Salmonella enterica serotypes and antibiotic susceptibility in New Zealand, 2002–2007

We analysed the serotypes and antibiotic susceptibility of 1560 human and 1505 non-human Salmonella isolated in New Zealand (NZ) between 2002 and 2007. The most common serotypes in humans were Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, S. Enteritidis, S. Brandenburg and S. Infantis. Over the 6-year pe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Epidemiology and infection 2010-03, Vol.138 (3), p.322-329
Hauptverfasser: BROUGHTON, E. I., HEFFERNAN, H. M., COLES, C. L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 329
container_issue 3
container_start_page 322
container_title Epidemiology and infection
container_volume 138
creator BROUGHTON, E. I.
HEFFERNAN, H. M.
COLES, C. L.
description We analysed the serotypes and antibiotic susceptibility of 1560 human and 1505 non-human Salmonella isolated in New Zealand (NZ) between 2002 and 2007. The most common serotypes in humans were Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, S. Enteritidis, S. Brandenburg and S. Infantis. Over the 6-year period human cases due to S. Agona and S. Enteritidis increased and cases due to S. Typhimurium decreased. The most common serotypes from non-human sources were S. Typhimurium, S. Brandenberg, S. Hindmarsh and S. Infantis, and there were no significant changes over time. More isolates were non-susceptible to streptomycin than to any other antibiotic. Almost all isolates were susceptible to ciprofloxacin and gentamicin. There were significant trends of increasing non-susceptibility to streptomycin and sulfonamides in isolates from human and non-human sources, while ampicillin, tetracycline and multidrug non-susceptibility also increased in human isolates. Despite these increases, rates of antibiotic non-susceptibility in Salmonella in NZ are still lower than in many international settings.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0950268809990458
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734252570</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0950268809990458</cupid><jstor_id>40390566</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40390566</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-e9b05d22f924ba9898b1c847d85733b2cd741daf0d36808b2c8cf3779c56c8ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2KFDEUhYMoTtv6AC6UQnDcWHrznyxlcMZhRkVaUdyEVColaeunTarQ3s07-IY-iWm66AFFF-GSnO9e7slB6D6GZxiwfL4CzYEIpUBrDYyrG2iBmdAlY6BvosVOLnf6EbqT0hoANFHyNjrCWnCqCVugjyvbdkPv29YWvh99DM4Wycdh3G58Kmxf5zOGKgxjcEWakvOb3bUN47YIffHGfy8-e9tm8GlBAMivq5-5yLvoVmPb5O_NdYk-nL58f_KqvHx7dn7y4rJ0TJOx9LoCXhPS5GUqq5VWFXaKyVpxSWlFXC0Zrm0DNRUKVH5QrqFSaseFU97SJXqyn7uJw7fJp9F0Ie-Y7fR-mJKRlBFOuIRMHv-XJJhKrBXL4KM_wPUwxT67MAQ4U5gCzxDeQy4OKUXfmE0MnY1bg8HswjF_hZN7Hs6Dp6rz9XXHnEYGHs-ATc62TbS9C-nAEUKZAE4y92DPrdM4xIPOgGrgQmS93Oshjf7HQbfxqxGSSm7E2TujTlfs0-sLnL9oiehsxnZVDPUXf23533Z-A1mZvSo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>205481305</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Salmonella enterica serotypes and antibiotic susceptibility in New Zealand, 2002–2007</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>BROUGHTON, E. I. ; HEFFERNAN, H. M. ; COLES, C. L.</creator><creatorcontrib>BROUGHTON, E. I. ; HEFFERNAN, H. M. ; COLES, C. L.</creatorcontrib><description>We analysed the serotypes and antibiotic susceptibility of 1560 human and 1505 non-human Salmonella isolated in New Zealand (NZ) between 2002 and 2007. The most common serotypes in humans were Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, S. Enteritidis, S. Brandenburg and S. Infantis. Over the 6-year period human cases due to S. Agona and S. Enteritidis increased and cases due to S. Typhimurium decreased. The most common serotypes from non-human sources were S. Typhimurium, S. Brandenberg, S. Hindmarsh and S. Infantis, and there were no significant changes over time. More isolates were non-susceptible to streptomycin than to any other antibiotic. Almost all isolates were susceptible to ciprofloxacin and gentamicin. There were significant trends of increasing non-susceptibility to streptomycin and sulfonamides in isolates from human and non-human sources, while ampicillin, tetracycline and multidrug non-susceptibility also increased in human isolates. Despite these increases, rates of antibiotic non-susceptibility in Salmonella in NZ are still lower than in many international settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-2688</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-4409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0950268809990458</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19653924</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EPINEU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology ; Antibiotic resistance ; Antibiotics ; antimicrobial resistance in agricultural settings ; Bacteriology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial ; Food safety ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Infections ; Microbiology ; Miscellaneous ; New Zealand - epidemiology ; Odds Ratio ; Population Surveillance ; Public health ; public health emerging infections ; Salmonella ; Salmonella enterica ; Salmonella enterica - classification ; Salmonella enterica - drug effects ; Salmonella infections ; Salmonella Infections - epidemiology ; Salmonella Infections - microbiology ; Salmonella typhimurium ; Salmonellae and cholera ; Serotyping ; Sulfonamides ; Surveillance ; surveillance system</subject><ispartof>Epidemiology and infection, 2010-03, Vol.138 (3), p.322-329</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009</rights><rights>Copyright 2010 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-e9b05d22f924ba9898b1c847d85733b2cd741daf0d36808b2c8cf3779c56c8ea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-e9b05d22f924ba9898b1c847d85733b2cd741daf0d36808b2c8cf3779c56c8ea3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40390566$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40390566$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27906,27907,57999,58232</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22346052$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19653924$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BROUGHTON, E. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HEFFERNAN, H. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COLES, C. L.</creatorcontrib><title>Salmonella enterica serotypes and antibiotic susceptibility in New Zealand, 2002–2007</title><title>Epidemiology and infection</title><addtitle>Epidemiol. Infect</addtitle><description>We analysed the serotypes and antibiotic susceptibility of 1560 human and 1505 non-human Salmonella isolated in New Zealand (NZ) between 2002 and 2007. The most common serotypes in humans were Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, S. Enteritidis, S. Brandenburg and S. Infantis. Over the 6-year period human cases due to S. Agona and S. Enteritidis increased and cases due to S. Typhimurium decreased. The most common serotypes from non-human sources were S. Typhimurium, S. Brandenberg, S. Hindmarsh and S. Infantis, and there were no significant changes over time. More isolates were non-susceptible to streptomycin than to any other antibiotic. Almost all isolates were susceptible to ciprofloxacin and gentamicin. There were significant trends of increasing non-susceptibility to streptomycin and sulfonamides in isolates from human and non-human sources, while ampicillin, tetracycline and multidrug non-susceptibility also increased in human isolates. Despite these increases, rates of antibiotic non-susceptibility in Salmonella in NZ are still lower than in many international settings.</description><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Antibiotic resistance</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>antimicrobial resistance in agricultural settings</subject><subject>Bacteriology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial</subject><subject>Food safety</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>New Zealand - epidemiology</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Population Surveillance</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>public health emerging infections</subject><subject>Salmonella</subject><subject>Salmonella enterica</subject><subject>Salmonella enterica - classification</subject><subject>Salmonella enterica - drug effects</subject><subject>Salmonella infections</subject><subject>Salmonella Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Salmonella Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Salmonella typhimurium</subject><subject>Salmonellae and cholera</subject><subject>Serotyping</subject><subject>Sulfonamides</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>surveillance system</subject><issn>0950-2688</issn><issn>1469-4409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc2KFDEUhYMoTtv6AC6UQnDcWHrznyxlcMZhRkVaUdyEVColaeunTarQ3s07-IY-iWm66AFFF-GSnO9e7slB6D6GZxiwfL4CzYEIpUBrDYyrG2iBmdAlY6BvosVOLnf6EbqT0hoANFHyNjrCWnCqCVugjyvbdkPv29YWvh99DM4Wycdh3G58Kmxf5zOGKgxjcEWakvOb3bUN47YIffHGfy8-e9tm8GlBAMivq5-5yLvoVmPb5O_NdYk-nL58f_KqvHx7dn7y4rJ0TJOx9LoCXhPS5GUqq5VWFXaKyVpxSWlFXC0Zrm0DNRUKVH5QrqFSaseFU97SJXqyn7uJw7fJp9F0Ie-Y7fR-mJKRlBFOuIRMHv-XJJhKrBXL4KM_wPUwxT67MAQ4U5gCzxDeQy4OKUXfmE0MnY1bg8HswjF_hZN7Hs6Dp6rz9XXHnEYGHs-ATc62TbS9C-nAEUKZAE4y92DPrdM4xIPOgGrgQmS93Oshjf7HQbfxqxGSSm7E2TujTlfs0-sLnL9oiehsxnZVDPUXf23533Z-A1mZvSo</recordid><startdate>20100301</startdate><enddate>20100301</enddate><creator>BROUGHTON, E. I.</creator><creator>HEFFERNAN, H. M.</creator><creator>COLES, C. L.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100301</creationdate><title>Salmonella enterica serotypes and antibiotic susceptibility in New Zealand, 2002–2007</title><author>BROUGHTON, E. I. ; HEFFERNAN, H. M. ; COLES, C. L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-e9b05d22f924ba9898b1c847d85733b2cd741daf0d36808b2c8cf3779c56c8ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Antibiotic resistance</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>antimicrobial resistance in agricultural settings</topic><topic>Bacteriology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial</topic><topic>Food safety</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>New Zealand - epidemiology</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Population Surveillance</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>public health emerging infections</topic><topic>Salmonella</topic><topic>Salmonella enterica</topic><topic>Salmonella enterica - classification</topic><topic>Salmonella enterica - drug effects</topic><topic>Salmonella infections</topic><topic>Salmonella Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Salmonella Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Salmonella typhimurium</topic><topic>Salmonellae and cholera</topic><topic>Serotyping</topic><topic>Sulfonamides</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>surveillance system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BROUGHTON, E. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HEFFERNAN, H. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COLES, C. L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Epidemiology and infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BROUGHTON, E. I.</au><au>HEFFERNAN, H. M.</au><au>COLES, C. L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Salmonella enterica serotypes and antibiotic susceptibility in New Zealand, 2002–2007</atitle><jtitle>Epidemiology and infection</jtitle><addtitle>Epidemiol. Infect</addtitle><date>2010-03-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>138</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>322</spage><epage>329</epage><pages>322-329</pages><issn>0950-2688</issn><eissn>1469-4409</eissn><coden>EPINEU</coden><abstract>We analysed the serotypes and antibiotic susceptibility of 1560 human and 1505 non-human Salmonella isolated in New Zealand (NZ) between 2002 and 2007. The most common serotypes in humans were Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, S. Enteritidis, S. Brandenburg and S. Infantis. Over the 6-year period human cases due to S. Agona and S. Enteritidis increased and cases due to S. Typhimurium decreased. The most common serotypes from non-human sources were S. Typhimurium, S. Brandenberg, S. Hindmarsh and S. Infantis, and there were no significant changes over time. More isolates were non-susceptible to streptomycin than to any other antibiotic. Almost all isolates were susceptible to ciprofloxacin and gentamicin. There were significant trends of increasing non-susceptibility to streptomycin and sulfonamides in isolates from human and non-human sources, while ampicillin, tetracycline and multidrug non-susceptibility also increased in human isolates. Despite these increases, rates of antibiotic non-susceptibility in Salmonella in NZ are still lower than in many international settings.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>19653924</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0950268809990458</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0950-2688
ispartof Epidemiology and infection, 2010-03, Vol.138 (3), p.322-329
issn 0950-2688
1469-4409
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734252570
source MEDLINE; Jstor Complete Legacy; PubMed Central
subjects Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology
Antibiotic resistance
Antibiotics
antimicrobial resistance in agricultural settings
Bacteriology
Biological and medical sciences
Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial
Food safety
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Infections
Microbiology
Miscellaneous
New Zealand - epidemiology
Odds Ratio
Population Surveillance
Public health
public health emerging infections
Salmonella
Salmonella enterica
Salmonella enterica - classification
Salmonella enterica - drug effects
Salmonella infections
Salmonella Infections - epidemiology
Salmonella Infections - microbiology
Salmonella typhimurium
Salmonellae and cholera
Serotyping
Sulfonamides
Surveillance
surveillance system
title Salmonella enterica serotypes and antibiotic susceptibility in New Zealand, 2002–2007
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T09%3A12%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Salmonella%20enterica%20serotypes%20and%20antibiotic%20susceptibility%20in%20New%20Zealand,%202002%E2%80%932007&rft.jtitle=Epidemiology%20and%20infection&rft.au=BROUGHTON,%20E.%20I.&rft.date=2010-03-01&rft.volume=138&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=322&rft.epage=329&rft.pages=322-329&rft.issn=0950-2688&rft.eissn=1469-4409&rft.coden=EPINEU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0950268809990458&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40390566%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=205481305&rft_id=info:pmid/19653924&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0950268809990458&rft_jstor_id=40390566&rfr_iscdi=true