Electromyographic assessment of trunk muscle activation amplitudes during a simulated lifting task using pattern recognition techniques

Abstract This study sought to determine the patterns of neuromuscular response from 24-trunk muscle sites during a symmetrical lift and replace task. Surface electromyograms (EMG) and kinematic variables were recorded from 29 healthy subjects. Pattern recognition techniques were used to examine how...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of electromyography and kinesiology 2009-12, Vol.19 (6), p.e505-e512
Hauptverfasser: Butler, Heather L, Hubley-Kozey, Cheryl L, Kozey, John W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e512
container_issue 6
container_start_page e505
container_title Journal of electromyography and kinesiology
container_volume 19
creator Butler, Heather L
Hubley-Kozey, Cheryl L
Kozey, John W
description Abstract This study sought to determine the patterns of neuromuscular response from 24-trunk muscle sites during a symmetrical lift and replace task. Surface electromyograms (EMG) and kinematic variables were recorded from 29 healthy subjects. Pattern recognition techniques were used to examine how activation amplitude patterns changed with the different physical demands of the task (reach, phase of movement). The results indicated that there was very little trunk and pelvis motion during the task. Three principal patterns accounted for 95% of the total variation suggesting that the measured data had a simple underlying structure of variance. ANOVA results revealed significant differences in principal pattern scores . These differences captured subtle changes in muscle recruitment strategies that most likely reflect different stability and biomechanical demands. More balanced activations (bracing) between the abdominal and back sites were observed during the lighter demands, whereas differential recruitment among the back extensor sites was more predominant in the more demanding conditions. A pattern recognition technique offers a novel method to examine the relationships among a large number of muscles and test how different work characteristics change the relationships among the muscle sites.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.09.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734131666</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1050641108001569</els_id><sourcerecordid>734131666</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-28bb6b61fd1564ac0b53ad093a18fe48c57b26ecff0839615ad6c63998cfa663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUstu1EAQtBCIhMAngObGyZtuP8b2BYSiAJEicSD30Xjc3ox3PGPmEWm_gN_Gzq6ExIVTt1rVVeqqzrL3CDsE5NfTbiJDB213BUC7g24HCC-yS2ybMq8bxJdrDzXkvEK8yN6EMAFgAy28zi6wgwoLXl1mv28NqejdfHR7L5dHrZgMgUKYyUbmRhZ9sgc2p6AMMamifpJRO8vkvBgd00CBDclru2eSBT0nIyMNzOgxbrMow4GlsLWLjJG8ZZ6U21v9TBJJPVr9K1F4m70apQn07lyvsoevtw833_P7H9_ubr7c56pq65gXbd_znuM4YM0rqaCvSzlAV0psR6paVTd9wUmNI7Rlx7GWA1e87LpWjZLz8ir7eKJdvNtko5h1UGSMtORSEE1ZYYn8GVmfkMq7EDyNYvF6lv4oEMSWgJjEOQGxJSCgE2sC696Hs0LqZxr-bp0tXwGfTwBaz3zS5EVQmqyiQa_WRDE4_V-JT_8wKKOtVtIc6Ehhcsnb1UOBIhQCxM_tDbYvWLOH1bau_AOwibNq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734131666</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electromyographic assessment of trunk muscle activation amplitudes during a simulated lifting task using pattern recognition techniques</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Butler, Heather L ; Hubley-Kozey, Cheryl L ; Kozey, John W</creator><creatorcontrib>Butler, Heather L ; Hubley-Kozey, Cheryl L ; Kozey, John W</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract This study sought to determine the patterns of neuromuscular response from 24-trunk muscle sites during a symmetrical lift and replace task. Surface electromyograms (EMG) and kinematic variables were recorded from 29 healthy subjects. Pattern recognition techniques were used to examine how activation amplitude patterns changed with the different physical demands of the task (reach, phase of movement). The results indicated that there was very little trunk and pelvis motion during the task. Three principal patterns accounted for 95% of the total variation suggesting that the measured data had a simple underlying structure of variance. ANOVA results revealed significant differences in principal pattern scores . These differences captured subtle changes in muscle recruitment strategies that most likely reflect different stability and biomechanical demands. More balanced activations (bracing) between the abdominal and back sites were observed during the lighter demands, whereas differential recruitment among the back extensor sites was more predominant in the more demanding conditions. A pattern recognition technique offers a novel method to examine the relationships among a large number of muscles and test how different work characteristics change the relationships among the muscle sites.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1050-6411</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.09.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19041264</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Abdominal Muscles - physiology ; Adult ; Algorithms ; Amplitude recruitment strategies ; Electromyography ; Electromyography - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Lifting ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Muscle Contraction - physiology ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Pattern recognition ; Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Trunk muscles ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology, 2009-12, Vol.19 (6), p.e505-e512</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2008 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-28bb6b61fd1564ac0b53ad093a18fe48c57b26ecff0839615ad6c63998cfa663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-28bb6b61fd1564ac0b53ad093a18fe48c57b26ecff0839615ad6c63998cfa663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050641108001569$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19041264$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Butler, Heather L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubley-Kozey, Cheryl L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozey, John W</creatorcontrib><title>Electromyographic assessment of trunk muscle activation amplitudes during a simulated lifting task using pattern recognition techniques</title><title>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology</title><addtitle>J Electromyogr Kinesiol</addtitle><description>Abstract This study sought to determine the patterns of neuromuscular response from 24-trunk muscle sites during a symmetrical lift and replace task. Surface electromyograms (EMG) and kinematic variables were recorded from 29 healthy subjects. Pattern recognition techniques were used to examine how activation amplitude patterns changed with the different physical demands of the task (reach, phase of movement). The results indicated that there was very little trunk and pelvis motion during the task. Three principal patterns accounted for 95% of the total variation suggesting that the measured data had a simple underlying structure of variance. ANOVA results revealed significant differences in principal pattern scores . These differences captured subtle changes in muscle recruitment strategies that most likely reflect different stability and biomechanical demands. More balanced activations (bracing) between the abdominal and back sites were observed during the lighter demands, whereas differential recruitment among the back extensor sites was more predominant in the more demanding conditions. A pattern recognition technique offers a novel method to examine the relationships among a large number of muscles and test how different work characteristics change the relationships among the muscle sites.</description><subject>Abdominal Muscles - physiology</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Amplitude recruitment strategies</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Electromyography - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lifting</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Muscle Contraction - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Pattern recognition</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Trunk muscles</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1050-6411</issn><issn>1873-5711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUstu1EAQtBCIhMAngObGyZtuP8b2BYSiAJEicSD30Xjc3ox3PGPmEWm_gN_Gzq6ExIVTt1rVVeqqzrL3CDsE5NfTbiJDB213BUC7g24HCC-yS2ybMq8bxJdrDzXkvEK8yN6EMAFgAy28zi6wgwoLXl1mv28NqejdfHR7L5dHrZgMgUKYyUbmRhZ9sgc2p6AMMamifpJRO8vkvBgd00CBDclru2eSBT0nIyMNzOgxbrMow4GlsLWLjJG8ZZ6U21v9TBJJPVr9K1F4m70apQn07lyvsoevtw833_P7H9_ubr7c56pq65gXbd_znuM4YM0rqaCvSzlAV0psR6paVTd9wUmNI7Rlx7GWA1e87LpWjZLz8ir7eKJdvNtko5h1UGSMtORSEE1ZYYn8GVmfkMq7EDyNYvF6lv4oEMSWgJjEOQGxJSCgE2sC696Hs0LqZxr-bp0tXwGfTwBaz3zS5EVQmqyiQa_WRDE4_V-JT_8wKKOtVtIc6Ehhcsnb1UOBIhQCxM_tDbYvWLOH1bau_AOwibNq</recordid><startdate>20091201</startdate><enddate>20091201</enddate><creator>Butler, Heather L</creator><creator>Hubley-Kozey, Cheryl L</creator><creator>Kozey, John W</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091201</creationdate><title>Electromyographic assessment of trunk muscle activation amplitudes during a simulated lifting task using pattern recognition techniques</title><author>Butler, Heather L ; Hubley-Kozey, Cheryl L ; Kozey, John W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-28bb6b61fd1564ac0b53ad093a18fe48c57b26ecff0839615ad6c63998cfa663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Muscles - physiology</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Amplitude recruitment strategies</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Electromyography - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lifting</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Muscle Contraction - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Pattern recognition</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Trunk muscles</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Butler, Heather L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubley-Kozey, Cheryl L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozey, John W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Butler, Heather L</au><au>Hubley-Kozey, Cheryl L</au><au>Kozey, John W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electromyographic assessment of trunk muscle activation amplitudes during a simulated lifting task using pattern recognition techniques</atitle><jtitle>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Electromyogr Kinesiol</addtitle><date>2009-12-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e505</spage><epage>e512</epage><pages>e505-e512</pages><issn>1050-6411</issn><eissn>1873-5711</eissn><abstract>Abstract This study sought to determine the patterns of neuromuscular response from 24-trunk muscle sites during a symmetrical lift and replace task. Surface electromyograms (EMG) and kinematic variables were recorded from 29 healthy subjects. Pattern recognition techniques were used to examine how activation amplitude patterns changed with the different physical demands of the task (reach, phase of movement). The results indicated that there was very little trunk and pelvis motion during the task. Three principal patterns accounted for 95% of the total variation suggesting that the measured data had a simple underlying structure of variance. ANOVA results revealed significant differences in principal pattern scores . These differences captured subtle changes in muscle recruitment strategies that most likely reflect different stability and biomechanical demands. More balanced activations (bracing) between the abdominal and back sites were observed during the lighter demands, whereas differential recruitment among the back extensor sites was more predominant in the more demanding conditions. A pattern recognition technique offers a novel method to examine the relationships among a large number of muscles and test how different work characteristics change the relationships among the muscle sites.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>19041264</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.09.010</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1050-6411
ispartof Journal of electromyography and kinesiology, 2009-12, Vol.19 (6), p.e505-e512
issn 1050-6411
1873-5711
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734131666
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Abdominal Muscles - physiology
Adult
Algorithms
Amplitude recruitment strategies
Electromyography
Electromyography - methods
Female
Humans
Lifting
Male
Middle Aged
Muscle Contraction - physiology
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Pattern recognition
Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Trunk muscles
Young Adult
title Electromyographic assessment of trunk muscle activation amplitudes during a simulated lifting task using pattern recognition techniques
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T01%3A58%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electromyographic%20assessment%20of%20trunk%20muscle%20activation%20amplitudes%20during%20a%20simulated%20lifting%20task%20using%20pattern%20recognition%20techniques&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20electromyography%20and%20kinesiology&rft.au=Butler,%20Heather%20L&rft.date=2009-12-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e505&rft.epage=e512&rft.pages=e505-e512&rft.issn=1050-6411&rft.eissn=1873-5711&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.09.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E734131666%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734131666&rft_id=info:pmid/19041264&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1050641108001569&rfr_iscdi=true