Auditory test result characteristics of subjects with and without tinnitus
Tinnitus is the perception of sound that does not have an acoustic source in the environment. Ascertaining the presence of tinnitus in individuals who claim tinnitus for compensation purposes is very difficult and increasingly becoming a problem. This study examined the potential to observe differen...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of rehabilitation research and development 2009-01, Vol.46 (5), p.619-632 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 632 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 619 |
| container_title | Journal of rehabilitation research and development |
| container_volume | 46 |
| creator | Henry, James A James, Kenneth E Owens, Kimberly Zaugg, Tara Porsov, Edward Silaski, Grayson |
| description | Tinnitus is the perception of sound that does not have an acoustic source in the environment. Ascertaining the presence of tinnitus in individuals who claim tinnitus for compensation purposes is very difficult and increasingly becoming a problem. This study examined the potential to observe differences in loudness and pitch matches between individuals who experience tinnitus versus those who do not. This study follows a previous pilot study we completed that included 12 subjects with and 12 subjects without tinnitus. The current study included 36 subjects with and 36 without tinnitus. Results of this study revealed no significant differences between groups with regard to decibel sensation level (SL) loudness matches and within-session loudness-match reliability. Between-group differences revealed that the tinnitus subjects had (1) greater decibel sound pressure level loudness matches, (2) better between-session loudness-match reliability, (3) better pitch-match reliability, and (4) higher frequency pitch matches. These findings support the data from our pilot study with the exception that decibel SL loudness matches were greater for the tinnitus subjects in the pilot study. Tinnitus loudness and pitch matching may have some value in an overall battery of tests for evaluating tinnitus claims. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1682/JRRD.2008.11.0157 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734119852</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A214103149</galeid><sourcerecordid>A214103149</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-bb8ecf6eac8a51b65d917d5fa63100236fc25a66c7150450b82f12014e28bf873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctq3DAYhUVIaaZpHyCbYrJoV3b1S9bFy2F6DYFCaNdClqVEg8dKdaHk7St3BgJdFC0kxHfE-fUhdAW4Ay7Jh5u7u48dwVh2AB0GJs7QBgYqW6CMnKMNFr1shQC4QK9S2mOMCSXwEl3AICXpB7ZBN9sy-RziU5Ntyk20qcy5MQ86apNt9Cl7k5rgmlTGvTU5Nb99fmj0Mv09hJKb7JfF55JeoxdOz8m-Oe2X6OfnTz92X9vb71--7ba3raGDyO04Smsct9pIzWDkbBpATMxpTmEtyJ0hTHNuBDDcMzxK4oBg6C2Ro5OCXqL3x3cfY_hVamt18MnYedaLDSUpQXuoAzJSyXf_JQkAF7VUBa__AfehxKVOURlGJKcDVKg7Qvd6tsovLuT6SXVN9uBNWKzz9X5LoAdMoR9qAI4BE0NK0Tr1GP1BxycFWK0C1SpQrQIVgFoF1szbU5MyHuz0nDgZo38AOwCVew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215286391</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Auditory test result characteristics of subjects with and without tinnitus</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>U.S. Government Documents</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Henry, James A ; James, Kenneth E ; Owens, Kimberly ; Zaugg, Tara ; Porsov, Edward ; Silaski, Grayson</creator><creatorcontrib>Henry, James A ; James, Kenneth E ; Owens, Kimberly ; Zaugg, Tara ; Porsov, Edward ; Silaski, Grayson</creatorcontrib><description>Tinnitus is the perception of sound that does not have an acoustic source in the environment. Ascertaining the presence of tinnitus in individuals who claim tinnitus for compensation purposes is very difficult and increasingly becoming a problem. This study examined the potential to observe differences in loudness and pitch matches between individuals who experience tinnitus versus those who do not. This study follows a previous pilot study we completed that included 12 subjects with and 12 subjects without tinnitus. The current study included 36 subjects with and 36 without tinnitus. Results of this study revealed no significant differences between groups with regard to decibel sensation level (SL) loudness matches and within-session loudness-match reliability. Between-group differences revealed that the tinnitus subjects had (1) greater decibel sound pressure level loudness matches, (2) better between-session loudness-match reliability, (3) better pitch-match reliability, and (4) higher frequency pitch matches. These findings support the data from our pilot study with the exception that decibel SL loudness matches were greater for the tinnitus subjects in the pilot study. Tinnitus loudness and pitch matching may have some value in an overall battery of tests for evaluating tinnitus claims.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-7711</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-1352</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2008.11.0157</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19882495</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JRRDDB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Department of Veterans Affairs</publisher><subject>Administrative support ; Aged ; Auditory perception ; Care and treatment ; Case-Control Studies ; Diagnosis ; Disability ; Disability Evaluation ; Female ; Hearing loss ; Hearing Tests - instrumentation ; Hearing Tests - methods ; Humans ; Loudness (Acoustics) ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Physiological aspects ; Psychoacoustics ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk factors ; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Studies ; Tinnitus ; Tinnitus - diagnosis</subject><ispartof>Journal of rehabilitation research and development, 2009-01, Vol.46 (5), p.619-632</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2009 Department of Veterans Affairs</rights><rights>Copyright Superintendent of Documents 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-bb8ecf6eac8a51b65d917d5fa63100236fc25a66c7150450b82f12014e28bf873</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27928,27929</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19882495$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Henry, James A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Kenneth E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owens, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaugg, Tara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porsov, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silaski, Grayson</creatorcontrib><title>Auditory test result characteristics of subjects with and without tinnitus</title><title>Journal of rehabilitation research and development</title><addtitle>J Rehabil Res Dev</addtitle><description>Tinnitus is the perception of sound that does not have an acoustic source in the environment. Ascertaining the presence of tinnitus in individuals who claim tinnitus for compensation purposes is very difficult and increasingly becoming a problem. This study examined the potential to observe differences in loudness and pitch matches between individuals who experience tinnitus versus those who do not. This study follows a previous pilot study we completed that included 12 subjects with and 12 subjects without tinnitus. The current study included 36 subjects with and 36 without tinnitus. Results of this study revealed no significant differences between groups with regard to decibel sensation level (SL) loudness matches and within-session loudness-match reliability. Between-group differences revealed that the tinnitus subjects had (1) greater decibel sound pressure level loudness matches, (2) better between-session loudness-match reliability, (3) better pitch-match reliability, and (4) higher frequency pitch matches. These findings support the data from our pilot study with the exception that decibel SL loudness matches were greater for the tinnitus subjects in the pilot study. Tinnitus loudness and pitch matching may have some value in an overall battery of tests for evaluating tinnitus claims.</description><subject>Administrative support</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Auditory perception</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hearing loss</subject><subject>Hearing Tests - instrumentation</subject><subject>Hearing Tests - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Loudness (Acoustics)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Psychoacoustics</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tinnitus</subject><subject>Tinnitus - diagnosis</subject><issn>0748-7711</issn><issn>1938-1352</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctq3DAYhUVIaaZpHyCbYrJoV3b1S9bFy2F6DYFCaNdClqVEg8dKdaHk7St3BgJdFC0kxHfE-fUhdAW4Ay7Jh5u7u48dwVh2AB0GJs7QBgYqW6CMnKMNFr1shQC4QK9S2mOMCSXwEl3AICXpB7ZBN9sy-RziU5Ntyk20qcy5MQ86apNt9Cl7k5rgmlTGvTU5Nb99fmj0Mv09hJKb7JfF55JeoxdOz8m-Oe2X6OfnTz92X9vb71--7ba3raGDyO04Smsct9pIzWDkbBpATMxpTmEtyJ0hTHNuBDDcMzxK4oBg6C2Ro5OCXqL3x3cfY_hVamt18MnYedaLDSUpQXuoAzJSyXf_JQkAF7VUBa__AfehxKVOURlGJKcDVKg7Qvd6tsovLuT6SXVN9uBNWKzz9X5LoAdMoR9qAI4BE0NK0Tr1GP1BxycFWK0C1SpQrQIVgFoF1szbU5MyHuz0nDgZo38AOwCVew</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Henry, James A</creator><creator>James, Kenneth E</creator><creator>Owens, Kimberly</creator><creator>Zaugg, Tara</creator><creator>Porsov, Edward</creator><creator>Silaski, Grayson</creator><general>Department of Veterans Affairs</general><general>Superintendent of Documents</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>Auditory test result characteristics of subjects with and without tinnitus</title><author>Henry, James A ; James, Kenneth E ; Owens, Kimberly ; Zaugg, Tara ; Porsov, Edward ; Silaski, Grayson</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-bb8ecf6eac8a51b65d917d5fa63100236fc25a66c7150450b82f12014e28bf873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Administrative support</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Auditory perception</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hearing loss</topic><topic>Hearing Tests - instrumentation</topic><topic>Hearing Tests - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Loudness (Acoustics)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Psychoacoustics</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tinnitus</topic><topic>Tinnitus - diagnosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Henry, James A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Kenneth E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owens, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaugg, Tara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porsov, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silaski, Grayson</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of rehabilitation research and development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Henry, James A</au><au>James, Kenneth E</au><au>Owens, Kimberly</au><au>Zaugg, Tara</au><au>Porsov, Edward</au><au>Silaski, Grayson</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Auditory test result characteristics of subjects with and without tinnitus</atitle><jtitle>Journal of rehabilitation research and development</jtitle><addtitle>J Rehabil Res Dev</addtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>619</spage><epage>632</epage><pages>619-632</pages><issn>0748-7711</issn><eissn>1938-1352</eissn><coden>JRRDDB</coden><abstract>Tinnitus is the perception of sound that does not have an acoustic source in the environment. Ascertaining the presence of tinnitus in individuals who claim tinnitus for compensation purposes is very difficult and increasingly becoming a problem. This study examined the potential to observe differences in loudness and pitch matches between individuals who experience tinnitus versus those who do not. This study follows a previous pilot study we completed that included 12 subjects with and 12 subjects without tinnitus. The current study included 36 subjects with and 36 without tinnitus. Results of this study revealed no significant differences between groups with regard to decibel sensation level (SL) loudness matches and within-session loudness-match reliability. Between-group differences revealed that the tinnitus subjects had (1) greater decibel sound pressure level loudness matches, (2) better between-session loudness-match reliability, (3) better pitch-match reliability, and (4) higher frequency pitch matches. These findings support the data from our pilot study with the exception that decibel SL loudness matches were greater for the tinnitus subjects in the pilot study. Tinnitus loudness and pitch matching may have some value in an overall battery of tests for evaluating tinnitus claims.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Department of Veterans Affairs</pub><pmid>19882495</pmid><doi>10.1682/JRRD.2008.11.0157</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0748-7711 |
| ispartof | Journal of rehabilitation research and development, 2009-01, Vol.46 (5), p.619-632 |
| issn | 0748-7711 1938-1352 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734119852 |
| source | MEDLINE; U.S. Government Documents; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Administrative support Aged Auditory perception Care and treatment Case-Control Studies Diagnosis Disability Disability Evaluation Female Hearing loss Hearing Tests - instrumentation Hearing Tests - methods Humans Loudness (Acoustics) Male Middle Aged Physiological aspects Psychoacoustics Reproducibility of Results Risk factors Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted Studies Tinnitus Tinnitus - diagnosis |
| title | Auditory test result characteristics of subjects with and without tinnitus |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T16%3A24%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Auditory%20test%20result%20characteristics%20of%20subjects%20with%20and%20without%20tinnitus&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20rehabilitation%20research%20and%20development&rft.au=Henry,%20James%20A&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=619&rft.epage=632&rft.pages=619-632&rft.issn=0748-7711&rft.eissn=1938-1352&rft.coden=JRRDDB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1682/JRRD.2008.11.0157&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA214103149%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215286391&rft_id=info:pmid/19882495&rft_galeid=A214103149&rfr_iscdi=true |