Cyclosporine Versus Tacrolimus in Immunosuppressive Maintenance Regimens in Renal Transplants in Brazil: Survival Analysis from 2000 to 2004

BACKGROUND In Brazil, the National Health System (SUS) is responsible for almost all renal transplants. SUS protocols recommend using cyclosporine, in association with azathioprine and corticosteroids, to maintain the immunosuppression that is essential for successful renal transplant. Alternatively, cyclosporine can be replaced by tacrolimus. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic schema involving cyclosporine or tacrolimus after renal transplant during a 60-month follow-up period. METHODSA historical cohort study, from 2000 to 2004, was conducted using 5686 patients who underwent renal transplant and received cyclosporine or tacrolimus. Uni - and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox model to examine factors associated with progression to treatment failure. RESULTS Most of the patients were male, aged 38 years or older, for whom the most frequent primary diagnosis of chronic renal failure (CRF) was glomerulonephritis/nephritis. Higher risk of treatment failure was associated with: therapeutic regimen (tacrolimus, HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.67), patient age at transplantation (additional year, HR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.02), donor type (deceased, HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.35 to 1.89), median time of dialysis prior to transplantation (>24 mo, HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.52), and primary CRF diagnosis (diabetes, HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.17). CONCLUSIONS The risk of treatment failure of patients receiving tacrolimus was observed to be 1.38 times that of those receiving cyclosporine, after adjusting the model for possible confounding factors such as patient sex, patient age, graft origin, prior time of dialysis, and cause of CRF. Our results were obtained from an observational study, and further studies are necessary to evaluate whether compliance with SUS clinical protocols could result in more effective care for renal transplant recipients.