A Self-Assessment Process for Accreditation Preparedness: A Practical Example for Local Health Departments

Introduction: Accreditation of local health departments (LHDs) is already a reality in many states, and with the establishment of the Public Health Accreditation Board, a national voluntary accreditation program will be forthcoming. To help prepare LHDs for accreditation, the National Association of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of public health management and practice 2009-11, Vol.15 (6), p.503-508
1. Verfasser: Erwin, Paul Campbell
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 508
container_issue 6
container_start_page 503
container_title Journal of public health management and practice
container_volume 15
creator Erwin, Paul Campbell
description Introduction: Accreditation of local health departments (LHDs) is already a reality in many states, and with the establishment of the Public Health Accreditation Board, a national voluntary accreditation program will be forthcoming. To help prepare LHDs for accreditation, the National Association of County and City Health Officials has developed a self-assessment instrument on the basis of the Operational Definition of a Functioning Local Health Department. Methods: The article is a case study, describing the inputs, processes, and outputs of using the self-assessment in an LHD in a manner that can be applicable to other settings. Results: A seven-member work group conducted the self-assessment over an 11-week period, providing a total of 184 person-hours, with an equivalent cost of $8565. The self-assessment was scored on the basis of indicators of performance of Essential Services and Standards. There were significant correlations between the scores on Essential Services and Standards with the scores on the documentary evidence that the indicators were being met (r = 0.7545, P = .0117; r = .7264, P < .0001, respectively). Conclusion: Overall, the workgroup found the self-assessment tool to be useful, particularly for emphasizing the importance of documentation, and the process of conducting the self-assessment valuable for accreditation preparedness and for improving current internal communications and work practices.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181aa282a
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734084838</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44971129</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44971129</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-654c2a3d3bab62570a3268aa13680a4773223008f59d6d783bdee0dca220d6773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtLw0AUhQdRbK3-A5XsXKXOMzNxF2q1QsGCug43kwmm5OXMFPTfO7FFwdV9nO_cCwehS4LnBKfydrNazXGBCTOMKAJAFYUjNCVC4FhgSo9Dj6WKeSLSCTpzbosDLDg5RROSKsoCOUXbLHoxTRVnzhnnWtP5aGN7Hfqo6m2UaW1NWXvwdd8FxQwQ5i7Id1EWZtC-1tBEy09oh8b8eNb9uFkZaPx7dD86_HjXnaOTChpnLg51ht4elq-LVbx-fnxaZOtYUyl9nAiuKbCSFVAkVEgMjCYKgLBEYeBSMkoZxqoSaZmUUrGiNAaXGijFZRLkGbrZ3x1s_7Ezzudt7bRpGuhMv3O5ZBwrrpgKJN-T2vbOWVPlg61bsF85wfkYch5Czv-HHGzXhwe7ojXln-mQagCu9sDW-d7-6pynkhCasm_sKoKn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734084838</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Self-Assessment Process for Accreditation Preparedness: A Practical Example for Local Health Departments</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Erwin, Paul Campbell</creator><creatorcontrib>Erwin, Paul Campbell ; Knox County Tennessee Work Group on Accreditation</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Accreditation of local health departments (LHDs) is already a reality in many states, and with the establishment of the Public Health Accreditation Board, a national voluntary accreditation program will be forthcoming. To help prepare LHDs for accreditation, the National Association of County and City Health Officials has developed a self-assessment instrument on the basis of the Operational Definition of a Functioning Local Health Department. Methods: The article is a case study, describing the inputs, processes, and outputs of using the self-assessment in an LHD in a manner that can be applicable to other settings. Results: A seven-member work group conducted the self-assessment over an 11-week period, providing a total of 184 person-hours, with an equivalent cost of $8565. The self-assessment was scored on the basis of indicators of performance of Essential Services and Standards. There were significant correlations between the scores on Essential Services and Standards with the scores on the documentary evidence that the indicators were being met (r = 0.7545, P = .0117; r = .7264, P &lt; .0001, respectively). Conclusion: Overall, the workgroup found the self-assessment tool to be useful, particularly for emphasizing the importance of documentation, and the process of conducting the self-assessment valuable for accreditation preparedness and for improving current internal communications and work practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-4659</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-5022</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181aa282a</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19823155</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Accreditation ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Health technology assessment ; Humans ; Interviews as Topic ; Local Government ; Organizational Case Studies ; Public Health - standards ; Quality Indicators, Health Care ; Tennessee</subject><ispartof>Journal of public health management and practice, 2009-11, Vol.15 (6), p.503-508</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-654c2a3d3bab62570a3268aa13680a4773223008f59d6d783bdee0dca220d6773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44971129$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44971129$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19823155$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Erwin, Paul Campbell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knox County Tennessee Work Group on Accreditation</creatorcontrib><title>A Self-Assessment Process for Accreditation Preparedness: A Practical Example for Local Health Departments</title><title>Journal of public health management and practice</title><addtitle>J Public Health Manag Pract</addtitle><description>Introduction: Accreditation of local health departments (LHDs) is already a reality in many states, and with the establishment of the Public Health Accreditation Board, a national voluntary accreditation program will be forthcoming. To help prepare LHDs for accreditation, the National Association of County and City Health Officials has developed a self-assessment instrument on the basis of the Operational Definition of a Functioning Local Health Department. Methods: The article is a case study, describing the inputs, processes, and outputs of using the self-assessment in an LHD in a manner that can be applicable to other settings. Results: A seven-member work group conducted the self-assessment over an 11-week period, providing a total of 184 person-hours, with an equivalent cost of $8565. The self-assessment was scored on the basis of indicators of performance of Essential Services and Standards. There were significant correlations between the scores on Essential Services and Standards with the scores on the documentary evidence that the indicators were being met (r = 0.7545, P = .0117; r = .7264, P &lt; .0001, respectively). Conclusion: Overall, the workgroup found the self-assessment tool to be useful, particularly for emphasizing the importance of documentation, and the process of conducting the self-assessment valuable for accreditation preparedness and for improving current internal communications and work practices.</description><subject>Accreditation</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Local Government</subject><subject>Organizational Case Studies</subject><subject>Public Health - standards</subject><subject>Quality Indicators, Health Care</subject><subject>Tennessee</subject><issn>1078-4659</issn><issn>1550-5022</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEtLw0AUhQdRbK3-A5XsXKXOMzNxF2q1QsGCug43kwmm5OXMFPTfO7FFwdV9nO_cCwehS4LnBKfydrNazXGBCTOMKAJAFYUjNCVC4FhgSo9Dj6WKeSLSCTpzbosDLDg5RROSKsoCOUXbLHoxTRVnzhnnWtP5aGN7Hfqo6m2UaW1NWXvwdd8FxQwQ5i7Id1EWZtC-1tBEy09oh8b8eNb9uFkZaPx7dD86_HjXnaOTChpnLg51ht4elq-LVbx-fnxaZOtYUyl9nAiuKbCSFVAkVEgMjCYKgLBEYeBSMkoZxqoSaZmUUrGiNAaXGijFZRLkGbrZ3x1s_7Ezzudt7bRpGuhMv3O5ZBwrrpgKJN-T2vbOWVPlg61bsF85wfkYch5Czv-HHGzXhwe7ojXln-mQagCu9sDW-d7-6pynkhCasm_sKoKn</recordid><startdate>20091101</startdate><enddate>20091101</enddate><creator>Erwin, Paul Campbell</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091101</creationdate><title>A Self-Assessment Process for Accreditation Preparedness: A Practical Example for Local Health Departments</title><author>Erwin, Paul Campbell</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-654c2a3d3bab62570a3268aa13680a4773223008f59d6d783bdee0dca220d6773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Accreditation</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Local Government</topic><topic>Organizational Case Studies</topic><topic>Public Health - standards</topic><topic>Quality Indicators, Health Care</topic><topic>Tennessee</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Erwin, Paul Campbell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knox County Tennessee Work Group on Accreditation</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of public health management and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Erwin, Paul Campbell</au><aucorp>Knox County Tennessee Work Group on Accreditation</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Self-Assessment Process for Accreditation Preparedness: A Practical Example for Local Health Departments</atitle><jtitle>Journal of public health management and practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Public Health Manag Pract</addtitle><date>2009-11-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>503</spage><epage>508</epage><pages>503-508</pages><issn>1078-4659</issn><eissn>1550-5022</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Accreditation of local health departments (LHDs) is already a reality in many states, and with the establishment of the Public Health Accreditation Board, a national voluntary accreditation program will be forthcoming. To help prepare LHDs for accreditation, the National Association of County and City Health Officials has developed a self-assessment instrument on the basis of the Operational Definition of a Functioning Local Health Department. Methods: The article is a case study, describing the inputs, processes, and outputs of using the self-assessment in an LHD in a manner that can be applicable to other settings. Results: A seven-member work group conducted the self-assessment over an 11-week period, providing a total of 184 person-hours, with an equivalent cost of $8565. The self-assessment was scored on the basis of indicators of performance of Essential Services and Standards. There were significant correlations between the scores on Essential Services and Standards with the scores on the documentary evidence that the indicators were being met (r = 0.7545, P = .0117; r = .7264, P &lt; .0001, respectively). Conclusion: Overall, the workgroup found the self-assessment tool to be useful, particularly for emphasizing the importance of documentation, and the process of conducting the self-assessment valuable for accreditation preparedness and for improving current internal communications and work practices.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>19823155</pmid><doi>10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181aa282a</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1078-4659
ispartof Journal of public health management and practice, 2009-11, Vol.15 (6), p.503-508
issn 1078-4659
1550-5022
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734084838
source MEDLINE; JSTOR
subjects Accreditation
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Health technology assessment
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Local Government
Organizational Case Studies
Public Health - standards
Quality Indicators, Health Care
Tennessee
title A Self-Assessment Process for Accreditation Preparedness: A Practical Example for Local Health Departments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A27%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Self-Assessment%20Process%20for%20Accreditation%20Preparedness:%20A%20Practical%20Example%20for%20Local%20Health%20Departments&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20public%20health%20management%20and%20practice&rft.au=Erwin,%20Paul%20Campbell&rft.aucorp=Knox%20County%20Tennessee%20Work%20Group%20on%20Accreditation&rft.date=2009-11-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=503&rft.epage=508&rft.pages=503-508&rft.issn=1078-4659&rft.eissn=1550-5022&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181aa282a&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44971129%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734084838&rft_id=info:pmid/19823155&rft_jstor_id=44971129&rfr_iscdi=true