Measurement of Optic Nerve Head Parameters: Comparison of Optical Coherence Tomography With Digital Planimetry

PURPOSETo compare the measurements of optic nerve head parameters from digital photographic images and optical coherence tomography (OCT) in normal children. METHODSThe Sydney Childhood Eye Study assessed 1765 children aged 6 years from 34 randomly selected primary schools during 2003 to 2005. Optic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of glaucoma 2009-10, Vol.18 (8), p.571-575
Hauptverfasser: Samarawickrama, Chameen, Pai, Amy, Huynh, Son C, Burlutsky, George, Jonas, Jost B, Mitchell, Paul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 575
container_issue 8
container_start_page 571
container_title Journal of glaucoma
container_volume 18
creator Samarawickrama, Chameen
Pai, Amy
Huynh, Son C
Burlutsky, George
Jonas, Jost B
Mitchell, Paul
description PURPOSETo compare the measurements of optic nerve head parameters from digital photographic images and optical coherence tomography (OCT) in normal children. METHODSThe Sydney Childhood Eye Study assessed 1765 children aged 6 years from 34 randomly selected primary schools during 2003 to 2005. Optic nerve head parameters were measured from digital photographs captured using a Canon fundus camera (CF-60Uvi)/EOS 10D and OCT3 (Zeiss Stratus) using the “fast” optic disc protocol. Retinal images of 333 sequential child participants were graded using both methods and are included in analyses. Optic disc and cup area, vertical and horizontal disc and cup diameters, vertical and horizontal cup/disc diameter ratios, and cup/disc area ratios were calculated using both modalities. Magnification of the planimetric images was corrected using the Bengtsson formula. RESULTSMean vertical and horizontal disc and cup diameter and mean disc and cup area, as measured using OCT (1.76, 1.50, 0.71, and 0.68 mm and 2.15 and 0.47 mm, respectively) were significantly (P0.05) between the 2 methods (0.41, 0.45, and 0.22 vs. 0.41, 0.44, and 0.21, respectively). CONCLUSIONSLinear and area measures by Stratus-OCT, compared with digital planimetry measurements, are around 10% smaller; however, all 3 cup/disc ratios were preserved. Where OCT produces unexpectedly small cup/disc ratios, manual viewing is advisable. However, OCT can be considered moderately reliable in measuring and monitoring cup/disc ratio in clinical settings.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181996da6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734084024</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>734084024</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3001-428bbcb985cb4fb89b27c8443fe17fd3e81e934bbfae565abafc42a6221d9d353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtv1TAQRi1ERUvhHyDkHauU8SOJzQ5doC0qtIuidmfZzqQJJHFqJ1T33-OrXrUSG7905vPMIeQdgxMGuv54_v30BBwwgYIppnXV2OoFOWKlqAqp2O3LfIayLkBxfUhep_QbgAPn7BU5ZFrxSihxRKYfaNMaccRpoaGll_PSe_oT41-kZ2gbemWjHXHBmD7RTRhnG_sUpifUDvm1w4iTR3odxnAX7dxt6U2_dPRLf9cvmbga7NTnkLh9Qw5aOyR8u9-Pya9vX683Z8XF5en55vNF4QUAKyRXznmnVemdbJ3SjtdeSSlaZHXbCFQMtZDOtRbLqrTOtl5yW-XpGt2IUhyTD4-5cwz3K6bFjH3yOORGMKzJ1EKCksBlJuUj6WNIKWJr5tiPNm4NA7MTbbJo87_oXPZ-_8HqRmyei_Zmn3MfwrCz92dYHzCaDu2wdAYAKpbZggNolm9Q7BYm_gElqYup</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734084024</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measurement of Optic Nerve Head Parameters: Comparison of Optical Coherence Tomography With Digital Planimetry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Samarawickrama, Chameen ; Pai, Amy ; Huynh, Son C ; Burlutsky, George ; Jonas, Jost B ; Mitchell, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Samarawickrama, Chameen ; Pai, Amy ; Huynh, Son C ; Burlutsky, George ; Jonas, Jost B ; Mitchell, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>PURPOSETo compare the measurements of optic nerve head parameters from digital photographic images and optical coherence tomography (OCT) in normal children. METHODSThe Sydney Childhood Eye Study assessed 1765 children aged 6 years from 34 randomly selected primary schools during 2003 to 2005. Optic nerve head parameters were measured from digital photographs captured using a Canon fundus camera (CF-60Uvi)/EOS 10D and OCT3 (Zeiss Stratus) using the “fast” optic disc protocol. Retinal images of 333 sequential child participants were graded using both methods and are included in analyses. Optic disc and cup area, vertical and horizontal disc and cup diameters, vertical and horizontal cup/disc diameter ratios, and cup/disc area ratios were calculated using both modalities. Magnification of the planimetric images was corrected using the Bengtsson formula. RESULTSMean vertical and horizontal disc and cup diameter and mean disc and cup area, as measured using OCT (1.76, 1.50, 0.71, and 0.68 mm and 2.15 and 0.47 mm, respectively) were significantly (P&lt;0.0001; cup area P=0.0014) smaller than when measured using digital photography (1.85, 1.66, 0.76, and 0.74 mm and 2.40 and 0.51 mm, respectively). All 3 cup/disc ratio measures did not vary significantly (P&gt;0.05) between the 2 methods (0.41, 0.45, and 0.22 vs. 0.41, 0.44, and 0.21, respectively). CONCLUSIONSLinear and area measures by Stratus-OCT, compared with digital planimetry measurements, are around 10% smaller; however, all 3 cup/disc ratios were preserved. Where OCT produces unexpectedly small cup/disc ratios, manual viewing is advisable. However, OCT can be considered moderately reliable in measuring and monitoring cup/disc ratio in clinical settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-0829</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-481X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181996da6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19826383</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Child ; Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological ; Female ; Fundus Oculi ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Male ; Optic Disk - anatomy &amp; histology ; Photography ; Reference Values ; Tomography, Optical Coherence - standards</subject><ispartof>Journal of glaucoma, 2009-10, Vol.18 (8), p.571-575</ispartof><rights>2009 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3001-428bbcb985cb4fb89b27c8443fe17fd3e81e934bbfae565abafc42a6221d9d353</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19826383$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Samarawickrama, Chameen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pai, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huynh, Son C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burlutsky, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jonas, Jost B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>Measurement of Optic Nerve Head Parameters: Comparison of Optical Coherence Tomography With Digital Planimetry</title><title>Journal of glaucoma</title><addtitle>J Glaucoma</addtitle><description>PURPOSETo compare the measurements of optic nerve head parameters from digital photographic images and optical coherence tomography (OCT) in normal children. METHODSThe Sydney Childhood Eye Study assessed 1765 children aged 6 years from 34 randomly selected primary schools during 2003 to 2005. Optic nerve head parameters were measured from digital photographs captured using a Canon fundus camera (CF-60Uvi)/EOS 10D and OCT3 (Zeiss Stratus) using the “fast” optic disc protocol. Retinal images of 333 sequential child participants were graded using both methods and are included in analyses. Optic disc and cup area, vertical and horizontal disc and cup diameters, vertical and horizontal cup/disc diameter ratios, and cup/disc area ratios were calculated using both modalities. Magnification of the planimetric images was corrected using the Bengtsson formula. RESULTSMean vertical and horizontal disc and cup diameter and mean disc and cup area, as measured using OCT (1.76, 1.50, 0.71, and 0.68 mm and 2.15 and 0.47 mm, respectively) were significantly (P&lt;0.0001; cup area P=0.0014) smaller than when measured using digital photography (1.85, 1.66, 0.76, and 0.74 mm and 2.40 and 0.51 mm, respectively). All 3 cup/disc ratio measures did not vary significantly (P&gt;0.05) between the 2 methods (0.41, 0.45, and 0.22 vs. 0.41, 0.44, and 0.21, respectively). CONCLUSIONSLinear and area measures by Stratus-OCT, compared with digital planimetry measurements, are around 10% smaller; however, all 3 cup/disc ratios were preserved. Where OCT produces unexpectedly small cup/disc ratios, manual viewing is advisable. However, OCT can be considered moderately reliable in measuring and monitoring cup/disc ratio in clinical settings.</description><subject>Child</subject><subject>Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundus Oculi</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Optic Disk - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Photography</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Tomography, Optical Coherence - standards</subject><issn>1057-0829</issn><issn>1536-481X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEtv1TAQRi1ERUvhHyDkHauU8SOJzQ5doC0qtIuidmfZzqQJJHFqJ1T33-OrXrUSG7905vPMIeQdgxMGuv54_v30BBwwgYIppnXV2OoFOWKlqAqp2O3LfIayLkBxfUhep_QbgAPn7BU5ZFrxSihxRKYfaNMaccRpoaGll_PSe_oT41-kZ2gbemWjHXHBmD7RTRhnG_sUpifUDvm1w4iTR3odxnAX7dxt6U2_dPRLf9cvmbga7NTnkLh9Qw5aOyR8u9-Pya9vX683Z8XF5en55vNF4QUAKyRXznmnVemdbJ3SjtdeSSlaZHXbCFQMtZDOtRbLqrTOtl5yW-XpGt2IUhyTD4-5cwz3K6bFjH3yOORGMKzJ1EKCksBlJuUj6WNIKWJr5tiPNm4NA7MTbbJo87_oXPZ-_8HqRmyei_Zmn3MfwrCz92dYHzCaDu2wdAYAKpbZggNolm9Q7BYm_gElqYup</recordid><startdate>200910</startdate><enddate>200910</enddate><creator>Samarawickrama, Chameen</creator><creator>Pai, Amy</creator><creator>Huynh, Son C</creator><creator>Burlutsky, George</creator><creator>Jonas, Jost B</creator><creator>Mitchell, Paul</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200910</creationdate><title>Measurement of Optic Nerve Head Parameters: Comparison of Optical Coherence Tomography With Digital Planimetry</title><author>Samarawickrama, Chameen ; Pai, Amy ; Huynh, Son C ; Burlutsky, George ; Jonas, Jost B ; Mitchell, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3001-428bbcb985cb4fb89b27c8443fe17fd3e81e934bbfae565abafc42a6221d9d353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Child</topic><topic>Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundus Oculi</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Optic Disk - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Photography</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Tomography, Optical Coherence - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Samarawickrama, Chameen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pai, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huynh, Son C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burlutsky, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jonas, Jost B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of glaucoma</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Samarawickrama, Chameen</au><au>Pai, Amy</au><au>Huynh, Son C</au><au>Burlutsky, George</au><au>Jonas, Jost B</au><au>Mitchell, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measurement of Optic Nerve Head Parameters: Comparison of Optical Coherence Tomography With Digital Planimetry</atitle><jtitle>Journal of glaucoma</jtitle><addtitle>J Glaucoma</addtitle><date>2009-10</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>571</spage><epage>575</epage><pages>571-575</pages><issn>1057-0829</issn><eissn>1536-481X</eissn><abstract>PURPOSETo compare the measurements of optic nerve head parameters from digital photographic images and optical coherence tomography (OCT) in normal children. METHODSThe Sydney Childhood Eye Study assessed 1765 children aged 6 years from 34 randomly selected primary schools during 2003 to 2005. Optic nerve head parameters were measured from digital photographs captured using a Canon fundus camera (CF-60Uvi)/EOS 10D and OCT3 (Zeiss Stratus) using the “fast” optic disc protocol. Retinal images of 333 sequential child participants were graded using both methods and are included in analyses. Optic disc and cup area, vertical and horizontal disc and cup diameters, vertical and horizontal cup/disc diameter ratios, and cup/disc area ratios were calculated using both modalities. Magnification of the planimetric images was corrected using the Bengtsson formula. RESULTSMean vertical and horizontal disc and cup diameter and mean disc and cup area, as measured using OCT (1.76, 1.50, 0.71, and 0.68 mm and 2.15 and 0.47 mm, respectively) were significantly (P&lt;0.0001; cup area P=0.0014) smaller than when measured using digital photography (1.85, 1.66, 0.76, and 0.74 mm and 2.40 and 0.51 mm, respectively). All 3 cup/disc ratio measures did not vary significantly (P&gt;0.05) between the 2 methods (0.41, 0.45, and 0.22 vs. 0.41, 0.44, and 0.21, respectively). CONCLUSIONSLinear and area measures by Stratus-OCT, compared with digital planimetry measurements, are around 10% smaller; however, all 3 cup/disc ratios were preserved. Where OCT produces unexpectedly small cup/disc ratios, manual viewing is advisable. However, OCT can be considered moderately reliable in measuring and monitoring cup/disc ratio in clinical settings.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>19826383</pmid><doi>10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181996da6</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1057-0829
ispartof Journal of glaucoma, 2009-10, Vol.18 (8), p.571-575
issn 1057-0829
1536-481X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734084024
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Child
Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological
Female
Fundus Oculi
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Male
Optic Disk - anatomy & histology
Photography
Reference Values
Tomography, Optical Coherence - standards
title Measurement of Optic Nerve Head Parameters: Comparison of Optical Coherence Tomography With Digital Planimetry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T23%3A03%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measurement%20of%20Optic%20Nerve%20Head%20Parameters:%20Comparison%20of%20Optical%20Coherence%20Tomography%20With%20Digital%20Planimetry&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20glaucoma&rft.au=Samarawickrama,%20Chameen&rft.date=2009-10&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=571&rft.epage=575&rft.pages=571-575&rft.issn=1057-0829&rft.eissn=1536-481X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181996da6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E734084024%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734084024&rft_id=info:pmid/19826383&rfr_iscdi=true