Improved survival of cardiac transplantation candidates with implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy: role of beta-blocker or amiodarone treatment
Survival in patients awaiting cardiac transplantation is poor due to the severity of left ventricular dysfunction and the susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmia. The potential role of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in this group of patients has been the subject of increasing intere...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology 2003-06, Vol.14 (6), p.578-583 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 583 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 578 |
container_title | Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Ermis, Cengiz Zadeii, Gino Zhu, Alan X Fabian, William Collins, Joanne Lurie, Keith G Sakaguchi, Scott Benditt, David G |
description | Survival in patients awaiting cardiac transplantation is poor due to the severity of left ventricular dysfunction and the susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmia. The potential role of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in this group of patients has been the subject of increasing interest. The aims of this study were to ascertain whether ICDs improve the survival rate of patients on the waiting list for cardiac transplantation and whether any improvement is independent of concomitant beta-blocker or amiodarone therapy.
Data comprised findings from 310 consecutive patients at a single center who were evaluated and deemed suitable for cardiac transplantation and placed on the waiting list. Kaplan-Meier actuarial approach was used for survival analysis. Survival analysis censored patients at time of transplantation or death. Of the 310 patients, 111 (35.8%) underwent successful cardiac transplantation and 164 (52.9%) died while waiting; 35 patients remain on the waiting list. Fifty-nine (19%) patients had ICD placement for ventricular arrhythmias prior to or after being listed. Twenty-nine (49.1%) ICD patients survived until cardiac transplantation, 13 (22%) patients died, and 17 (28.8%) remain on the waiting list. Among non-ICD patients, 82 (32.7%) received transplants, 151 (60.2%) died, and 18 (7.2%) remain on the waiting list. Survival rates at 6 months and 1, 2, 3, and 4 years were better for all ICD patients compared to non-ICD patients (log-rank x2, P = 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, ICD therapy and beta-blocker treatment were the strongest predictors of survival. Further, ICD treatment was associated with improved survival independent of concomitant treatment with beta-blocker or amiodarone. Among ICD and non-ICD patients treated with a beta-blocker or amiodarone, survivals at the 1 and 4 years were 93% vs 69% and 57% vs 32%, respectively (log-rank x2, P = 0.003).
ICD therapy is associated with improved survival in high-risk cardiac transplant candidates, and ICD benefit appears to be independent of concomitant treatment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2003.02590.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73436986</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>73436986</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-b548ded9181c00fcb8de469259a963ef3caf88584e5ee7a2ce0ed48ac29a6f893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFUctuFDEQtCIQecAvIJ-4zWCPH-PhhiICkSJxIWerx-5RvJkZL7Z3ST4lf4uXXZFTu7urqq0qQihnLWdSf960XEnWGK77tmNMtKxTA2ufzsjF_8Wb-mZSNcL04pxc5rxhjAvN1DtyzjvTK8n1BXm5XbYp7tHTvEv7sIeZxok6SD6AoyXBmrczrAVKiGudrz54KJjpn1AeaFiOy3HGI6cqpYKJepzCmMI8Q4mJlgdMsH3-QlOswKo_YoFmnKN7rNgKgCVEDymuWE8ilAXX8p68nWDO-OFUr8j9zbdf1z-au5_fb6-_3jWuU7o0o5LGox-44Y6xyY21k3qofsCgBU7CwWSMMhIVYg-dQ4ZeGnDdAHoyg7gin4661YffO8zFLiE7rF9fMe6y7YUUejC6As0R6FLMOeFktykskJ4tZ_YQi93Yg_v24L49xGL_xWKfKvXj6cZuXNC_Ek85iL_wd49j</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73436986</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improved survival of cardiac transplantation candidates with implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy: role of beta-blocker or amiodarone treatment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Ermis, Cengiz ; Zadeii, Gino ; Zhu, Alan X ; Fabian, William ; Collins, Joanne ; Lurie, Keith G ; Sakaguchi, Scott ; Benditt, David G</creator><creatorcontrib>Ermis, Cengiz ; Zadeii, Gino ; Zhu, Alan X ; Fabian, William ; Collins, Joanne ; Lurie, Keith G ; Sakaguchi, Scott ; Benditt, David G</creatorcontrib><description>Survival in patients awaiting cardiac transplantation is poor due to the severity of left ventricular dysfunction and the susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmia. The potential role of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in this group of patients has been the subject of increasing interest. The aims of this study were to ascertain whether ICDs improve the survival rate of patients on the waiting list for cardiac transplantation and whether any improvement is independent of concomitant beta-blocker or amiodarone therapy.
Data comprised findings from 310 consecutive patients at a single center who were evaluated and deemed suitable for cardiac transplantation and placed on the waiting list. Kaplan-Meier actuarial approach was used for survival analysis. Survival analysis censored patients at time of transplantation or death. Of the 310 patients, 111 (35.8%) underwent successful cardiac transplantation and 164 (52.9%) died while waiting; 35 patients remain on the waiting list. Fifty-nine (19%) patients had ICD placement for ventricular arrhythmias prior to or after being listed. Twenty-nine (49.1%) ICD patients survived until cardiac transplantation, 13 (22%) patients died, and 17 (28.8%) remain on the waiting list. Among non-ICD patients, 82 (32.7%) received transplants, 151 (60.2%) died, and 18 (7.2%) remain on the waiting list. Survival rates at 6 months and 1, 2, 3, and 4 years were better for all ICD patients compared to non-ICD patients (log-rank x2, P = 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, ICD therapy and beta-blocker treatment were the strongest predictors of survival. Further, ICD treatment was associated with improved survival independent of concomitant treatment with beta-blocker or amiodarone. Among ICD and non-ICD patients treated with a beta-blocker or amiodarone, survivals at the 1 and 4 years were 93% vs 69% and 57% vs 32%, respectively (log-rank x2, P = 0.003).
ICD therapy is associated with improved survival in high-risk cardiac transplant candidates, and ICD benefit appears to be independent of concomitant treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1045-3873</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8167</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2003.02590.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12875416</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adrenergic beta-Antagonists - therapeutic use ; Adult ; Amiodarone - therapeutic use ; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents - therapeutic use ; Arrhythmias, Cardiac - mortality ; Arrhythmias, Cardiac - therapy ; Cardiomyopathies - mortality ; Cardiomyopathies - therapy ; Combined Modality Therapy - mortality ; Defibrillators, Implantable ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Heart Transplantation - mortality ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Minnesota ; Multivariate Analysis ; Myocardial Ischemia - mortality ; Myocardial Ischemia - therapy ; Risk Factors ; Stroke Volume - physiology ; Survival Analysis ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Waiting Lists</subject><ispartof>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2003-06, Vol.14 (6), p.578-583</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-b548ded9181c00fcb8de469259a963ef3caf88584e5ee7a2ce0ed48ac29a6f893</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12875416$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ermis, Cengiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zadeii, Gino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Alan X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabian, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lurie, Keith G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakaguchi, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benditt, David G</creatorcontrib><title>Improved survival of cardiac transplantation candidates with implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy: role of beta-blocker or amiodarone treatment</title><title>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology</title><addtitle>J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol</addtitle><description>Survival in patients awaiting cardiac transplantation is poor due to the severity of left ventricular dysfunction and the susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmia. The potential role of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in this group of patients has been the subject of increasing interest. The aims of this study were to ascertain whether ICDs improve the survival rate of patients on the waiting list for cardiac transplantation and whether any improvement is independent of concomitant beta-blocker or amiodarone therapy.
Data comprised findings from 310 consecutive patients at a single center who were evaluated and deemed suitable for cardiac transplantation and placed on the waiting list. Kaplan-Meier actuarial approach was used for survival analysis. Survival analysis censored patients at time of transplantation or death. Of the 310 patients, 111 (35.8%) underwent successful cardiac transplantation and 164 (52.9%) died while waiting; 35 patients remain on the waiting list. Fifty-nine (19%) patients had ICD placement for ventricular arrhythmias prior to or after being listed. Twenty-nine (49.1%) ICD patients survived until cardiac transplantation, 13 (22%) patients died, and 17 (28.8%) remain on the waiting list. Among non-ICD patients, 82 (32.7%) received transplants, 151 (60.2%) died, and 18 (7.2%) remain on the waiting list. Survival rates at 6 months and 1, 2, 3, and 4 years were better for all ICD patients compared to non-ICD patients (log-rank x2, P = 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, ICD therapy and beta-blocker treatment were the strongest predictors of survival. Further, ICD treatment was associated with improved survival independent of concomitant treatment with beta-blocker or amiodarone. Among ICD and non-ICD patients treated with a beta-blocker or amiodarone, survivals at the 1 and 4 years were 93% vs 69% and 57% vs 32%, respectively (log-rank x2, P = 0.003).
ICD therapy is associated with improved survival in high-risk cardiac transplant candidates, and ICD benefit appears to be independent of concomitant treatment.</description><subject>Adrenergic beta-Antagonists - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Amiodarone - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Anti-Arrhythmia Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - mortality</subject><subject>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - therapy</subject><subject>Cardiomyopathies - mortality</subject><subject>Cardiomyopathies - therapy</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy - mortality</subject><subject>Defibrillators, Implantable</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Heart Transplantation - mortality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minnesota</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Myocardial Ischemia - mortality</subject><subject>Myocardial Ischemia - therapy</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Stroke Volume - physiology</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Waiting Lists</subject><issn>1045-3873</issn><issn>1540-8167</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFUctuFDEQtCIQecAvIJ-4zWCPH-PhhiICkSJxIWerx-5RvJkZL7Z3ST4lf4uXXZFTu7urqq0qQihnLWdSf960XEnWGK77tmNMtKxTA2ufzsjF_8Wb-mZSNcL04pxc5rxhjAvN1DtyzjvTK8n1BXm5XbYp7tHTvEv7sIeZxok6SD6AoyXBmrczrAVKiGudrz54KJjpn1AeaFiOy3HGI6cqpYKJepzCmMI8Q4mJlgdMsH3-QlOswKo_YoFmnKN7rNgKgCVEDymuWE8ilAXX8p68nWDO-OFUr8j9zbdf1z-au5_fb6-_3jWuU7o0o5LGox-44Y6xyY21k3qofsCgBU7CwWSMMhIVYg-dQ4ZeGnDdAHoyg7gin4661YffO8zFLiE7rF9fMe6y7YUUejC6As0R6FLMOeFktykskJ4tZ_YQi93Yg_v24L49xGL_xWKfKvXj6cZuXNC_Ek85iL_wd49j</recordid><startdate>200306</startdate><enddate>200306</enddate><creator>Ermis, Cengiz</creator><creator>Zadeii, Gino</creator><creator>Zhu, Alan X</creator><creator>Fabian, William</creator><creator>Collins, Joanne</creator><creator>Lurie, Keith G</creator><creator>Sakaguchi, Scott</creator><creator>Benditt, David G</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200306</creationdate><title>Improved survival of cardiac transplantation candidates with implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy: role of beta-blocker or amiodarone treatment</title><author>Ermis, Cengiz ; Zadeii, Gino ; Zhu, Alan X ; Fabian, William ; Collins, Joanne ; Lurie, Keith G ; Sakaguchi, Scott ; Benditt, David G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-b548ded9181c00fcb8de469259a963ef3caf88584e5ee7a2ce0ed48ac29a6f893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adrenergic beta-Antagonists - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Amiodarone - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Anti-Arrhythmia Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - mortality</topic><topic>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - therapy</topic><topic>Cardiomyopathies - mortality</topic><topic>Cardiomyopathies - therapy</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy - mortality</topic><topic>Defibrillators, Implantable</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Heart Transplantation - mortality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minnesota</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Myocardial Ischemia - mortality</topic><topic>Myocardial Ischemia - therapy</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Stroke Volume - physiology</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Waiting Lists</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ermis, Cengiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zadeii, Gino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Alan X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabian, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lurie, Keith G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakaguchi, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benditt, David G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ermis, Cengiz</au><au>Zadeii, Gino</au><au>Zhu, Alan X</au><au>Fabian, William</au><au>Collins, Joanne</au><au>Lurie, Keith G</au><au>Sakaguchi, Scott</au><au>Benditt, David G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improved survival of cardiac transplantation candidates with implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy: role of beta-blocker or amiodarone treatment</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol</addtitle><date>2003-06</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>578</spage><epage>583</epage><pages>578-583</pages><issn>1045-3873</issn><eissn>1540-8167</eissn><abstract>Survival in patients awaiting cardiac transplantation is poor due to the severity of left ventricular dysfunction and the susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmia. The potential role of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in this group of patients has been the subject of increasing interest. The aims of this study were to ascertain whether ICDs improve the survival rate of patients on the waiting list for cardiac transplantation and whether any improvement is independent of concomitant beta-blocker or amiodarone therapy.
Data comprised findings from 310 consecutive patients at a single center who were evaluated and deemed suitable for cardiac transplantation and placed on the waiting list. Kaplan-Meier actuarial approach was used for survival analysis. Survival analysis censored patients at time of transplantation or death. Of the 310 patients, 111 (35.8%) underwent successful cardiac transplantation and 164 (52.9%) died while waiting; 35 patients remain on the waiting list. Fifty-nine (19%) patients had ICD placement for ventricular arrhythmias prior to or after being listed. Twenty-nine (49.1%) ICD patients survived until cardiac transplantation, 13 (22%) patients died, and 17 (28.8%) remain on the waiting list. Among non-ICD patients, 82 (32.7%) received transplants, 151 (60.2%) died, and 18 (7.2%) remain on the waiting list. Survival rates at 6 months and 1, 2, 3, and 4 years were better for all ICD patients compared to non-ICD patients (log-rank x2, P = 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, ICD therapy and beta-blocker treatment were the strongest predictors of survival. Further, ICD treatment was associated with improved survival independent of concomitant treatment with beta-blocker or amiodarone. Among ICD and non-ICD patients treated with a beta-blocker or amiodarone, survivals at the 1 and 4 years were 93% vs 69% and 57% vs 32%, respectively (log-rank x2, P = 0.003).
ICD therapy is associated with improved survival in high-risk cardiac transplant candidates, and ICD benefit appears to be independent of concomitant treatment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>12875416</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1540-8167.2003.02590.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1045-3873 |
ispartof | Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2003-06, Vol.14 (6), p.578-583 |
issn | 1045-3873 1540-8167 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73436986 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Adrenergic beta-Antagonists - therapeutic use Adult Amiodarone - therapeutic use Anti-Arrhythmia Agents - therapeutic use Arrhythmias, Cardiac - mortality Arrhythmias, Cardiac - therapy Cardiomyopathies - mortality Cardiomyopathies - therapy Combined Modality Therapy - mortality Defibrillators, Implantable Female Follow-Up Studies Heart Transplantation - mortality Humans Male Middle Aged Minnesota Multivariate Analysis Myocardial Ischemia - mortality Myocardial Ischemia - therapy Risk Factors Stroke Volume - physiology Survival Analysis Time Factors Treatment Outcome Waiting Lists |
title | Improved survival of cardiac transplantation candidates with implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy: role of beta-blocker or amiodarone treatment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T21%3A51%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improved%20survival%20of%20cardiac%20transplantation%20candidates%20with%20implantable%20cardioverter%20defibrillator%20therapy:%20role%20of%20beta-blocker%20or%20amiodarone%20treatment&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cardiovascular%20electrophysiology&rft.au=Ermis,%20Cengiz&rft.date=2003-06&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=578&rft.epage=583&rft.pages=578-583&rft.issn=1045-3873&rft.eissn=1540-8167&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1540-8167.2003.02590.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73436986%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73436986&rft_id=info:pmid/12875416&rfr_iscdi=true |