A Self-Assessment Process for Accreditation Preparedness: A Practical Example for Local Health Departments
Introduction: Accreditation of local health departments (LHDs) is already a reality in many states, and with the establishment of the Public Health Accreditation Board, a national voluntary accreditation program will be forthcoming. To help prepare LHDs for accreditation, the National Association of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of public health management and practice 2009-11, Vol.15 (6), p.503-508 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 508 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 503 |
container_title | Journal of public health management and practice |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Erwin, Paul Campbell |
description | Introduction: Accreditation of local health departments (LHDs) is already a reality in many states, and with the establishment of the Public Health Accreditation Board, a national voluntary accreditation program will be forthcoming. To help prepare LHDs for accreditation, the National Association of County and City Health Officials has developed a self-assessment instrument on the basis of the Operational Definition of a Functioning Local Health Department. Methods: The article is a case study, describing the inputs, processes, and outputs of using the self-assessment in an LHD in a manner that can be applicable to other settings. Results: A seven-member work group conducted the self-assessment over an 11-week period, providing a total of 184 person-hours, with an equivalent cost of $8565. The self-assessment was scored on the basis of indicators of performance of Essential Services and Standards. There were significant correlations between the scores on Essential Services and Standards with the scores on the documentary evidence that the indicators were being met (r = 0.7545, P = .0117; r = .7264, P < .0001, respectively). Conclusion: Overall, the workgroup found the self-assessment tool to be useful, particularly for emphasizing the importance of documentation, and the process of conducting the self-assessment valuable for accreditation preparedness and for improving current internal communications and work practices. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181aa282a |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734084838</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44971129</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44971129</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-654c2a3d3bab62570a3268aa13680a4773223008f59d6d783bdee0dca220d6773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtLw0AUhQdRbK3-A5XsXKXOMzNxF2q1QsGCug43kwmm5OXMFPTfO7FFwdV9nO_cCwehS4LnBKfydrNazXGBCTOMKAJAFYUjNCVC4FhgSo9Dj6WKeSLSCTpzbosDLDg5RROSKsoCOUXbLHoxTRVnzhnnWtP5aGN7Hfqo6m2UaW1NWXvwdd8FxQwQ5i7Id1EWZtC-1tBEy09oh8b8eNb9uFkZaPx7dD86_HjXnaOTChpnLg51ht4elq-LVbx-fnxaZOtYUyl9nAiuKbCSFVAkVEgMjCYKgLBEYeBSMkoZxqoSaZmUUrGiNAaXGijFZRLkGbrZ3x1s_7Ezzudt7bRpGuhMv3O5ZBwrrpgKJN-T2vbOWVPlg61bsF85wfkYch5Czv-HHGzXhwe7ojXln-mQagCu9sDW-d7-6pynkhCasm_sKoKn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734084838</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Self-Assessment Process for Accreditation Preparedness: A Practical Example for Local Health Departments</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Erwin, Paul Campbell</creator><creatorcontrib>Erwin, Paul Campbell ; Knox County Tennessee Work Group on Accreditation</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Accreditation of local health departments (LHDs) is already a reality in many states, and with the establishment of the Public Health Accreditation Board, a national voluntary accreditation program will be forthcoming. To help prepare LHDs for accreditation, the National Association of County and City Health Officials has developed a self-assessment instrument on the basis of the Operational Definition of a Functioning Local Health Department. Methods: The article is a case study, describing the inputs, processes, and outputs of using the self-assessment in an LHD in a manner that can be applicable to other settings. Results: A seven-member work group conducted the self-assessment over an 11-week period, providing a total of 184 person-hours, with an equivalent cost of $8565. The self-assessment was scored on the basis of indicators of performance of Essential Services and Standards. There were significant correlations between the scores on Essential Services and Standards with the scores on the documentary evidence that the indicators were being met (r = 0.7545, P = .0117; r = .7264, P < .0001, respectively). Conclusion: Overall, the workgroup found the self-assessment tool to be useful, particularly for emphasizing the importance of documentation, and the process of conducting the self-assessment valuable for accreditation preparedness and for improving current internal communications and work practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-4659</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-5022</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181aa282a</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19823155</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Accreditation ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Health technology assessment ; Humans ; Interviews as Topic ; Local Government ; Organizational Case Studies ; Public Health - standards ; Quality Indicators, Health Care ; Tennessee</subject><ispartof>Journal of public health management and practice, 2009-11, Vol.15 (6), p.503-508</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-654c2a3d3bab62570a3268aa13680a4773223008f59d6d783bdee0dca220d6773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44971129$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44971129$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19823155$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Erwin, Paul Campbell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knox County Tennessee Work Group on Accreditation</creatorcontrib><title>A Self-Assessment Process for Accreditation Preparedness: A Practical Example for Local Health Departments</title><title>Journal of public health management and practice</title><addtitle>J Public Health Manag Pract</addtitle><description>Introduction: Accreditation of local health departments (LHDs) is already a reality in many states, and with the establishment of the Public Health Accreditation Board, a national voluntary accreditation program will be forthcoming. To help prepare LHDs for accreditation, the National Association of County and City Health Officials has developed a self-assessment instrument on the basis of the Operational Definition of a Functioning Local Health Department. Methods: The article is a case study, describing the inputs, processes, and outputs of using the self-assessment in an LHD in a manner that can be applicable to other settings. Results: A seven-member work group conducted the self-assessment over an 11-week period, providing a total of 184 person-hours, with an equivalent cost of $8565. The self-assessment was scored on the basis of indicators of performance of Essential Services and Standards. There were significant correlations between the scores on Essential Services and Standards with the scores on the documentary evidence that the indicators were being met (r = 0.7545, P = .0117; r = .7264, P < .0001, respectively). Conclusion: Overall, the workgroup found the self-assessment tool to be useful, particularly for emphasizing the importance of documentation, and the process of conducting the self-assessment valuable for accreditation preparedness and for improving current internal communications and work practices.</description><subject>Accreditation</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Local Government</subject><subject>Organizational Case Studies</subject><subject>Public Health - standards</subject><subject>Quality Indicators, Health Care</subject><subject>Tennessee</subject><issn>1078-4659</issn><issn>1550-5022</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEtLw0AUhQdRbK3-A5XsXKXOMzNxF2q1QsGCug43kwmm5OXMFPTfO7FFwdV9nO_cCwehS4LnBKfydrNazXGBCTOMKAJAFYUjNCVC4FhgSo9Dj6WKeSLSCTpzbosDLDg5RROSKsoCOUXbLHoxTRVnzhnnWtP5aGN7Hfqo6m2UaW1NWXvwdd8FxQwQ5i7Id1EWZtC-1tBEy09oh8b8eNb9uFkZaPx7dD86_HjXnaOTChpnLg51ht4elq-LVbx-fnxaZOtYUyl9nAiuKbCSFVAkVEgMjCYKgLBEYeBSMkoZxqoSaZmUUrGiNAaXGijFZRLkGbrZ3x1s_7Ezzudt7bRpGuhMv3O5ZBwrrpgKJN-T2vbOWVPlg61bsF85wfkYch5Czv-HHGzXhwe7ojXln-mQagCu9sDW-d7-6pynkhCasm_sKoKn</recordid><startdate>20091101</startdate><enddate>20091101</enddate><creator>Erwin, Paul Campbell</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091101</creationdate><title>A Self-Assessment Process for Accreditation Preparedness: A Practical Example for Local Health Departments</title><author>Erwin, Paul Campbell</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-654c2a3d3bab62570a3268aa13680a4773223008f59d6d783bdee0dca220d6773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Accreditation</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Local Government</topic><topic>Organizational Case Studies</topic><topic>Public Health - standards</topic><topic>Quality Indicators, Health Care</topic><topic>Tennessee</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Erwin, Paul Campbell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knox County Tennessee Work Group on Accreditation</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of public health management and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Erwin, Paul Campbell</au><aucorp>Knox County Tennessee Work Group on Accreditation</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Self-Assessment Process for Accreditation Preparedness: A Practical Example for Local Health Departments</atitle><jtitle>Journal of public health management and practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Public Health Manag Pract</addtitle><date>2009-11-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>503</spage><epage>508</epage><pages>503-508</pages><issn>1078-4659</issn><eissn>1550-5022</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Accreditation of local health departments (LHDs) is already a reality in many states, and with the establishment of the Public Health Accreditation Board, a national voluntary accreditation program will be forthcoming. To help prepare LHDs for accreditation, the National Association of County and City Health Officials has developed a self-assessment instrument on the basis of the Operational Definition of a Functioning Local Health Department. Methods: The article is a case study, describing the inputs, processes, and outputs of using the self-assessment in an LHD in a manner that can be applicable to other settings. Results: A seven-member work group conducted the self-assessment over an 11-week period, providing a total of 184 person-hours, with an equivalent cost of $8565. The self-assessment was scored on the basis of indicators of performance of Essential Services and Standards. There were significant correlations between the scores on Essential Services and Standards with the scores on the documentary evidence that the indicators were being met (r = 0.7545, P = .0117; r = .7264, P < .0001, respectively). Conclusion: Overall, the workgroup found the self-assessment tool to be useful, particularly for emphasizing the importance of documentation, and the process of conducting the self-assessment valuable for accreditation preparedness and for improving current internal communications and work practices.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>19823155</pmid><doi>10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181aa282a</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1078-4659 |
ispartof | Journal of public health management and practice, 2009-11, Vol.15 (6), p.503-508 |
issn | 1078-4659 1550-5022 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734084838 |
source | MEDLINE; JSTOR |
subjects | Accreditation Evaluation Studies as Topic Health technology assessment Humans Interviews as Topic Local Government Organizational Case Studies Public Health - standards Quality Indicators, Health Care Tennessee |
title | A Self-Assessment Process for Accreditation Preparedness: A Practical Example for Local Health Departments |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A27%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Self-Assessment%20Process%20for%20Accreditation%20Preparedness:%20A%20Practical%20Example%20for%20Local%20Health%20Departments&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20public%20health%20management%20and%20practice&rft.au=Erwin,%20Paul%20Campbell&rft.aucorp=Knox%20County%20Tennessee%20Work%20Group%20on%20Accreditation&rft.date=2009-11-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=503&rft.epage=508&rft.pages=503-508&rft.issn=1078-4659&rft.eissn=1550-5022&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181aa282a&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44971129%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734084838&rft_id=info:pmid/19823155&rft_jstor_id=44971129&rfr_iscdi=true |