The prelexical development in children implanted by 16 months compared with normal hearing children
Summary Objective Few studies exist which document the early speech development of German-speaking children or German-speaking children who are deaf and using cochlear implants. The current study aims to: (1) document the pre-canonical and canonical speech development of German-speaking children who...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology 2009-12, Vol.73 (12), p.1673-1681 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1681 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1673 |
container_title | International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology |
container_volume | 73 |
creator | Schramm, Bianka Bohnert, Andrea Keilmann, Annerose |
description | Summary Objective Few studies exist which document the early speech development of German-speaking children or German-speaking children who are deaf and using cochlear implants. The current study aims to: (1) document the pre-canonical and canonical speech development of German-speaking children who are deaf and receive cochlear implants by the age of 16 months and (2) compare these children's results with those of children with normal hearing. Design This longitudinal study included 5 German-speaking children with normal hearing and 5 with sensorineural deafness. All children from the deaf group received hearing amplification before cochlear implantation, received their first implant by 16 months of age, and became bilateral implant users by 31 months of age. The pre-canonical and canonical vocalisations of each child were recorded on video- and audiotapes in a semi-standardised playing situation every 4 weeks over a span of 1 year. In the cochlear implant group, the recording started 4–5 days postoperatively (first implant); in the normal hearing group it began between the ages of 4 and 5 months. The video and audio recordings were analysed using EUDICO Linguistic Annotator version 2.4 (Nijmegen, The Netherlands) and International Phonetic Alphabet transcription. Results Both groups showed individual patterns of babbling acquisition, though the groups’ patterns of acquisition were similar when analysed for consonant manner and place. Some children started with plosives and others, with nasals, but all acquired fricatives and laterals next. Onset of canonical babbling for children in the cochlear implant group began 0–4 months after first fitting of the first device, while children from the normal hearing group demonstrated an onset of canonical babbling between 4 and 9 months of age. Conclusion Our results show that deaf children who receive cochlear implants at an early age are capable of reaching the canonical babbling milestone in a shorter time than children with normal hearing typically do and that their consonant phoneme acquisition follows a similar sequence to normal hearing peers’. These results are consistent with the literature indicating that early identification and intervention are important for allowing children with cochlear implants the opportunity to catch up to hearing peers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.08.023 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734153160</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0165587609004637</els_id><sourcerecordid>734153160</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-3c3087459f0ef1daa40305877c713aca820508cc91d2a2bbbbb11b43cf5b39473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU-L1TAUxYMoznP0G4hk56r1pkmadiPIMP6BAReO65Cmtza1TWrSN_q-vSnvoeDGbALhnHNvfoeQlwxKBqx-M5VuWkOcywqgLaEpoeKPyIE1qioaUYvH5JBlspCNqq_Is5QmAKZAyqfkirVKSSWbA7H3I9I14oy_nDUz7fEB57Au6DfqPLWjm_uInrplnY3fsKfdibKaLsFvY6I2LKuJ-fWn20bqQ1xyxogmOv_tj_k5eTKYOeGLy31Nvr6_vb_5WNx9_vDp5t1dYQWrt4JbDo0Ssh0AB9YbI4BD3l5ZxbixpqlAQmNty_rKVN1-GOsEt4PseCsUvyavz7lrDD-OmDa9uGRxzotjOCatuGCSsxqyUpyVNoaUIg56jW4x8aQZ6J2unvSZrt7pamh0ppttry4Djt2C_V_TBWcWvD0LMH_zwWHUyTr0FnsX0W66D-5_E_4NsLPzezPf8YRpCsfoM0LNdKo06C97w3vB0AKImiv-G-UOoww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734153160</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The prelexical development in children implanted by 16 months compared with normal hearing children</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Schramm, Bianka ; Bohnert, Andrea ; Keilmann, Annerose</creator><creatorcontrib>Schramm, Bianka ; Bohnert, Andrea ; Keilmann, Annerose</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Objective Few studies exist which document the early speech development of German-speaking children or German-speaking children who are deaf and using cochlear implants. The current study aims to: (1) document the pre-canonical and canonical speech development of German-speaking children who are deaf and receive cochlear implants by the age of 16 months and (2) compare these children's results with those of children with normal hearing. Design This longitudinal study included 5 German-speaking children with normal hearing and 5 with sensorineural deafness. All children from the deaf group received hearing amplification before cochlear implantation, received their first implant by 16 months of age, and became bilateral implant users by 31 months of age. The pre-canonical and canonical vocalisations of each child were recorded on video- and audiotapes in a semi-standardised playing situation every 4 weeks over a span of 1 year. In the cochlear implant group, the recording started 4–5 days postoperatively (first implant); in the normal hearing group it began between the ages of 4 and 5 months. The video and audio recordings were analysed using EUDICO Linguistic Annotator version 2.4 (Nijmegen, The Netherlands) and International Phonetic Alphabet transcription. Results Both groups showed individual patterns of babbling acquisition, though the groups’ patterns of acquisition were similar when analysed for consonant manner and place. Some children started with plosives and others, with nasals, but all acquired fricatives and laterals next. Onset of canonical babbling for children in the cochlear implant group began 0–4 months after first fitting of the first device, while children from the normal hearing group demonstrated an onset of canonical babbling between 4 and 9 months of age. Conclusion Our results show that deaf children who receive cochlear implants at an early age are capable of reaching the canonical babbling milestone in a shorter time than children with normal hearing typically do and that their consonant phoneme acquisition follows a similar sequence to normal hearing peers’. These results are consistent with the literature indicating that early identification and intervention are important for allowing children with cochlear implants the opportunity to catch up to hearing peers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-5876</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.08.023</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19775758</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Age at implantation ; Age Factors ; Audiometry - methods ; Auditory Threshold ; Canonical babbling ; Case-Control Studies ; Cochlear Implantation - methods ; Cochlear Implants ; Deafness - diagnosis ; Deafness - rehabilitation ; Deafness - surgery ; Female ; German language development ; Germany ; Humans ; Infant ; Language ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Otolaryngology ; Pediatrics ; Reference Values ; Risk Assessment ; Speech Intelligibility ; Speech Perception ; Speech production ; Speech Production Measurement ; Vocal development</subject><ispartof>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 2009-12, Vol.73 (12), p.1673-1681</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-3c3087459f0ef1daa40305877c713aca820508cc91d2a2bbbbb11b43cf5b39473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-3c3087459f0ef1daa40305877c713aca820508cc91d2a2bbbbb11b43cf5b39473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165587609004637$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19775758$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schramm, Bianka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohnert, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keilmann, Annerose</creatorcontrib><title>The prelexical development in children implanted by 16 months compared with normal hearing children</title><title>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology</title><addtitle>Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><description>Summary Objective Few studies exist which document the early speech development of German-speaking children or German-speaking children who are deaf and using cochlear implants. The current study aims to: (1) document the pre-canonical and canonical speech development of German-speaking children who are deaf and receive cochlear implants by the age of 16 months and (2) compare these children's results with those of children with normal hearing. Design This longitudinal study included 5 German-speaking children with normal hearing and 5 with sensorineural deafness. All children from the deaf group received hearing amplification before cochlear implantation, received their first implant by 16 months of age, and became bilateral implant users by 31 months of age. The pre-canonical and canonical vocalisations of each child were recorded on video- and audiotapes in a semi-standardised playing situation every 4 weeks over a span of 1 year. In the cochlear implant group, the recording started 4–5 days postoperatively (first implant); in the normal hearing group it began between the ages of 4 and 5 months. The video and audio recordings were analysed using EUDICO Linguistic Annotator version 2.4 (Nijmegen, The Netherlands) and International Phonetic Alphabet transcription. Results Both groups showed individual patterns of babbling acquisition, though the groups’ patterns of acquisition were similar when analysed for consonant manner and place. Some children started with plosives and others, with nasals, but all acquired fricatives and laterals next. Onset of canonical babbling for children in the cochlear implant group began 0–4 months after first fitting of the first device, while children from the normal hearing group demonstrated an onset of canonical babbling between 4 and 9 months of age. Conclusion Our results show that deaf children who receive cochlear implants at an early age are capable of reaching the canonical babbling milestone in a shorter time than children with normal hearing typically do and that their consonant phoneme acquisition follows a similar sequence to normal hearing peers’. These results are consistent with the literature indicating that early identification and intervention are important for allowing children with cochlear implants the opportunity to catch up to hearing peers.</description><subject>Age at implantation</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Audiometry - methods</subject><subject>Auditory Threshold</subject><subject>Canonical babbling</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cochlear Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Cochlear Implants</subject><subject>Deafness - diagnosis</subject><subject>Deafness - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Deafness - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>German language development</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Otolaryngology</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Speech Intelligibility</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><subject>Speech production</subject><subject>Speech Production Measurement</subject><subject>Vocal development</subject><issn>0165-5876</issn><issn>1872-8464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU-L1TAUxYMoznP0G4hk56r1pkmadiPIMP6BAReO65Cmtza1TWrSN_q-vSnvoeDGbALhnHNvfoeQlwxKBqx-M5VuWkOcywqgLaEpoeKPyIE1qioaUYvH5JBlspCNqq_Is5QmAKZAyqfkirVKSSWbA7H3I9I14oy_nDUz7fEB57Au6DfqPLWjm_uInrplnY3fsKfdibKaLsFvY6I2LKuJ-fWn20bqQ1xyxogmOv_tj_k5eTKYOeGLy31Nvr6_vb_5WNx9_vDp5t1dYQWrt4JbDo0Ssh0AB9YbI4BD3l5ZxbixpqlAQmNty_rKVN1-GOsEt4PseCsUvyavz7lrDD-OmDa9uGRxzotjOCatuGCSsxqyUpyVNoaUIg56jW4x8aQZ6J2unvSZrt7pamh0ppttry4Djt2C_V_TBWcWvD0LMH_zwWHUyTr0FnsX0W66D-5_E_4NsLPzezPf8YRpCsfoM0LNdKo06C97w3vB0AKImiv-G-UOoww</recordid><startdate>20091201</startdate><enddate>20091201</enddate><creator>Schramm, Bianka</creator><creator>Bohnert, Andrea</creator><creator>Keilmann, Annerose</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091201</creationdate><title>The prelexical development in children implanted by 16 months compared with normal hearing children</title><author>Schramm, Bianka ; Bohnert, Andrea ; Keilmann, Annerose</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-3c3087459f0ef1daa40305877c713aca820508cc91d2a2bbbbb11b43cf5b39473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Age at implantation</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Audiometry - methods</topic><topic>Auditory Threshold</topic><topic>Canonical babbling</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cochlear Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Cochlear Implants</topic><topic>Deafness - diagnosis</topic><topic>Deafness - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Deafness - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>German language development</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Otolaryngology</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Speech Intelligibility</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><topic>Speech production</topic><topic>Speech Production Measurement</topic><topic>Vocal development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schramm, Bianka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohnert, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keilmann, Annerose</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schramm, Bianka</au><au>Bohnert, Andrea</au><au>Keilmann, Annerose</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The prelexical development in children implanted by 16 months compared with normal hearing children</atitle><jtitle>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><date>2009-12-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1673</spage><epage>1681</epage><pages>1673-1681</pages><issn>0165-5876</issn><eissn>1872-8464</eissn><abstract>Summary Objective Few studies exist which document the early speech development of German-speaking children or German-speaking children who are deaf and using cochlear implants. The current study aims to: (1) document the pre-canonical and canonical speech development of German-speaking children who are deaf and receive cochlear implants by the age of 16 months and (2) compare these children's results with those of children with normal hearing. Design This longitudinal study included 5 German-speaking children with normal hearing and 5 with sensorineural deafness. All children from the deaf group received hearing amplification before cochlear implantation, received their first implant by 16 months of age, and became bilateral implant users by 31 months of age. The pre-canonical and canonical vocalisations of each child were recorded on video- and audiotapes in a semi-standardised playing situation every 4 weeks over a span of 1 year. In the cochlear implant group, the recording started 4–5 days postoperatively (first implant); in the normal hearing group it began between the ages of 4 and 5 months. The video and audio recordings were analysed using EUDICO Linguistic Annotator version 2.4 (Nijmegen, The Netherlands) and International Phonetic Alphabet transcription. Results Both groups showed individual patterns of babbling acquisition, though the groups’ patterns of acquisition were similar when analysed for consonant manner and place. Some children started with plosives and others, with nasals, but all acquired fricatives and laterals next. Onset of canonical babbling for children in the cochlear implant group began 0–4 months after first fitting of the first device, while children from the normal hearing group demonstrated an onset of canonical babbling between 4 and 9 months of age. Conclusion Our results show that deaf children who receive cochlear implants at an early age are capable of reaching the canonical babbling milestone in a shorter time than children with normal hearing typically do and that their consonant phoneme acquisition follows a similar sequence to normal hearing peers’. These results are consistent with the literature indicating that early identification and intervention are important for allowing children with cochlear implants the opportunity to catch up to hearing peers.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>19775758</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.08.023</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-5876 |
ispartof | International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 2009-12, Vol.73 (12), p.1673-1681 |
issn | 0165-5876 1872-8464 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734153160 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Age at implantation Age Factors Audiometry - methods Auditory Threshold Canonical babbling Case-Control Studies Cochlear Implantation - methods Cochlear Implants Deafness - diagnosis Deafness - rehabilitation Deafness - surgery Female German language development Germany Humans Infant Language Longitudinal Studies Male Otolaryngology Pediatrics Reference Values Risk Assessment Speech Intelligibility Speech Perception Speech production Speech Production Measurement Vocal development |
title | The prelexical development in children implanted by 16 months compared with normal hearing children |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T21%3A12%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20prelexical%20development%20in%20children%20implanted%20by%2016%20months%20compared%20with%20normal%20hearing%20children&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20pediatric%20otorhinolaryngology&rft.au=Schramm,%20Bianka&rft.date=2009-12-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1673&rft.epage=1681&rft.pages=1673-1681&rft.issn=0165-5876&rft.eissn=1872-8464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.08.023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E734153160%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734153160&rft_id=info:pmid/19775758&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0165587609004637&rfr_iscdi=true |