Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma: Multi-Institutional Experience

This multi-institutional registry study evaluated cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM). A multi-institutional data registry that included 405 patients with DMPM treated by a uniform approach t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical oncology 2009-12, Vol.27 (36), p.6237-6242
Hauptverfasser: Yan, Tristan D, Deraco, Marcello, Baratti, Dario, Kusamura, Shigeki, Elias, Dominique, Glehen, Olivier, Gilly, François N, Levine, Edward A, Shen, Perry, Mohamed, Faheez, Moran, Brendan J, Morris, David L, Chua, Terence C, Piso, Pompiliu, Sugarbaker, Paul H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 6242
container_issue 36
container_start_page 6237
container_title Journal of clinical oncology
container_volume 27
creator Yan, Tristan D
Deraco, Marcello
Baratti, Dario
Kusamura, Shigeki
Elias, Dominique
Glehen, Olivier
Gilly, François N
Levine, Edward A
Shen, Perry
Mohamed, Faheez
Moran, Brendan J
Morris, David L
Chua, Terence C
Piso, Pompiliu
Sugarbaker, Paul H
description This multi-institutional registry study evaluated cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM). A multi-institutional data registry that included 405 patients with DMPM treated by a uniform approach that used CRS and HIPEC was established. The primary end point was overall survival. The secondary end point was evaluation of prognostic variables for overall survival. Follow-up was complete in 401 patients (99%). The median follow-up period for the patients who were alive was 33 months (range, 1 to 235 months). The mean age was 50 years (standard deviation [SD], 14 years). Three hundred eighteen patients (79%) had epithelial tumors. Twenty-five patients (6%) had positive lymph nodes. The mean peritoneal cancer index was 20. One hundred eighty-seven patients (46%) had complete or near-complete cytoreduction. Three hundred seventy-two patients (92%) received HIPEC. One hundred twenty-seven patients (31%) had grades 3 to 4 complications. Nine patients (2%) died perioperatively. The mean length of hospital stay was 22 days (SD, 15 days). The overall median survival was 53 months (1 to 235 months), and 3- and 5-year survival rates were 60% and 47%, respectively. Four prognostic factors were independently associated with improved survival in the multivariate analysis: epithelial subtype (P < .001), absence of lymph node metastasis (P < .001), completeness of cytoreduction scores of CC-0 or CC-1 (P < .001), and HIPEC (P = .002). The data suggest that CRS combined with HIPEC achieved prolonged survival in selected patients with DMPM.
doi_str_mv 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.9640
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734200943</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>734200943</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-3e7984a05e8fe1116948240d3af067514bcf7e2ae95ba9a395d2d71f06078f773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1v1DAQhi1ERZfCnRPyjVMWfyWOuaGo0EVdFQkq9WZ5k8muKydebKc0P4F_jaOutKfRaJ73HelB6AMla8oI-fyjuVvnqdaMr1UlyCu0oiWThZRl-RqtiOSsoDV_uERvY3wkhIqal2_QJVWKyrpiK_SvmZMP0E1tsk-Af01hD2HGZuzwzXyEkA4QBtvizZiCybtNfgTjcHOAwS9Hc5xx7wPeGmf3oxkT_nmmthAXyFk_mC94O7lki80Yk01Tsn7MxPXzUgpjC-_QRW9chPeneYXuv13_bm6K27vvm-brbdEKXqeCg1S1MKSEugdKaaVEzQTpuOlJJUsqdm0vgRlQ5c4ow1XZsU7SfCSy7qXkV-jTS-8x-D8TxKQHG1twzozgp6glF4tSwTNJXsg2-BgD9PoY7GDCrCnRi3-d_esF1ozrxX-OfDyVT7sBunPgJPz8_WD3h782gI6DcS7jTD-2nknNK505yf8DOdWRmA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734200943</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma: Multi-Institutional Experience</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Yan, Tristan D ; Deraco, Marcello ; Baratti, Dario ; Kusamura, Shigeki ; Elias, Dominique ; Glehen, Olivier ; Gilly, François N ; Levine, Edward A ; Shen, Perry ; Mohamed, Faheez ; Moran, Brendan J ; Morris, David L ; Chua, Terence C ; Piso, Pompiliu ; Sugarbaker, Paul H</creator><creatorcontrib>Yan, Tristan D ; Deraco, Marcello ; Baratti, Dario ; Kusamura, Shigeki ; Elias, Dominique ; Glehen, Olivier ; Gilly, François N ; Levine, Edward A ; Shen, Perry ; Mohamed, Faheez ; Moran, Brendan J ; Morris, David L ; Chua, Terence C ; Piso, Pompiliu ; Sugarbaker, Paul H</creatorcontrib><description>This multi-institutional registry study evaluated cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM). A multi-institutional data registry that included 405 patients with DMPM treated by a uniform approach that used CRS and HIPEC was established. The primary end point was overall survival. The secondary end point was evaluation of prognostic variables for overall survival. Follow-up was complete in 401 patients (99%). The median follow-up period for the patients who were alive was 33 months (range, 1 to 235 months). The mean age was 50 years (standard deviation [SD], 14 years). Three hundred eighteen patients (79%) had epithelial tumors. Twenty-five patients (6%) had positive lymph nodes. The mean peritoneal cancer index was 20. One hundred eighty-seven patients (46%) had complete or near-complete cytoreduction. Three hundred seventy-two patients (92%) received HIPEC. One hundred twenty-seven patients (31%) had grades 3 to 4 complications. Nine patients (2%) died perioperatively. The mean length of hospital stay was 22 days (SD, 15 days). The overall median survival was 53 months (1 to 235 months), and 3- and 5-year survival rates were 60% and 47%, respectively. Four prognostic factors were independently associated with improved survival in the multivariate analysis: epithelial subtype (P &lt; .001), absence of lymph node metastasis (P &lt; .001), completeness of cytoreduction scores of CC-0 or CC-1 (P &lt; .001), and HIPEC (P = .002). The data suggest that CRS combined with HIPEC achieved prolonged survival in selected patients with DMPM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-7755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.9640</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19917862</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society of Clinical Oncology</publisher><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Hyperthermia, Induced - methods ; Infusions, Parenteral ; Male ; Mesothelioma - drug therapy ; Mesothelioma - pathology ; Mesothelioma - surgery ; Mesothelioma - therapy ; Middle Aged ; Peritoneal Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Peritoneal Neoplasms - pathology ; Peritoneal Neoplasms - surgery ; Peritoneal Neoplasms - therapy ; Prognosis ; Survival Rate</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical oncology, 2009-12, Vol.27 (36), p.6237-6242</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-3e7984a05e8fe1116948240d3af067514bcf7e2ae95ba9a395d2d71f06078f773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-3e7984a05e8fe1116948240d3af067514bcf7e2ae95ba9a395d2d71f06078f773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3716,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19917862$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yan, Tristan D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deraco, Marcello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baratti, Dario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kusamura, Shigeki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elias, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glehen, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilly, François N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, Edward A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Perry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamed, Faheez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moran, Brendan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, David L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chua, Terence C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piso, Pompiliu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugarbaker, Paul H</creatorcontrib><title>Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma: Multi-Institutional Experience</title><title>Journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>This multi-institutional registry study evaluated cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM). A multi-institutional data registry that included 405 patients with DMPM treated by a uniform approach that used CRS and HIPEC was established. The primary end point was overall survival. The secondary end point was evaluation of prognostic variables for overall survival. Follow-up was complete in 401 patients (99%). The median follow-up period for the patients who were alive was 33 months (range, 1 to 235 months). The mean age was 50 years (standard deviation [SD], 14 years). Three hundred eighteen patients (79%) had epithelial tumors. Twenty-five patients (6%) had positive lymph nodes. The mean peritoneal cancer index was 20. One hundred eighty-seven patients (46%) had complete or near-complete cytoreduction. Three hundred seventy-two patients (92%) received HIPEC. One hundred twenty-seven patients (31%) had grades 3 to 4 complications. Nine patients (2%) died perioperatively. The mean length of hospital stay was 22 days (SD, 15 days). The overall median survival was 53 months (1 to 235 months), and 3- and 5-year survival rates were 60% and 47%, respectively. Four prognostic factors were independently associated with improved survival in the multivariate analysis: epithelial subtype (P &lt; .001), absence of lymph node metastasis (P &lt; .001), completeness of cytoreduction scores of CC-0 or CC-1 (P &lt; .001), and HIPEC (P = .002). The data suggest that CRS combined with HIPEC achieved prolonged survival in selected patients with DMPM.</description><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperthermia, Induced - methods</subject><subject>Infusions, Parenteral</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mesothelioma - drug therapy</subject><subject>Mesothelioma - pathology</subject><subject>Mesothelioma - surgery</subject><subject>Mesothelioma - therapy</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Peritoneal Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Peritoneal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Peritoneal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Peritoneal Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><issn>0732-183X</issn><issn>1527-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkE1v1DAQhi1ERZfCnRPyjVMWfyWOuaGo0EVdFQkq9WZ5k8muKydebKc0P4F_jaOutKfRaJ73HelB6AMla8oI-fyjuVvnqdaMr1UlyCu0oiWThZRl-RqtiOSsoDV_uERvY3wkhIqal2_QJVWKyrpiK_SvmZMP0E1tsk-Af01hD2HGZuzwzXyEkA4QBtvizZiCybtNfgTjcHOAwS9Hc5xx7wPeGmf3oxkT_nmmthAXyFk_mC94O7lki80Yk01Tsn7MxPXzUgpjC-_QRW9chPeneYXuv13_bm6K27vvm-brbdEKXqeCg1S1MKSEugdKaaVEzQTpuOlJJUsqdm0vgRlQ5c4ow1XZsU7SfCSy7qXkV-jTS-8x-D8TxKQHG1twzozgp6glF4tSwTNJXsg2-BgD9PoY7GDCrCnRi3-d_esF1ozrxX-OfDyVT7sBunPgJPz8_WD3h782gI6DcS7jTD-2nknNK505yf8DOdWRmA</recordid><startdate>20091220</startdate><enddate>20091220</enddate><creator>Yan, Tristan D</creator><creator>Deraco, Marcello</creator><creator>Baratti, Dario</creator><creator>Kusamura, Shigeki</creator><creator>Elias, Dominique</creator><creator>Glehen, Olivier</creator><creator>Gilly, François N</creator><creator>Levine, Edward A</creator><creator>Shen, Perry</creator><creator>Mohamed, Faheez</creator><creator>Moran, Brendan J</creator><creator>Morris, David L</creator><creator>Chua, Terence C</creator><creator>Piso, Pompiliu</creator><creator>Sugarbaker, Paul H</creator><general>American Society of Clinical Oncology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091220</creationdate><title>Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma: Multi-Institutional Experience</title><author>Yan, Tristan D ; Deraco, Marcello ; Baratti, Dario ; Kusamura, Shigeki ; Elias, Dominique ; Glehen, Olivier ; Gilly, François N ; Levine, Edward A ; Shen, Perry ; Mohamed, Faheez ; Moran, Brendan J ; Morris, David L ; Chua, Terence C ; Piso, Pompiliu ; Sugarbaker, Paul H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-3e7984a05e8fe1116948240d3af067514bcf7e2ae95ba9a395d2d71f06078f773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperthermia, Induced - methods</topic><topic>Infusions, Parenteral</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mesothelioma - drug therapy</topic><topic>Mesothelioma - pathology</topic><topic>Mesothelioma - surgery</topic><topic>Mesothelioma - therapy</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Peritoneal Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Peritoneal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Peritoneal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Peritoneal Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yan, Tristan D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deraco, Marcello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baratti, Dario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kusamura, Shigeki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elias, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glehen, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilly, François N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, Edward A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Perry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamed, Faheez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moran, Brendan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, David L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chua, Terence C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piso, Pompiliu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugarbaker, Paul H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yan, Tristan D</au><au>Deraco, Marcello</au><au>Baratti, Dario</au><au>Kusamura, Shigeki</au><au>Elias, Dominique</au><au>Glehen, Olivier</au><au>Gilly, François N</au><au>Levine, Edward A</au><au>Shen, Perry</au><au>Mohamed, Faheez</au><au>Moran, Brendan J</au><au>Morris, David L</au><au>Chua, Terence C</au><au>Piso, Pompiliu</au><au>Sugarbaker, Paul H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma: Multi-Institutional Experience</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2009-12-20</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>36</issue><spage>6237</spage><epage>6242</epage><pages>6237-6242</pages><issn>0732-183X</issn><eissn>1527-7755</eissn><abstract>This multi-institutional registry study evaluated cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM). A multi-institutional data registry that included 405 patients with DMPM treated by a uniform approach that used CRS and HIPEC was established. The primary end point was overall survival. The secondary end point was evaluation of prognostic variables for overall survival. Follow-up was complete in 401 patients (99%). The median follow-up period for the patients who were alive was 33 months (range, 1 to 235 months). The mean age was 50 years (standard deviation [SD], 14 years). Three hundred eighteen patients (79%) had epithelial tumors. Twenty-five patients (6%) had positive lymph nodes. The mean peritoneal cancer index was 20. One hundred eighty-seven patients (46%) had complete or near-complete cytoreduction. Three hundred seventy-two patients (92%) received HIPEC. One hundred twenty-seven patients (31%) had grades 3 to 4 complications. Nine patients (2%) died perioperatively. The mean length of hospital stay was 22 days (SD, 15 days). The overall median survival was 53 months (1 to 235 months), and 3- and 5-year survival rates were 60% and 47%, respectively. Four prognostic factors were independently associated with improved survival in the multivariate analysis: epithelial subtype (P &lt; .001), absence of lymph node metastasis (P &lt; .001), completeness of cytoreduction scores of CC-0 or CC-1 (P &lt; .001), and HIPEC (P = .002). The data suggest that CRS combined with HIPEC achieved prolonged survival in selected patients with DMPM.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society of Clinical Oncology</pub><pmid>19917862</pmid><doi>10.1200/JCO.2009.23.9640</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0732-183X
ispartof Journal of clinical oncology, 2009-12, Vol.27 (36), p.6237-6242
issn 0732-183X
1527-7755
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734200943
source MEDLINE; American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Antineoplastic Agents - administration & dosage
Combined Modality Therapy
Female
Humans
Hyperthermia, Induced - methods
Infusions, Parenteral
Male
Mesothelioma - drug therapy
Mesothelioma - pathology
Mesothelioma - surgery
Mesothelioma - therapy
Middle Aged
Peritoneal Neoplasms - drug therapy
Peritoneal Neoplasms - pathology
Peritoneal Neoplasms - surgery
Peritoneal Neoplasms - therapy
Prognosis
Survival Rate
title Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma: Multi-Institutional Experience
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T03%3A14%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cytoreductive%20Surgery%20and%20Hyperthermic%20Intraperitoneal%20Chemotherapy%20for%20Malignant%20Peritoneal%20Mesothelioma:%20Multi-Institutional%20Experience&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=Yan,%20Tristan%20D&rft.date=2009-12-20&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=36&rft.spage=6237&rft.epage=6242&rft.pages=6237-6242&rft.issn=0732-183X&rft.eissn=1527-7755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.9640&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E734200943%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734200943&rft_id=info:pmid/19917862&rfr_iscdi=true