Estimates of Starch Digestion in the Rat Small Intestine Differ from Those Obtained Using In Vitro Time-Sensitive Starch Fractionation Assays

The objectives of this study were as follows: 1) to determine the rate and extent of starch disappearance from the small intestine of the rat fed selected starch sources, 2) to determine the ratios of the major starch fractions [rapidly digestible starch (RDS), slowly digestible starch (SDS), and re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of nutrition 2003-07, Vol.133 (7), p.2256-2261
Hauptverfasser: Bauer, Laura L., Murphy, Michael R., Fahey, George C., Wolf, Bryan W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2261
container_issue 7
container_start_page 2256
container_title The Journal of nutrition
container_volume 133
creator Bauer, Laura L.
Murphy, Michael R.
Fahey, George C.
Wolf, Bryan W.
description The objectives of this study were as follows: 1) to determine the rate and extent of starch disappearance from the small intestine of the rat fed selected starch sources, 2) to determine the ratios of the major starch fractions [rapidly digestible starch (RDS), slowly digestible starch (SDS), and resistant starch (RS)] in those starch sources using two in vitro methods and 3) to compare the two data sets to determine the accuracy of the in vitro methods. Diets were prepared using cornstarch, potato starch, amylomaize, maltodextrin, modified maltodextrin or pullulan. Starch sources and diets were analyzed for starch fractions by two in vitro methods. Diets were fed to rats, intestinal contents were collected and the ethanol-induced precipitate from the contents was analyzed to obtain a digestion curve that was mathematically modeled for comparison to results obtained using the two in vitro methods. Only the cornstarch diet had a defined amount of RDS, SDS and RS. The RDS concentration obtained from the intestinal contents of the rats fed the cornstarch diet differed (P < 0.05) from that determined by one in vitro method but was consistent with the value obtained using the other in vitro method. All other digestible starch values obtained differed (P < 0.05) among methods except for that of amylomaize. Starch fractions in starch sources obtained using in vitro procedures differed (P < 0.05) from values obtained for diets. The rate of disappearance differed (P < 0.05) between in vivo and in vitro procedures. There was minimal agreement between in vitro methods tested, and there was also minimal agreement between in vitro and in vivo results. Classification of starch into RDS and SDS components cannot be accomplished for a variety of starch sources, with cornstarch being the major exception.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jn/133.7.2256
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73430140</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022316622160633</els_id><sourcerecordid>73430140</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-dc6357afe816cfc2f35f191bdfb44e8a09a8a7c75747ad206ca64e9b92ebd4033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10VFr2zAQB3AzNta02-NeNzHo3pxKlmzZj6Vrt0KhsCR7FWf5lCjYUicphX6IfecpTUZhsCeB9OPur7ui-MDonNGOX2zdBeN8LudVVTevihmrBSsbRunrYkZpVZWcNc1JcRrjllLKRNe-LU5Y1QrK2m5W_L6OyU6QMBJvyCJB0Bvy1a4xX3tHrCNpg-QHJLKYYBzJrUv7J4cZGYOBmOAnstz4iOS-T5BfBrKK1q0zJT9tCp4s7YTlAl20yT7i3yY3AfS-Bzw3uowRnuK74o2BMeL743lWrG6ul1ffy7v7b7dXl3elFrVM5aAbXksw2LJGG10ZXhvWsX4wvRDYAu2gBallLYWEoaKNhkZg13cV9oOgnJ8VXw51H4L_tcsfUpONGscRHPpdVJILnmdFM_z8D9z6XXA5m2KdFLxtWpZReUA6-BgDGvUQ8kzDk2JU7Zektk7lJSmp9kvK_uOx6K6fcHjRx61kcH4EEDWMJoDTNr440fEu58vu08EZ8ArWIZvVotoHp7Th8lnIg8A8zUeLQUVt0WkcbECd1ODtf0L-AfP9tsk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197438681</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimates of Starch Digestion in the Rat Small Intestine Differ from Those Obtained Using In Vitro Time-Sensitive Starch Fractionation Assays</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bauer, Laura L. ; Murphy, Michael R. ; Fahey, George C. ; Wolf, Bryan W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Laura L. ; Murphy, Michael R. ; Fahey, George C. ; Wolf, Bryan W.</creatorcontrib><description>The objectives of this study were as follows: 1) to determine the rate and extent of starch disappearance from the small intestine of the rat fed selected starch sources, 2) to determine the ratios of the major starch fractions [rapidly digestible starch (RDS), slowly digestible starch (SDS), and resistant starch (RS)] in those starch sources using two in vitro methods and 3) to compare the two data sets to determine the accuracy of the in vitro methods. Diets were prepared using cornstarch, potato starch, amylomaize, maltodextrin, modified maltodextrin or pullulan. Starch sources and diets were analyzed for starch fractions by two in vitro methods. Diets were fed to rats, intestinal contents were collected and the ethanol-induced precipitate from the contents was analyzed to obtain a digestion curve that was mathematically modeled for comparison to results obtained using the two in vitro methods. Only the cornstarch diet had a defined amount of RDS, SDS and RS. The RDS concentration obtained from the intestinal contents of the rats fed the cornstarch diet differed (P &lt; 0.05) from that determined by one in vitro method but was consistent with the value obtained using the other in vitro method. All other digestible starch values obtained differed (P &lt; 0.05) among methods except for that of amylomaize. Starch fractions in starch sources obtained using in vitro procedures differed (P &lt; 0.05) from values obtained for diets. The rate of disappearance differed (P &lt; 0.05) between in vivo and in vitro procedures. There was minimal agreement between in vitro methods tested, and there was also minimal agreement between in vitro and in vivo results. Classification of starch into RDS and SDS components cannot be accomplished for a variety of starch sources, with cornstarch being the major exception.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3166</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-6100</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jn/133.7.2256</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12840189</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JONUAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda, MD: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carbohydrates ; Chemical Fractionation - methods ; corn starch ; data collection ; Diet ; Digestion ; fractionation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; in vitro ; in vivo ; Intestine, Small - metabolism ; Male ; Nutrition ; potato starch ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; resistant starch ; Rodents ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Small intestine ; starch ; Starch - metabolism</subject><ispartof>The Journal of nutrition, 2003-07, Vol.133 (7), p.2256-2261</ispartof><rights>2003 American Society for Nutrition.</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Institute of Nutrition Jul 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-dc6357afe816cfc2f35f191bdfb44e8a09a8a7c75747ad206ca64e9b92ebd4033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-dc6357afe816cfc2f35f191bdfb44e8a09a8a7c75747ad206ca64e9b92ebd4033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14939301$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12840189$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Laura L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fahey, George C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, Bryan W.</creatorcontrib><title>Estimates of Starch Digestion in the Rat Small Intestine Differ from Those Obtained Using In Vitro Time-Sensitive Starch Fractionation Assays</title><title>The Journal of nutrition</title><addtitle>J Nutr</addtitle><description>The objectives of this study were as follows: 1) to determine the rate and extent of starch disappearance from the small intestine of the rat fed selected starch sources, 2) to determine the ratios of the major starch fractions [rapidly digestible starch (RDS), slowly digestible starch (SDS), and resistant starch (RS)] in those starch sources using two in vitro methods and 3) to compare the two data sets to determine the accuracy of the in vitro methods. Diets were prepared using cornstarch, potato starch, amylomaize, maltodextrin, modified maltodextrin or pullulan. Starch sources and diets were analyzed for starch fractions by two in vitro methods. Diets were fed to rats, intestinal contents were collected and the ethanol-induced precipitate from the contents was analyzed to obtain a digestion curve that was mathematically modeled for comparison to results obtained using the two in vitro methods. Only the cornstarch diet had a defined amount of RDS, SDS and RS. The RDS concentration obtained from the intestinal contents of the rats fed the cornstarch diet differed (P &lt; 0.05) from that determined by one in vitro method but was consistent with the value obtained using the other in vitro method. All other digestible starch values obtained differed (P &lt; 0.05) among methods except for that of amylomaize. Starch fractions in starch sources obtained using in vitro procedures differed (P &lt; 0.05) from values obtained for diets. The rate of disappearance differed (P &lt; 0.05) between in vivo and in vitro procedures. There was minimal agreement between in vitro methods tested, and there was also minimal agreement between in vitro and in vivo results. Classification of starch into RDS and SDS components cannot be accomplished for a variety of starch sources, with cornstarch being the major exception.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carbohydrates</subject><subject>Chemical Fractionation - methods</subject><subject>corn starch</subject><subject>data collection</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Digestion</subject><subject>fractionation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>in vitro</subject><subject>in vivo</subject><subject>Intestine, Small - metabolism</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>potato starch</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</subject><subject>resistant starch</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Small intestine</subject><subject>starch</subject><subject>Starch - metabolism</subject><issn>0022-3166</issn><issn>1541-6100</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10VFr2zAQB3AzNta02-NeNzHo3pxKlmzZj6Vrt0KhsCR7FWf5lCjYUicphX6IfecpTUZhsCeB9OPur7ui-MDonNGOX2zdBeN8LudVVTevihmrBSsbRunrYkZpVZWcNc1JcRrjllLKRNe-LU5Y1QrK2m5W_L6OyU6QMBJvyCJB0Bvy1a4xX3tHrCNpg-QHJLKYYBzJrUv7J4cZGYOBmOAnstz4iOS-T5BfBrKK1q0zJT9tCp4s7YTlAl20yT7i3yY3AfS-Bzw3uowRnuK74o2BMeL743lWrG6ul1ffy7v7b7dXl3elFrVM5aAbXksw2LJGG10ZXhvWsX4wvRDYAu2gBallLYWEoaKNhkZg13cV9oOgnJ8VXw51H4L_tcsfUpONGscRHPpdVJILnmdFM_z8D9z6XXA5m2KdFLxtWpZReUA6-BgDGvUQ8kzDk2JU7Zektk7lJSmp9kvK_uOx6K6fcHjRx61kcH4EEDWMJoDTNr440fEu58vu08EZ8ArWIZvVotoHp7Th8lnIg8A8zUeLQUVt0WkcbECd1ODtf0L-AfP9tsk</recordid><startdate>20030701</startdate><enddate>20030701</enddate><creator>Bauer, Laura L.</creator><creator>Murphy, Michael R.</creator><creator>Fahey, George C.</creator><creator>Wolf, Bryan W.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>American Society for Nutritional Sciences</general><general>American Institute of Nutrition</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030701</creationdate><title>Estimates of Starch Digestion in the Rat Small Intestine Differ from Those Obtained Using In Vitro Time-Sensitive Starch Fractionation Assays</title><author>Bauer, Laura L. ; Murphy, Michael R. ; Fahey, George C. ; Wolf, Bryan W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-dc6357afe816cfc2f35f191bdfb44e8a09a8a7c75747ad206ca64e9b92ebd4033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carbohydrates</topic><topic>Chemical Fractionation - methods</topic><topic>corn starch</topic><topic>data collection</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Digestion</topic><topic>fractionation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>in vitro</topic><topic>in vivo</topic><topic>Intestine, Small - metabolism</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>potato starch</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</topic><topic>resistant starch</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Small intestine</topic><topic>starch</topic><topic>Starch - metabolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Laura L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fahey, George C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, Bryan W.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bauer, Laura L.</au><au>Murphy, Michael R.</au><au>Fahey, George C.</au><au>Wolf, Bryan W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimates of Starch Digestion in the Rat Small Intestine Differ from Those Obtained Using In Vitro Time-Sensitive Starch Fractionation Assays</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of nutrition</jtitle><addtitle>J Nutr</addtitle><date>2003-07-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>133</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2256</spage><epage>2261</epage><pages>2256-2261</pages><issn>0022-3166</issn><eissn>1541-6100</eissn><coden>JONUAI</coden><abstract>The objectives of this study were as follows: 1) to determine the rate and extent of starch disappearance from the small intestine of the rat fed selected starch sources, 2) to determine the ratios of the major starch fractions [rapidly digestible starch (RDS), slowly digestible starch (SDS), and resistant starch (RS)] in those starch sources using two in vitro methods and 3) to compare the two data sets to determine the accuracy of the in vitro methods. Diets were prepared using cornstarch, potato starch, amylomaize, maltodextrin, modified maltodextrin or pullulan. Starch sources and diets were analyzed for starch fractions by two in vitro methods. Diets were fed to rats, intestinal contents were collected and the ethanol-induced precipitate from the contents was analyzed to obtain a digestion curve that was mathematically modeled for comparison to results obtained using the two in vitro methods. Only the cornstarch diet had a defined amount of RDS, SDS and RS. The RDS concentration obtained from the intestinal contents of the rats fed the cornstarch diet differed (P &lt; 0.05) from that determined by one in vitro method but was consistent with the value obtained using the other in vitro method. All other digestible starch values obtained differed (P &lt; 0.05) among methods except for that of amylomaize. Starch fractions in starch sources obtained using in vitro procedures differed (P &lt; 0.05) from values obtained for diets. The rate of disappearance differed (P &lt; 0.05) between in vivo and in vitro procedures. There was minimal agreement between in vitro methods tested, and there was also minimal agreement between in vitro and in vivo results. Classification of starch into RDS and SDS components cannot be accomplished for a variety of starch sources, with cornstarch being the major exception.</abstract><cop>Bethesda, MD</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>12840189</pmid><doi>10.1093/jn/133.7.2256</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3166
ispartof The Journal of nutrition, 2003-07, Vol.133 (7), p.2256-2261
issn 0022-3166
1541-6100
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73430140
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Carbohydrates
Chemical Fractionation - methods
corn starch
data collection
Diet
Digestion
fractionation
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
in vitro
in vivo
Intestine, Small - metabolism
Male
Nutrition
potato starch
Rats
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
resistant starch
Rodents
Sensitivity and Specificity
Small intestine
starch
Starch - metabolism
title Estimates of Starch Digestion in the Rat Small Intestine Differ from Those Obtained Using In Vitro Time-Sensitive Starch Fractionation Assays
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T21%3A20%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimates%20of%20Starch%20Digestion%20in%20the%20Rat%20Small%20Intestine%20Differ%20from%20Those%20Obtained%20Using%20In%20Vitro%20Time-Sensitive%20Starch%20Fractionation%20Assays&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20nutrition&rft.au=Bauer,%20Laura%20L.&rft.date=2003-07-01&rft.volume=133&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2256&rft.epage=2261&rft.pages=2256-2261&rft.issn=0022-3166&rft.eissn=1541-6100&rft.coden=JONUAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jn/133.7.2256&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73430140%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197438681&rft_id=info:pmid/12840189&rft_els_id=S0022316622160633&rfr_iscdi=true