Parents’ views on the quality of life of their children 2–3 years after cochlear implantation

Abstract Objective Cochlear implants for children are known to have impact on the lives of recipients and their families in a variety of ways. To obtain a clearer picture of these benefits, we explored the quality of life of 36 Finnish children and their families 2–3 years after unilateral cochlear...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology 2009-12, Vol.73 (12), p.1786-1794
Hauptverfasser: Huttunen, K, Rimmanen, S, Vikman, S, Virokannas, N, Sorri, M, Archbold, S, Lutman, M.E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1794
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1786
container_title International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology
container_volume 73
creator Huttunen, K
Rimmanen, S
Vikman, S
Virokannas, N
Sorri, M
Archbold, S
Lutman, M.E
description Abstract Objective Cochlear implants for children are known to have impact on the lives of recipients and their families in a variety of ways. To obtain a clearer picture of these benefits, we explored the quality of life of 36 Finnish children and their families 2–3 years after unilateral cochlear implantation. Methods The studied children were, on average 5 years old, and had received their implant at the median age of 2 years:5 months (range 1:6 to 12:3). Most (67%) of the children used speech, eight (22%) used speech and signs, and four (11%) used sign language as their main communication mode. A third of the children had concomitant problems in addition to their profound hearing impairment. A validated closed-set questionnaire “Children with cochlear implants: parental perspectives” (available, e.g., at http://www.earfoundation.org.uk/research/questionnaires.html ) was used to find out parents’ views and experiences on implantation and explore life after it. Results Parents were most satisfied with improved/expanded social relations, improved communication (the development of spoken language), general functioning with the help of hearing and improved self-reliance of the child. Benefit of cochlear implantation was also detected with the Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP), which was concordant with views of the parents on the progress of their child in the areas of communication and education. When deciding on implantation, the parents particularly expected auditory information to enhance their child's safety in traffic, joining socially the hearing world, and better employment prospects as adults. Concerning the process of implantation, parents especially valued the know-how and fluent services of the implant centre, positive attitude within the family and information received from other families during the time they were considering the implant decision. Parents also found it important that they have the possibility to influence the communication mode that is used in their child's educational setting. Conclusions Parents report that cochlear implants affect their children in a wide variety of ways that cannot be summarized by a single scale. A broader descriptive framework is required to capture their experiences adequately.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.09.038
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734151647</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0165587609005254</els_id><sourcerecordid>734151647</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-7a80b438819fa76998d5978d8683748af8fc46b8419e395d109797c2ac0e6a863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc-KFDEQxoO4uLOrbyCSm6cek-78vQiyqCssuLDrOWTS1UzaTGc2SStz23fw5Ovtk5hmBgQvQkGRyvdVJb9C6DUla0qoeDeu_biPKaxbQvR6iU49QyuqZNsoJthztKoy3nAlxTm6yHkkhErC-Qt0TrWSnCqyQvbWJphKfnr8jX94-JlxnHDZAn6YbfDlgOOAgx9gybXsE3ZbH_rqwe3T468OH8CmjO1QoF5Ftw31jP1uH-xUbPFxeonOBhsyvDrlS_Tt08f7q-vm5uvnL1cfbhrHqCiNtIpsWKcU1YOVQmvVcy1Vr4TqJFN2UINjYqMY1dBp3lOipZautY6AsEp0l-jtse8-xYcZcjE7nx2E-hCIczayY5RTwWRVsqPSpZhzgsHsk9_ZdDCUmIWtGc2RrVnYmiU6VW1vTgPmzQ76v6YTzCp4fxRA_WaFmUx2HiYHvU_giumj_9-Efxu44CfvbPgOB8hjnNNUERpqcmuIuVv2u6yXaEJ4y1n3B6tkotY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734151647</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Parents’ views on the quality of life of their children 2–3 years after cochlear implantation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Huttunen, K ; Rimmanen, S ; Vikman, S ; Virokannas, N ; Sorri, M ; Archbold, S ; Lutman, M.E</creator><creatorcontrib>Huttunen, K ; Rimmanen, S ; Vikman, S ; Virokannas, N ; Sorri, M ; Archbold, S ; Lutman, M.E</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective Cochlear implants for children are known to have impact on the lives of recipients and their families in a variety of ways. To obtain a clearer picture of these benefits, we explored the quality of life of 36 Finnish children and their families 2–3 years after unilateral cochlear implantation. Methods The studied children were, on average 5 years old, and had received their implant at the median age of 2 years:5 months (range 1:6 to 12:3). Most (67%) of the children used speech, eight (22%) used speech and signs, and four (11%) used sign language as their main communication mode. A third of the children had concomitant problems in addition to their profound hearing impairment. A validated closed-set questionnaire “Children with cochlear implants: parental perspectives” (available, e.g., at http://www.earfoundation.org.uk/research/questionnaires.html ) was used to find out parents’ views and experiences on implantation and explore life after it. Results Parents were most satisfied with improved/expanded social relations, improved communication (the development of spoken language), general functioning with the help of hearing and improved self-reliance of the child. Benefit of cochlear implantation was also detected with the Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP), which was concordant with views of the parents on the progress of their child in the areas of communication and education. When deciding on implantation, the parents particularly expected auditory information to enhance their child's safety in traffic, joining socially the hearing world, and better employment prospects as adults. Concerning the process of implantation, parents especially valued the know-how and fluent services of the implant centre, positive attitude within the family and information received from other families during the time they were considering the implant decision. Parents also found it important that they have the possibility to influence the communication mode that is used in their child's educational setting. Conclusions Parents report that cochlear implants affect their children in a wide variety of ways that cannot be summarized by a single scale. A broader descriptive framework is required to capture their experiences adequately.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-5876</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.09.038</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19875180</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Physiological ; Adaptation, Psychological ; Age Factors ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Cochlear Implantation - methods ; Cochlear Implantation - psychology ; Cochlear Implants ; Cohort Studies ; Communication ; Education ; Effectiveness of implantation ; Female ; Finland ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hearing impairment ; Hearing loss ; Hearing Loss - diagnosis ; Hearing Loss - psychology ; Hearing Loss - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Otolaryngology ; Parent-Child Relations ; Parents - psychology ; Pediatrics ; Quality of Life ; Questionnaire ; Sex Factors ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 2009-12, Vol.73 (12), p.1786-1794</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-7a80b438819fa76998d5978d8683748af8fc46b8419e395d109797c2ac0e6a863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-7a80b438819fa76998d5978d8683748af8fc46b8419e395d109797c2ac0e6a863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165587609005254$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19875180$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huttunen, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rimmanen, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vikman, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virokannas, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorri, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Archbold, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutman, M.E</creatorcontrib><title>Parents’ views on the quality of life of their children 2–3 years after cochlear implantation</title><title>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology</title><addtitle>Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective Cochlear implants for children are known to have impact on the lives of recipients and their families in a variety of ways. To obtain a clearer picture of these benefits, we explored the quality of life of 36 Finnish children and their families 2–3 years after unilateral cochlear implantation. Methods The studied children were, on average 5 years old, and had received their implant at the median age of 2 years:5 months (range 1:6 to 12:3). Most (67%) of the children used speech, eight (22%) used speech and signs, and four (11%) used sign language as their main communication mode. A third of the children had concomitant problems in addition to their profound hearing impairment. A validated closed-set questionnaire “Children with cochlear implants: parental perspectives” (available, e.g., at http://www.earfoundation.org.uk/research/questionnaires.html ) was used to find out parents’ views and experiences on implantation and explore life after it. Results Parents were most satisfied with improved/expanded social relations, improved communication (the development of spoken language), general functioning with the help of hearing and improved self-reliance of the child. Benefit of cochlear implantation was also detected with the Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP), which was concordant with views of the parents on the progress of their child in the areas of communication and education. When deciding on implantation, the parents particularly expected auditory information to enhance their child's safety in traffic, joining socially the hearing world, and better employment prospects as adults. Concerning the process of implantation, parents especially valued the know-how and fluent services of the implant centre, positive attitude within the family and information received from other families during the time they were considering the implant decision. Parents also found it important that they have the possibility to influence the communication mode that is used in their child's educational setting. Conclusions Parents report that cochlear implants affect their children in a wide variety of ways that cannot be summarized by a single scale. A broader descriptive framework is required to capture their experiences adequately.</description><subject>Adaptation, Physiological</subject><subject>Adaptation, Psychological</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Cochlear Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Cochlear Implantation - psychology</subject><subject>Cochlear Implants</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Effectiveness of implantation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Finland</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hearing impairment</subject><subject>Hearing loss</subject><subject>Hearing Loss - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hearing Loss - psychology</subject><subject>Hearing Loss - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Otolaryngology</subject><subject>Parent-Child Relations</subject><subject>Parents - psychology</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Questionnaire</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0165-5876</issn><issn>1872-8464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc-KFDEQxoO4uLOrbyCSm6cek-78vQiyqCssuLDrOWTS1UzaTGc2SStz23fw5Ovtk5hmBgQvQkGRyvdVJb9C6DUla0qoeDeu_biPKaxbQvR6iU49QyuqZNsoJthztKoy3nAlxTm6yHkkhErC-Qt0TrWSnCqyQvbWJphKfnr8jX94-JlxnHDZAn6YbfDlgOOAgx9gybXsE3ZbH_rqwe3T468OH8CmjO1QoF5Ftw31jP1uH-xUbPFxeonOBhsyvDrlS_Tt08f7q-vm5uvnL1cfbhrHqCiNtIpsWKcU1YOVQmvVcy1Vr4TqJFN2UINjYqMY1dBp3lOipZautY6AsEp0l-jtse8-xYcZcjE7nx2E-hCIczayY5RTwWRVsqPSpZhzgsHsk9_ZdDCUmIWtGc2RrVnYmiU6VW1vTgPmzQ76v6YTzCp4fxRA_WaFmUx2HiYHvU_giumj_9-Efxu44CfvbPgOB8hjnNNUERpqcmuIuVv2u6yXaEJ4y1n3B6tkotY</recordid><startdate>20091201</startdate><enddate>20091201</enddate><creator>Huttunen, K</creator><creator>Rimmanen, S</creator><creator>Vikman, S</creator><creator>Virokannas, N</creator><creator>Sorri, M</creator><creator>Archbold, S</creator><creator>Lutman, M.E</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091201</creationdate><title>Parents’ views on the quality of life of their children 2–3 years after cochlear implantation</title><author>Huttunen, K ; Rimmanen, S ; Vikman, S ; Virokannas, N ; Sorri, M ; Archbold, S ; Lutman, M.E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-7a80b438819fa76998d5978d8683748af8fc46b8419e395d109797c2ac0e6a863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Physiological</topic><topic>Adaptation, Psychological</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Cochlear Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Cochlear Implantation - psychology</topic><topic>Cochlear Implants</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Effectiveness of implantation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Finland</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hearing impairment</topic><topic>Hearing loss</topic><topic>Hearing Loss - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hearing Loss - psychology</topic><topic>Hearing Loss - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Otolaryngology</topic><topic>Parent-Child Relations</topic><topic>Parents - psychology</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Questionnaire</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huttunen, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rimmanen, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vikman, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virokannas, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorri, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Archbold, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutman, M.E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huttunen, K</au><au>Rimmanen, S</au><au>Vikman, S</au><au>Virokannas, N</au><au>Sorri, M</au><au>Archbold, S</au><au>Lutman, M.E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Parents’ views on the quality of life of their children 2–3 years after cochlear implantation</atitle><jtitle>International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><date>2009-12-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1786</spage><epage>1794</epage><pages>1786-1794</pages><issn>0165-5876</issn><eissn>1872-8464</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective Cochlear implants for children are known to have impact on the lives of recipients and their families in a variety of ways. To obtain a clearer picture of these benefits, we explored the quality of life of 36 Finnish children and their families 2–3 years after unilateral cochlear implantation. Methods The studied children were, on average 5 years old, and had received their implant at the median age of 2 years:5 months (range 1:6 to 12:3). Most (67%) of the children used speech, eight (22%) used speech and signs, and four (11%) used sign language as their main communication mode. A third of the children had concomitant problems in addition to their profound hearing impairment. A validated closed-set questionnaire “Children with cochlear implants: parental perspectives” (available, e.g., at http://www.earfoundation.org.uk/research/questionnaires.html ) was used to find out parents’ views and experiences on implantation and explore life after it. Results Parents were most satisfied with improved/expanded social relations, improved communication (the development of spoken language), general functioning with the help of hearing and improved self-reliance of the child. Benefit of cochlear implantation was also detected with the Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP), which was concordant with views of the parents on the progress of their child in the areas of communication and education. When deciding on implantation, the parents particularly expected auditory information to enhance their child's safety in traffic, joining socially the hearing world, and better employment prospects as adults. Concerning the process of implantation, parents especially valued the know-how and fluent services of the implant centre, positive attitude within the family and information received from other families during the time they were considering the implant decision. Parents also found it important that they have the possibility to influence the communication mode that is used in their child's educational setting. Conclusions Parents report that cochlear implants affect their children in a wide variety of ways that cannot be summarized by a single scale. A broader descriptive framework is required to capture their experiences adequately.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>19875180</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.09.038</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-5876
ispartof International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 2009-12, Vol.73 (12), p.1786-1794
issn 0165-5876
1872-8464
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734151647
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adaptation, Physiological
Adaptation, Psychological
Age Factors
Child
Child, Preschool
Cochlear Implantation - methods
Cochlear Implantation - psychology
Cochlear Implants
Cohort Studies
Communication
Education
Effectiveness of implantation
Female
Finland
Follow-Up Studies
Hearing impairment
Hearing loss
Hearing Loss - diagnosis
Hearing Loss - psychology
Hearing Loss - surgery
Humans
Male
Otolaryngology
Parent-Child Relations
Parents - psychology
Pediatrics
Quality of Life
Questionnaire
Sex Factors
Surveys and Questionnaires
Time Factors
title Parents’ views on the quality of life of their children 2–3 years after cochlear implantation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T12%3A42%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Parents%E2%80%99%20views%20on%20the%20quality%20of%20life%20of%20their%20children%202%E2%80%933%20years%20after%20cochlear%20implantation&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20pediatric%20otorhinolaryngology&rft.au=Huttunen,%20K&rft.date=2009-12-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1786&rft.epage=1794&rft.pages=1786-1794&rft.issn=0165-5876&rft.eissn=1872-8464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.09.038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E734151647%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734151647&rft_id=info:pmid/19875180&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0165587609005254&rfr_iscdi=true