Consequences of additional use of PET information for target volume delineation and radiotherapy dose distribution for esophageal cancer

Abstract Background and purpose To determine the consequences of target volume (TV) modifications, based on the additional use of PET information, on radiation planning, assuming PET/CT-imaging represents the true extent of the tumour. Materials and methods For 21 patients with esophageal cancer, tw...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiotherapy and oncology 2009-12, Vol.93 (3), p.447-453
Hauptverfasser: Muijs, Christina T, Schreurs, Liesbeth M, Busz, Dianne M, Beukema, Jannet C, van der Borden, Arnout J, Pruim, Jan, Van der Jagt, Eric J, Plukker, John Th, Langendijk, Johannes A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background and purpose To determine the consequences of target volume (TV) modifications, based on the additional use of PET information, on radiation planning, assuming PET/CT-imaging represents the true extent of the tumour. Materials and methods For 21 patients with esophageal cancer, two separate TV’s were retrospectively defined based on CT (CT-TV) and co-registered PET/CT images (PET/CT-TV). Two 3D-CRT plans (prescribed dose 50.4 Gy) were constructed to cover the corresponding TV’s. Subsequently, these plans were compared for target coverage, normal tissue dose–volume histograms and the corresponding normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) values. Results The addition of PET led to the modification of CT-TV with at least 10% in 12 of 21 patients (57%) (reduction in 9, enlargement in 3). PET/CT-TV was inadequately covered by the CT-based treatment plan in 8 patients (36%). Treatment plan modifications resulted in significant changes ( p < 0.05) in dose distributions to heart and lungs. Corresponding changes in NTCP values ranged from −3% to +2% for radiation pneumonitis and from −0.2% to +1.2% for cardiac mortality. Conclusions This study demonstrated that TV’s based on CT might exclude PET-avid disease. Consequences are under dosing and thereby possibly ineffective treatment. Moreover, the addition of PET in radiation planning might result in clinical important changes in NTCP.
ISSN:0167-8140
1879-0887
DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.030