Cardiac resynchronization therapy utilization for heart failure: Findings from IMPROVE HF
Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has established efficacy for patients with systolic heart failure (HF). Treatment rates and factors associated with CRT utilization among eligible patients in outpatient cardiology practices have not been well studied. Methods IMPROVE HF is a prospe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American heart journal 2009-12, Vol.158 (6), p.956-964 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 964 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 956 |
container_title | The American heart journal |
container_volume | 158 |
creator | Curtis, Anne B., MD Yancy, Clyde W., MD Albert, Nancy M., PhD, RN Stough, Wendy Gattis, PharmD Gheorghiade, Mihai, MD Heywood, J. Thomas, MD McBride, Mark L., PhD Mehra, Mandeep R., MD OConnor, Christopher M., MD Reynolds, Dwight, MD Walsh, Mary Norine, MD Fonarow, Gregg C., MD |
description | Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has established efficacy for patients with systolic heart failure (HF). Treatment rates and factors associated with CRT utilization among eligible patients in outpatient cardiology practices have not been well studied. Methods IMPROVE HF is a prospective cohort study designed to characterize current management of patients with chronic HF and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% in a registry of outpatient cardiology practices located throughout the United States. Baseline data were abstracted by trained chart review specialists from May 31, 2005, through June 22, 2007, for 15,381 patients attending 167 outpatient cardiology practices. Multivariable analyses of patient and practice characteristics identified predictors of CRT for eligible patients. Results A total of 1,373 patients were eligible for CRT based on current guideline criteria, and 533 (38.8%) received a CRT device, with 84.1% of these treated with a CRT-defibrillator. Cardiac resynchronization therapy use varied widely among practices, with 11.1% at the 25th percentile and 53.4% at the 75th percentile. Patient age, insurance, longer QRS duration, and practice location were independently associated with higher CRT utilization rates among eligible patients, whereas sex, HF etiology, and other clinical and laboratory parameters were not. Conclusions Despite being evidence based and guideline recommended, CRT is underutilized in eligible patients with significant variations associated with age, insurance, QRS duration, and geographic location of practices. Practice-specific performance improvement initiatives may be needed to reduce variations in use of CRT for eligible patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.10.011 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734169742</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002870309008035</els_id><sourcerecordid>734169742</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-662d7ace9800a84da71239acaddd1eb635c1261a62650754bafcada4db8c48713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMo7rj6A7xIwIOnHivp7nwoLMiw4y6srPgFnkImqXbS9nSPSbcw_nrTzMjCHjyFqjxvkTxFyHMGSwZMvG6XdtsuOYDO9RIYe0AWDLQshKyqh2QBALxQEsoz8iSlNpeCK_GYnDGta6UEX5DvKxt9sI5GTIfebePQhz92DENPxy1Guz_QaQzdv14zRLpFG0fa2NBNEd_Qdeh96H8k2sRhR68_fPx0--2SXq2fkkeN7RI-O53n5Ov68svqqri5fX-9endTuBrYWAjBvbQOtQKwqvJWMl5q66z3nuFGlLVjXDAruKhB1tXGNvnOVn6jXKUkK8_Jq-PcfRx-TZhGswvJYdfZHocpGVlWTGhZ8Uy-vEe2wxT7_DjDaqhqLZWGTLEj5eKQUsTG7GPY2XgwDMys3bQmazez9rmVtefMi9PkabNDf5c4ec7A2yOA2cTvgNEkF7B36ENENxo_hP-Ov7iXdl3og7PdTzxguvuFSdyA-TzvfV47aAAFZV3-BbRYpvU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1504597890</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cardiac resynchronization therapy utilization for heart failure: Findings from IMPROVE HF</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Curtis, Anne B., MD ; Yancy, Clyde W., MD ; Albert, Nancy M., PhD, RN ; Stough, Wendy Gattis, PharmD ; Gheorghiade, Mihai, MD ; Heywood, J. Thomas, MD ; McBride, Mark L., PhD ; Mehra, Mandeep R., MD ; OConnor, Christopher M., MD ; Reynolds, Dwight, MD ; Walsh, Mary Norine, MD ; Fonarow, Gregg C., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Curtis, Anne B., MD ; Yancy, Clyde W., MD ; Albert, Nancy M., PhD, RN ; Stough, Wendy Gattis, PharmD ; Gheorghiade, Mihai, MD ; Heywood, J. Thomas, MD ; McBride, Mark L., PhD ; Mehra, Mandeep R., MD ; OConnor, Christopher M., MD ; Reynolds, Dwight, MD ; Walsh, Mary Norine, MD ; Fonarow, Gregg C., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has established efficacy for patients with systolic heart failure (HF). Treatment rates and factors associated with CRT utilization among eligible patients in outpatient cardiology practices have not been well studied. Methods IMPROVE HF is a prospective cohort study designed to characterize current management of patients with chronic HF and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% in a registry of outpatient cardiology practices located throughout the United States. Baseline data were abstracted by trained chart review specialists from May 31, 2005, through June 22, 2007, for 15,381 patients attending 167 outpatient cardiology practices. Multivariable analyses of patient and practice characteristics identified predictors of CRT for eligible patients. Results A total of 1,373 patients were eligible for CRT based on current guideline criteria, and 533 (38.8%) received a CRT device, with 84.1% of these treated with a CRT-defibrillator. Cardiac resynchronization therapy use varied widely among practices, with 11.1% at the 25th percentile and 53.4% at the 75th percentile. Patient age, insurance, longer QRS duration, and practice location were independently associated with higher CRT utilization rates among eligible patients, whereas sex, HF etiology, and other clinical and laboratory parameters were not. Conclusions Despite being evidence based and guideline recommended, CRT is underutilized in eligible patients with significant variations associated with age, insurance, QRS duration, and geographic location of practices. Practice-specific performance improvement initiatives may be needed to reduce variations in use of CRT for eligible patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8703</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6744</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.10.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19958862</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AHJOA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Cardiac Pacing, Artificial ; Cardiovascular ; Drug therapy ; Female ; Heart attacks ; Heart Failure - therapy ; Humans ; Male ; Mortality ; Palliative care ; Prospective Studies</subject><ispartof>The American heart journal, 2009-12, Vol.158 (6), p.956-964</ispartof><rights>Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>2009 Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Dec 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-662d7ace9800a84da71239acaddd1eb635c1261a62650754bafcada4db8c48713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-662d7ace9800a84da71239acaddd1eb635c1261a62650754bafcada4db8c48713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1504597890?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19958862$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Curtis, Anne B., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yancy, Clyde W., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albert, Nancy M., PhD, RN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stough, Wendy Gattis, PharmD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gheorghiade, Mihai, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heywood, J. Thomas, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McBride, Mark L., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehra, Mandeep R., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OConnor, Christopher M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Dwight, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Mary Norine, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonarow, Gregg C., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Cardiac resynchronization therapy utilization for heart failure: Findings from IMPROVE HF</title><title>The American heart journal</title><addtitle>Am Heart J</addtitle><description>Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has established efficacy for patients with systolic heart failure (HF). Treatment rates and factors associated with CRT utilization among eligible patients in outpatient cardiology practices have not been well studied. Methods IMPROVE HF is a prospective cohort study designed to characterize current management of patients with chronic HF and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% in a registry of outpatient cardiology practices located throughout the United States. Baseline data were abstracted by trained chart review specialists from May 31, 2005, through June 22, 2007, for 15,381 patients attending 167 outpatient cardiology practices. Multivariable analyses of patient and practice characteristics identified predictors of CRT for eligible patients. Results A total of 1,373 patients were eligible for CRT based on current guideline criteria, and 533 (38.8%) received a CRT device, with 84.1% of these treated with a CRT-defibrillator. Cardiac resynchronization therapy use varied widely among practices, with 11.1% at the 25th percentile and 53.4% at the 75th percentile. Patient age, insurance, longer QRS duration, and practice location were independently associated with higher CRT utilization rates among eligible patients, whereas sex, HF etiology, and other clinical and laboratory parameters were not. Conclusions Despite being evidence based and guideline recommended, CRT is underutilized in eligible patients with significant variations associated with age, insurance, QRS duration, and geographic location of practices. Practice-specific performance improvement initiatives may be needed to reduce variations in use of CRT for eligible patients.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Heart Failure - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><issn>0002-8703</issn><issn>1097-6744</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMo7rj6A7xIwIOnHivp7nwoLMiw4y6srPgFnkImqXbS9nSPSbcw_nrTzMjCHjyFqjxvkTxFyHMGSwZMvG6XdtsuOYDO9RIYe0AWDLQshKyqh2QBALxQEsoz8iSlNpeCK_GYnDGta6UEX5DvKxt9sI5GTIfebePQhz92DENPxy1Guz_QaQzdv14zRLpFG0fa2NBNEd_Qdeh96H8k2sRhR68_fPx0--2SXq2fkkeN7RI-O53n5Ov68svqqri5fX-9endTuBrYWAjBvbQOtQKwqvJWMl5q66z3nuFGlLVjXDAruKhB1tXGNvnOVn6jXKUkK8_Jq-PcfRx-TZhGswvJYdfZHocpGVlWTGhZ8Uy-vEe2wxT7_DjDaqhqLZWGTLEj5eKQUsTG7GPY2XgwDMys3bQmazez9rmVtefMi9PkabNDf5c4ec7A2yOA2cTvgNEkF7B36ENENxo_hP-Ov7iXdl3og7PdTzxguvuFSdyA-TzvfV47aAAFZV3-BbRYpvU</recordid><startdate>20091201</startdate><enddate>20091201</enddate><creator>Curtis, Anne B., MD</creator><creator>Yancy, Clyde W., MD</creator><creator>Albert, Nancy M., PhD, RN</creator><creator>Stough, Wendy Gattis, PharmD</creator><creator>Gheorghiade, Mihai, MD</creator><creator>Heywood, J. Thomas, MD</creator><creator>McBride, Mark L., PhD</creator><creator>Mehra, Mandeep R., MD</creator><creator>OConnor, Christopher M., MD</creator><creator>Reynolds, Dwight, MD</creator><creator>Walsh, Mary Norine, MD</creator><creator>Fonarow, Gregg C., MD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091201</creationdate><title>Cardiac resynchronization therapy utilization for heart failure: Findings from IMPROVE HF</title><author>Curtis, Anne B., MD ; Yancy, Clyde W., MD ; Albert, Nancy M., PhD, RN ; Stough, Wendy Gattis, PharmD ; Gheorghiade, Mihai, MD ; Heywood, J. Thomas, MD ; McBride, Mark L., PhD ; Mehra, Mandeep R., MD ; OConnor, Christopher M., MD ; Reynolds, Dwight, MD ; Walsh, Mary Norine, MD ; Fonarow, Gregg C., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-662d7ace9800a84da71239acaddd1eb635c1261a62650754bafcada4db8c48713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cardiac Pacing, Artificial</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Heart Failure - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Curtis, Anne B., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yancy, Clyde W., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albert, Nancy M., PhD, RN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stough, Wendy Gattis, PharmD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gheorghiade, Mihai, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heywood, J. Thomas, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McBride, Mark L., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehra, Mandeep R., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OConnor, Christopher M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Dwight, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Mary Norine, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonarow, Gregg C., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American heart journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Curtis, Anne B., MD</au><au>Yancy, Clyde W., MD</au><au>Albert, Nancy M., PhD, RN</au><au>Stough, Wendy Gattis, PharmD</au><au>Gheorghiade, Mihai, MD</au><au>Heywood, J. Thomas, MD</au><au>McBride, Mark L., PhD</au><au>Mehra, Mandeep R., MD</au><au>OConnor, Christopher M., MD</au><au>Reynolds, Dwight, MD</au><au>Walsh, Mary Norine, MD</au><au>Fonarow, Gregg C., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cardiac resynchronization therapy utilization for heart failure: Findings from IMPROVE HF</atitle><jtitle>The American heart journal</jtitle><addtitle>Am Heart J</addtitle><date>2009-12-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>158</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>956</spage><epage>964</epage><pages>956-964</pages><issn>0002-8703</issn><eissn>1097-6744</eissn><coden>AHJOA2</coden><abstract>Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has established efficacy for patients with systolic heart failure (HF). Treatment rates and factors associated with CRT utilization among eligible patients in outpatient cardiology practices have not been well studied. Methods IMPROVE HF is a prospective cohort study designed to characterize current management of patients with chronic HF and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% in a registry of outpatient cardiology practices located throughout the United States. Baseline data were abstracted by trained chart review specialists from May 31, 2005, through June 22, 2007, for 15,381 patients attending 167 outpatient cardiology practices. Multivariable analyses of patient and practice characteristics identified predictors of CRT for eligible patients. Results A total of 1,373 patients were eligible for CRT based on current guideline criteria, and 533 (38.8%) received a CRT device, with 84.1% of these treated with a CRT-defibrillator. Cardiac resynchronization therapy use varied widely among practices, with 11.1% at the 25th percentile and 53.4% at the 75th percentile. Patient age, insurance, longer QRS duration, and practice location were independently associated with higher CRT utilization rates among eligible patients, whereas sex, HF etiology, and other clinical and laboratory parameters were not. Conclusions Despite being evidence based and guideline recommended, CRT is underutilized in eligible patients with significant variations associated with age, insurance, QRS duration, and geographic location of practices. Practice-specific performance improvement initiatives may be needed to reduce variations in use of CRT for eligible patients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>19958862</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ahj.2009.10.011</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-8703 |
ispartof | The American heart journal, 2009-12, Vol.158 (6), p.956-964 |
issn | 0002-8703 1097-6744 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734169742 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Aged Cardiac Pacing, Artificial Cardiovascular Drug therapy Female Heart attacks Heart Failure - therapy Humans Male Mortality Palliative care Prospective Studies |
title | Cardiac resynchronization therapy utilization for heart failure: Findings from IMPROVE HF |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T12%3A13%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cardiac%20resynchronization%20therapy%20utilization%20for%20heart%20failure:%20Findings%20from%20IMPROVE%20HF&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20heart%20journal&rft.au=Curtis,%20Anne%20B.,%20MD&rft.date=2009-12-01&rft.volume=158&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=956&rft.epage=964&rft.pages=956-964&rft.issn=0002-8703&rft.eissn=1097-6744&rft.coden=AHJOA2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ahj.2009.10.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E734169742%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1504597890&rft_id=info:pmid/19958862&rft_els_id=S0002870309008035&rfr_iscdi=true |