Death After Colectomy: It's Later Than We Think
BACKGROUND Clinical outcomes are increasingly subject to objective assessment and professional accountability. Informed consent relies on accurate estimation of operative risk. Current scoring systems for assessment of operative mortality after colorectal surgery (CRS) almost uniformly report 30-day...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960) 2009-11, Vol.144 (11), p.1021-1027 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1027 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1021 |
container_title | Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960) |
container_volume | 144 |
creator | Visser, Brendan C Keegan, Hugh Martin, Molinda Wren, Sherry M |
description | BACKGROUND Clinical outcomes are increasingly subject to objective assessment and professional accountability. Informed consent relies on accurate estimation of operative risk. Current scoring systems for assessment of operative mortality after colorectal surgery (CRS) almost uniformly report 30-day mortality and may not represent true risk. DESIGN Prospective cohort. SETTING University-affiliated Veterans Affairs Medical Center. PATIENTS All patients who underwent resections of the colon and/or rectum (as the principal operation) at a single hospital whose data are captured in the Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VA-NSQIP) database from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2006. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Mortality at 30 days and 90 days. RESULTS The VA-NSQIP cohort included 186 patients who underwent CRS, including 148 patients who underwent elective procedures (79.6%) and 38 patients who underwent emergency procedures (20.4%). All but 8 patients were men, with a median age of 67 years (range, 26-92 years). Laparoscopic operations comprised 24.2% and open operations comprised 75.8%. Most (60.8%) were performed for neoplasms. The actual 30-day mortality rates (all, elective, and emergency procedures) were 4.3%, 1.4%, and 15.8%, respectively. These rates closely mirrored the calculated VA-NSQIP risk-adjusted observed-to-expected ratio for 30-day mortality (4.8%, 1.8%, and 18.2%, respectively). However, mortality at 90 days increased substantially to 9.1%, 4.1%, and 28.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION The 30-day mortality significantly underreports the true risk of death after CRS. The 90-day mortality rate should be included as a standard outcome measure after CRS because it serves as a better estimation of risk for counseling patients.Arch Surg. 2009;144(11):1021-1027--> |
doi_str_mv | 10.1001/archsurg.2009.197 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734143484</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ama_id>405455</ama_id><sourcerecordid>734143484</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a327t-f27efddc59491a972d7bb7dfc6eab2eedc4443b8a39e7e02046ac9772f01b6073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-gF4kCNJT2v1KN-ut1K9CwUvF4zLZbGxqPupucui_d0NjBU8zzDwzvDwIjQmeEozJDKzeutZ-TinGckqkOENDErE4ZHPOz9EQY8xDD-IBunJu5zsaS3qJBkRKIiSLh2j2aKDZBousMTZY1oXRTV0eHoJVM3HBGrrpZgtV8GF8zauva3SRQeHMTV9H6P35abN8DddvL6vlYh0Co6IJMypMlqY6klwSkIKmIklEmum5gYQak2rOOUtiYNIIgynmc9BSCJphksyxYCM0Of7d2_q7Na5RZe60KQqoTN06JRgnnPGYe_LuH7mrW1v5cIoyGkVUMOIhcoS0rZ2zJlN7m5dgD4pg1blUvy5V51J5l_7mtn_cJqVJ_y56eR647wFwGorMQqVzd-IoxZJFoks4PnJQwmnLccSjiP0Au_6EBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>232552731</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Death After Colectomy: It's Later Than We Think</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Medical Association Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Visser, Brendan C ; Keegan, Hugh ; Martin, Molinda ; Wren, Sherry M</creator><creatorcontrib>Visser, Brendan C ; Keegan, Hugh ; Martin, Molinda ; Wren, Sherry M</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND Clinical outcomes are increasingly subject to objective assessment and professional accountability. Informed consent relies on accurate estimation of operative risk. Current scoring systems for assessment of operative mortality after colorectal surgery (CRS) almost uniformly report 30-day mortality and may not represent true risk. DESIGN Prospective cohort. SETTING University-affiliated Veterans Affairs Medical Center. PATIENTS All patients who underwent resections of the colon and/or rectum (as the principal operation) at a single hospital whose data are captured in the Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VA-NSQIP) database from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2006. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Mortality at 30 days and 90 days. RESULTS The VA-NSQIP cohort included 186 patients who underwent CRS, including 148 patients who underwent elective procedures (79.6%) and 38 patients who underwent emergency procedures (20.4%). All but 8 patients were men, with a median age of 67 years (range, 26-92 years). Laparoscopic operations comprised 24.2% and open operations comprised 75.8%. Most (60.8%) were performed for neoplasms. The actual 30-day mortality rates (all, elective, and emergency procedures) were 4.3%, 1.4%, and 15.8%, respectively. These rates closely mirrored the calculated VA-NSQIP risk-adjusted observed-to-expected ratio for 30-day mortality (4.8%, 1.8%, and 18.2%, respectively). However, mortality at 90 days increased substantially to 9.1%, 4.1%, and 28.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION The 30-day mortality significantly underreports the true risk of death after CRS. The 90-day mortality rate should be included as a standard outcome measure after CRS because it serves as a better estimation of risk for counseling patients.Arch Surg. 2009;144(11):1021-1027--></description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-0010</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2168-6254</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-3644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-6262</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.197</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19917938</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ARSUAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Academic Medical Centers ; Age Distribution ; Biological and medical sciences ; California ; Cause of Death ; Clinical outcomes ; Cohort Studies ; Colectomy - methods ; Colectomy - mortality ; Colonoscopy - methods ; Colonoscopy - mortality ; Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality ; Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Colorectal surgery ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; General aspects ; Hospital Mortality - trends ; Hospitals, Veterans ; Humans ; Incidence ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Mortality ; Postoperative Complications - mortality ; Prospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Severity of Illness Index ; Sex Distribution ; Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the digestive system ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960), 2009-11, Vol.144 (11), p.1021-1027</ispartof><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Medical Association Nov 2009</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/articlepdf/10.1001/archsurg.2009.197$$EPDF$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/10.1001/archsurg.2009.197$$EHTML$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>64,314,776,780,3327,27901,27902,76231,76234</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22093574$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19917938$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Visser, Brendan C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keegan, Hugh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Molinda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wren, Sherry M</creatorcontrib><title>Death After Colectomy: It's Later Than We Think</title><title>Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960)</title><addtitle>Arch Surg</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND Clinical outcomes are increasingly subject to objective assessment and professional accountability. Informed consent relies on accurate estimation of operative risk. Current scoring systems for assessment of operative mortality after colorectal surgery (CRS) almost uniformly report 30-day mortality and may not represent true risk. DESIGN Prospective cohort. SETTING University-affiliated Veterans Affairs Medical Center. PATIENTS All patients who underwent resections of the colon and/or rectum (as the principal operation) at a single hospital whose data are captured in the Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VA-NSQIP) database from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2006. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Mortality at 30 days and 90 days. RESULTS The VA-NSQIP cohort included 186 patients who underwent CRS, including 148 patients who underwent elective procedures (79.6%) and 38 patients who underwent emergency procedures (20.4%). All but 8 patients were men, with a median age of 67 years (range, 26-92 years). Laparoscopic operations comprised 24.2% and open operations comprised 75.8%. Most (60.8%) were performed for neoplasms. The actual 30-day mortality rates (all, elective, and emergency procedures) were 4.3%, 1.4%, and 15.8%, respectively. These rates closely mirrored the calculated VA-NSQIP risk-adjusted observed-to-expected ratio for 30-day mortality (4.8%, 1.8%, and 18.2%, respectively). However, mortality at 90 days increased substantially to 9.1%, 4.1%, and 28.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION The 30-day mortality significantly underreports the true risk of death after CRS. The 90-day mortality rate should be included as a standard outcome measure after CRS because it serves as a better estimation of risk for counseling patients.Arch Surg. 2009;144(11):1021-1027--></description><subject>Academic Medical Centers</subject><subject>Age Distribution</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Cause of Death</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Colectomy - methods</subject><subject>Colectomy - mortality</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - mortality</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Colorectal surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Hospital Mortality - trends</subject><subject>Hospitals, Veterans</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - mortality</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Sex Distribution</subject><subject>Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the digestive system</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0004-0010</issn><issn>2168-6254</issn><issn>1538-3644</issn><issn>2168-6262</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-gF4kCNJT2v1KN-ut1K9CwUvF4zLZbGxqPupucui_d0NjBU8zzDwzvDwIjQmeEozJDKzeutZ-TinGckqkOENDErE4ZHPOz9EQY8xDD-IBunJu5zsaS3qJBkRKIiSLh2j2aKDZBousMTZY1oXRTV0eHoJVM3HBGrrpZgtV8GF8zauva3SRQeHMTV9H6P35abN8DddvL6vlYh0Co6IJMypMlqY6klwSkIKmIklEmum5gYQak2rOOUtiYNIIgynmc9BSCJphksyxYCM0Of7d2_q7Na5RZe60KQqoTN06JRgnnPGYe_LuH7mrW1v5cIoyGkVUMOIhcoS0rZ2zJlN7m5dgD4pg1blUvy5V51J5l_7mtn_cJqVJ_y56eR647wFwGorMQqVzd-IoxZJFoks4PnJQwmnLccSjiP0Au_6EBQ</recordid><startdate>20091101</startdate><enddate>20091101</enddate><creator>Visser, Brendan C</creator><creator>Keegan, Hugh</creator><creator>Martin, Molinda</creator><creator>Wren, Sherry M</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091101</creationdate><title>Death After Colectomy: It's Later Than We Think</title><author>Visser, Brendan C ; Keegan, Hugh ; Martin, Molinda ; Wren, Sherry M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a327t-f27efddc59491a972d7bb7dfc6eab2eedc4443b8a39e7e02046ac9772f01b6073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Academic Medical Centers</topic><topic>Age Distribution</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Cause of Death</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Colectomy - methods</topic><topic>Colectomy - mortality</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - mortality</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Colorectal surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Hospital Mortality - trends</topic><topic>Hospitals, Veterans</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - mortality</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Sex Distribution</topic><topic>Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the digestive system</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Visser, Brendan C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keegan, Hugh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Molinda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wren, Sherry M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Visser, Brendan C</au><au>Keegan, Hugh</au><au>Martin, Molinda</au><au>Wren, Sherry M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Death After Colectomy: It's Later Than We Think</atitle><jtitle>Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960)</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Surg</addtitle><date>2009-11-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>144</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1021</spage><epage>1027</epage><pages>1021-1027</pages><issn>0004-0010</issn><issn>2168-6254</issn><eissn>1538-3644</eissn><eissn>2168-6262</eissn><coden>ARSUAX</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND Clinical outcomes are increasingly subject to objective assessment and professional accountability. Informed consent relies on accurate estimation of operative risk. Current scoring systems for assessment of operative mortality after colorectal surgery (CRS) almost uniformly report 30-day mortality and may not represent true risk. DESIGN Prospective cohort. SETTING University-affiliated Veterans Affairs Medical Center. PATIENTS All patients who underwent resections of the colon and/or rectum (as the principal operation) at a single hospital whose data are captured in the Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VA-NSQIP) database from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2006. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Mortality at 30 days and 90 days. RESULTS The VA-NSQIP cohort included 186 patients who underwent CRS, including 148 patients who underwent elective procedures (79.6%) and 38 patients who underwent emergency procedures (20.4%). All but 8 patients were men, with a median age of 67 years (range, 26-92 years). Laparoscopic operations comprised 24.2% and open operations comprised 75.8%. Most (60.8%) were performed for neoplasms. The actual 30-day mortality rates (all, elective, and emergency procedures) were 4.3%, 1.4%, and 15.8%, respectively. These rates closely mirrored the calculated VA-NSQIP risk-adjusted observed-to-expected ratio for 30-day mortality (4.8%, 1.8%, and 18.2%, respectively). However, mortality at 90 days increased substantially to 9.1%, 4.1%, and 28.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION The 30-day mortality significantly underreports the true risk of death after CRS. The 90-day mortality rate should be included as a standard outcome measure after CRS because it serves as a better estimation of risk for counseling patients.Arch Surg. 2009;144(11):1021-1027--></abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>19917938</pmid><doi>10.1001/archsurg.2009.197</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0004-0010 |
ispartof | Archives of surgery (Chicago. 1960), 2009-11, Vol.144 (11), p.1021-1027 |
issn | 0004-0010 2168-6254 1538-3644 2168-6262 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734143484 |
source | MEDLINE; American Medical Association Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Academic Medical Centers Age Distribution Biological and medical sciences California Cause of Death Clinical outcomes Cohort Studies Colectomy - methods Colectomy - mortality Colonoscopy - methods Colonoscopy - mortality Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery Colorectal surgery Female Follow-Up Studies General aspects Hospital Mortality - trends Hospitals, Veterans Humans Incidence Male Medical sciences Mortality Postoperative Complications - mortality Prospective Studies Risk Assessment Severity of Illness Index Sex Distribution Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgery of the digestive system Time Factors Treatment Outcome |
title | Death After Colectomy: It's Later Than We Think |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T05%3A09%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Death%20After%20Colectomy:%20It's%20Later%20Than%20We%20Think&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20surgery%20(Chicago.%201960)&rft.au=Visser,%20Brendan%20C&rft.date=2009-11-01&rft.volume=144&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1021&rft.epage=1027&rft.pages=1021-1027&rft.issn=0004-0010&rft.eissn=1538-3644&rft.coden=ARSUAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/archsurg.2009.197&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E734143484%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=232552731&rft_id=info:pmid/19917938&rft_ama_id=405455&rfr_iscdi=true |