An Evidentiary Review Regarding the Use of Chronological and Adjusted Age in the Assessment of Preterm Infants

PURPOSE.  The evidence supporting the recommendation to use age adjustment when assessing the growth, motor, and global development of premature infants was explored. Following a comprehensive literature search, 16 articles that compared the use of adjusted and chronological age were reviewed. CONCL...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal for specialists in pediatric nursing 2010-01, Vol.15 (1), p.26-32
1. Verfasser: D'Agostino, Jo Ann
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 32
container_issue 1
container_start_page 26
container_title Journal for specialists in pediatric nursing
container_volume 15
creator D'Agostino, Jo Ann
description PURPOSE.  The evidence supporting the recommendation to use age adjustment when assessing the growth, motor, and global development of premature infants was explored. Following a comprehensive literature search, 16 articles that compared the use of adjusted and chronological age were reviewed. CONCLUSIONS.  The use of full age adjustment based on the degree of prematurity was supported for the assessment of premature infants for a minimum of 12 months adjusted age. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS.  The use of adjusted age enhances the ability to accurately recognize genuine delays as opposed to perceived delays related to a child's gestational age at birth.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1744-6155.2009.00215.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734237321</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1942895181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4835-2879d6d00984078b391cb1204ffdd6530a4d703c1524d59f84a7641d752c7863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFP3DAQhS3UCijtX6isXnpKasd2nBx6WC2UUqEtBSoQF8sbO4vTxKF2Asu_74Sle-CELzOSv_c0Mw8hTElK4X1pUio5T3IqRJoRUqaEZFSk6x20v_14A71gZUIoy_fQuxgbQqjICN9Fe6CRHIz2kZ95fHTvjPWD0-ERn9t7Zx-grHQwzq_wcGvx72hxX-P5beh93_YrV-kWa2_wzDRjHCw0K4udf4JnMdoYOzCcNGfBDjZ0-MTX2g_xPXpb6zbaD8_1AF1-O7qcf09Ofx6fzGenScULJpKskKXJDWxWcCKLJStptaQwe10bkwtGNDeSsAr24UaUdcG1zDk1UmSVLHJ2gD5vbO9C_3e0cVCdi5VtW-1tP0YlGc-YZBkF8tMLsunH4GE2RUshc8LLEqBiA1WhjzHYWt0F18G5FCVqCkQ1arq7mu6upkDUUyBqDdKPz_7jsrNmK_yfAABfN8CDa-3jq43Vj4uzBXSgTzZ6B0Gst3od_qhcMinU1eJYLa7p4fzm-pfK2D8eKKay</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195760499</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Evidentiary Review Regarding the Use of Chronological and Adjusted Age in the Assessment of Preterm Infants</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>D'Agostino, Jo Ann</creator><creatorcontrib>D'Agostino, Jo Ann</creatorcontrib><description>PURPOSE.  The evidence supporting the recommendation to use age adjustment when assessing the growth, motor, and global development of premature infants was explored. Following a comprehensive literature search, 16 articles that compared the use of adjusted and chronological age were reviewed. CONCLUSIONS.  The use of full age adjustment based on the degree of prematurity was supported for the assessment of premature infants for a minimum of 12 months adjusted age. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS.  The use of adjusted age enhances the ability to accurately recognize genuine delays as opposed to perceived delays related to a child's gestational age at birth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1539-0136</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-6155</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6155.2009.00215.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20074111</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adjusted age ; Age Factors ; Child Development - physiology ; chronological age ; corrected age ; development ; Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Evidence-Based Nursing ; Gestational Age ; growth ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Infant, Premature - physiology ; Infant, Premature - psychology ; Language Development ; Motor Skills ; Neonatal Nursing - methods ; Neonatal Screening - methods ; Nursing ; Nursing Assessment - methods ; Nursing Research ; outcome ; post-conceptual age ; premature infant ; term equivalent age</subject><ispartof>Journal for specialists in pediatric nursing, 2010-01, Vol.15 (1), p.26-32</ispartof><rights>(2009), Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Jan 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4835-2879d6d00984078b391cb1204ffdd6530a4d703c1524d59f84a7641d752c7863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4835-2879d6d00984078b391cb1204ffdd6530a4d703c1524d59f84a7641d752c7863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1744-6155.2009.00215.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1744-6155.2009.00215.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27931,27932,45581,45582</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20074111$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>D'Agostino, Jo Ann</creatorcontrib><title>An Evidentiary Review Regarding the Use of Chronological and Adjusted Age in the Assessment of Preterm Infants</title><title>Journal for specialists in pediatric nursing</title><addtitle>J Spec Pediatr Nurs</addtitle><description>PURPOSE.  The evidence supporting the recommendation to use age adjustment when assessing the growth, motor, and global development of premature infants was explored. Following a comprehensive literature search, 16 articles that compared the use of adjusted and chronological age were reviewed. CONCLUSIONS.  The use of full age adjustment based on the degree of prematurity was supported for the assessment of premature infants for a minimum of 12 months adjusted age. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS.  The use of adjusted age enhances the ability to accurately recognize genuine delays as opposed to perceived delays related to a child's gestational age at birth.</description><subject>Adjusted age</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Child Development - physiology</subject><subject>chronological age</subject><subject>corrected age</subject><subject>development</subject><subject>Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Nursing</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>growth</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infant, Premature - physiology</subject><subject>Infant, Premature - psychology</subject><subject>Language Development</subject><subject>Motor Skills</subject><subject>Neonatal Nursing - methods</subject><subject>Neonatal Screening - methods</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Nursing Research</subject><subject>outcome</subject><subject>post-conceptual age</subject><subject>premature infant</subject><subject>term equivalent age</subject><issn>1539-0136</issn><issn>1744-6155</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUFP3DAQhS3UCijtX6isXnpKasd2nBx6WC2UUqEtBSoQF8sbO4vTxKF2Asu_74Sle-CELzOSv_c0Mw8hTElK4X1pUio5T3IqRJoRUqaEZFSk6x20v_14A71gZUIoy_fQuxgbQqjICN9Fe6CRHIz2kZ95fHTvjPWD0-ERn9t7Zx-grHQwzq_wcGvx72hxX-P5beh93_YrV-kWa2_wzDRjHCw0K4udf4JnMdoYOzCcNGfBDjZ0-MTX2g_xPXpb6zbaD8_1AF1-O7qcf09Ofx6fzGenScULJpKskKXJDWxWcCKLJStptaQwe10bkwtGNDeSsAr24UaUdcG1zDk1UmSVLHJ2gD5vbO9C_3e0cVCdi5VtW-1tP0YlGc-YZBkF8tMLsunH4GE2RUshc8LLEqBiA1WhjzHYWt0F18G5FCVqCkQ1arq7mu6upkDUUyBqDdKPz_7jsrNmK_yfAABfN8CDa-3jq43Vj4uzBXSgTzZ6B0Gst3od_qhcMinU1eJYLa7p4fzm-pfK2D8eKKay</recordid><startdate>201001</startdate><enddate>201001</enddate><creator>D'Agostino, Jo Ann</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201001</creationdate><title>An Evidentiary Review Regarding the Use of Chronological and Adjusted Age in the Assessment of Preterm Infants</title><author>D'Agostino, Jo Ann</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4835-2879d6d00984078b391cb1204ffdd6530a4d703c1524d59f84a7641d752c7863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adjusted age</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Child Development - physiology</topic><topic>chronological age</topic><topic>corrected age</topic><topic>development</topic><topic>Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Nursing</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>growth</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infant, Premature - physiology</topic><topic>Infant, Premature - psychology</topic><topic>Language Development</topic><topic>Motor Skills</topic><topic>Neonatal Nursing - methods</topic><topic>Neonatal Screening - methods</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Nursing Research</topic><topic>outcome</topic><topic>post-conceptual age</topic><topic>premature infant</topic><topic>term equivalent age</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>D'Agostino, Jo Ann</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal for specialists in pediatric nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>D'Agostino, Jo Ann</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Evidentiary Review Regarding the Use of Chronological and Adjusted Age in the Assessment of Preterm Infants</atitle><jtitle>Journal for specialists in pediatric nursing</jtitle><addtitle>J Spec Pediatr Nurs</addtitle><date>2010-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>26</spage><epage>32</epage><pages>26-32</pages><issn>1539-0136</issn><eissn>1744-6155</eissn><abstract>PURPOSE.  The evidence supporting the recommendation to use age adjustment when assessing the growth, motor, and global development of premature infants was explored. Following a comprehensive literature search, 16 articles that compared the use of adjusted and chronological age were reviewed. CONCLUSIONS.  The use of full age adjustment based on the degree of prematurity was supported for the assessment of premature infants for a minimum of 12 months adjusted age. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS.  The use of adjusted age enhances the ability to accurately recognize genuine delays as opposed to perceived delays related to a child's gestational age at birth.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>20074111</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1744-6155.2009.00215.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1539-0136
ispartof Journal for specialists in pediatric nursing, 2010-01, Vol.15 (1), p.26-32
issn 1539-0136
1744-6155
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734237321
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Adjusted age
Age Factors
Child Development - physiology
chronological age
corrected age
development
Developmental Disabilities - diagnosis
Diagnosis, Differential
Evidence-Based Nursing
Gestational Age
growth
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Premature - physiology
Infant, Premature - psychology
Language Development
Motor Skills
Neonatal Nursing - methods
Neonatal Screening - methods
Nursing
Nursing Assessment - methods
Nursing Research
outcome
post-conceptual age
premature infant
term equivalent age
title An Evidentiary Review Regarding the Use of Chronological and Adjusted Age in the Assessment of Preterm Infants
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T23%3A40%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Evidentiary%20Review%20Regarding%20the%20Use%20of%20Chronological%20and%20Adjusted%20Age%20in%20the%20Assessment%20of%20Preterm%20Infants&rft.jtitle=Journal%20for%20specialists%20in%20pediatric%20nursing&rft.au=D'Agostino,%20Jo%20Ann&rft.date=2010-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=26&rft.epage=32&rft.pages=26-32&rft.issn=1539-0136&rft.eissn=1744-6155&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1744-6155.2009.00215.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1942895181%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195760499&rft_id=info:pmid/20074111&rfr_iscdi=true