e13445a871dfd32fbee575015b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-2ba6dfc11653b00c5840bdf7ffb075d6cf0b34e13445a871dfd32fbee575015b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/000313480306900612$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000313480306900612$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>310,311,315,781,785,790,791,21824,23935,23936,25145,27929,27930,43626,43627</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14999068$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12852511$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haynes, Georgia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garske, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Case, Doug</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Perry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, Edward A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrier, Nancy D.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Massage Technique on Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Cancer of the Breast</title><title>The American surgeon</title><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><description>Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping has substantially changed the nature of surgery for cancer of the breast. Variables such as tracer type, volume, injection site, timing, and surgical experience have all been extensively evaluated. However, little attention has been paid to the technique of massage for SLN procedures. We sought to evaluate the effects of three different massage techniques on mapping success or accuracy of SLN mapping for breast cancer. All lymphatic mapping procedures for breast cancer at our tertiary-care center were performed by three experienced surgeons using both colloid and dye followed by a 5-minute massage. All data pertaining to SLN identification, histopathology, tumor characteristics, and patient demographics were entered into the Breast Care Center database. Consistent and uniquely differing massage techniques classified as resuscitative, buffer, or knead-like were each used by a specific surgeon. The last 25 consecutive cases performed by two surgeons and the last 24 by one surgeon were evaluated. The overall rate of SLN identification was 97 per cent, and the overall accuracy was 98.7 per cent. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of SLN identification or accuracy between techniques. The proportions of blue-stained SLNs were similar, but the resuscitative technique yielded fewer hot SLNs (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.02). This method also yielded one false negative case. The three different massage techniques yielded a similar number of blue-stained SLNs. The resuscitative technique yielded fewer hot SLNs than the kneading and buffer methods. Our results failed to demonstrate a superior breast massage technique for identifying sentinel nodes. A larger randomized trial is needed to confirm these findings.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Axilla</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - surgery</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>Massage</subject><subject>Massage - methods</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Radiopharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Rosaniline Dyes</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland</subject><subject>Technetium Tc 99m Sulfur Colloid</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0003-1348</issn><issn>1555-9823</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV1LwzAUhoMobk7_gBcSBL2rO2mSflzqmB8w9WLzuqTpydbRtTXpLvbvTdlgoODVIfC857w8IeSawQNjcTwGAM64SIBDlAJELDwhQyalDNIk5Kdk2ANBTwzIhXNr_xSRZOdkwMJEhpKxIZlPjUHd0cbQd-WcWiJdoF7V5fcWaVPTOdZdWWNFZ7tNu6IfTYEebNuyXlLTWDpRtUbbx7sV0ieLynWX5MyoyuHVYY7I1_N0MXkNZp8vb5PHWaB5GnVBmKuoMJqxSPIcQMtEQF6Y2JgcYllE2kDOBfr-QqokZoUpeGhyRBlLYDLnI3K_39vaxtd1XbYpncaqUjU2W5fFPim4AA_e_gLXzdbWvlsWehXepRQeCveQto1zFk3W2nKj7C5jkPW-s7--fejmsHmbb7A4Rg6CPXB3AJTTqjLW-yrdkRNpmkKUeG685_ovONb75_QPUuyS1A</recordid><startdate>20030601</startdate><enddate>20030601</enddate><creator>Haynes, Georgia</creator><creator>Garske, Diane</creator><creator>Case, Doug</creator><creator>Shen, Perry</creator><creator>Levine, Edward A.</creator><creator>Perrier, Nancy D.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Southeastern Surgical Congress</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030601</creationdate><title>Effect of Massage Technique on Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Cancer of the Breast</title><author>Haynes, Georgia ; Garske, Diane ; Case, Doug ; Shen, Perry ; Levine, Edward A. ; Perrier, Nancy D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-2ba6dfc11653b00c5840bdf7ffb075d6cf0b34e13445a871dfd32fbee575015b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Axilla</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - surgery</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>Massage</topic><topic>Massage - methods</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Radiopharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Rosaniline Dyes</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland</topic><topic>Technetium Tc 99m Sulfur Colloid</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haynes, Georgia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garske, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Case, Doug</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Perry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, Edward A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrier, Nancy D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haynes, Georgia</au><au>Garske, Diane</au><au>Case, Doug</au><au>Shen, Perry</au><au>Levine, Edward A.</au><au>Perrier, Nancy D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Massage Technique on Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Cancer of the Breast</atitle><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><date>2003-06-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>520</spage><epage>522</epage><pages>520-522</pages><issn>0003-1348</issn><eissn>1555-9823</eissn><coden>AMSUAW</coden><abstract>Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping has substantially changed the nature of surgery for cancer of the breast. Variables such as tracer type, volume, injection site, timing, and surgical experience have all been extensively evaluated. However, little attention has been paid to the technique of massage for SLN procedures. We sought to evaluate the effects of three different massage techniques on mapping success or accuracy of SLN mapping for breast cancer. All lymphatic mapping procedures for breast cancer at our tertiary-care center were performed by three experienced surgeons using both colloid and dye followed by a 5-minute massage. All data pertaining to SLN identification, histopathology, tumor characteristics, and patient demographics were entered into the Breast Care Center database. Consistent and uniquely differing massage techniques classified as resuscitative, buffer, or knead-like were each used by a specific surgeon. The last 25 consecutive cases performed by two surgeons and the last 24 by one surgeon were evaluated. The overall rate of SLN identification was 97 per cent, and the overall accuracy was 98.7 per cent. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of SLN identification or accuracy between techniques. The proportions of blue-stained SLNs were similar, but the resuscitative technique yielded fewer hot SLNs (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.02). This method also yielded one false negative case. The three different massage techniques yielded a similar number of blue-stained SLNs. The resuscitative technique yielded fewer hot SLNs than the kneading and buffer methods. Our results failed to demonstrate a superior breast massage technique for identifying sentinel nodes. A larger randomized trial is needed to confirm these findings.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>12852511</pmid><doi>10.1177/000313480306900612</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-1348 |
ispartof | The American surgeon, 2003-06, Vol.69 (6), p.520-522 |
issn | 0003-1348 1555-9823 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73444340 |
source | Access via SAGE; MEDLINE |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Axilla Biological and medical sciences Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - surgery Female Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Lymph Nodes - surgery Lymphatic system Mammary gland diseases Massage Massage - methods Medical sciences Middle Aged Radiopharmaceuticals Rosaniline Dyes Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland Technetium Tc 99m Sulfur Colloid Tumors |
title | Effect of Massage Technique on Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Cancer of the Breast |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T20%3A07%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Massage%20Technique%20on%20Sentinel%20Lymph%20Node%20Mapping%20for%20Cancer%20of%20the%20Breast&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20surgeon&rft.au=Haynes,%20Georgia&rft.date=2003-06-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=520&rft.epage=522&rft.pages=520-522&rft.issn=0003-1348&rft.eissn=1555-9823&rft.coden=AMSUAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/000313480306900612&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E425114101%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212817754&rft_id=info:pmid/12852511&rft_sage_id=10.1177_000313480306900612&rfr_iscdi=true |