Measuring Methods for Functional Reach Test: Comparison of 1-Arm Reach and 2-Arm Reach
Abstract Kage H, Okuda M, Nakamura I, Kunitsugu I, Sugiyama S, Hobara T. Measuring methods for functional reach test: comparison of 1-arm reach and 2-arm reach. Objectives To investigate which functional reach test better reflects the center of pressure excursion, a 1-arm reach or a 2-arm reach, and...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2009-12, Vol.90 (12), p.2103-2107 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2107 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 12 |
| container_start_page | 2103 |
| container_title | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation |
| container_volume | 90 |
| creator | Kage, Haruko, PT, BA Okuda, Masayuki, MD, PhD Nakamura, Ippei, PT Kunitsugu, Ichiro, MD Sugiyama, Shinichi, MD Hobara, Tatsuya, MD, PhD |
| description | Abstract Kage H, Okuda M, Nakamura I, Kunitsugu I, Sugiyama S, Hobara T. Measuring methods for functional reach test: comparison of 1-arm reach and 2-arm reach. Objectives To investigate which functional reach test better reflects the center of pressure excursion, a 1-arm reach or a 2-arm reach, and to investigate the effect of trunk rotation on the reach distance in a 1-arm reach. In addition, we considered the influence of the individual variation at the starting position. Design Descriptive study using a force platform and a 3-dimensional (3D) motion capture system. Setting Motion analysis laboratory in a college setting. Participants Elderly volunteers (N=41; 15 men, 26 women; 71.8±5.2y). Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures 3D coordinate data and the movement of the center of pressure. Results The correlation between the reach distance and the center of pressure excursion was significantly higher ( P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.07.021 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734173954</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003999309007163</els_id><sourcerecordid>734173954</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-8fb4d8ca3e4bab0a022214db9d16a0cffd7db01c25b1dd3331aeca710052a873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd-L1DAQx4Mo3nr6D_ggfRGfWmeS_tiICMfincIdgi7iW5gmqZe1bdakFe6_v5QtHvjgUxjy-U4mn2HsJUKBgPXbQ0HHIRQcQBbQFMDxEdtgJXi-5fjjMdsAgMillOKMPYvxkMq6EviUnaGUtcSm2rDvN5biHNz4M7ux0603Met8yC7nUU_Oj9RnXy3p22xv4_Qu2_nhSMFFP2a-yzC_CMN6T6PJ-EP9nD3pqI_2xXqes_3lx_3uU3795erz7uI61xXUU77t2tJsNQlbttQCAeccS9NKgzWB7jrTmBZQ86pFY4QQSFZTgwAVp20jztmbU9tj8L_nNKIaXNS272m0fo6qESU2QlZlIvmJ1MHHGGynjsENFO4UglpsqoNabKrFpoJGJZsp9GptP7eDNQ-RVV8CXq8ARU19F2jULv7l0m_qklcyce9PnE0u_jgbVNTOjtoaF6yelPHu_3N8-Ceueze69OIve2fjwc8hbSoqVJErUN-WvS9rBwnQYC3EPU5PprU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734173954</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring Methods for Functional Reach Test: Comparison of 1-Arm Reach and 2-Arm Reach</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Kage, Haruko, PT, BA ; Okuda, Masayuki, MD, PhD ; Nakamura, Ippei, PT ; Kunitsugu, Ichiro, MD ; Sugiyama, Shinichi, MD ; Hobara, Tatsuya, MD, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Kage, Haruko, PT, BA ; Okuda, Masayuki, MD, PhD ; Nakamura, Ippei, PT ; Kunitsugu, Ichiro, MD ; Sugiyama, Shinichi, MD ; Hobara, Tatsuya, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Kage H, Okuda M, Nakamura I, Kunitsugu I, Sugiyama S, Hobara T. Measuring methods for functional reach test: comparison of 1-arm reach and 2-arm reach. Objectives To investigate which functional reach test better reflects the center of pressure excursion, a 1-arm reach or a 2-arm reach, and to investigate the effect of trunk rotation on the reach distance in a 1-arm reach. In addition, we considered the influence of the individual variation at the starting position. Design Descriptive study using a force platform and a 3-dimensional (3D) motion capture system. Setting Motion analysis laboratory in a college setting. Participants Elderly volunteers (N=41; 15 men, 26 women; 71.8±5.2y). Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures 3D coordinate data and the movement of the center of pressure. Results The correlation between the reach distance and the center of pressure excursion was significantly higher ( P <.05) for the 1-arm reach ( r =.60, .72) compared with a 2-arm reach ( r =.41, .55). In the case of the 1-arm reach, center of pressure excursion was a significant factor affecting reach distance (β=.319, .470) in multivariate regression analysis, but trunk rotation was not (β=.162, .095). When the reach distance was measured using the heel as a reference, the correlation was stronger. Conclusions To evaluate dynamic balance, a 1-arm reach, which better reflects center of pressure excursion, is more valid. It is meaningful to reduce the individual variation of the acromion at the starting position.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-821X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.07.021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19969175</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APMHAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous ; Movement - physiology ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Postural Balance - physiology ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Rehabilitation ; Rotation ; Upper Extremity - physiology</subject><ispartof>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2009-12, Vol.90 (12), p.2103-2107</ispartof><rights>American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine</rights><rights>2009 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-8fb4d8ca3e4bab0a022214db9d16a0cffd7db01c25b1dd3331aeca710052a873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-8fb4d8ca3e4bab0a022214db9d16a0cffd7db01c25b1dd3331aeca710052a873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999309007163$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22264259$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19969175$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kage, Haruko, PT, BA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okuda, Masayuki, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Ippei, PT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunitsugu, Ichiro, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugiyama, Shinichi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hobara, Tatsuya, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring Methods for Functional Reach Test: Comparison of 1-Arm Reach and 2-Arm Reach</title><title>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><description>Abstract Kage H, Okuda M, Nakamura I, Kunitsugu I, Sugiyama S, Hobara T. Measuring methods for functional reach test: comparison of 1-arm reach and 2-arm reach. Objectives To investigate which functional reach test better reflects the center of pressure excursion, a 1-arm reach or a 2-arm reach, and to investigate the effect of trunk rotation on the reach distance in a 1-arm reach. In addition, we considered the influence of the individual variation at the starting position. Design Descriptive study using a force platform and a 3-dimensional (3D) motion capture system. Setting Motion analysis laboratory in a college setting. Participants Elderly volunteers (N=41; 15 men, 26 women; 71.8±5.2y). Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures 3D coordinate data and the movement of the center of pressure. Results The correlation between the reach distance and the center of pressure excursion was significantly higher ( P <.05) for the 1-arm reach ( r =.60, .72) compared with a 2-arm reach ( r =.41, .55). In the case of the 1-arm reach, center of pressure excursion was a significant factor affecting reach distance (β=.319, .470) in multivariate regression analysis, but trunk rotation was not (β=.162, .095). When the reach distance was measured using the heel as a reference, the correlation was stronger. Conclusions To evaluate dynamic balance, a 1-arm reach, which better reflects center of pressure excursion, is more valid. It is meaningful to reduce the individual variation of the acromion at the starting position.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Postural Balance - physiology</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Upper Extremity - physiology</subject><issn>0003-9993</issn><issn>1532-821X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd-L1DAQx4Mo3nr6D_ggfRGfWmeS_tiICMfincIdgi7iW5gmqZe1bdakFe6_v5QtHvjgUxjy-U4mn2HsJUKBgPXbQ0HHIRQcQBbQFMDxEdtgJXi-5fjjMdsAgMillOKMPYvxkMq6EviUnaGUtcSm2rDvN5biHNz4M7ux0603Met8yC7nUU_Oj9RnXy3p22xv4_Qu2_nhSMFFP2a-yzC_CMN6T6PJ-EP9nD3pqI_2xXqes_3lx_3uU3795erz7uI61xXUU77t2tJsNQlbttQCAeccS9NKgzWB7jrTmBZQ86pFY4QQSFZTgwAVp20jztmbU9tj8L_nNKIaXNS272m0fo6qESU2QlZlIvmJ1MHHGGynjsENFO4UglpsqoNabKrFpoJGJZsp9GptP7eDNQ-RVV8CXq8ARU19F2jULv7l0m_qklcyce9PnE0u_jgbVNTOjtoaF6yelPHu_3N8-Ceueze69OIve2fjwc8hbSoqVJErUN-WvS9rBwnQYC3EPU5PprU</recordid><startdate>20091201</startdate><enddate>20091201</enddate><creator>Kage, Haruko, PT, BA</creator><creator>Okuda, Masayuki, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Nakamura, Ippei, PT</creator><creator>Kunitsugu, Ichiro, MD</creator><creator>Sugiyama, Shinichi, MD</creator><creator>Hobara, Tatsuya, MD, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091201</creationdate><title>Measuring Methods for Functional Reach Test: Comparison of 1-Arm Reach and 2-Arm Reach</title><author>Kage, Haruko, PT, BA ; Okuda, Masayuki, MD, PhD ; Nakamura, Ippei, PT ; Kunitsugu, Ichiro, MD ; Sugiyama, Shinichi, MD ; Hobara, Tatsuya, MD, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-8fb4d8ca3e4bab0a022214db9d16a0cffd7db01c25b1dd3331aeca710052a873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Postural Balance - physiology</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Upper Extremity - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kage, Haruko, PT, BA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okuda, Masayuki, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Ippei, PT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunitsugu, Ichiro, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugiyama, Shinichi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hobara, Tatsuya, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kage, Haruko, PT, BA</au><au>Okuda, Masayuki, MD, PhD</au><au>Nakamura, Ippei, PT</au><au>Kunitsugu, Ichiro, MD</au><au>Sugiyama, Shinichi, MD</au><au>Hobara, Tatsuya, MD, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring Methods for Functional Reach Test: Comparison of 1-Arm Reach and 2-Arm Reach</atitle><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><date>2009-12-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2103</spage><epage>2107</epage><pages>2103-2107</pages><issn>0003-9993</issn><eissn>1532-821X</eissn><coden>APMHAI</coden><abstract>Abstract Kage H, Okuda M, Nakamura I, Kunitsugu I, Sugiyama S, Hobara T. Measuring methods for functional reach test: comparison of 1-arm reach and 2-arm reach. Objectives To investigate which functional reach test better reflects the center of pressure excursion, a 1-arm reach or a 2-arm reach, and to investigate the effect of trunk rotation on the reach distance in a 1-arm reach. In addition, we considered the influence of the individual variation at the starting position. Design Descriptive study using a force platform and a 3-dimensional (3D) motion capture system. Setting Motion analysis laboratory in a college setting. Participants Elderly volunteers (N=41; 15 men, 26 women; 71.8±5.2y). Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures 3D coordinate data and the movement of the center of pressure. Results The correlation between the reach distance and the center of pressure excursion was significantly higher ( P <.05) for the 1-arm reach ( r =.60, .72) compared with a 2-arm reach ( r =.41, .55). In the case of the 1-arm reach, center of pressure excursion was a significant factor affecting reach distance (β=.319, .470) in multivariate regression analysis, but trunk rotation was not (β=.162, .095). When the reach distance was measured using the heel as a reference, the correlation was stronger. Conclusions To evaluate dynamic balance, a 1-arm reach, which better reflects center of pressure excursion, is more valid. It is meaningful to reduce the individual variation of the acromion at the starting position.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>19969175</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.apmr.2009.07.021</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0003-9993 |
| ispartof | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2009-12, Vol.90 (12), p.2103-2107 |
| issn | 0003-9993 1532-821X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734173954 |
| source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
| subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Biological and medical sciences Biomechanical Phenomena Diseases of the osteoarticular system Female Humans Male Medical sciences Miscellaneous Movement - physiology Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Postural Balance - physiology Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) Rehabilitation Rotation Upper Extremity - physiology |
| title | Measuring Methods for Functional Reach Test: Comparison of 1-Arm Reach and 2-Arm Reach |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T21%3A36%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20Methods%20for%20Functional%20Reach%20Test:%20Comparison%20of%201-Arm%20Reach%20and%202-Arm%20Reach&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20physical%20medicine%20and%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Kage,%20Haruko,%20PT,%20BA&rft.date=2009-12-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2103&rft.epage=2107&rft.pages=2103-2107&rft.issn=0003-9993&rft.eissn=1532-821X&rft.coden=APMHAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apmr.2009.07.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E734173954%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734173954&rft_id=info:pmid/19969175&rft_els_id=S0003999309007163&rfr_iscdi=true |