The Effects of Stimulus Frequency and Recording Site on the Amplitude and Latency of Multichannel Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential (CAEP) Component N1

ABSTRACTMagnetoencephalographic (MEG) applications in auditory evoked field (AEF) recordings have demonstrated that both tonotopicity and amplitopicity exist in the auditory cortex. The present study was conducted to determine whether previously reported characteristics of the AEF could be identifie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ear and hearing 1992-10, Vol.13 (5), p.300-306
Hauptverfasser: Jacobson, Gary P, Lombardi, Donna M, Gibbens, Noreen D, Ahmad, B K, Newman, Craig W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 306
container_issue 5
container_start_page 300
container_title Ear and hearing
container_volume 13
creator Jacobson, Gary P
Lombardi, Donna M
Gibbens, Noreen D
Ahmad, B K
Newman, Craig W
description ABSTRACTMagnetoencephalographic (MEG) applications in auditory evoked field (AEF) recordings have demonstrated that both tonotopicity and amplitopicity exist in the auditory cortex. The present study was conducted to determine whether previously reported characteristics of the AEF could be identified in multichannel cortical auditory evoked potential N1e (e.g., the electrical correlate of the magnetically recorded N1m) component recordings. Multichannel auditory evoked potentials from 11 young normal adults were collected after monaural tone burst stimuli of 250, 1000, and 4000 Hz. Results demonstrated that N1e amplitudes after stimulation at 250 Hz were significantly larger than those obtained after stimulation at 1000 or 4000 Hz. These frequency-specific differences existed for latency as well. Responses obtained after stimulation at 250 Hz were, on the average, 13 msec longer than those obtained after stimulation at 1000 or 4000 Hz. Also, contralateral latencies were significantly shorter than ipsilateral latencies. Although the significant frequency-specific amplitude results support the findings of previous investigators, the frequency-related latency differences have not been described. An explanation of these differences may exist in the spatial differences in the reception areas for low- and high-frequency tones in the primary auditory cortex.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00003446-199210000-00007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73439216</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>73439216</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3847-f80139f459988930febae5876fbe4f1d9a89cca4e79f023b08fe9f3e7549e27d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kl1vFCEUhonR1G31J5hwYYxejIWBHeBys9lqk9U2tl5PWObgYplhC4zN_pP-XNmP1iu5gJxznvfw8YIQpuQzJUqckzIY501FlarpLqp2k3iBJnTKZMWbRrxEE0JVU5Ga1K_RaUq_CaG1avgJOqFcCiLVBD3ergEvrAWTEw4W32TXj35M-CLC_QiD2WI9dPgHmBA7N_zCNy4DDgPORTfrN97lsYM9s9R5z5cu30afnVnrYQCP5yGWQHs8GzuXQ9zixZ9wBx2-DkWQXal8nM8W158K2W_CUHL4O32DXlntE7w9rmfo58Xidv61Wl59uZzPlpVhkovKSkKZsnyqlJSKEQsrDVMpGrsCbmmntFTGaA5CWVKzFZEWlGUgplxBLTp2hj4c-m5iKBdOue1dMuC9HiCMqRWMs_LETQHlATQxpBTBtpvoeh23LSXtzpT2yZT22ZR9ShTpu-Me46qH7p_w4EKpvz_WdSoPZaMejEvPWDkAqWteMH7AHoLPENOdHx8gtmvQPq_b_30J9hfgSqSG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73439216</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effects of Stimulus Frequency and Recording Site on the Amplitude and Latency of Multichannel Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential (CAEP) Component N1</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Jacobson, Gary P ; Lombardi, Donna M ; Gibbens, Noreen D ; Ahmad, B K ; Newman, Craig W</creator><creatorcontrib>Jacobson, Gary P ; Lombardi, Donna M ; Gibbens, Noreen D ; Ahmad, B K ; Newman, Craig W</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACTMagnetoencephalographic (MEG) applications in auditory evoked field (AEF) recordings have demonstrated that both tonotopicity and amplitopicity exist in the auditory cortex. The present study was conducted to determine whether previously reported characteristics of the AEF could be identified in multichannel cortical auditory evoked potential N1e (e.g., the electrical correlate of the magnetically recorded N1m) component recordings. Multichannel auditory evoked potentials from 11 young normal adults were collected after monaural tone burst stimuli of 250, 1000, and 4000 Hz. Results demonstrated that N1e amplitudes after stimulation at 250 Hz were significantly larger than those obtained after stimulation at 1000 or 4000 Hz. These frequency-specific differences existed for latency as well. Responses obtained after stimulation at 250 Hz were, on the average, 13 msec longer than those obtained after stimulation at 1000 or 4000 Hz. Also, contralateral latencies were significantly shorter than ipsilateral latencies. Although the significant frequency-specific amplitude results support the findings of previous investigators, the frequency-related latency differences have not been described. An explanation of these differences may exist in the spatial differences in the reception areas for low- and high-frequency tones in the primary auditory cortex.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-0202</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4667</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199210000-00007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1487089</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EAHEDS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore, MD: Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation ; Adult ; Auditory Cortex - physiology ; Auditory Pathways - physiology ; Auditory Perception - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain Mapping ; Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem - physiology ; Female ; Hearing - physiology ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous. Technology</subject><ispartof>Ear and hearing, 1992-10, Vol.13 (5), p.300-306</ispartof><rights>Williams &amp; Wilkins 1992. All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3847-f80139f459988930febae5876fbe4f1d9a89cca4e79f023b08fe9f3e7549e27d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4390224$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1487089$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jacobson, Gary P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lombardi, Donna M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbens, Noreen D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmad, B K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newman, Craig W</creatorcontrib><title>The Effects of Stimulus Frequency and Recording Site on the Amplitude and Latency of Multichannel Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential (CAEP) Component N1</title><title>Ear and hearing</title><addtitle>Ear Hear</addtitle><description>ABSTRACTMagnetoencephalographic (MEG) applications in auditory evoked field (AEF) recordings have demonstrated that both tonotopicity and amplitopicity exist in the auditory cortex. The present study was conducted to determine whether previously reported characteristics of the AEF could be identified in multichannel cortical auditory evoked potential N1e (e.g., the electrical correlate of the magnetically recorded N1m) component recordings. Multichannel auditory evoked potentials from 11 young normal adults were collected after monaural tone burst stimuli of 250, 1000, and 4000 Hz. Results demonstrated that N1e amplitudes after stimulation at 250 Hz were significantly larger than those obtained after stimulation at 1000 or 4000 Hz. These frequency-specific differences existed for latency as well. Responses obtained after stimulation at 250 Hz were, on the average, 13 msec longer than those obtained after stimulation at 1000 or 4000 Hz. Also, contralateral latencies were significantly shorter than ipsilateral latencies. Although the significant frequency-specific amplitude results support the findings of previous investigators, the frequency-related latency differences have not been described. An explanation of these differences may exist in the spatial differences in the reception areas for low- and high-frequency tones in the primary auditory cortex.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Auditory Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>Auditory Pathways - physiology</subject><subject>Auditory Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hearing - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous. Technology</subject><issn>0196-0202</issn><issn>1538-4667</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kl1vFCEUhonR1G31J5hwYYxejIWBHeBys9lqk9U2tl5PWObgYplhC4zN_pP-XNmP1iu5gJxznvfw8YIQpuQzJUqckzIY501FlarpLqp2k3iBJnTKZMWbRrxEE0JVU5Ga1K_RaUq_CaG1avgJOqFcCiLVBD3ergEvrAWTEw4W32TXj35M-CLC_QiD2WI9dPgHmBA7N_zCNy4DDgPORTfrN97lsYM9s9R5z5cu30afnVnrYQCP5yGWQHs8GzuXQ9zixZ9wBx2-DkWQXal8nM8W158K2W_CUHL4O32DXlntE7w9rmfo58Xidv61Wl59uZzPlpVhkovKSkKZsnyqlJSKEQsrDVMpGrsCbmmntFTGaA5CWVKzFZEWlGUgplxBLTp2hj4c-m5iKBdOue1dMuC9HiCMqRWMs_LETQHlATQxpBTBtpvoeh23LSXtzpT2yZT22ZR9ShTpu-Me46qH7p_w4EKpvz_WdSoPZaMejEvPWDkAqWteMH7AHoLPENOdHx8gtmvQPq_b_30J9hfgSqSG</recordid><startdate>199210</startdate><enddate>199210</enddate><creator>Jacobson, Gary P</creator><creator>Lombardi, Donna M</creator><creator>Gibbens, Noreen D</creator><creator>Ahmad, B K</creator><creator>Newman, Craig W</creator><general>Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199210</creationdate><title>The Effects of Stimulus Frequency and Recording Site on the Amplitude and Latency of Multichannel Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential (CAEP) Component N1</title><author>Jacobson, Gary P ; Lombardi, Donna M ; Gibbens, Noreen D ; Ahmad, B K ; Newman, Craig W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3847-f80139f459988930febae5876fbe4f1d9a89cca4e79f023b08fe9f3e7549e27d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Auditory Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>Auditory Pathways - physiology</topic><topic>Auditory Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hearing - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous. Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jacobson, Gary P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lombardi, Donna M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbens, Noreen D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmad, B K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newman, Craig W</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Ear and hearing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jacobson, Gary P</au><au>Lombardi, Donna M</au><au>Gibbens, Noreen D</au><au>Ahmad, B K</au><au>Newman, Craig W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effects of Stimulus Frequency and Recording Site on the Amplitude and Latency of Multichannel Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential (CAEP) Component N1</atitle><jtitle>Ear and hearing</jtitle><addtitle>Ear Hear</addtitle><date>1992-10</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>300</spage><epage>306</epage><pages>300-306</pages><issn>0196-0202</issn><eissn>1538-4667</eissn><coden>EAHEDS</coden><abstract>ABSTRACTMagnetoencephalographic (MEG) applications in auditory evoked field (AEF) recordings have demonstrated that both tonotopicity and amplitopicity exist in the auditory cortex. The present study was conducted to determine whether previously reported characteristics of the AEF could be identified in multichannel cortical auditory evoked potential N1e (e.g., the electrical correlate of the magnetically recorded N1m) component recordings. Multichannel auditory evoked potentials from 11 young normal adults were collected after monaural tone burst stimuli of 250, 1000, and 4000 Hz. Results demonstrated that N1e amplitudes after stimulation at 250 Hz were significantly larger than those obtained after stimulation at 1000 or 4000 Hz. These frequency-specific differences existed for latency as well. Responses obtained after stimulation at 250 Hz were, on the average, 13 msec longer than those obtained after stimulation at 1000 or 4000 Hz. Also, contralateral latencies were significantly shorter than ipsilateral latencies. Although the significant frequency-specific amplitude results support the findings of previous investigators, the frequency-related latency differences have not been described. An explanation of these differences may exist in the spatial differences in the reception areas for low- and high-frequency tones in the primary auditory cortex.</abstract><cop>Baltimore, MD</cop><pub>Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>1487089</pmid><doi>10.1097/00003446-199210000-00007</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-0202
ispartof Ear and hearing, 1992-10, Vol.13 (5), p.300-306
issn 0196-0202
1538-4667
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73439216
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Acoustic Stimulation
Adult
Auditory Cortex - physiology
Auditory Pathways - physiology
Auditory Perception - physiology
Biological and medical sciences
Brain Mapping
Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording
Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem - physiology
Female
Hearing - physiology
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Male
Medical sciences
Miscellaneous. Technology
title The Effects of Stimulus Frequency and Recording Site on the Amplitude and Latency of Multichannel Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential (CAEP) Component N1
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T17%3A39%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effects%20of%20Stimulus%20Frequency%20and%20Recording%20Site%20on%20the%20Amplitude%20and%20Latency%20of%20Multichannel%20Cortical%20Auditory%20Evoked%20Potential%20(CAEP)%20Component%20N1&rft.jtitle=Ear%20and%20hearing&rft.au=Jacobson,%20Gary%20P&rft.date=1992-10&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=300&rft.epage=306&rft.pages=300-306&rft.issn=0196-0202&rft.eissn=1538-4667&rft.coden=EAHEDS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00003446-199210000-00007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73439216%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73439216&rft_id=info:pmid/1487089&rfr_iscdi=true