On the differentiation of N2 components in an appetitive choice task: Evidence for the revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory
Task‐ and personality‐related modulations of the N2 were probed within the framework of the revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST). Using an appetitive choice task, we investigated 58 students with extreme scores on the behavioral inhibition system and behavioral approach system (BIS/BAS) sc...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Psychophysiology 2009-11, Vol.46 (6), p.1244-1257 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1257 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 1244 |
| container_title | Psychophysiology |
| container_volume | 46 |
| creator | Leue, Anja Chavanon, Mira-Lynn Wacker, Jan Stemmler, Gerhard |
| description | Task‐ and personality‐related modulations of the N2 were probed within the framework of the revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST). Using an appetitive choice task, we investigated 58 students with extreme scores on the behavioral inhibition system and behavioral approach system (BIS/BAS) scales. The baseline‐to‐peak N2 amplitude was sensitive to the strength of decision conflict and demonstrated RST‐related personality differences. In addition to the baseline N2 amplitude, temporal PCA results suggested two N2 components accounting for a laterality effect and capturing different N2 patterns for BIS/BAS groups with increasing conflict level. Evidence for RST‐related personality differences was obtained for baseline‐to‐peak N2 and tPCA components in the present task. The results support the RST prediction that BAS sensitivity modulates conflict processing and confirm the cognitive–motivational conflict concept of RST. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00872.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734088866</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1878660491</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4642-1f1d4709e9faea6ff4fb07f8ef944975bc19c3c315411987fac75e504d6229453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV9v0zAUxS0EYmXwFZDFAzwl2I4T20g8TNXYhqatouPvi5U616q7Ng522rVPfHWctRoSDwjrSva9_p0jWwchTElO03q7yCmvVCaVrHJGiMoJkYLl20do9HDxGI0I4TIrhWBH6FmMC5JIythTdERVJXih-Aj9um5xPwfcOGshQNu7une-xd7iK4aNX3W-TdOIXYvrVF0HvevdBrCZe2cA93W8fYdPN66BNrXWh3u_ABsXocGfwLVpZmCVXPAU2jioXb_DN3PwYfccPbH1MsKLw36MPn84vRmfZ5fXZxfjk8vM8IqzjFracEEUKFtDXVnL7YwIK8EqzpUoZ4YqU5iClpxSJYWtjSihJLypGFO8LI7Rm71vF_zPNcRer1w0sFzWLfh11KLgREpZVYl8_U-SUcpVxVQCX_0FLvw6tOkXiSnSa0siEyT3kAk-xgBWd8Gt6rDTlOghS73QQ2R6iEwPWer7LPU2SV8e_NezFTR_hIfwEvB-D9y5Jez-21hPpt8n6ZT02V7vYg_bB30dbnUlClHqr1dnevrx248v52OiJ8VvfbO9lg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>213470508</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the differentiation of N2 components in an appetitive choice task: Evidence for the revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Leue, Anja ; Chavanon, Mira-Lynn ; Wacker, Jan ; Stemmler, Gerhard</creator><creatorcontrib>Leue, Anja ; Chavanon, Mira-Lynn ; Wacker, Jan ; Stemmler, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><description>Task‐ and personality‐related modulations of the N2 were probed within the framework of the revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST). Using an appetitive choice task, we investigated 58 students with extreme scores on the behavioral inhibition system and behavioral approach system (BIS/BAS) scales. The baseline‐to‐peak N2 amplitude was sensitive to the strength of decision conflict and demonstrated RST‐related personality differences. In addition to the baseline N2 amplitude, temporal PCA results suggested two N2 components accounting for a laterality effect and capturing different N2 patterns for BIS/BAS groups with increasing conflict level. Evidence for RST‐related personality differences was obtained for baseline‐to‐peak N2 and tPCA components in the present task. The results support the RST prediction that BAS sensitivity modulates conflict processing and confirm the cognitive–motivational conflict concept of RST.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-5772</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8986</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-5958</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00872.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19674394</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Appetite - physiology ; Behavioral inhibition system ; Choice Behavior - physiology ; Cognition & reasoning ; Conflict (Psychology) ; Conflict monitoring ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; Electroencephalography - statistics & numerical data ; Emotions - physiology ; Executive Function - physiology ; Humans ; Individuality ; Information processing ; Male ; N2 potential ; Personality - physiology ; Personality traits ; Physiological psychology ; Principal Component Analysis ; Promax ; Reinforcement (Psychology) ; Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory ; Reward ; Task analysis ; Temporal PCA ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Psychophysiology, 2009-11, Vol.46 (6), p.1244-1257</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009 Society for Psychophysiological Research</rights><rights>Copyright © 2009 by the Society for Psychophysiological Research</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4642-1f1d4709e9faea6ff4fb07f8ef944975bc19c3c315411987fac75e504d6229453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4642-1f1d4709e9faea6ff4fb07f8ef944975bc19c3c315411987fac75e504d6229453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1469-8986.2009.00872.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1469-8986.2009.00872.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19674394$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leue, Anja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chavanon, Mira-Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wacker, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stemmler, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><title>On the differentiation of N2 components in an appetitive choice task: Evidence for the revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory</title><title>Psychophysiology</title><addtitle>Psychophysiology</addtitle><description>Task‐ and personality‐related modulations of the N2 were probed within the framework of the revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST). Using an appetitive choice task, we investigated 58 students with extreme scores on the behavioral inhibition system and behavioral approach system (BIS/BAS) scales. The baseline‐to‐peak N2 amplitude was sensitive to the strength of decision conflict and demonstrated RST‐related personality differences. In addition to the baseline N2 amplitude, temporal PCA results suggested two N2 components accounting for a laterality effect and capturing different N2 patterns for BIS/BAS groups with increasing conflict level. Evidence for RST‐related personality differences was obtained for baseline‐to‐peak N2 and tPCA components in the present task. The results support the RST prediction that BAS sensitivity modulates conflict processing and confirm the cognitive–motivational conflict concept of RST.</description><subject>Appetite - physiology</subject><subject>Behavioral inhibition system</subject><subject>Choice Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Conflict (Psychology)</subject><subject>Conflict monitoring</subject><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>Electroencephalography - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Emotions - physiology</subject><subject>Executive Function - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Individuality</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>N2 potential</subject><subject>Personality - physiology</subject><subject>Personality traits</subject><subject>Physiological psychology</subject><subject>Principal Component Analysis</subject><subject>Promax</subject><subject>Reinforcement (Psychology)</subject><subject>Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory</subject><subject>Reward</subject><subject>Task analysis</subject><subject>Temporal PCA</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0048-5772</issn><issn>1469-8986</issn><issn>1540-5958</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV9v0zAUxS0EYmXwFZDFAzwl2I4T20g8TNXYhqatouPvi5U616q7Ng522rVPfHWctRoSDwjrSva9_p0jWwchTElO03q7yCmvVCaVrHJGiMoJkYLl20do9HDxGI0I4TIrhWBH6FmMC5JIythTdERVJXih-Aj9um5xPwfcOGshQNu7une-xd7iK4aNX3W-TdOIXYvrVF0HvevdBrCZe2cA93W8fYdPN66BNrXWh3u_ABsXocGfwLVpZmCVXPAU2jioXb_DN3PwYfccPbH1MsKLw36MPn84vRmfZ5fXZxfjk8vM8IqzjFracEEUKFtDXVnL7YwIK8EqzpUoZ4YqU5iClpxSJYWtjSihJLypGFO8LI7Rm71vF_zPNcRer1w0sFzWLfh11KLgREpZVYl8_U-SUcpVxVQCX_0FLvw6tOkXiSnSa0siEyT3kAk-xgBWd8Gt6rDTlOghS73QQ2R6iEwPWer7LPU2SV8e_NezFTR_hIfwEvB-D9y5Jez-21hPpt8n6ZT02V7vYg_bB30dbnUlClHqr1dnevrx248v52OiJ8VvfbO9lg</recordid><startdate>200911</startdate><enddate>200911</enddate><creator>Leue, Anja</creator><creator>Chavanon, Mira-Lynn</creator><creator>Wacker, Jan</creator><creator>Stemmler, Gerhard</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200911</creationdate><title>On the differentiation of N2 components in an appetitive choice task: Evidence for the revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory</title><author>Leue, Anja ; Chavanon, Mira-Lynn ; Wacker, Jan ; Stemmler, Gerhard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4642-1f1d4709e9faea6ff4fb07f8ef944975bc19c3c315411987fac75e504d6229453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Appetite - physiology</topic><topic>Behavioral inhibition system</topic><topic>Choice Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Conflict (Psychology)</topic><topic>Conflict monitoring</topic><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>Electroencephalography - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Emotions - physiology</topic><topic>Executive Function - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Individuality</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>N2 potential</topic><topic>Personality - physiology</topic><topic>Personality traits</topic><topic>Physiological psychology</topic><topic>Principal Component Analysis</topic><topic>Promax</topic><topic>Reinforcement (Psychology)</topic><topic>Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory</topic><topic>Reward</topic><topic>Task analysis</topic><topic>Temporal PCA</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leue, Anja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chavanon, Mira-Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wacker, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stemmler, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leue, Anja</au><au>Chavanon, Mira-Lynn</au><au>Wacker, Jan</au><au>Stemmler, Gerhard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the differentiation of N2 components in an appetitive choice task: Evidence for the revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory</atitle><jtitle>Psychophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Psychophysiology</addtitle><date>2009-11</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1244</spage><epage>1257</epage><pages>1244-1257</pages><issn>0048-5772</issn><eissn>1469-8986</eissn><eissn>1540-5958</eissn><abstract>Task‐ and personality‐related modulations of the N2 were probed within the framework of the revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST). Using an appetitive choice task, we investigated 58 students with extreme scores on the behavioral inhibition system and behavioral approach system (BIS/BAS) scales. The baseline‐to‐peak N2 amplitude was sensitive to the strength of decision conflict and demonstrated RST‐related personality differences. In addition to the baseline N2 amplitude, temporal PCA results suggested two N2 components accounting for a laterality effect and capturing different N2 patterns for BIS/BAS groups with increasing conflict level. Evidence for RST‐related personality differences was obtained for baseline‐to‐peak N2 and tPCA components in the present task. The results support the RST prediction that BAS sensitivity modulates conflict processing and confirm the cognitive–motivational conflict concept of RST.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>19674394</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00872.x</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0048-5772 |
| ispartof | Psychophysiology, 2009-11, Vol.46 (6), p.1244-1257 |
| issn | 0048-5772 1469-8986 1540-5958 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734088866 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Appetite - physiology Behavioral inhibition system Choice Behavior - physiology Cognition & reasoning Conflict (Psychology) Conflict monitoring Data Interpretation, Statistical Electroencephalography - statistics & numerical data Emotions - physiology Executive Function - physiology Humans Individuality Information processing Male N2 potential Personality - physiology Personality traits Physiological psychology Principal Component Analysis Promax Reinforcement (Psychology) Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory Reward Task analysis Temporal PCA Young Adult |
| title | On the differentiation of N2 components in an appetitive choice task: Evidence for the revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T11%3A56%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20differentiation%20of%20N2%20components%20in%20an%20appetitive%20choice%20task:%20Evidence%20for%20the%20revised%20Reinforcement%20Sensitivity%20Theory&rft.jtitle=Psychophysiology&rft.au=Leue,%20Anja&rft.date=2009-11&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1244&rft.epage=1257&rft.pages=1244-1257&rft.issn=0048-5772&rft.eissn=1469-8986&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00872.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1878660491%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=213470508&rft_id=info:pmid/19674394&rfr_iscdi=true |