A Comparison of Delusions and Overvalued Ideas
The relationship between delusions and overvalued ideas is uncertain, and has clinical as well as conceptual implications. This study aims to compare delusions and overvalued ideas on several characteristics that might further describe and distinguish them. A total of 24 individuals with delusions a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of nervous and mental disease 2010-01, Vol.198 (1), p.35-38 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 38 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 35 |
| container_title | The journal of nervous and mental disease |
| container_volume | 198 |
| creator | Mullen, Richard Linscott, Richard J |
| description | The relationship between delusions and overvalued ideas is uncertain, and has clinical as well as conceptual implications. This study aims to compare delusions and overvalued ideas on several characteristics that might further describe and distinguish them. A total of 24 individuals with delusions and 27 with overvalued ideas were recruited from a psychiatric service and assessed using a semistructured interview. Deluded individuals were less likely to identify what might modify their belief, less preoccupied, and less concerned about othersʼ reactions than those with overvalued ideas. Delusions were less plausible and their onset less likely to appear reasonable. Delusions were more likely to have abrupt onset and overvalued ideas a gradual onset. Conviction and insight were similar in the 2 groups. Belief conviction and insight may be an inadequate basis for separating delusions from overvalued ideas. Abrupt onset, implausible content, and relative indifference to the opinions of others may be better distinguishing features. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181c818b2 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734231382</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>734231382</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4087-e5e8f3aa1686511cc3f526bd1715eb7af5c0387d39ae100163608b6c1dcc27a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1vEzEQhi0EoqHwDxBaISFOG2Y88UeOVcpHpUIvIHGzvN5ZdYuzDna2Ff8eRw1Uqi-WR8_MvH6EeI2wRFibD9--ni-hAyQmtBgs2k4-EQtUtG4N6Z9PxQJAypYA7Yl4UcoNABpawXNxIgE0Wm0WYnnWbNJ25_NY0tSkoTnnOJcxTaXxU99c3XK-9XHmvrno2ZeX4tngY-FXx_tU_Pj08fvmS3t59flic3bZhhVY07JiO5D3qK1WiCHQoKTuejSouDN-UAHImp7WnrHG0qTBdjpgH4I0HuhUvL-fu8vp98xl77ZjCRyjnzjNxdV_SEKyspJvH5E3ac5TDeckGDKgLFZodQ-FnErJPLhdHrc-_3EI7mDTVZvusc3a9uY4e-623P9v-qevAu-OgC_BxyH7KYzlgZOrNUqtH_bfpbjnXH7F-Y6zu2Yf99cO6lGgqJVwkFFf7aFk6C-ziIqZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>207370581</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparison of Delusions and Overvalued Ideas</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Mullen, Richard ; Linscott, Richard J</creator><creatorcontrib>Mullen, Richard ; Linscott, Richard J</creatorcontrib><description>The relationship between delusions and overvalued ideas is uncertain, and has clinical as well as conceptual implications. This study aims to compare delusions and overvalued ideas on several characteristics that might further describe and distinguish them. A total of 24 individuals with delusions and 27 with overvalued ideas were recruited from a psychiatric service and assessed using a semistructured interview. Deluded individuals were less likely to identify what might modify their belief, less preoccupied, and less concerned about othersʼ reactions than those with overvalued ideas. Delusions were less plausible and their onset less likely to appear reasonable. Delusions were more likely to have abrupt onset and overvalued ideas a gradual onset. Conviction and insight were similar in the 2 groups. Belief conviction and insight may be an inadequate basis for separating delusions from overvalued ideas. Abrupt onset, implausible content, and relative indifference to the opinions of others may be better distinguishing features.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3018</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-736X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181c818b2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20061867</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JNMDAN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Awareness ; Belief & doubt ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition Disorders - diagnosis ; Cognition Disorders - psychology ; Comparative analysis ; Delusions - diagnosis ; Delusions - psychology ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Models, Psychological ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Other psychotic disorders ; Paranoid Disorders - diagnosis ; Paranoid Disorders - psychology ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychometrics ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Psychoses ; Schizophrenia - diagnosis ; Schizophrenic Psychology ; Studies</subject><ispartof>The journal of nervous and mental disease, 2010-01, Vol.198 (1), p.35-38</ispartof><rights>2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Jan 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4087-e5e8f3aa1686511cc3f526bd1715eb7af5c0387d39ae100163608b6c1dcc27a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4087-e5e8f3aa1686511cc3f526bd1715eb7af5c0387d39ae100163608b6c1dcc27a03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,4010,27904,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22491266$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20061867$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mullen, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linscott, Richard J</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparison of Delusions and Overvalued Ideas</title><title>The journal of nervous and mental disease</title><addtitle>J Nerv Ment Dis</addtitle><description>The relationship between delusions and overvalued ideas is uncertain, and has clinical as well as conceptual implications. This study aims to compare delusions and overvalued ideas on several characteristics that might further describe and distinguish them. A total of 24 individuals with delusions and 27 with overvalued ideas were recruited from a psychiatric service and assessed using a semistructured interview. Deluded individuals were less likely to identify what might modify their belief, less preoccupied, and less concerned about othersʼ reactions than those with overvalued ideas. Delusions were less plausible and their onset less likely to appear reasonable. Delusions were more likely to have abrupt onset and overvalued ideas a gradual onset. Conviction and insight were similar in the 2 groups. Belief conviction and insight may be an inadequate basis for separating delusions from overvalued ideas. Abrupt onset, implausible content, and relative indifference to the opinions of others may be better distinguishing features.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Awareness</subject><subject>Belief & doubt</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Delusions - diagnosis</subject><subject>Delusions - psychology</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Other psychotic disorders</subject><subject>Paranoid Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Paranoid Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychoses</subject><subject>Schizophrenia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Schizophrenic Psychology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0022-3018</issn><issn>1539-736X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1vEzEQhi0EoqHwDxBaISFOG2Y88UeOVcpHpUIvIHGzvN5ZdYuzDna2Ff8eRw1Uqi-WR8_MvH6EeI2wRFibD9--ni-hAyQmtBgs2k4-EQtUtG4N6Z9PxQJAypYA7Yl4UcoNABpawXNxIgE0Wm0WYnnWbNJ25_NY0tSkoTnnOJcxTaXxU99c3XK-9XHmvrno2ZeX4tngY-FXx_tU_Pj08fvmS3t59flic3bZhhVY07JiO5D3qK1WiCHQoKTuejSouDN-UAHImp7WnrHG0qTBdjpgH4I0HuhUvL-fu8vp98xl77ZjCRyjnzjNxdV_SEKyspJvH5E3ac5TDeckGDKgLFZodQ-FnErJPLhdHrc-_3EI7mDTVZvusc3a9uY4e-623P9v-qevAu-OgC_BxyH7KYzlgZOrNUqtH_bfpbjnXH7F-Y6zu2Yf99cO6lGgqJVwkFFf7aFk6C-ziIqZ</recordid><startdate>201001</startdate><enddate>201001</enddate><creator>Mullen, Richard</creator><creator>Linscott, Richard J</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201001</creationdate><title>A Comparison of Delusions and Overvalued Ideas</title><author>Mullen, Richard ; Linscott, Richard J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4087-e5e8f3aa1686511cc3f526bd1715eb7af5c0387d39ae100163608b6c1dcc27a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Awareness</topic><topic>Belief & doubt</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Delusions - diagnosis</topic><topic>Delusions - psychology</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Other psychotic disorders</topic><topic>Paranoid Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Paranoid Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychoses</topic><topic>Schizophrenia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Schizophrenic Psychology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mullen, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linscott, Richard J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of nervous and mental disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mullen, Richard</au><au>Linscott, Richard J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparison of Delusions and Overvalued Ideas</atitle><jtitle>The journal of nervous and mental disease</jtitle><addtitle>J Nerv Ment Dis</addtitle><date>2010-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>198</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>35</spage><epage>38</epage><pages>35-38</pages><issn>0022-3018</issn><eissn>1539-736X</eissn><coden>JNMDAN</coden><abstract>The relationship between delusions and overvalued ideas is uncertain, and has clinical as well as conceptual implications. This study aims to compare delusions and overvalued ideas on several characteristics that might further describe and distinguish them. A total of 24 individuals with delusions and 27 with overvalued ideas were recruited from a psychiatric service and assessed using a semistructured interview. Deluded individuals were less likely to identify what might modify their belief, less preoccupied, and less concerned about othersʼ reactions than those with overvalued ideas. Delusions were less plausible and their onset less likely to appear reasonable. Delusions were more likely to have abrupt onset and overvalued ideas a gradual onset. Conviction and insight were similar in the 2 groups. Belief conviction and insight may be an inadequate basis for separating delusions from overvalued ideas. Abrupt onset, implausible content, and relative indifference to the opinions of others may be better distinguishing features.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>20061867</pmid><doi>10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181c818b2</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-3018 |
| ispartof | The journal of nervous and mental disease, 2010-01, Vol.198 (1), p.35-38 |
| issn | 0022-3018 1539-736X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734231382 |
| source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
| subjects | Adult Adult and adolescent clinical studies Awareness Belief & doubt Biological and medical sciences Cognition Disorders - diagnosis Cognition Disorders - psychology Comparative analysis Delusions - diagnosis Delusions - psychology Diagnosis, Differential Female Humans Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Models, Psychological Neuropsychological Tests Other psychotic disorders Paranoid Disorders - diagnosis Paranoid Disorders - psychology Psychiatric Status Rating Scales Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychometrics Psychopathology. Psychiatry Psychoses Schizophrenia - diagnosis Schizophrenic Psychology Studies |
| title | A Comparison of Delusions and Overvalued Ideas |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T23%3A18%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparison%20of%20Delusions%20and%20Overvalued%20Ideas&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20nervous%20and%20mental%20disease&rft.au=Mullen,%20Richard&rft.date=2010-01&rft.volume=198&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=35&rft.epage=38&rft.pages=35-38&rft.issn=0022-3018&rft.eissn=1539-736X&rft.coden=JNMDAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181c818b2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E734231382%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=207370581&rft_id=info:pmid/20061867&rfr_iscdi=true |