Nutrient mitigation capacity in Mississippi Delta, USA drainage ditches

Eutrophication and hypoxia within aquatic systems are a serious international concern. Various management practices have been proposed to help alleviate nutrient loads transported to the Gulf of Mexico and other high-profile aquatic systems. The current study examined the nutrient mitigation capacit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental pollution (1987) 2010, Vol.158 (1), p.175-184
Hauptverfasser: Moore, M.T., Kröger, R., Locke, M.A., Cullum, R.F., Steinriede, R.W., Testa, S., Lizotte, R.E., Bryant, C.T., Cooper, C.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 184
container_issue 1
container_start_page 175
container_title Environmental pollution (1987)
container_volume 158
creator Moore, M.T.
Kröger, R.
Locke, M.A.
Cullum, R.F.
Steinriede, R.W.
Testa, S.
Lizotte, R.E.
Bryant, C.T.
Cooper, C.M.
description Eutrophication and hypoxia within aquatic systems are a serious international concern. Various management practices have been proposed to help alleviate nutrient loads transported to the Gulf of Mexico and other high-profile aquatic systems. The current study examined the nutrient mitigation capacity of a vegetated (V) and non-vegetated (NV) agricultural drainage ditch of similar size and landform in the Mississippi Delta. While no statistically significant differences in ammonium, nitrate, or dissolved inorganic phosphorus mitigation between the two ditches existed, there were significant differences in total inorganic phosphorus percent load reductions (V: 36% ± 4; NV: 71% ± 4). However, both agricultural drainage ditches were able to mitigate nutrients, thus reducing the load reaching downstream aquatic receiving systems. Further studies examining ecosystem dynamics within drainage ditches such as sediment and plant nutrient partitioning, as well as microbial processes involved, are needed to provide a better understanding of natural nutrient variability, seasonality and flux. Agricultural drainage ditches reduce N and P runoff concentrations from production landscapes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.envpol.2009.07.024
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734158893</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0269749109003625</els_id><sourcerecordid>734158893</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-13ad5c8e1fbef8caa3a814112cae2625390a613fd7fd4eddde4cf40c2119296e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv1DAQgC0EokvhHyDIpeJCwviRhy9IVV8gtXAoe7am9mTxKpsE21up_75eZQU3pNHM5ZuHvmHsPYeKA2--bCsaH-dpqASArqCtQKgXbMW7VpaNEuolW4FodNkqzU_Ymxi3AKCklK_ZCddN3dS6W7GbH_sUPI2p2PnkN5j8NBYWZ7Q-PRV-LO58jIeYZ19c0pDwc7G-Py9cQD_ihgrnk_1N8S171eMQ6d2xnrL19dWvi2_l7c-b7xfnt6VVvE4ll-hq2xHvH6jvLKLEjivOhUUSjailBmy47F3bO0XOOVK2V2AF51rohuQp-7TMncP0Z08xmZ2PloYBR5r20bQy7-k6LTOpFtKGKcZAvZmD32F4MhzMwaDZmsWgORg00JpsMLd9OC7YP-zI_Ws6KsvA2RHAaHHoA47Wx7-cEBIgp8x9XLgeJ4ObkJn1vQAugbeiA1Vn4utCUBb26CmYaPMrLDkfyCbjJv__W58BRL-aZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734158893</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nutrient mitigation capacity in Mississippi Delta, USA drainage ditches</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Moore, M.T. ; Kröger, R. ; Locke, M.A. ; Cullum, R.F. ; Steinriede, R.W. ; Testa, S. ; Lizotte, R.E. ; Bryant, C.T. ; Cooper, C.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Moore, M.T. ; Kröger, R. ; Locke, M.A. ; Cullum, R.F. ; Steinriede, R.W. ; Testa, S. ; Lizotte, R.E. ; Bryant, C.T. ; Cooper, C.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Eutrophication and hypoxia within aquatic systems are a serious international concern. Various management practices have been proposed to help alleviate nutrient loads transported to the Gulf of Mexico and other high-profile aquatic systems. The current study examined the nutrient mitigation capacity of a vegetated (V) and non-vegetated (NV) agricultural drainage ditch of similar size and landform in the Mississippi Delta. While no statistically significant differences in ammonium, nitrate, or dissolved inorganic phosphorus mitigation between the two ditches existed, there were significant differences in total inorganic phosphorus percent load reductions (V: 36% ± 4; NV: 71% ± 4). However, both agricultural drainage ditches were able to mitigate nutrients, thus reducing the load reaching downstream aquatic receiving systems. Further studies examining ecosystem dynamics within drainage ditches such as sediment and plant nutrient partitioning, as well as microbial processes involved, are needed to provide a better understanding of natural nutrient variability, seasonality and flux. Agricultural drainage ditches reduce N and P runoff concentrations from production landscapes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-7491</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6424</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2009.07.024</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19656598</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENVPAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>agricultural runoff ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Applied sciences ; bioaccumulation ; Biodegradation, Environmental ; Biological and medical sciences ; chemical analysis ; drainage channels ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; Environmental Monitoring ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Natural water pollution ; Nitrogen ; Nitrogen - analysis ; Phosphorus ; Phosphorus - analysis ; Phytoremediation ; Pollution ; pollution load ; Pollution, environment geology ; Rainwaters, run off water and others ; Runoff ; sediment contamination ; Soil and water pollution ; soil nutrients ; Soil science ; vegetation ; Water Movements ; water pollution ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Environmental pollution (1987), 2010, Vol.158 (1), p.175-184</ispartof><rights>2009</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-13ad5c8e1fbef8caa3a814112cae2625390a613fd7fd4eddde4cf40c2119296e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-13ad5c8e1fbef8caa3a814112cae2625390a613fd7fd4eddde4cf40c2119296e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749109003625$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,4010,27900,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22300223$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19656598$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moore, M.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kröger, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Locke, M.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cullum, R.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinriede, R.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Testa, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lizotte, R.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryant, C.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, C.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Nutrient mitigation capacity in Mississippi Delta, USA drainage ditches</title><title>Environmental pollution (1987)</title><addtitle>Environ Pollut</addtitle><description>Eutrophication and hypoxia within aquatic systems are a serious international concern. Various management practices have been proposed to help alleviate nutrient loads transported to the Gulf of Mexico and other high-profile aquatic systems. The current study examined the nutrient mitigation capacity of a vegetated (V) and non-vegetated (NV) agricultural drainage ditch of similar size and landform in the Mississippi Delta. While no statistically significant differences in ammonium, nitrate, or dissolved inorganic phosphorus mitigation between the two ditches existed, there were significant differences in total inorganic phosphorus percent load reductions (V: 36% ± 4; NV: 71% ± 4). However, both agricultural drainage ditches were able to mitigate nutrients, thus reducing the load reaching downstream aquatic receiving systems. Further studies examining ecosystem dynamics within drainage ditches such as sediment and plant nutrient partitioning, as well as microbial processes involved, are needed to provide a better understanding of natural nutrient variability, seasonality and flux. Agricultural drainage ditches reduce N and P runoff concentrations from production landscapes.</description><subject>agricultural runoff</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>bioaccumulation</subject><subject>Biodegradation, Environmental</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>chemical analysis</subject><subject>drainage channels</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Natural water pollution</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen - analysis</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Phosphorus - analysis</subject><subject>Phytoremediation</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>pollution load</subject><subject>Pollution, environment geology</subject><subject>Rainwaters, run off water and others</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>sediment contamination</subject><subject>Soil and water pollution</subject><subject>soil nutrients</subject><subject>Soil science</subject><subject>vegetation</subject><subject>Water Movements</subject><subject>water pollution</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0269-7491</issn><issn>1873-6424</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtv1DAQgC0EokvhHyDIpeJCwviRhy9IVV8gtXAoe7am9mTxKpsE21up_75eZQU3pNHM5ZuHvmHsPYeKA2--bCsaH-dpqASArqCtQKgXbMW7VpaNEuolW4FodNkqzU_Ymxi3AKCklK_ZCddN3dS6W7GbH_sUPI2p2PnkN5j8NBYWZ7Q-PRV-LO58jIeYZ19c0pDwc7G-Py9cQD_ihgrnk_1N8S171eMQ6d2xnrL19dWvi2_l7c-b7xfnt6VVvE4ll-hq2xHvH6jvLKLEjivOhUUSjailBmy47F3bO0XOOVK2V2AF51rohuQp-7TMncP0Z08xmZ2PloYBR5r20bQy7-k6LTOpFtKGKcZAvZmD32F4MhzMwaDZmsWgORg00JpsMLd9OC7YP-zI_Ws6KsvA2RHAaHHoA47Wx7-cEBIgp8x9XLgeJ4ObkJn1vQAugbeiA1Vn4utCUBb26CmYaPMrLDkfyCbjJv__W58BRL-aZA</recordid><startdate>2010</startdate><enddate>2010</enddate><creator>Moore, M.T.</creator><creator>Kröger, R.</creator><creator>Locke, M.A.</creator><creator>Cullum, R.F.</creator><creator>Steinriede, R.W.</creator><creator>Testa, S.</creator><creator>Lizotte, R.E.</creator><creator>Bryant, C.T.</creator><creator>Cooper, C.M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2010</creationdate><title>Nutrient mitigation capacity in Mississippi Delta, USA drainage ditches</title><author>Moore, M.T. ; Kröger, R. ; Locke, M.A. ; Cullum, R.F. ; Steinriede, R.W. ; Testa, S. ; Lizotte, R.E. ; Bryant, C.T. ; Cooper, C.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-13ad5c8e1fbef8caa3a814112cae2625390a613fd7fd4eddde4cf40c2119296e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>agricultural runoff</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>bioaccumulation</topic><topic>Biodegradation, Environmental</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>chemical analysis</topic><topic>drainage channels</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Natural water pollution</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen - analysis</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Phosphorus - analysis</topic><topic>Phytoremediation</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>pollution load</topic><topic>Pollution, environment geology</topic><topic>Rainwaters, run off water and others</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>sediment contamination</topic><topic>Soil and water pollution</topic><topic>soil nutrients</topic><topic>Soil science</topic><topic>vegetation</topic><topic>Water Movements</topic><topic>water pollution</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moore, M.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kröger, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Locke, M.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cullum, R.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinriede, R.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Testa, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lizotte, R.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryant, C.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, C.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental pollution (1987)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moore, M.T.</au><au>Kröger, R.</au><au>Locke, M.A.</au><au>Cullum, R.F.</au><au>Steinriede, R.W.</au><au>Testa, S.</au><au>Lizotte, R.E.</au><au>Bryant, C.T.</au><au>Cooper, C.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nutrient mitigation capacity in Mississippi Delta, USA drainage ditches</atitle><jtitle>Environmental pollution (1987)</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Pollut</addtitle><date>2010</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>158</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>175</spage><epage>184</epage><pages>175-184</pages><issn>0269-7491</issn><eissn>1873-6424</eissn><coden>ENVPAF</coden><abstract>Eutrophication and hypoxia within aquatic systems are a serious international concern. Various management practices have been proposed to help alleviate nutrient loads transported to the Gulf of Mexico and other high-profile aquatic systems. The current study examined the nutrient mitigation capacity of a vegetated (V) and non-vegetated (NV) agricultural drainage ditch of similar size and landform in the Mississippi Delta. While no statistically significant differences in ammonium, nitrate, or dissolved inorganic phosphorus mitigation between the two ditches existed, there were significant differences in total inorganic phosphorus percent load reductions (V: 36% ± 4; NV: 71% ± 4). However, both agricultural drainage ditches were able to mitigate nutrients, thus reducing the load reaching downstream aquatic receiving systems. Further studies examining ecosystem dynamics within drainage ditches such as sediment and plant nutrient partitioning, as well as microbial processes involved, are needed to provide a better understanding of natural nutrient variability, seasonality and flux. Agricultural drainage ditches reduce N and P runoff concentrations from production landscapes.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>19656598</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.envpol.2009.07.024</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-7491
ispartof Environmental pollution (1987), 2010, Vol.158 (1), p.175-184
issn 0269-7491
1873-6424
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734158893
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects agricultural runoff
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Applied sciences
bioaccumulation
Biodegradation, Environmental
Biological and medical sciences
chemical analysis
drainage channels
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics
Environmental Monitoring
Exact sciences and technology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Natural water pollution
Nitrogen
Nitrogen - analysis
Phosphorus
Phosphorus - analysis
Phytoremediation
Pollution
pollution load
Pollution, environment geology
Rainwaters, run off water and others
Runoff
sediment contamination
Soil and water pollution
soil nutrients
Soil science
vegetation
Water Movements
water pollution
Water treatment and pollution
title Nutrient mitigation capacity in Mississippi Delta, USA drainage ditches
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T02%3A03%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nutrient%20mitigation%20capacity%20in%20Mississippi%20Delta,%20USA%20drainage%20ditches&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20pollution%20(1987)&rft.au=Moore,%20M.T.&rft.date=2010&rft.volume=158&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=175&rft.epage=184&rft.pages=175-184&rft.issn=0269-7491&rft.eissn=1873-6424&rft.coden=ENVPAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.envpol.2009.07.024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E734158893%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734158893&rft_id=info:pmid/19656598&rft_els_id=S0269749109003625&rfr_iscdi=true