Initial evaluation of quality indicators for psychosocial care of adults with cancer

The American Psychosocial Oncology Society has developed the first indicators of the quality of psychosocial care for cancer patients. This report describes the initial evaluation of these indicators. Medical records of 388 colorectal cancer patients first seen by a medical oncologist in 2006 at sev...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer control 2009-10, Vol.16 (4), p.328-334
Hauptverfasser: Jacobsen, Paul B, Shibata, David, Siegel, Erin M, Lee, Ji-Hyun, Alemany, Carlos A, Brown, Richard, Cartwright, Thomas H, Levine, Richard M, Smith, Jesusa Corazon R, Abesada-Terk, Jr, Guillermo, Malafa, Mokenge P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 334
container_issue 4
container_start_page 328
container_title Cancer control
container_volume 16
creator Jacobsen, Paul B
Shibata, David
Siegel, Erin M
Lee, Ji-Hyun
Alemany, Carlos A
Brown, Richard
Cartwright, Thomas H
Levine, Richard M
Smith, Jesusa Corazon R
Abesada-Terk, Jr, Guillermo
Malafa, Mokenge P
description The American Psychosocial Oncology Society has developed the first indicators of the quality of psychosocial care for cancer patients. This report describes the initial evaluation of these indicators. Medical records of 388 colorectal cancer patients first seen by a medical oncologist in 2006 at seven practice sites were reviewed by trained abstractors whose accuracy was documented by periodic checks. Rates of assessment of emotional well-being within 1 month of a patient's first visit with a medical oncologist ranged from 6% to 84% (mean = 60%; P < .001). Among the 45 patients identified as having a problem with emotional well-being, rates of evidence of action taken (or explanation for no action) ranged from 0% to 100% (mean = 51%; P = .85). A direct comparison showed that pain was assessed more often than emotional well-being in these patients (87% vs 60%, P < .001). Findings show these indicators can be measured easily and reliably, demonstrate variability across practices that suggests potential for improvement, and yield information that can be used to take actions to improve quality. Additional findings suggest that, to date, efforts to promote routine symptom assessment have been more successful for pain than for emotional well-being.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/107327480901600407
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734138698</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>734138698</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-895deae42110c0df5bcbb649fb0c79040604c4a8e33d03f08f0b0cf3eb352d703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkEtPwzAQhC0EolD4AxyQb5wC60fi-IgqHpUqcSnnyHFs1SiNW9sB9d_jqJU4cNrV7jcjzSB0R-CRECGeCAhGBa9BAqkAOIgzdEVKWhWUlfI87xkoJmKGrmP8AqDAGb9EMyIlAUnkFVovB5ec6rH5Vv2okvMD9hbvR9W7dMBu6JxWyYeIrQ94Fw9646PXk0KrYCZWdWOfIv5xaZNvgzbhBl1Y1Udze5pz9Pn6sl68F6uPt-XieVVoBjQVtSw7owynhICGzpatbtuKS9uCFjLnqYBrrmrDWAfMQm0hfywzLStpJ4DN0cPRdxf8fjQxNVsXtel7NRg_xkYwTlhdyTqT9Ejq4GMMxja74LYqHBoCzVRm87_MLLo_2Y_t1nR_klN77Bfynm_D</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734138698</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Initial evaluation of quality indicators for psychosocial care of adults with cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Jacobsen, Paul B ; Shibata, David ; Siegel, Erin M ; Lee, Ji-Hyun ; Alemany, Carlos A ; Brown, Richard ; Cartwright, Thomas H ; Levine, Richard M ; Smith, Jesusa Corazon R ; Abesada-Terk, Jr, Guillermo ; Malafa, Mokenge P</creator><creatorcontrib>Jacobsen, Paul B ; Shibata, David ; Siegel, Erin M ; Lee, Ji-Hyun ; Alemany, Carlos A ; Brown, Richard ; Cartwright, Thomas H ; Levine, Richard M ; Smith, Jesusa Corazon R ; Abesada-Terk, Jr, Guillermo ; Malafa, Mokenge P</creatorcontrib><description>The American Psychosocial Oncology Society has developed the first indicators of the quality of psychosocial care for cancer patients. This report describes the initial evaluation of these indicators. Medical records of 388 colorectal cancer patients first seen by a medical oncologist in 2006 at seven practice sites were reviewed by trained abstractors whose accuracy was documented by periodic checks. Rates of assessment of emotional well-being within 1 month of a patient's first visit with a medical oncologist ranged from 6% to 84% (mean = 60%; P &lt; .001). Among the 45 patients identified as having a problem with emotional well-being, rates of evidence of action taken (or explanation for no action) ranged from 0% to 100% (mean = 51%; P = .85). A direct comparison showed that pain was assessed more often than emotional well-being in these patients (87% vs 60%, P &lt; .001). Findings show these indicators can be measured easily and reliably, demonstrate variability across practices that suggests potential for improvement, and yield information that can be used to take actions to improve quality. Additional findings suggest that, to date, efforts to promote routine symptom assessment have been more successful for pain than for emotional well-being.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1073-2748</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-2359</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1073-2748</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/107327480901600407</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19910919</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Colorectal Neoplasms - psychology ; Colorectal Neoplasms - therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical Oncology - methods ; Medical Oncology - standards ; Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods ; Social Support ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Cancer control, 2009-10, Vol.16 (4), p.328-334</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-895deae42110c0df5bcbb649fb0c79040604c4a8e33d03f08f0b0cf3eb352d703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-895deae42110c0df5bcbb649fb0c79040604c4a8e33d03f08f0b0cf3eb352d703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19910919$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jacobsen, Paul B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shibata, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegel, Erin M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Ji-Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alemany, Carlos A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cartwright, Thomas H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, Richard M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Jesusa Corazon R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abesada-Terk, Jr, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malafa, Mokenge P</creatorcontrib><title>Initial evaluation of quality indicators for psychosocial care of adults with cancer</title><title>Cancer control</title><addtitle>Cancer Control</addtitle><description>The American Psychosocial Oncology Society has developed the first indicators of the quality of psychosocial care for cancer patients. This report describes the initial evaluation of these indicators. Medical records of 388 colorectal cancer patients first seen by a medical oncologist in 2006 at seven practice sites were reviewed by trained abstractors whose accuracy was documented by periodic checks. Rates of assessment of emotional well-being within 1 month of a patient's first visit with a medical oncologist ranged from 6% to 84% (mean = 60%; P &lt; .001). Among the 45 patients identified as having a problem with emotional well-being, rates of evidence of action taken (or explanation for no action) ranged from 0% to 100% (mean = 51%; P = .85). A direct comparison showed that pain was assessed more often than emotional well-being in these patients (87% vs 60%, P &lt; .001). Findings show these indicators can be measured easily and reliably, demonstrate variability across practices that suggests potential for improvement, and yield information that can be used to take actions to improve quality. Additional findings suggest that, to date, efforts to promote routine symptom assessment have been more successful for pain than for emotional well-being.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Oncology - methods</subject><subject>Medical Oncology - standards</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1073-2748</issn><issn>1526-2359</issn><issn>1073-2748</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNplkEtPwzAQhC0EolD4AxyQb5wC60fi-IgqHpUqcSnnyHFs1SiNW9sB9d_jqJU4cNrV7jcjzSB0R-CRECGeCAhGBa9BAqkAOIgzdEVKWhWUlfI87xkoJmKGrmP8AqDAGb9EMyIlAUnkFVovB5ec6rH5Vv2okvMD9hbvR9W7dMBu6JxWyYeIrQ94Fw9646PXk0KrYCZWdWOfIv5xaZNvgzbhBl1Y1Udze5pz9Pn6sl68F6uPt-XieVVoBjQVtSw7owynhICGzpatbtuKS9uCFjLnqYBrrmrDWAfMQm0hfywzLStpJ4DN0cPRdxf8fjQxNVsXtel7NRg_xkYwTlhdyTqT9Ejq4GMMxja74LYqHBoCzVRm87_MLLo_2Y_t1nR_klN77Bfynm_D</recordid><startdate>20091001</startdate><enddate>20091001</enddate><creator>Jacobsen, Paul B</creator><creator>Shibata, David</creator><creator>Siegel, Erin M</creator><creator>Lee, Ji-Hyun</creator><creator>Alemany, Carlos A</creator><creator>Brown, Richard</creator><creator>Cartwright, Thomas H</creator><creator>Levine, Richard M</creator><creator>Smith, Jesusa Corazon R</creator><creator>Abesada-Terk, Jr, Guillermo</creator><creator>Malafa, Mokenge P</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091001</creationdate><title>Initial evaluation of quality indicators for psychosocial care of adults with cancer</title><author>Jacobsen, Paul B ; Shibata, David ; Siegel, Erin M ; Lee, Ji-Hyun ; Alemany, Carlos A ; Brown, Richard ; Cartwright, Thomas H ; Levine, Richard M ; Smith, Jesusa Corazon R ; Abesada-Terk, Jr, Guillermo ; Malafa, Mokenge P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-895deae42110c0df5bcbb649fb0c79040604c4a8e33d03f08f0b0cf3eb352d703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Oncology - methods</topic><topic>Medical Oncology - standards</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jacobsen, Paul B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shibata, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegel, Erin M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Ji-Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alemany, Carlos A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cartwright, Thomas H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, Richard M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Jesusa Corazon R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abesada-Terk, Jr, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malafa, Mokenge P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jacobsen, Paul B</au><au>Shibata, David</au><au>Siegel, Erin M</au><au>Lee, Ji-Hyun</au><au>Alemany, Carlos A</au><au>Brown, Richard</au><au>Cartwright, Thomas H</au><au>Levine, Richard M</au><au>Smith, Jesusa Corazon R</au><au>Abesada-Terk, Jr, Guillermo</au><au>Malafa, Mokenge P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Initial evaluation of quality indicators for psychosocial care of adults with cancer</atitle><jtitle>Cancer control</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Control</addtitle><date>2009-10-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>328</spage><epage>334</epage><pages>328-334</pages><issn>1073-2748</issn><eissn>1526-2359</eissn><eissn>1073-2748</eissn><abstract>The American Psychosocial Oncology Society has developed the first indicators of the quality of psychosocial care for cancer patients. This report describes the initial evaluation of these indicators. Medical records of 388 colorectal cancer patients first seen by a medical oncologist in 2006 at seven practice sites were reviewed by trained abstractors whose accuracy was documented by periodic checks. Rates of assessment of emotional well-being within 1 month of a patient's first visit with a medical oncologist ranged from 6% to 84% (mean = 60%; P &lt; .001). Among the 45 patients identified as having a problem with emotional well-being, rates of evidence of action taken (or explanation for no action) ranged from 0% to 100% (mean = 51%; P = .85). A direct comparison showed that pain was assessed more often than emotional well-being in these patients (87% vs 60%, P &lt; .001). Findings show these indicators can be measured easily and reliably, demonstrate variability across practices that suggests potential for improvement, and yield information that can be used to take actions to improve quality. Additional findings suggest that, to date, efforts to promote routine symptom assessment have been more successful for pain than for emotional well-being.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>19910919</pmid><doi>10.1177/107327480901600407</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1073-2748
ispartof Cancer control, 2009-10, Vol.16 (4), p.328-334
issn 1073-2748
1526-2359
1073-2748
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734138698
source MEDLINE; Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adult
Colorectal Neoplasms - psychology
Colorectal Neoplasms - therapy
Female
Humans
Male
Medical Oncology - methods
Medical Oncology - standards
Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods
Social Support
Young Adult
title Initial evaluation of quality indicators for psychosocial care of adults with cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T04%3A27%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Initial%20evaluation%20of%20quality%20indicators%20for%20psychosocial%20care%20of%20adults%20with%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20control&rft.au=Jacobsen,%20Paul%20B&rft.date=2009-10-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=328&rft.epage=334&rft.pages=328-334&rft.issn=1073-2748&rft.eissn=1526-2359&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/107327480901600407&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E734138698%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734138698&rft_id=info:pmid/19910919&rfr_iscdi=true