Initial evaluation of quality indicators for psychosocial care of adults with cancer
The American Psychosocial Oncology Society has developed the first indicators of the quality of psychosocial care for cancer patients. This report describes the initial evaluation of these indicators. Medical records of 388 colorectal cancer patients first seen by a medical oncologist in 2006 at sev...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer control 2009-10, Vol.16 (4), p.328-334 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 334 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 328 |
container_title | Cancer control |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Jacobsen, Paul B Shibata, David Siegel, Erin M Lee, Ji-Hyun Alemany, Carlos A Brown, Richard Cartwright, Thomas H Levine, Richard M Smith, Jesusa Corazon R Abesada-Terk, Jr, Guillermo Malafa, Mokenge P |
description | The American Psychosocial Oncology Society has developed the first indicators of the quality of psychosocial care for cancer patients. This report describes the initial evaluation of these indicators.
Medical records of 388 colorectal cancer patients first seen by a medical oncologist in 2006 at seven practice sites were reviewed by trained abstractors whose accuracy was documented by periodic checks.
Rates of assessment of emotional well-being within 1 month of a patient's first visit with a medical oncologist ranged from 6% to 84% (mean = 60%; P < .001). Among the 45 patients identified as having a problem with emotional well-being, rates of evidence of action taken (or explanation for no action) ranged from 0% to 100% (mean = 51%; P = .85). A direct comparison showed that pain was assessed more often than emotional well-being in these patients (87% vs 60%, P < .001).
Findings show these indicators can be measured easily and reliably, demonstrate variability across practices that suggests potential for improvement, and yield information that can be used to take actions to improve quality. Additional findings suggest that, to date, efforts to promote routine symptom assessment have been more successful for pain than for emotional well-being. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/107327480901600407 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734138698</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>734138698</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-895deae42110c0df5bcbb649fb0c79040604c4a8e33d03f08f0b0cf3eb352d703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkEtPwzAQhC0EolD4AxyQb5wC60fi-IgqHpUqcSnnyHFs1SiNW9sB9d_jqJU4cNrV7jcjzSB0R-CRECGeCAhGBa9BAqkAOIgzdEVKWhWUlfI87xkoJmKGrmP8AqDAGb9EMyIlAUnkFVovB5ec6rH5Vv2okvMD9hbvR9W7dMBu6JxWyYeIrQ94Fw9646PXk0KrYCZWdWOfIv5xaZNvgzbhBl1Y1Udze5pz9Pn6sl68F6uPt-XieVVoBjQVtSw7owynhICGzpatbtuKS9uCFjLnqYBrrmrDWAfMQm0hfywzLStpJ4DN0cPRdxf8fjQxNVsXtel7NRg_xkYwTlhdyTqT9Ejq4GMMxja74LYqHBoCzVRm87_MLLo_2Y_t1nR_klN77Bfynm_D</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734138698</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Initial evaluation of quality indicators for psychosocial care of adults with cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Jacobsen, Paul B ; Shibata, David ; Siegel, Erin M ; Lee, Ji-Hyun ; Alemany, Carlos A ; Brown, Richard ; Cartwright, Thomas H ; Levine, Richard M ; Smith, Jesusa Corazon R ; Abesada-Terk, Jr, Guillermo ; Malafa, Mokenge P</creator><creatorcontrib>Jacobsen, Paul B ; Shibata, David ; Siegel, Erin M ; Lee, Ji-Hyun ; Alemany, Carlos A ; Brown, Richard ; Cartwright, Thomas H ; Levine, Richard M ; Smith, Jesusa Corazon R ; Abesada-Terk, Jr, Guillermo ; Malafa, Mokenge P</creatorcontrib><description>The American Psychosocial Oncology Society has developed the first indicators of the quality of psychosocial care for cancer patients. This report describes the initial evaluation of these indicators.
Medical records of 388 colorectal cancer patients first seen by a medical oncologist in 2006 at seven practice sites were reviewed by trained abstractors whose accuracy was documented by periodic checks.
Rates of assessment of emotional well-being within 1 month of a patient's first visit with a medical oncologist ranged from 6% to 84% (mean = 60%; P < .001). Among the 45 patients identified as having a problem with emotional well-being, rates of evidence of action taken (or explanation for no action) ranged from 0% to 100% (mean = 51%; P = .85). A direct comparison showed that pain was assessed more often than emotional well-being in these patients (87% vs 60%, P < .001).
Findings show these indicators can be measured easily and reliably, demonstrate variability across practices that suggests potential for improvement, and yield information that can be used to take actions to improve quality. Additional findings suggest that, to date, efforts to promote routine symptom assessment have been more successful for pain than for emotional well-being.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1073-2748</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-2359</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1073-2748</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/107327480901600407</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19910919</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Colorectal Neoplasms - psychology ; Colorectal Neoplasms - therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical Oncology - methods ; Medical Oncology - standards ; Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods ; Social Support ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Cancer control, 2009-10, Vol.16 (4), p.328-334</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-895deae42110c0df5bcbb649fb0c79040604c4a8e33d03f08f0b0cf3eb352d703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-895deae42110c0df5bcbb649fb0c79040604c4a8e33d03f08f0b0cf3eb352d703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19910919$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jacobsen, Paul B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shibata, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegel, Erin M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Ji-Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alemany, Carlos A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cartwright, Thomas H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, Richard M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Jesusa Corazon R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abesada-Terk, Jr, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malafa, Mokenge P</creatorcontrib><title>Initial evaluation of quality indicators for psychosocial care of adults with cancer</title><title>Cancer control</title><addtitle>Cancer Control</addtitle><description>The American Psychosocial Oncology Society has developed the first indicators of the quality of psychosocial care for cancer patients. This report describes the initial evaluation of these indicators.
Medical records of 388 colorectal cancer patients first seen by a medical oncologist in 2006 at seven practice sites were reviewed by trained abstractors whose accuracy was documented by periodic checks.
Rates of assessment of emotional well-being within 1 month of a patient's first visit with a medical oncologist ranged from 6% to 84% (mean = 60%; P < .001). Among the 45 patients identified as having a problem with emotional well-being, rates of evidence of action taken (or explanation for no action) ranged from 0% to 100% (mean = 51%; P = .85). A direct comparison showed that pain was assessed more often than emotional well-being in these patients (87% vs 60%, P < .001).
Findings show these indicators can be measured easily and reliably, demonstrate variability across practices that suggests potential for improvement, and yield information that can be used to take actions to improve quality. Additional findings suggest that, to date, efforts to promote routine symptom assessment have been more successful for pain than for emotional well-being.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Oncology - methods</subject><subject>Medical Oncology - standards</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1073-2748</issn><issn>1526-2359</issn><issn>1073-2748</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNplkEtPwzAQhC0EolD4AxyQb5wC60fi-IgqHpUqcSnnyHFs1SiNW9sB9d_jqJU4cNrV7jcjzSB0R-CRECGeCAhGBa9BAqkAOIgzdEVKWhWUlfI87xkoJmKGrmP8AqDAGb9EMyIlAUnkFVovB5ec6rH5Vv2okvMD9hbvR9W7dMBu6JxWyYeIrQ94Fw9646PXk0KrYCZWdWOfIv5xaZNvgzbhBl1Y1Udze5pz9Pn6sl68F6uPt-XieVVoBjQVtSw7owynhICGzpatbtuKS9uCFjLnqYBrrmrDWAfMQm0hfywzLStpJ4DN0cPRdxf8fjQxNVsXtel7NRg_xkYwTlhdyTqT9Ejq4GMMxja74LYqHBoCzVRm87_MLLo_2Y_t1nR_klN77Bfynm_D</recordid><startdate>20091001</startdate><enddate>20091001</enddate><creator>Jacobsen, Paul B</creator><creator>Shibata, David</creator><creator>Siegel, Erin M</creator><creator>Lee, Ji-Hyun</creator><creator>Alemany, Carlos A</creator><creator>Brown, Richard</creator><creator>Cartwright, Thomas H</creator><creator>Levine, Richard M</creator><creator>Smith, Jesusa Corazon R</creator><creator>Abesada-Terk, Jr, Guillermo</creator><creator>Malafa, Mokenge P</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091001</creationdate><title>Initial evaluation of quality indicators for psychosocial care of adults with cancer</title><author>Jacobsen, Paul B ; Shibata, David ; Siegel, Erin M ; Lee, Ji-Hyun ; Alemany, Carlos A ; Brown, Richard ; Cartwright, Thomas H ; Levine, Richard M ; Smith, Jesusa Corazon R ; Abesada-Terk, Jr, Guillermo ; Malafa, Mokenge P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-895deae42110c0df5bcbb649fb0c79040604c4a8e33d03f08f0b0cf3eb352d703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Oncology - methods</topic><topic>Medical Oncology - standards</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jacobsen, Paul B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shibata, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegel, Erin M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Ji-Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alemany, Carlos A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cartwright, Thomas H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, Richard M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Jesusa Corazon R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abesada-Terk, Jr, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malafa, Mokenge P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jacobsen, Paul B</au><au>Shibata, David</au><au>Siegel, Erin M</au><au>Lee, Ji-Hyun</au><au>Alemany, Carlos A</au><au>Brown, Richard</au><au>Cartwright, Thomas H</au><au>Levine, Richard M</au><au>Smith, Jesusa Corazon R</au><au>Abesada-Terk, Jr, Guillermo</au><au>Malafa, Mokenge P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Initial evaluation of quality indicators for psychosocial care of adults with cancer</atitle><jtitle>Cancer control</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Control</addtitle><date>2009-10-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>328</spage><epage>334</epage><pages>328-334</pages><issn>1073-2748</issn><eissn>1526-2359</eissn><eissn>1073-2748</eissn><abstract>The American Psychosocial Oncology Society has developed the first indicators of the quality of psychosocial care for cancer patients. This report describes the initial evaluation of these indicators.
Medical records of 388 colorectal cancer patients first seen by a medical oncologist in 2006 at seven practice sites were reviewed by trained abstractors whose accuracy was documented by periodic checks.
Rates of assessment of emotional well-being within 1 month of a patient's first visit with a medical oncologist ranged from 6% to 84% (mean = 60%; P < .001). Among the 45 patients identified as having a problem with emotional well-being, rates of evidence of action taken (or explanation for no action) ranged from 0% to 100% (mean = 51%; P = .85). A direct comparison showed that pain was assessed more often than emotional well-being in these patients (87% vs 60%, P < .001).
Findings show these indicators can be measured easily and reliably, demonstrate variability across practices that suggests potential for improvement, and yield information that can be used to take actions to improve quality. Additional findings suggest that, to date, efforts to promote routine symptom assessment have been more successful for pain than for emotional well-being.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>19910919</pmid><doi>10.1177/107327480901600407</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1073-2748 |
ispartof | Cancer control, 2009-10, Vol.16 (4), p.328-334 |
issn | 1073-2748 1526-2359 1073-2748 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734138698 |
source | MEDLINE; Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Adult Colorectal Neoplasms - psychology Colorectal Neoplasms - therapy Female Humans Male Medical Oncology - methods Medical Oncology - standards Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods Social Support Young Adult |
title | Initial evaluation of quality indicators for psychosocial care of adults with cancer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T04%3A27%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Initial%20evaluation%20of%20quality%20indicators%20for%20psychosocial%20care%20of%20adults%20with%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20control&rft.au=Jacobsen,%20Paul%20B&rft.date=2009-10-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=328&rft.epage=334&rft.pages=328-334&rft.issn=1073-2748&rft.eissn=1526-2359&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/107327480901600407&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E734138698%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734138698&rft_id=info:pmid/19910919&rfr_iscdi=true |