Cigarette brand preference as a function of price among smoking youths in Canada: are they smoking premium, discount or native brands?

Introduction:Given that little is known about the price-related cigarette brand preferences of youths, the current study seeks to characterise cigarette brand preferences and examine factors associated with smoking discount or native cigarette brands among Canadian youths who are current smokers.Met...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Tobacco control 2009-12, Vol.18 (6), p.466-473
Hauptverfasser: Leatherdale, S T, Ahmed, R, Barisic, A, Murnaghan, D, Manske, S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 473
container_issue 6
container_start_page 466
container_title Tobacco control
container_volume 18
creator Leatherdale, S T
Ahmed, R
Barisic, A
Murnaghan, D
Manske, S
description Introduction:Given that little is known about the price-related cigarette brand preferences of youths, the current study seeks to characterise cigarette brand preferences and examine factors associated with smoking discount or native cigarette brands among Canadian youths who are current smokers.Methods:This study used nationally representative data collected from 71 003 grade 5–12 students as part of the 2006–7 Canadian Youth Smoking Survey (YSS). Using data from current smokers, logistic regression models were used to examine factors associated with smoking discount or native cigarette brands relative to premium cigarette brands.Results:In 2006, premium cigarettes were the most prevalent brand of cigarette youths report usually smoking (49.4%); a substantial number of youths do report usually smoking either discount (12.9%) or native (9.3%) cigarette brands. Occasional smokers were more likely to report usually smoking premium cigarettes whereas daily smokers were more likely to report smoking either discount or native cigarettes. In particular, discount and native brands appear to be appealing among smoking youths with less spending money or those who are heavier smokers compared to youths smoking premium brands.Conclusion:Discount and native cigarette brands are commonly used by a substantial number of smoking youths in Canada. Additional research is required to better understand the reasons behind different cigarette brand preferences and how youths are able to access premium, discount and illicit native cigarettes. Moreover, ongoing surveillance of the cigarette brand preferences of youths is required for guiding future tobacco control policy and programming activities.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/tc.2009.029736
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734168675</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27798657</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27798657</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b416t-485fda5ca77c7bc32d7bb234ef5089079346c0bbe20bd1dc7cb9d1ff46aec2fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9rFDEYxoModrt69aYEPBTBWZNJJpl4ERlsKy56UXsM-TftbHeSNsmI-wX83GaZZYVePL2Q55fnfXgfAF5gtMKYsHfZrGqExArVghP2CCwwZW1FCG4fgwUSjFa0YeQEnKa0QQgT3uCn4AQLLnhD6AL86YZrFV3ODuqovIV30fUuOm8cVAkq2E_e5CF4GPqiDfvnMfhrmMZwO5S5C1O-SXDwsFNeWfUeFjuYb9zuiBTLcZjGt9AOyYTJZxgi9CoPvw5L04dn4Emvtsk9P8wl-HH-6Xt3Wa2_XXzuPq4rTTHLFW2b3qrGKM4N14bUlmtdE-r6BrUCcUEoM0hrVyNtsTXcaGFx31OmnKl7Q5bgbPa9i-F-cinLsWRy263yLkxJclL2tKzcZglePyA3YYq-hJOYt1jUhAtRqNVMmRhSKqeT5UajijuJkdwXJLOR-4LkXFD58OpgO-nR2X_4oZECvJyBTcohHvWac9Gyhhe9mvUhZff7qKt4Kxkv9cqvPzvJr67Euv3SSFz4NzOvx83_wv0Fv5qy3A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1781923799</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cigarette brand preference as a function of price among smoking youths in Canada: are they smoking premium, discount or native brands?</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Leatherdale, S T ; Ahmed, R ; Barisic, A ; Murnaghan, D ; Manske, S</creator><creatorcontrib>Leatherdale, S T ; Ahmed, R ; Barisic, A ; Murnaghan, D ; Manske, S</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction:Given that little is known about the price-related cigarette brand preferences of youths, the current study seeks to characterise cigarette brand preferences and examine factors associated with smoking discount or native cigarette brands among Canadian youths who are current smokers.Methods:This study used nationally representative data collected from 71 003 grade 5–12 students as part of the 2006–7 Canadian Youth Smoking Survey (YSS). Using data from current smokers, logistic regression models were used to examine factors associated with smoking discount or native cigarette brands relative to premium cigarette brands.Results:In 2006, premium cigarettes were the most prevalent brand of cigarette youths report usually smoking (49.4%); a substantial number of youths do report usually smoking either discount (12.9%) or native (9.3%) cigarette brands. Occasional smokers were more likely to report usually smoking premium cigarettes whereas daily smokers were more likely to report smoking either discount or native cigarettes. In particular, discount and native brands appear to be appealing among smoking youths with less spending money or those who are heavier smokers compared to youths smoking premium brands.Conclusion:Discount and native cigarette brands are commonly used by a substantial number of smoking youths in Canada. Additional research is required to better understand the reasons behind different cigarette brand preferences and how youths are able to access premium, discount and illicit native cigarettes. Moreover, ongoing surveillance of the cigarette brand preferences of youths is required for guiding future tobacco control policy and programming activities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-4563</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3318</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/tc.2009.029736</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19797534</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adolescent Behavior ; Anti smoking movements ; Brand preferences ; Brands ; Canada - epidemiology ; Cigarette smoking ; Cigarettes ; Consumer Behavior - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Contraband ; Costs and Cost Analysis - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Discounts ; Elementary schools ; Female ; Health Surveys ; Humans ; Male ; Military bases ; Native North Americans ; Price premiums ; Response rates ; Smoking ; Smoking - economics ; Smoking - epidemiology ; Spending ; Tobacco ; Tobacco products</subject><ispartof>Tobacco control, 2009-12, Vol.18 (6), p.466-473</ispartof><rights>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2009 BMJ Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright: 2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b416t-485fda5ca77c7bc32d7bb234ef5089079346c0bbe20bd1dc7cb9d1ff46aec2fc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b416t-485fda5ca77c7bc32d7bb234ef5089079346c0bbe20bd1dc7cb9d1ff46aec2fc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/18/6/466.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/18/6/466.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,776,780,799,3183,23552,27903,27904,57995,58228,77346,77377</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19797534$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leatherdale, S T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barisic, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murnaghan, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manske, S</creatorcontrib><title>Cigarette brand preference as a function of price among smoking youths in Canada: are they smoking premium, discount or native brands?</title><title>Tobacco control</title><addtitle>Tob Control</addtitle><description>Introduction:Given that little is known about the price-related cigarette brand preferences of youths, the current study seeks to characterise cigarette brand preferences and examine factors associated with smoking discount or native cigarette brands among Canadian youths who are current smokers.Methods:This study used nationally representative data collected from 71 003 grade 5–12 students as part of the 2006–7 Canadian Youth Smoking Survey (YSS). Using data from current smokers, logistic regression models were used to examine factors associated with smoking discount or native cigarette brands relative to premium cigarette brands.Results:In 2006, premium cigarettes were the most prevalent brand of cigarette youths report usually smoking (49.4%); a substantial number of youths do report usually smoking either discount (12.9%) or native (9.3%) cigarette brands. Occasional smokers were more likely to report usually smoking premium cigarettes whereas daily smokers were more likely to report smoking either discount or native cigarettes. In particular, discount and native brands appear to be appealing among smoking youths with less spending money or those who are heavier smokers compared to youths smoking premium brands.Conclusion:Discount and native cigarette brands are commonly used by a substantial number of smoking youths in Canada. Additional research is required to better understand the reasons behind different cigarette brand preferences and how youths are able to access premium, discount and illicit native cigarettes. Moreover, ongoing surveillance of the cigarette brand preferences of youths is required for guiding future tobacco control policy and programming activities.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adolescent Behavior</subject><subject>Anti smoking movements</subject><subject>Brand preferences</subject><subject>Brands</subject><subject>Canada - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cigarette smoking</subject><subject>Cigarettes</subject><subject>Consumer Behavior - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Contraband</subject><subject>Costs and Cost Analysis - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Discounts</subject><subject>Elementary schools</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Military bases</subject><subject>Native North Americans</subject><subject>Price premiums</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Smoking - economics</subject><subject>Smoking - epidemiology</subject><subject>Spending</subject><subject>Tobacco</subject><subject>Tobacco products</subject><issn>0964-4563</issn><issn>1468-3318</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9rFDEYxoModrt69aYEPBTBWZNJJpl4ERlsKy56UXsM-TftbHeSNsmI-wX83GaZZYVePL2Q55fnfXgfAF5gtMKYsHfZrGqExArVghP2CCwwZW1FCG4fgwUSjFa0YeQEnKa0QQgT3uCn4AQLLnhD6AL86YZrFV3ODuqovIV30fUuOm8cVAkq2E_e5CF4GPqiDfvnMfhrmMZwO5S5C1O-SXDwsFNeWfUeFjuYb9zuiBTLcZjGt9AOyYTJZxgi9CoPvw5L04dn4Emvtsk9P8wl-HH-6Xt3Wa2_XXzuPq4rTTHLFW2b3qrGKM4N14bUlmtdE-r6BrUCcUEoM0hrVyNtsTXcaGFx31OmnKl7Q5bgbPa9i-F-cinLsWRy263yLkxJclL2tKzcZglePyA3YYq-hJOYt1jUhAtRqNVMmRhSKqeT5UajijuJkdwXJLOR-4LkXFD58OpgO-nR2X_4oZECvJyBTcohHvWac9Gyhhe9mvUhZff7qKt4Kxkv9cqvPzvJr67Euv3SSFz4NzOvx83_wv0Fv5qy3A</recordid><startdate>200912</startdate><enddate>200912</enddate><creator>Leatherdale, S T</creator><creator>Ahmed, R</creator><creator>Barisic, A</creator><creator>Murnaghan, D</creator><creator>Manske, S</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200912</creationdate><title>Cigarette brand preference as a function of price among smoking youths in Canada: are they smoking premium, discount or native brands?</title><author>Leatherdale, S T ; Ahmed, R ; Barisic, A ; Murnaghan, D ; Manske, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b416t-485fda5ca77c7bc32d7bb234ef5089079346c0bbe20bd1dc7cb9d1ff46aec2fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adolescent Behavior</topic><topic>Anti smoking movements</topic><topic>Brand preferences</topic><topic>Brands</topic><topic>Canada - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cigarette smoking</topic><topic>Cigarettes</topic><topic>Consumer Behavior - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Contraband</topic><topic>Costs and Cost Analysis - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Discounts</topic><topic>Elementary schools</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Military bases</topic><topic>Native North Americans</topic><topic>Price premiums</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Smoking - economics</topic><topic>Smoking - epidemiology</topic><topic>Spending</topic><topic>Tobacco</topic><topic>Tobacco products</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leatherdale, S T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barisic, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murnaghan, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manske, S</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Tobacco control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leatherdale, S T</au><au>Ahmed, R</au><au>Barisic, A</au><au>Murnaghan, D</au><au>Manske, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cigarette brand preference as a function of price among smoking youths in Canada: are they smoking premium, discount or native brands?</atitle><jtitle>Tobacco control</jtitle><addtitle>Tob Control</addtitle><date>2009-12</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>466</spage><epage>473</epage><pages>466-473</pages><issn>0964-4563</issn><eissn>1468-3318</eissn><abstract>Introduction:Given that little is known about the price-related cigarette brand preferences of youths, the current study seeks to characterise cigarette brand preferences and examine factors associated with smoking discount or native cigarette brands among Canadian youths who are current smokers.Methods:This study used nationally representative data collected from 71 003 grade 5–12 students as part of the 2006–7 Canadian Youth Smoking Survey (YSS). Using data from current smokers, logistic regression models were used to examine factors associated with smoking discount or native cigarette brands relative to premium cigarette brands.Results:In 2006, premium cigarettes were the most prevalent brand of cigarette youths report usually smoking (49.4%); a substantial number of youths do report usually smoking either discount (12.9%) or native (9.3%) cigarette brands. Occasional smokers were more likely to report usually smoking premium cigarettes whereas daily smokers were more likely to report smoking either discount or native cigarettes. In particular, discount and native brands appear to be appealing among smoking youths with less spending money or those who are heavier smokers compared to youths smoking premium brands.Conclusion:Discount and native cigarette brands are commonly used by a substantial number of smoking youths in Canada. Additional research is required to better understand the reasons behind different cigarette brand preferences and how youths are able to access premium, discount and illicit native cigarettes. Moreover, ongoing surveillance of the cigarette brand preferences of youths is required for guiding future tobacco control policy and programming activities.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>19797534</pmid><doi>10.1136/tc.2009.029736</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0964-4563
ispartof Tobacco control, 2009-12, Vol.18 (6), p.466-473
issn 0964-4563
1468-3318
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734168675
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2
subjects Adolescent
Adolescent Behavior
Anti smoking movements
Brand preferences
Brands
Canada - epidemiology
Cigarette smoking
Cigarettes
Consumer Behavior - statistics & numerical data
Contraband
Costs and Cost Analysis - statistics & numerical data
Discounts
Elementary schools
Female
Health Surveys
Humans
Male
Military bases
Native North Americans
Price premiums
Response rates
Smoking
Smoking - economics
Smoking - epidemiology
Spending
Tobacco
Tobacco products
title Cigarette brand preference as a function of price among smoking youths in Canada: are they smoking premium, discount or native brands?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T12%3A38%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cigarette%20brand%20preference%20as%20a%20function%20of%20price%20among%20smoking%20youths%20in%20Canada:%20are%20they%20smoking%20premium,%20discount%20or%20native%20brands?&rft.jtitle=Tobacco%20control&rft.au=Leatherdale,%20S%20T&rft.date=2009-12&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=466&rft.epage=473&rft.pages=466-473&rft.issn=0964-4563&rft.eissn=1468-3318&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/tc.2009.029736&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27798657%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1781923799&rft_id=info:pmid/19797534&rft_jstor_id=27798657&rfr_iscdi=true