The Reliability of Patient-Reported Pregnancy Outcome Data

Pregnancy and neonatal outcome information is frequently used in disease management to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of prenatal interventions and for other research and reporting activities. The purpose of this study was to determine if a telephone interview process is a reliable methodology for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Population health management 2010-02, Vol.13 (1), p.27-32
Hauptverfasser: Elliott, John P., Desch, Cheryl, Istwan, Niki B., Rhea, Debbie, Collins, Ann M., Stanziano, Gary J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 32
container_issue 1
container_start_page 27
container_title Population health management
container_volume 13
creator Elliott, John P.
Desch, Cheryl
Istwan, Niki B.
Rhea, Debbie
Collins, Ann M.
Stanziano, Gary J.
description Pregnancy and neonatal outcome information is frequently used in disease management to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of prenatal interventions and for other research and reporting activities. The purpose of this study was to determine if a telephone interview process is a reliable methodology for collecting pregnancy outcomes. High-risk patients from a large maternal–fetal medicine practice who received outpatient preterm labor management services from January 1996 to June 2001 were identified. Patient-reported pregnancy outcome data for 285 mothers and 478 infants were collected via a telephone interview by a perinatal nurse and compared to pregnancy outcome data abstracted from the maternal and infant hospital records. Overall, concordance and/or Kappa coefficients between maternal report and the medical record were high for delivery date (96.4%), birth weight within 100 grams (88.9%), Cesarean delivery (99.0%, Kappa = 0.98), and high-level nursery admission (91.2%, Kappa = 0.82). Both singleton and multiple gestation types accurately reported pregnancy outcome information. A telephone interview with a skilled nurse can be a reliable methodology for collection of valuable clinical and research data related to pregnancy outcome. Data collected in this manner and maintained in a database may be used with a high level of confidence by health care providers, payers, and researchers. ( Population Health Management 2010;13:27–32)
doi_str_mv 10.1089/pop.2009.0008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734281581</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>734281581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-1d5c2717bd0d928da52c0cbc235234eae25a5714293387a295b4971745d8d1863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQQC0EoqUwsqJsTCn-iBObDfEtVWpVldly7CsEJXGwnaH_nkRtWZnudHp60j2ErgmeEyzkXee6OcVYzjHG4gRNicxoWkjMT4-7kGSCLkL4xjjPcszP0YRiwgWjZIruN1-QrKGudFnVVdwlbpusdKygjekaOucj2GTl4bPVrdklyz4a10DypKO-RGdbXQe4OswZ-nh53jy-pYvl6_vjwyI1jOUxJZYbWpCitNhKKqzm1GBTGso4ZRlooFzzgmRUMiYKTSUvMznwGbfCEpGzGbrdezvvfnoIUTVVMFDXugXXB1WwjIrhHzKQ6Z403oXgYas6XzXa7xTBaqylhlpqrKXGWgN_czD3ZQP2jz7mGQC2B8azbtu6ghJ8_Ef7CwW9dMY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734281581</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Reliability of Patient-Reported Pregnancy Outcome Data</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Elliott, John P. ; Desch, Cheryl ; Istwan, Niki B. ; Rhea, Debbie ; Collins, Ann M. ; Stanziano, Gary J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Elliott, John P. ; Desch, Cheryl ; Istwan, Niki B. ; Rhea, Debbie ; Collins, Ann M. ; Stanziano, Gary J.</creatorcontrib><description>Pregnancy and neonatal outcome information is frequently used in disease management to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of prenatal interventions and for other research and reporting activities. The purpose of this study was to determine if a telephone interview process is a reliable methodology for collecting pregnancy outcomes. High-risk patients from a large maternal–fetal medicine practice who received outpatient preterm labor management services from January 1996 to June 2001 were identified. Patient-reported pregnancy outcome data for 285 mothers and 478 infants were collected via a telephone interview by a perinatal nurse and compared to pregnancy outcome data abstracted from the maternal and infant hospital records. Overall, concordance and/or Kappa coefficients between maternal report and the medical record were high for delivery date (96.4%), birth weight within 100 grams (88.9%), Cesarean delivery (99.0%, Kappa = 0.98), and high-level nursery admission (91.2%, Kappa = 0.82). Both singleton and multiple gestation types accurately reported pregnancy outcome information. A telephone interview with a skilled nurse can be a reliable methodology for collection of valuable clinical and research data related to pregnancy outcome. Data collected in this manner and maintained in a database may be used with a high level of confidence by health care providers, payers, and researchers. ( Population Health Management 2010;13:27–32)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1942-7891</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-7905</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/pop.2009.0008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20158321</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Birth Weight ; Confidence Intervals ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Data Collection ; Disease Management ; Female ; Humans ; Interviews as Topic ; Original Articles ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology ; Pregnancy Outcome - economics ; Reproducibility of Results ; Statistics as Topic ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Telephone ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Population health management, 2010-02, Vol.13 (1), p.27-32</ispartof><rights>2010, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-1d5c2717bd0d928da52c0cbc235234eae25a5714293387a295b4971745d8d1863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-1d5c2717bd0d928da52c0cbc235234eae25a5714293387a295b4971745d8d1863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20158321$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elliott, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desch, Cheryl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Istwan, Niki B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhea, Debbie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Ann M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanziano, Gary J.</creatorcontrib><title>The Reliability of Patient-Reported Pregnancy Outcome Data</title><title>Population health management</title><addtitle>Popul Health Manag</addtitle><description>Pregnancy and neonatal outcome information is frequently used in disease management to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of prenatal interventions and for other research and reporting activities. The purpose of this study was to determine if a telephone interview process is a reliable methodology for collecting pregnancy outcomes. High-risk patients from a large maternal–fetal medicine practice who received outpatient preterm labor management services from January 1996 to June 2001 were identified. Patient-reported pregnancy outcome data for 285 mothers and 478 infants were collected via a telephone interview by a perinatal nurse and compared to pregnancy outcome data abstracted from the maternal and infant hospital records. Overall, concordance and/or Kappa coefficients between maternal report and the medical record were high for delivery date (96.4%), birth weight within 100 grams (88.9%), Cesarean delivery (99.0%, Kappa = 0.98), and high-level nursery admission (91.2%, Kappa = 0.82). Both singleton and multiple gestation types accurately reported pregnancy outcome information. A telephone interview with a skilled nurse can be a reliable methodology for collection of valuable clinical and research data related to pregnancy outcome. Data collected in this manner and maintained in a database may be used with a high level of confidence by health care providers, payers, and researchers. ( Population Health Management 2010;13:27–32)</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Birth Weight</subject><subject>Confidence Intervals</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Disease Management</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Original Articles</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome - economics</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Statistics as Topic</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Telephone</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>1942-7891</issn><issn>1942-7905</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQQC0EoqUwsqJsTCn-iBObDfEtVWpVldly7CsEJXGwnaH_nkRtWZnudHp60j2ErgmeEyzkXee6OcVYzjHG4gRNicxoWkjMT4-7kGSCLkL4xjjPcszP0YRiwgWjZIruN1-QrKGudFnVVdwlbpusdKygjekaOucj2GTl4bPVrdklyz4a10DypKO-RGdbXQe4OswZ-nh53jy-pYvl6_vjwyI1jOUxJZYbWpCitNhKKqzm1GBTGso4ZRlooFzzgmRUMiYKTSUvMznwGbfCEpGzGbrdezvvfnoIUTVVMFDXugXXB1WwjIrhHzKQ6Z403oXgYas6XzXa7xTBaqylhlpqrKXGWgN_czD3ZQP2jz7mGQC2B8azbtu6ghJ8_Ef7CwW9dMY</recordid><startdate>20100201</startdate><enddate>20100201</enddate><creator>Elliott, John P.</creator><creator>Desch, Cheryl</creator><creator>Istwan, Niki B.</creator><creator>Rhea, Debbie</creator><creator>Collins, Ann M.</creator><creator>Stanziano, Gary J.</creator><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100201</creationdate><title>The Reliability of Patient-Reported Pregnancy Outcome Data</title><author>Elliott, John P. ; Desch, Cheryl ; Istwan, Niki B. ; Rhea, Debbie ; Collins, Ann M. ; Stanziano, Gary J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-1d5c2717bd0d928da52c0cbc235234eae25a5714293387a295b4971745d8d1863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Birth Weight</topic><topic>Confidence Intervals</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Disease Management</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Original Articles</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome - economics</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Statistics as Topic</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Telephone</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elliott, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desch, Cheryl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Istwan, Niki B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhea, Debbie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Ann M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanziano, Gary J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Population health management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elliott, John P.</au><au>Desch, Cheryl</au><au>Istwan, Niki B.</au><au>Rhea, Debbie</au><au>Collins, Ann M.</au><au>Stanziano, Gary J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Reliability of Patient-Reported Pregnancy Outcome Data</atitle><jtitle>Population health management</jtitle><addtitle>Popul Health Manag</addtitle><date>2010-02-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>27</spage><epage>32</epage><pages>27-32</pages><issn>1942-7891</issn><eissn>1942-7905</eissn><abstract>Pregnancy and neonatal outcome information is frequently used in disease management to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of prenatal interventions and for other research and reporting activities. The purpose of this study was to determine if a telephone interview process is a reliable methodology for collecting pregnancy outcomes. High-risk patients from a large maternal–fetal medicine practice who received outpatient preterm labor management services from January 1996 to June 2001 were identified. Patient-reported pregnancy outcome data for 285 mothers and 478 infants were collected via a telephone interview by a perinatal nurse and compared to pregnancy outcome data abstracted from the maternal and infant hospital records. Overall, concordance and/or Kappa coefficients between maternal report and the medical record were high for delivery date (96.4%), birth weight within 100 grams (88.9%), Cesarean delivery (99.0%, Kappa = 0.98), and high-level nursery admission (91.2%, Kappa = 0.82). Both singleton and multiple gestation types accurately reported pregnancy outcome information. A telephone interview with a skilled nurse can be a reliable methodology for collection of valuable clinical and research data related to pregnancy outcome. Data collected in this manner and maintained in a database may be used with a high level of confidence by health care providers, payers, and researchers. ( Population Health Management 2010;13:27–32)</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</pub><pmid>20158321</pmid><doi>10.1089/pop.2009.0008</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1942-7891
ispartof Population health management, 2010-02, Vol.13 (1), p.27-32
issn 1942-7891
1942-7905
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734281581
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Birth Weight
Confidence Intervals
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Data Collection
Disease Management
Female
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Original Articles
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology
Pregnancy Outcome - economics
Reproducibility of Results
Statistics as Topic
Surveys and Questionnaires
Telephone
United States - epidemiology
title The Reliability of Patient-Reported Pregnancy Outcome Data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T03%3A53%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Reliability%20of%20Patient-Reported%20Pregnancy%20Outcome%20Data&rft.jtitle=Population%20health%20management&rft.au=Elliott,%20John%20P.&rft.date=2010-02-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=27&rft.epage=32&rft.pages=27-32&rft.issn=1942-7891&rft.eissn=1942-7905&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/pop.2009.0008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E734281581%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734281581&rft_id=info:pmid/20158321&rfr_iscdi=true