The prelexical development in children implanted by 16 months compared with normal hearing children

Summary Objective Few studies exist which document the early speech development of German-speaking children or German-speaking children who are deaf and using cochlear implants. The current study aims to: (1) document the pre-canonical and canonical speech development of German-speaking children who...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology 2009-12, Vol.73 (12), p.1673-1681
Hauptverfasser: Schramm, Bianka, Bohnert, Andrea, Keilmann, Annerose
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1681
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1673
container_title International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology
container_volume 73
creator Schramm, Bianka
Bohnert, Andrea
Keilmann, Annerose
description Summary Objective Few studies exist which document the early speech development of German-speaking children or German-speaking children who are deaf and using cochlear implants. The current study aims to: (1) document the pre-canonical and canonical speech development of German-speaking children who are deaf and receive cochlear implants by the age of 16 months and (2) compare these children's results with those of children with normal hearing. Design This longitudinal study included 5 German-speaking children with normal hearing and 5 with sensorineural deafness. All children from the deaf group received hearing amplification before cochlear implantation, received their first implant by 16 months of age, and became bilateral implant users by 31 months of age. The pre-canonical and canonical vocalisations of each child were recorded on video- and audiotapes in a semi-standardised playing situation every 4 weeks over a span of 1 year. In the cochlear implant group, the recording started 4–5 days postoperatively (first implant); in the normal hearing group it began between the ages of 4 and 5 months. The video and audio recordings were analysed using EUDICO Linguistic Annotator version 2.4 (Nijmegen, The Netherlands) and International Phonetic Alphabet transcription. Results Both groups showed individual patterns of babbling acquisition, though the groups’ patterns of acquisition were similar when analysed for consonant manner and place. Some children started with plosives and others, with nasals, but all acquired fricatives and laterals next. Onset of canonical babbling for children in the cochlear implant group began 0–4 months after first fitting of the first device, while children from the normal hearing group demonstrated an onset of canonical babbling between 4 and 9 months of age. Conclusion Our results show that deaf children who receive cochlear implants at an early age are capable of reaching the canonical babbling milestone in a shorter time than children with normal hearing typically do and that their consonant phoneme acquisition follows a similar sequence to normal hearing peers’. These results are consistent with the literature indicating that early identification and intervention are important for allowing children with cochlear implants the opportunity to catch up to hearing peers.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.08.023
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734153160</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0165587609004637</els_id><sourcerecordid>734153160</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-3c3087459f0ef1daa40305877c713aca820508cc91d2a2bbbbb11b43cf5b39473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU-L1TAUxYMoznP0G4hk56r1pkmadiPIMP6BAReO65Cmtza1TWrSN_q-vSnvoeDGbALhnHNvfoeQlwxKBqx-M5VuWkOcywqgLaEpoeKPyIE1qioaUYvH5JBlspCNqq_Is5QmAKZAyqfkirVKSSWbA7H3I9I14oy_nDUz7fEB57Au6DfqPLWjm_uInrplnY3fsKfdibKaLsFvY6I2LKuJ-fWn20bqQ1xyxogmOv_tj_k5eTKYOeGLy31Nvr6_vb_5WNx9_vDp5t1dYQWrt4JbDo0Ssh0AB9YbI4BD3l5ZxbixpqlAQmNty_rKVN1-GOsEt4PseCsUvyavz7lrDD-OmDa9uGRxzotjOCatuGCSsxqyUpyVNoaUIg56jW4x8aQZ6J2unvSZrt7pamh0ppttry4Djt2C_V_TBWcWvD0LMH_zwWHUyTr0FnsX0W66D-5_E_4NsLPzezPf8YRpCsfoM0LNdKo06C97w3vB0AKImiv-G-UOoww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734153160</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The prelexical development in children implanted by 16 months compared with normal hearing children</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Schramm, Bianka ; Bohnert, Andrea ; Keilmann, Annerose</creator><creatorcontrib>Schramm, Bianka ; Bohnert, Andrea ; Keilmann, Annerose</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Objective Few studies exist which document the early speech development of German-speaking children or German-speaking children who are deaf and using cochlear implants. The current study aims to: (1) document the pre-canonical and canonical speech development of German-speaking children who are deaf and receive cochlear implants by the age of 16 months and (2) compare these children's results with those of children with normal hearing. Design This longitudinal study included 5 German-speaking children with normal hearing and 5 with sensorineural deafness. All children from the deaf group received hearing amplification before cochlear implantation, received their first implant by 16 months of age, and became bilateral implant users by 31 months of age. The pre-canonical and canonical vocalisations of each child were recorded on video- and audiotapes in a semi-standardised playing situation every 4 weeks over a span of 1 year. In the cochlear implant group, the recording started 4–5 days postoperatively (first implant); in the normal hearing group it began between the ages of 4 and 5 months. The video and audio recordings were analysed using EUDICO Linguistic Annotator version 2.4 (Nijmegen, The Netherlands) and International Phonetic Alphabet transcription. Results Both groups showed individual patterns of babbling acquisition, though the groups’ patterns of acquisition were similar when analysed for consonant manner and place. Some children started with plosives and others, with nasals, but all acquired fricatives and laterals next. Onset of canonical babbling for children in the cochlear implant group began 0–4 months after first fitting of the first device, while children from the normal hearing group demonstrated an onset of canonical babbling between 4 and 9 months of age. Conclusion Our results show that deaf children who receive cochlear implants at an early age are capable of reaching the canonical babbling milestone in a shorter time than children with normal hearing typically do and that their consonant phoneme acquisition follows a similar sequence to normal hearing peers’. These results are consistent with the literature indicating that early identification and intervention are important for allowing children with cochlear implants the opportunity to catch up to hearing peers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-5876</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.08.023</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19775758</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Age at implantation ; Age Factors ; Audiometry - methods ; Auditory Threshold ; Canonical babbling ; Case-Control Studies ; Cochlear Implantation - methods ; Cochlear Implants ; Deafness - diagnosis ; Deafness - rehabilitation ; Deafness - surgery ; Female ; German language development ; Germany ; Humans ; Infant ; Language ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Otolaryngology ; Pediatrics ; Reference Values ; Risk Assessment ; Speech Intelligibility ; Speech Perception ; Speech production ; Speech Production Measurement ; Vocal development</subject><ispartof>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 2009-12, Vol.73 (12), p.1673-1681</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-3c3087459f0ef1daa40305877c713aca820508cc91d2a2bbbbb11b43cf5b39473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-3c3087459f0ef1daa40305877c713aca820508cc91d2a2bbbbb11b43cf5b39473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165587609004637$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19775758$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schramm, Bianka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohnert, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keilmann, Annerose</creatorcontrib><title>The prelexical development in children implanted by 16 months compared with normal hearing children</title><title>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology</title><addtitle>Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><description>Summary Objective Few studies exist which document the early speech development of German-speaking children or German-speaking children who are deaf and using cochlear implants. The current study aims to: (1) document the pre-canonical and canonical speech development of German-speaking children who are deaf and receive cochlear implants by the age of 16 months and (2) compare these children's results with those of children with normal hearing. Design This longitudinal study included 5 German-speaking children with normal hearing and 5 with sensorineural deafness. All children from the deaf group received hearing amplification before cochlear implantation, received their first implant by 16 months of age, and became bilateral implant users by 31 months of age. The pre-canonical and canonical vocalisations of each child were recorded on video- and audiotapes in a semi-standardised playing situation every 4 weeks over a span of 1 year. In the cochlear implant group, the recording started 4–5 days postoperatively (first implant); in the normal hearing group it began between the ages of 4 and 5 months. The video and audio recordings were analysed using EUDICO Linguistic Annotator version 2.4 (Nijmegen, The Netherlands) and International Phonetic Alphabet transcription. Results Both groups showed individual patterns of babbling acquisition, though the groups’ patterns of acquisition were similar when analysed for consonant manner and place. Some children started with plosives and others, with nasals, but all acquired fricatives and laterals next. Onset of canonical babbling for children in the cochlear implant group began 0–4 months after first fitting of the first device, while children from the normal hearing group demonstrated an onset of canonical babbling between 4 and 9 months of age. Conclusion Our results show that deaf children who receive cochlear implants at an early age are capable of reaching the canonical babbling milestone in a shorter time than children with normal hearing typically do and that their consonant phoneme acquisition follows a similar sequence to normal hearing peers’. These results are consistent with the literature indicating that early identification and intervention are important for allowing children with cochlear implants the opportunity to catch up to hearing peers.</description><subject>Age at implantation</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Audiometry - methods</subject><subject>Auditory Threshold</subject><subject>Canonical babbling</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cochlear Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Cochlear Implants</subject><subject>Deafness - diagnosis</subject><subject>Deafness - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Deafness - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>German language development</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Otolaryngology</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Speech Intelligibility</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><subject>Speech production</subject><subject>Speech Production Measurement</subject><subject>Vocal development</subject><issn>0165-5876</issn><issn>1872-8464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU-L1TAUxYMoznP0G4hk56r1pkmadiPIMP6BAReO65Cmtza1TWrSN_q-vSnvoeDGbALhnHNvfoeQlwxKBqx-M5VuWkOcywqgLaEpoeKPyIE1qioaUYvH5JBlspCNqq_Is5QmAKZAyqfkirVKSSWbA7H3I9I14oy_nDUz7fEB57Au6DfqPLWjm_uInrplnY3fsKfdibKaLsFvY6I2LKuJ-fWn20bqQ1xyxogmOv_tj_k5eTKYOeGLy31Nvr6_vb_5WNx9_vDp5t1dYQWrt4JbDo0Ssh0AB9YbI4BD3l5ZxbixpqlAQmNty_rKVN1-GOsEt4PseCsUvyavz7lrDD-OmDa9uGRxzotjOCatuGCSsxqyUpyVNoaUIg56jW4x8aQZ6J2unvSZrt7pamh0ppttry4Djt2C_V_TBWcWvD0LMH_zwWHUyTr0FnsX0W66D-5_E_4NsLPzezPf8YRpCsfoM0LNdKo06C97w3vB0AKImiv-G-UOoww</recordid><startdate>20091201</startdate><enddate>20091201</enddate><creator>Schramm, Bianka</creator><creator>Bohnert, Andrea</creator><creator>Keilmann, Annerose</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091201</creationdate><title>The prelexical development in children implanted by 16 months compared with normal hearing children</title><author>Schramm, Bianka ; Bohnert, Andrea ; Keilmann, Annerose</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-3c3087459f0ef1daa40305877c713aca820508cc91d2a2bbbbb11b43cf5b39473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Age at implantation</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Audiometry - methods</topic><topic>Auditory Threshold</topic><topic>Canonical babbling</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cochlear Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Cochlear Implants</topic><topic>Deafness - diagnosis</topic><topic>Deafness - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Deafness - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>German language development</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Otolaryngology</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Speech Intelligibility</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><topic>Speech production</topic><topic>Speech Production Measurement</topic><topic>Vocal development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schramm, Bianka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohnert, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keilmann, Annerose</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schramm, Bianka</au><au>Bohnert, Andrea</au><au>Keilmann, Annerose</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The prelexical development in children implanted by 16 months compared with normal hearing children</atitle><jtitle>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><date>2009-12-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1673</spage><epage>1681</epage><pages>1673-1681</pages><issn>0165-5876</issn><eissn>1872-8464</eissn><abstract>Summary Objective Few studies exist which document the early speech development of German-speaking children or German-speaking children who are deaf and using cochlear implants. The current study aims to: (1) document the pre-canonical and canonical speech development of German-speaking children who are deaf and receive cochlear implants by the age of 16 months and (2) compare these children's results with those of children with normal hearing. Design This longitudinal study included 5 German-speaking children with normal hearing and 5 with sensorineural deafness. All children from the deaf group received hearing amplification before cochlear implantation, received their first implant by 16 months of age, and became bilateral implant users by 31 months of age. The pre-canonical and canonical vocalisations of each child were recorded on video- and audiotapes in a semi-standardised playing situation every 4 weeks over a span of 1 year. In the cochlear implant group, the recording started 4–5 days postoperatively (first implant); in the normal hearing group it began between the ages of 4 and 5 months. The video and audio recordings were analysed using EUDICO Linguistic Annotator version 2.4 (Nijmegen, The Netherlands) and International Phonetic Alphabet transcription. Results Both groups showed individual patterns of babbling acquisition, though the groups’ patterns of acquisition were similar when analysed for consonant manner and place. Some children started with plosives and others, with nasals, but all acquired fricatives and laterals next. Onset of canonical babbling for children in the cochlear implant group began 0–4 months after first fitting of the first device, while children from the normal hearing group demonstrated an onset of canonical babbling between 4 and 9 months of age. Conclusion Our results show that deaf children who receive cochlear implants at an early age are capable of reaching the canonical babbling milestone in a shorter time than children with normal hearing typically do and that their consonant phoneme acquisition follows a similar sequence to normal hearing peers’. These results are consistent with the literature indicating that early identification and intervention are important for allowing children with cochlear implants the opportunity to catch up to hearing peers.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>19775758</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.08.023</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-5876
ispartof International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 2009-12, Vol.73 (12), p.1673-1681
issn 0165-5876
1872-8464
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734153160
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Age at implantation
Age Factors
Audiometry - methods
Auditory Threshold
Canonical babbling
Case-Control Studies
Cochlear Implantation - methods
Cochlear Implants
Deafness - diagnosis
Deafness - rehabilitation
Deafness - surgery
Female
German language development
Germany
Humans
Infant
Language
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Otolaryngology
Pediatrics
Reference Values
Risk Assessment
Speech Intelligibility
Speech Perception
Speech production
Speech Production Measurement
Vocal development
title The prelexical development in children implanted by 16 months compared with normal hearing children
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T21%3A12%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20prelexical%20development%20in%20children%20implanted%20by%2016%20months%20compared%20with%20normal%20hearing%20children&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20pediatric%20otorhinolaryngology&rft.au=Schramm,%20Bianka&rft.date=2009-12-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1673&rft.epage=1681&rft.pages=1673-1681&rft.issn=0165-5876&rft.eissn=1872-8464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.08.023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E734153160%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734153160&rft_id=info:pmid/19775758&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0165587609004637&rfr_iscdi=true