The Ash Split CathTM as long-term IJ access: Hydraulic performance and longevity

The Ash Split CathTM as long-term IJ access: Hydraulic performance and longevity

A prospective observational study was performed to determine the duration of use of the Ash Split Cath placed as primary or bridge access in ESRD patients; 164 ESRD patients received a Split Cath in the IJ location, with transcutaneous placement guided by ultrasound. Mean follow-up time was 19.3 mon...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of vascular access 2002-01, Vol.3 (1), p.3-9
Hauptverfasser: Ash, S R, Mankus, R A, Sutton, J M, Spray, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 9
container_issue 1
container_start_page 3
container_title The journal of vascular access
container_volume 3
creator Ash, S R
Mankus, R A
Sutton, J M
Spray, M
description A prospective observational study was performed to determine the duration of use of the Ash Split Cath placed as primary or bridge access in ESRD patients; 164 ESRD patients received a Split Cath in the IJ location, with transcutaneous placement guided by ultrasound. Mean follow-up time was 19.3 months (maximum up to 48 months). During the follow-up, there were 36 catheter failures resulting in removal, 53% due to infection and the others due to outflow failure or break (leak) of the catheter. By Kaplan-Maier analysis 82% of placed catheters were functional at 12 months and half-life of catheter duration was 26 months. Blood flow rates during dialysis were not distinguishable between IJ catheter patients and those with functioning grafts or fistulas. Function, safety and duration of use of the Split Cath in the IJ location all compare favorably to AV grafts.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734211114</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>734211114</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p554-d3f5cf3eab27025b2572ca32a89d4e2653826d952a0f5f95d8804eb2ab70f7e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo10L1OwzAUBWAPIFoKr4C8MUVKru06ZqsqoEVFIJE9urGvaVD-sBOkvj1VKWc5y6cznAs2zzIwiQaTz9h1jF9pCkZl8orNMr0URio5Z-_Fnvgq7vnH0NQjX-O4L145Rt703WcyUmj59oWjtRTjA98cXMCpqS0fKPg-tNhZ4ti5E6efejzcsEuPTaTbcy9Y8fRYrDfJ7u15u17tkkEpmTjhlfWCsAKdgqpAabAoAHPjJMFSiRyWzijA1CtvlMvzVFIFWOnUa9Jiwe7_ZofQf08Ux7Kto6WmwY76KZZaSMiOkUd5d5ZT1ZIrh1C3GA7l_wfiF57fVhQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734211114</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Ash Split CathTM as long-term IJ access: Hydraulic performance and longevity</title><source>SAGE Journals Online</source><creator>Ash, S R ; Mankus, R A ; Sutton, J M ; Spray, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Ash, S R ; Mankus, R A ; Sutton, J M ; Spray, M</creatorcontrib><description>A prospective observational study was performed to determine the duration of use of the Ash Split Cath placed as primary or bridge access in ESRD patients; 164 ESRD patients received a Split Cath in the IJ location, with transcutaneous placement guided by ultrasound. Mean follow-up time was 19.3 months (maximum up to 48 months). During the follow-up, there were 36 catheter failures resulting in removal, 53% due to infection and the others due to outflow failure or break (leak) of the catheter. By Kaplan-Maier analysis 82% of placed catheters were functional at 12 months and half-life of catheter duration was 26 months. Blood flow rates during dialysis were not distinguishable between IJ catheter patients and those with functioning grafts or fistulas. Function, safety and duration of use of the Split Cath in the IJ location all compare favorably to AV grafts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1129-7298</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17639454</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>The journal of vascular access, 2002-01, Vol.3 (1), p.3-9</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17639454$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ash, S R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mankus, R A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spray, M</creatorcontrib><title>The Ash Split CathTM as long-term IJ access: Hydraulic performance and longevity</title><title>The journal of vascular access</title><addtitle>J Vasc Access</addtitle><description>A prospective observational study was performed to determine the duration of use of the Ash Split Cath placed as primary or bridge access in ESRD patients; 164 ESRD patients received a Split Cath in the IJ location, with transcutaneous placement guided by ultrasound. Mean follow-up time was 19.3 months (maximum up to 48 months). During the follow-up, there were 36 catheter failures resulting in removal, 53% due to infection and the others due to outflow failure or break (leak) of the catheter. By Kaplan-Maier analysis 82% of placed catheters were functional at 12 months and half-life of catheter duration was 26 months. Blood flow rates during dialysis were not distinguishable between IJ catheter patients and those with functioning grafts or fistulas. Function, safety and duration of use of the Split Cath in the IJ location all compare favorably to AV grafts.</description><issn>1129-7298</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo10L1OwzAUBWAPIFoKr4C8MUVKru06ZqsqoEVFIJE9urGvaVD-sBOkvj1VKWc5y6cznAs2zzIwiQaTz9h1jF9pCkZl8orNMr0URio5Z-_Fnvgq7vnH0NQjX-O4L145Rt703WcyUmj59oWjtRTjA98cXMCpqS0fKPg-tNhZ4ti5E6efejzcsEuPTaTbcy9Y8fRYrDfJ7u15u17tkkEpmTjhlfWCsAKdgqpAabAoAHPjJMFSiRyWzijA1CtvlMvzVFIFWOnUa9Jiwe7_ZofQf08Ux7Kto6WmwY76KZZaSMiOkUd5d5ZT1ZIrh1C3GA7l_wfiF57fVhQ</recordid><startdate>200201</startdate><enddate>200201</enddate><creator>Ash, S R</creator><creator>Mankus, R A</creator><creator>Sutton, J M</creator><creator>Spray, M</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200201</creationdate><title>The Ash Split CathTM as long-term IJ access: Hydraulic performance and longevity</title><author>Ash, S R ; Mankus, R A ; Sutton, J M ; Spray, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p554-d3f5cf3eab27025b2572ca32a89d4e2653826d952a0f5f95d8804eb2ab70f7e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ash, S R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mankus, R A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spray, M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of vascular access</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ash, S R</au><au>Mankus, R A</au><au>Sutton, J M</au><au>Spray, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Ash Split CathTM as long-term IJ access: Hydraulic performance and longevity</atitle><jtitle>The journal of vascular access</jtitle><addtitle>J Vasc Access</addtitle><date>2002-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>3-9</pages><issn>1129-7298</issn><abstract>A prospective observational study was performed to determine the duration of use of the Ash Split Cath placed as primary or bridge access in ESRD patients; 164 ESRD patients received a Split Cath in the IJ location, with transcutaneous placement guided by ultrasound. Mean follow-up time was 19.3 months (maximum up to 48 months). During the follow-up, there were 36 catheter failures resulting in removal, 53% due to infection and the others due to outflow failure or break (leak) of the catheter. By Kaplan-Maier analysis 82% of placed catheters were functional at 12 months and half-life of catheter duration was 26 months. Blood flow rates during dialysis were not distinguishable between IJ catheter patients and those with functioning grafts or fistulas. Function, safety and duration of use of the Split Cath in the IJ location all compare favorably to AV grafts.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>17639454</pmid><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1129-7298
ispartof The journal of vascular access, 2002-01, Vol.3 (1), p.3-9
issn 1129-7298
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734211114
source SAGE Journals Online
title The Ash Split CathTM as long-term IJ access: Hydraulic performance and longevity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T10%3A23%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Ash%20Split%20CathTM%20as%20long-term%20IJ%20access:%20Hydraulic%20performance%20and%20longevity&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20vascular%20access&rft.au=Ash,%20S%20R&rft.date=2002-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=3-9&rft.issn=1129-7298&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E734211114%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734211114&rft_id=info:pmid/17639454&rfr_iscdi=true