Comparison of classification-based physical therapy with therapy based on clinical practice guidelines for patients with acute low back pain: a randomized clinical trial

A randomized clinical trial was conducted. To compare the effectiveness of classification-based physical therapy with that of therapy based on clinical practice guidelines for patients with acute, work-related low back pain. Clinical practice guidelines recommend minimal intervention during the firs...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) Pa. 1976), 2003-07, Vol.28 (13), p.1363-1371
Hauptverfasser: Fritz, Julie M, Delitto, Anthony, Erhard, Richard E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1371
container_issue 13
container_start_page 1363
container_title Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)
container_volume 28
creator Fritz, Julie M
Delitto, Anthony
Erhard, Richard E
description A randomized clinical trial was conducted. To compare the effectiveness of classification-based physical therapy with that of therapy based on clinical practice guidelines for patients with acute, work-related low back pain. Clinical practice guidelines recommend minimal intervention during the first few weeks after acute low back injury. However, studies supporting this recommendation have not attempted to identify which patients are likely to respond to particular interventions. For this study, 78 subjects with work-related low back pain of less than 3 weeks duration were randomized to receive therapy based on a classification system that attempts to match patients to specific interventions or therapy based on the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research guidelines. The subjects were followed for 1 year. Outcomes included the impairment index, Oswestry scale, SF-36 component scores, satisfaction, medical costs, and return to work status. After adjustment for baseline factors, subjects receiving classification-based therapy showed greater change on the Oswestry (P = 0.023) and the SF-36 physical component (P = 0.029) after 4 weeks. Patient satisfaction was greater (P = 0.006) and return to full-duty work status more likely (P = 0.017) after 4 weeks in the classification-based group. After 1 year, there was a trend toward reduced Oswestry scores in the classification-based group (P = 0.063). Median total medical costs for 1 year after injury were 1003.68 dollars for the guideline-based group and 774.00 dollars for the classification-based group (P = 0.13). For patients with acute, work-related low back pain, the use of a classification-based approach resulted in improved disability and return to work status after 4 weeks, as compared with therapy based on clinical practice guidelines. Further research is needed on the optimal timing and methods of intervention for patients with acute low back pain.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/01.BRS.0000067115.61673.FF
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73413415</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>73413415</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-4684b0d18b9d8bccfeccb8fe63ebbbae9d23b8d5856ccabb20f4aefbfdced5743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkc1u1DAUhS1ERaeFV0AWC3YJdpwfpzsYNQWpElILa8s_14whiYPtqJq-EW-JpzNqrStZPvc7x4uD0AdKSkr67hOh5Ze7-5IcTttR2pQtbTtWDsMrtKFNxYus9a_RhrC2KqqatefoIsbfB5zR_g06pxVnnPR0g_5t_bTI4KKfsbdYjzJGZ52Wyfm5UDKCwctuH7My4rSDIJc9fnBp9_w4MtmuRzc_YUuQOjkN-NfqDGQVIrY-4CWHwpzi0S_1mgCP_iEn6D956eYrLHGQs_GTe8yZz4EpODm-RWdWjhHene5L9HO4_rH9Wtx-v_m2_Xxb6Ip3qahbXitiKFe94UprC1orbqFloJSS0JuKKW4a3rRaS6UqYmsJVlmjwTRdzS7Rx2PuEvzfFWISk4saxlHO4NcoOlbTPE0Gr46gDj7GAFYswU0y7AUl4lCUIFTkosRLUeKpKDEM2fz-9MuqJjAv1lMz7D_SUpZo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73413415</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of classification-based physical therapy with therapy based on clinical practice guidelines for patients with acute low back pain: a randomized clinical trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Fritz, Julie M ; Delitto, Anthony ; Erhard, Richard E</creator><creatorcontrib>Fritz, Julie M ; Delitto, Anthony ; Erhard, Richard E</creatorcontrib><description>A randomized clinical trial was conducted. To compare the effectiveness of classification-based physical therapy with that of therapy based on clinical practice guidelines for patients with acute, work-related low back pain. Clinical practice guidelines recommend minimal intervention during the first few weeks after acute low back injury. However, studies supporting this recommendation have not attempted to identify which patients are likely to respond to particular interventions. For this study, 78 subjects with work-related low back pain of less than 3 weeks duration were randomized to receive therapy based on a classification system that attempts to match patients to specific interventions or therapy based on the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research guidelines. The subjects were followed for 1 year. Outcomes included the impairment index, Oswestry scale, SF-36 component scores, satisfaction, medical costs, and return to work status. After adjustment for baseline factors, subjects receiving classification-based therapy showed greater change on the Oswestry (P = 0.023) and the SF-36 physical component (P = 0.029) after 4 weeks. Patient satisfaction was greater (P = 0.006) and return to full-duty work status more likely (P = 0.017) after 4 weeks in the classification-based group. After 1 year, there was a trend toward reduced Oswestry scores in the classification-based group (P = 0.063). Median total medical costs for 1 year after injury were 1003.68 dollars for the guideline-based group and 774.00 dollars for the classification-based group (P = 0.13). For patients with acute, work-related low back pain, the use of a classification-based approach resulted in improved disability and return to work status after 4 weeks, as compared with therapy based on clinical practice guidelines. Further research is needed on the optimal timing and methods of intervention for patients with acute low back pain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-2436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000067115.61673.FF</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12838091</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Acute Disease ; Adult ; Disability Evaluation ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Health Care Costs ; Humans ; Low Back Pain - classification ; Low Back Pain - therapy ; Male ; Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Pain Measurement - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Pennsylvania ; Physical Therapy Modalities - economics ; Physical Therapy Modalities - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Sick Leave - statistics &amp; numerical data ; United States ; United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - standards</subject><ispartof>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 2003-07, Vol.28 (13), p.1363-1371</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-4684b0d18b9d8bccfeccb8fe63ebbbae9d23b8d5856ccabb20f4aefbfdced5743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12838091$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fritz, Julie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delitto, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erhard, Richard E</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of classification-based physical therapy with therapy based on clinical practice guidelines for patients with acute low back pain: a randomized clinical trial</title><title>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</title><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><description>A randomized clinical trial was conducted. To compare the effectiveness of classification-based physical therapy with that of therapy based on clinical practice guidelines for patients with acute, work-related low back pain. Clinical practice guidelines recommend minimal intervention during the first few weeks after acute low back injury. However, studies supporting this recommendation have not attempted to identify which patients are likely to respond to particular interventions. For this study, 78 subjects with work-related low back pain of less than 3 weeks duration were randomized to receive therapy based on a classification system that attempts to match patients to specific interventions or therapy based on the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research guidelines. The subjects were followed for 1 year. Outcomes included the impairment index, Oswestry scale, SF-36 component scores, satisfaction, medical costs, and return to work status. After adjustment for baseline factors, subjects receiving classification-based therapy showed greater change on the Oswestry (P = 0.023) and the SF-36 physical component (P = 0.029) after 4 weeks. Patient satisfaction was greater (P = 0.006) and return to full-duty work status more likely (P = 0.017) after 4 weeks in the classification-based group. After 1 year, there was a trend toward reduced Oswestry scores in the classification-based group (P = 0.063). Median total medical costs for 1 year after injury were 1003.68 dollars for the guideline-based group and 774.00 dollars for the classification-based group (P = 0.13). For patients with acute, work-related low back pain, the use of a classification-based approach resulted in improved disability and return to work status after 4 weeks, as compared with therapy based on clinical practice guidelines. Further research is needed on the optimal timing and methods of intervention for patients with acute low back pain.</description><subject>Acute Disease</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Health Care Costs</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - classification</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Pennsylvania</subject><subject>Physical Therapy Modalities - economics</subject><subject>Physical Therapy Modalities - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Sick Leave - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - standards</subject><issn>0362-2436</issn><issn>1528-1159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkc1u1DAUhS1ERaeFV0AWC3YJdpwfpzsYNQWpElILa8s_14whiYPtqJq-EW-JpzNqrStZPvc7x4uD0AdKSkr67hOh5Ze7-5IcTttR2pQtbTtWDsMrtKFNxYus9a_RhrC2KqqatefoIsbfB5zR_g06pxVnnPR0g_5t_bTI4KKfsbdYjzJGZ52Wyfm5UDKCwctuH7My4rSDIJc9fnBp9_w4MtmuRzc_YUuQOjkN-NfqDGQVIrY-4CWHwpzi0S_1mgCP_iEn6D956eYrLHGQs_GTe8yZz4EpODm-RWdWjhHene5L9HO4_rH9Wtx-v_m2_Xxb6Ip3qahbXitiKFe94UprC1orbqFloJSS0JuKKW4a3rRaS6UqYmsJVlmjwTRdzS7Rx2PuEvzfFWISk4saxlHO4NcoOlbTPE0Gr46gDj7GAFYswU0y7AUl4lCUIFTkosRLUeKpKDEM2fz-9MuqJjAv1lMz7D_SUpZo</recordid><startdate>20030701</startdate><enddate>20030701</enddate><creator>Fritz, Julie M</creator><creator>Delitto, Anthony</creator><creator>Erhard, Richard E</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030701</creationdate><title>Comparison of classification-based physical therapy with therapy based on clinical practice guidelines for patients with acute low back pain: a randomized clinical trial</title><author>Fritz, Julie M ; Delitto, Anthony ; Erhard, Richard E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-4684b0d18b9d8bccfeccb8fe63ebbbae9d23b8d5856ccabb20f4aefbfdced5743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Acute Disease</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Health Care Costs</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - classification</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Pennsylvania</topic><topic>Physical Therapy Modalities - economics</topic><topic>Physical Therapy Modalities - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Sick Leave - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fritz, Julie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delitto, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erhard, Richard E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fritz, Julie M</au><au>Delitto, Anthony</au><au>Erhard, Richard E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of classification-based physical therapy with therapy based on clinical practice guidelines for patients with acute low back pain: a randomized clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><date>2003-07-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>1363</spage><epage>1371</epage><pages>1363-1371</pages><issn>0362-2436</issn><eissn>1528-1159</eissn><abstract>A randomized clinical trial was conducted. To compare the effectiveness of classification-based physical therapy with that of therapy based on clinical practice guidelines for patients with acute, work-related low back pain. Clinical practice guidelines recommend minimal intervention during the first few weeks after acute low back injury. However, studies supporting this recommendation have not attempted to identify which patients are likely to respond to particular interventions. For this study, 78 subjects with work-related low back pain of less than 3 weeks duration were randomized to receive therapy based on a classification system that attempts to match patients to specific interventions or therapy based on the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research guidelines. The subjects were followed for 1 year. Outcomes included the impairment index, Oswestry scale, SF-36 component scores, satisfaction, medical costs, and return to work status. After adjustment for baseline factors, subjects receiving classification-based therapy showed greater change on the Oswestry (P = 0.023) and the SF-36 physical component (P = 0.029) after 4 weeks. Patient satisfaction was greater (P = 0.006) and return to full-duty work status more likely (P = 0.017) after 4 weeks in the classification-based group. After 1 year, there was a trend toward reduced Oswestry scores in the classification-based group (P = 0.063). Median total medical costs for 1 year after injury were 1003.68 dollars for the guideline-based group and 774.00 dollars for the classification-based group (P = 0.13). For patients with acute, work-related low back pain, the use of a classification-based approach resulted in improved disability and return to work status after 4 weeks, as compared with therapy based on clinical practice guidelines. Further research is needed on the optimal timing and methods of intervention for patients with acute low back pain.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>12838091</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.BRS.0000067115.61673.FF</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0362-2436
ispartof Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 2003-07, Vol.28 (13), p.1363-1371
issn 0362-2436
1528-1159
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73413415
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Acute Disease
Adult
Disability Evaluation
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Health Care Costs
Humans
Low Back Pain - classification
Low Back Pain - therapy
Male
Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) - statistics & numerical data
Pain Measurement - statistics & numerical data
Pennsylvania
Physical Therapy Modalities - economics
Physical Therapy Modalities - statistics & numerical data
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Sick Leave - statistics & numerical data
United States
United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality - standards
title Comparison of classification-based physical therapy with therapy based on clinical practice guidelines for patients with acute low back pain: a randomized clinical trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T20%3A49%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20classification-based%20physical%20therapy%20with%20therapy%20based%20on%20clinical%20practice%20guidelines%20for%20patients%20with%20acute%20low%20back%20pain:%20a%20randomized%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Spine%20(Philadelphia,%20Pa.%201976)&rft.au=Fritz,%20Julie%20M&rft.date=2003-07-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=1363&rft.epage=1371&rft.pages=1363-1371&rft.issn=0362-2436&rft.eissn=1528-1159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.BRS.0000067115.61673.FF&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73413415%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73413415&rft_id=info:pmid/12838091&rfr_iscdi=true