Why do residents choose the medical oncology specialty? Implications for future recruitment—results of the 2007 French Association of Residents in Oncology (AERIO) Survey

Background: The aim of this study was to analyze demography, motivation behind the choice of the medical oncology specialty, career plans, and the quality of training in medical oncology and to provide guidance to candidates for boosting the number of oncologists. Methods: In 2007, the French Associ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of oncology 2010-01, Vol.21 (1), p.161-165
Hauptverfasser: Loriot, Y., Albiges-Sauvin, L., Dionysopoulos, D., Bouyon-Monteau, A., Boyle, H., You, B., Massard, C., de La Motte Rouge, T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 165
container_issue 1
container_start_page 161
container_title Annals of oncology
container_volume 21
creator Loriot, Y.
Albiges-Sauvin, L.
Dionysopoulos, D.
Bouyon-Monteau, A.
Boyle, H.
You, B.
Massard, C.
de La Motte Rouge, T.
description Background: The aim of this study was to analyze demography, motivation behind the choice of the medical oncology specialty, career plans, and the quality of training in medical oncology and to provide guidance to candidates for boosting the number of oncologists. Methods: In 2007, the French Association of Residents in Oncology conducted a nationwide study of all medical oncology residents in France. Results: The strongest factors that had influenced their decision to become a medical oncology specialist were an interest in medical oncology (98%), exposure to this branch of medicine during graduate training as a medical student (83%), interest in research (81%), and the diversity of the activity (75%). The mean score for the quality of training was 6 (0–10). More time for reading during working hours as well as for attending staff meetings and greater availability of teaching oncologists would improve the quality of training. The most popular career choice was working in a public hospital but most residents stated that they had not received adequate information about the different career plans. Conclusions: No data are available regarding how training in medical oncology is perceived. This study provides useful data for future policies to boost the number of oncologists.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/annonc/mdp294
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734201643</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/annonc/mdp294</oup_id><sourcerecordid>734201643</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-ebf3e88e4d81cd4656eaaaf0b1d6f4508271884968ef5b0659c477adfe69d89f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkb2O1DAURiMEYoeFkha5QSxFWNtxHLtCo9X-jLQw0gJiRWN5nGvGkMTBThDpeAgeg6fiSfCQYSipXNyj813fL8seE_yCYFmc6q7znTlt655KdidbkJLLXGBG7mYLLGmRV2XBjrIHMX7CGHNJ5f3siEhORcmrRfbz_XZCtUcBoquhGyIyW-8joGELqIXaGd2gFOAb_3FCsQfjdDNML9Gq7Zs0HJzvIrI-IDsOY4AkMmF0Q5tcv77_SNqxSVJv_wgpxhW6CNCZLVrG6JNsJ9iNbw4LuA6t_waeLM9vVuvn6M0YvsL0MLtndRPh0f49zt5dnL89u8qv15ers-V1bkpMhxw2tgAhgNWCmJrxkoPW2uINqbllJRa0IkIwyQXYcoN5KQ2rKl1b4LIW0hbH2bPZ2wf_ZYQ4qNZFA02jO_BjVFXBKCacFYnMZ9IEH2MAq_rgWh0mRbDa9aPmftTcT-Kf7M3jJl33H70vJAFP94CO6fQ26M64eOAo5bjggifuZOb82P83c7-jiwN8O8A6fFYpsCrV1e0Hdfma31LyiqW__QbZE7u8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734201643</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why do residents choose the medical oncology specialty? Implications for future recruitment—results of the 2007 French Association of Residents in Oncology (AERIO) Survey</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Loriot, Y. ; Albiges-Sauvin, L. ; Dionysopoulos, D. ; Bouyon-Monteau, A. ; Boyle, H. ; You, B. ; Massard, C. ; de La Motte Rouge, T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Loriot, Y. ; Albiges-Sauvin, L. ; Dionysopoulos, D. ; Bouyon-Monteau, A. ; Boyle, H. ; You, B. ; Massard, C. ; de La Motte Rouge, T. ; French Association of Residents in Oncology</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The aim of this study was to analyze demography, motivation behind the choice of the medical oncology specialty, career plans, and the quality of training in medical oncology and to provide guidance to candidates for boosting the number of oncologists. Methods: In 2007, the French Association of Residents in Oncology conducted a nationwide study of all medical oncology residents in France. Results: The strongest factors that had influenced their decision to become a medical oncology specialist were an interest in medical oncology (98%), exposure to this branch of medicine during graduate training as a medical student (83%), interest in research (81%), and the diversity of the activity (75%). The mean score for the quality of training was 6 (0–10). More time for reading during working hours as well as for attending staff meetings and greater availability of teaching oncologists would improve the quality of training. The most popular career choice was working in a public hospital but most residents stated that they had not received adequate information about the different career plans. Conclusions: No data are available regarding how training in medical oncology is perceived. This study provides useful data for future policies to boost the number of oncologists.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0923-7534</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1569-8041</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdp294</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19628567</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Antineoplastic agents ; Biological and medical sciences ; cancer ; Choice Behavior ; demography ; Education, Medical, Graduate ; Female ; France ; Humans ; Internship and Residency - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Male ; medical oncology ; Medical Oncology - education ; Medical Oncology - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Medical sciences ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Physicians - supply &amp; distribution ; resident ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; training ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>Annals of oncology, 2010-01, Vol.21 (1), p.161-165</ispartof><rights>The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org 2009</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-ebf3e88e4d81cd4656eaaaf0b1d6f4508271884968ef5b0659c477adfe69d89f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-ebf3e88e4d81cd4656eaaaf0b1d6f4508271884968ef5b0659c477adfe69d89f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22603686$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19628567$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loriot, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albiges-Sauvin, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dionysopoulos, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouyon-Monteau, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyle, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>You, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massard, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de La Motte Rouge, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French Association of Residents in Oncology</creatorcontrib><title>Why do residents choose the medical oncology specialty? Implications for future recruitment—results of the 2007 French Association of Residents in Oncology (AERIO) Survey</title><title>Annals of oncology</title><addtitle>Ann Oncol</addtitle><description>Background: The aim of this study was to analyze demography, motivation behind the choice of the medical oncology specialty, career plans, and the quality of training in medical oncology and to provide guidance to candidates for boosting the number of oncologists. Methods: In 2007, the French Association of Residents in Oncology conducted a nationwide study of all medical oncology residents in France. Results: The strongest factors that had influenced their decision to become a medical oncology specialist were an interest in medical oncology (98%), exposure to this branch of medicine during graduate training as a medical student (83%), interest in research (81%), and the diversity of the activity (75%). The mean score for the quality of training was 6 (0–10). More time for reading during working hours as well as for attending staff meetings and greater availability of teaching oncologists would improve the quality of training. The most popular career choice was working in a public hospital but most residents stated that they had not received adequate information about the different career plans. Conclusions: No data are available regarding how training in medical oncology is perceived. This study provides useful data for future policies to boost the number of oncologists.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antineoplastic agents</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>cancer</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>demography</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Graduate</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>France</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>medical oncology</subject><subject>Medical Oncology - education</subject><subject>Medical Oncology - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Physicians - supply &amp; distribution</subject><subject>resident</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>training</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>0923-7534</issn><issn>1569-8041</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkb2O1DAURiMEYoeFkha5QSxFWNtxHLtCo9X-jLQw0gJiRWN5nGvGkMTBThDpeAgeg6fiSfCQYSipXNyj813fL8seE_yCYFmc6q7znTlt655KdidbkJLLXGBG7mYLLGmRV2XBjrIHMX7CGHNJ5f3siEhORcmrRfbz_XZCtUcBoquhGyIyW-8joGELqIXaGd2gFOAb_3FCsQfjdDNML9Gq7Zs0HJzvIrI-IDsOY4AkMmF0Q5tcv77_SNqxSVJv_wgpxhW6CNCZLVrG6JNsJ9iNbw4LuA6t_waeLM9vVuvn6M0YvsL0MLtndRPh0f49zt5dnL89u8qv15ers-V1bkpMhxw2tgAhgNWCmJrxkoPW2uINqbllJRa0IkIwyQXYcoN5KQ2rKl1b4LIW0hbH2bPZ2wf_ZYQ4qNZFA02jO_BjVFXBKCacFYnMZ9IEH2MAq_rgWh0mRbDa9aPmftTcT-Kf7M3jJl33H70vJAFP94CO6fQ26M64eOAo5bjggifuZOb82P83c7-jiwN8O8A6fFYpsCrV1e0Hdfma31LyiqW__QbZE7u8</recordid><startdate>20100101</startdate><enddate>20100101</enddate><creator>Loriot, Y.</creator><creator>Albiges-Sauvin, L.</creator><creator>Dionysopoulos, D.</creator><creator>Bouyon-Monteau, A.</creator><creator>Boyle, H.</creator><creator>You, B.</creator><creator>Massard, C.</creator><creator>de La Motte Rouge, T.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100101</creationdate><title>Why do residents choose the medical oncology specialty? Implications for future recruitment—results of the 2007 French Association of Residents in Oncology (AERIO) Survey</title><author>Loriot, Y. ; Albiges-Sauvin, L. ; Dionysopoulos, D. ; Bouyon-Monteau, A. ; Boyle, H. ; You, B. ; Massard, C. ; de La Motte Rouge, T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-ebf3e88e4d81cd4656eaaaf0b1d6f4508271884968ef5b0659c477adfe69d89f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antineoplastic agents</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>cancer</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>demography</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Graduate</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>France</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>medical oncology</topic><topic>Medical Oncology - education</topic><topic>Medical Oncology - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Physicians - supply &amp; distribution</topic><topic>resident</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>training</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loriot, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albiges-Sauvin, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dionysopoulos, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouyon-Monteau, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyle, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>You, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massard, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de La Motte Rouge, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French Association of Residents in Oncology</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loriot, Y.</au><au>Albiges-Sauvin, L.</au><au>Dionysopoulos, D.</au><au>Bouyon-Monteau, A.</au><au>Boyle, H.</au><au>You, B.</au><au>Massard, C.</au><au>de La Motte Rouge, T.</au><aucorp>French Association of Residents in Oncology</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why do residents choose the medical oncology specialty? Implications for future recruitment—results of the 2007 French Association of Residents in Oncology (AERIO) Survey</atitle><jtitle>Annals of oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Oncol</addtitle><date>2010-01-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>161</spage><epage>165</epage><pages>161-165</pages><issn>0923-7534</issn><eissn>1569-8041</eissn><abstract>Background: The aim of this study was to analyze demography, motivation behind the choice of the medical oncology specialty, career plans, and the quality of training in medical oncology and to provide guidance to candidates for boosting the number of oncologists. Methods: In 2007, the French Association of Residents in Oncology conducted a nationwide study of all medical oncology residents in France. Results: The strongest factors that had influenced their decision to become a medical oncology specialist were an interest in medical oncology (98%), exposure to this branch of medicine during graduate training as a medical student (83%), interest in research (81%), and the diversity of the activity (75%). The mean score for the quality of training was 6 (0–10). More time for reading during working hours as well as for attending staff meetings and greater availability of teaching oncologists would improve the quality of training. The most popular career choice was working in a public hospital but most residents stated that they had not received adequate information about the different career plans. Conclusions: No data are available regarding how training in medical oncology is perceived. This study provides useful data for future policies to boost the number of oncologists.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>19628567</pmid><doi>10.1093/annonc/mdp294</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0923-7534
ispartof Annals of oncology, 2010-01, Vol.21 (1), p.161-165
issn 0923-7534
1569-8041
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734201643
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Antineoplastic agents
Biological and medical sciences
cancer
Choice Behavior
demography
Education, Medical, Graduate
Female
France
Humans
Internship and Residency - statistics & numerical data
Male
medical oncology
Medical Oncology - education
Medical Oncology - statistics & numerical data
Medical sciences
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Physicians - supply & distribution
resident
Surveys and Questionnaires
training
Workforce
title Why do residents choose the medical oncology specialty? Implications for future recruitment—results of the 2007 French Association of Residents in Oncology (AERIO) Survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T16%3A05%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20do%20residents%20choose%20the%20medical%20oncology%20specialty?%20Implications%20for%20future%20recruitment%E2%80%94results%20of%20the%202007%20French%20Association%20of%20Residents%20in%20Oncology%20(AERIO)%20Survey&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20oncology&rft.au=Loriot,%20Y.&rft.aucorp=French%20Association%20of%20Residents%20in%20Oncology&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=161&rft.epage=165&rft.pages=161-165&rft.issn=0923-7534&rft.eissn=1569-8041&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp294&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E734201643%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734201643&rft_id=info:pmid/19628567&rft_oup_id=10.1093/annonc/mdp294&rfr_iscdi=true