Cleanliness of dentinal tubules following gutta-percha removal with and without solvents: a scanning electron microscopic study

Aim  To determine the influence of solvents on gutta‐percha and sealer remaining on root canal walls and in dentinal tubules. Methodology  The root canals of 70 teeth were prepared chemomechanically to apical size 40. In group 1 (n = 10; control group), the canals remained unfilled. In groups 2–4 (n...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International endodontic journal 2009-11, Vol.42 (11), p.1032-1038
Hauptverfasser: Horvath, S. D., Altenburger, M. J., Naumann, M., Wolkewitz, M., Schirrmeister, J. F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1038
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1032
container_title International endodontic journal
container_volume 42
creator Horvath, S. D.
Altenburger, M. J.
Naumann, M.
Wolkewitz, M.
Schirrmeister, J. F.
description Aim  To determine the influence of solvents on gutta‐percha and sealer remaining on root canal walls and in dentinal tubules. Methodology  The root canals of 70 teeth were prepared chemomechanically to apical size 40. In group 1 (n = 10; control group), the canals remained unfilled. In groups 2–4 (n = 20 each), the canals were filled using lateral compaction with gutta‐percha and sealer. Removal of root fillings was undertaken after 2 weeks using Gates Glidden burs and hand files without solvent (group 2), with eucalyptol (60 μL; group 3) and with chloroform (60 μL; group 4) to size 50. After further irrigation using sodium hypochlorite and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, the roots were split, photographed and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed. The number of filled dentinal tubules (SEM) and the surface covered by root filling remnants (photographs) were evaluated for the coronal, middle and apical third of each root half. Statistical analysis was performed via mixed model for clustered data followed by Tukey’s test. Results  After pooling the results of all thirds of the canal, open tubules were more prevalent in the control group, followed by the nonsolvent group, the eucalyptol group and the chloroform group (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01616.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734083930</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>734083930</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4066-26477a7499cd560b3e682dec3bb86733862b9849dbb73173e1a6088ca7746aad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFv2yAYhtG0aU27_YWJ2072wNiAJ-0wRW3WLmqlatOOCOMvLRmGzOAmOfWv126i7louvBLv833oQQhTktPxfFnnlPEqK6qa5gUhdU4opzzfvUGzl4e3aEZoybJCyuoEnca4JoRUhNH36ITWshijnKHHuQPtnfUQIw4r3IJP1muH09AMDiJeBefC1vo7fDekpLMN9OZe4x668DDWtjbdY-3b5xCGhGNwD-OM-BVrHI32fkLBgUl98Lizpg_RhI01OKah3X9A71baRfh4vM_Q74vzX_Mf2fJmcTn_vsxMSTjPCl4KoUVZ16atOGkYcFm0YFjTSC4Yk7xoalnWbdMIRgUDqjmR0mghSq51y87Q58PcTR_-DRCT6mw04Jz2EIaoBCuJZDUjY1MemtNPYw8rteltp_u9okRN9tVaTZLVJFlN9tWzfbUb0U_HJUPTQfsfPOoeC98Oha11sH_1YHV5fjWlkc8OvI0Jdi-87v-q0YKo1J_rhfp5u6C3y_pazdkTYrGk3A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734083930</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cleanliness of dentinal tubules following gutta-percha removal with and without solvents: a scanning electron microscopic study</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Horvath, S. D. ; Altenburger, M. J. ; Naumann, M. ; Wolkewitz, M. ; Schirrmeister, J. F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Horvath, S. D. ; Altenburger, M. J. ; Naumann, M. ; Wolkewitz, M. ; Schirrmeister, J. F.</creatorcontrib><description>Aim  To determine the influence of solvents on gutta‐percha and sealer remaining on root canal walls and in dentinal tubules. Methodology  The root canals of 70 teeth were prepared chemomechanically to apical size 40. In group 1 (n = 10; control group), the canals remained unfilled. In groups 2–4 (n = 20 each), the canals were filled using lateral compaction with gutta‐percha and sealer. Removal of root fillings was undertaken after 2 weeks using Gates Glidden burs and hand files without solvent (group 2), with eucalyptol (60 μL; group 3) and with chloroform (60 μL; group 4) to size 50. After further irrigation using sodium hypochlorite and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, the roots were split, photographed and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed. The number of filled dentinal tubules (SEM) and the surface covered by root filling remnants (photographs) were evaluated for the coronal, middle and apical third of each root half. Statistical analysis was performed via mixed model for clustered data followed by Tukey’s test. Results  After pooling the results of all thirds of the canal, open tubules were more prevalent in the control group, followed by the nonsolvent group, the eucalyptol group and the chloroform group (P &lt; 0.05 between all groups). Less surface was covered by root filling remnants in the nonsolvent group than in the eucalyptol group and the chloroform group (P &lt; 0.05); again, fewer remnants were found in the control group than in all other groups (P &lt; 0.05). Conclusions  Solvents led to more gutta‐percha and sealer remnants on root canal walls and inside dentinal tubules.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-2885</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01616.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19825038</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Chloroform ; Cuspid ; Cyclohexanols ; Dental Debonding - methods ; Dental Pulp Cavity - ultrastructure ; Dentin - ultrastructure ; dentinal tubules ; Dentistry ; endodontic retreatment ; eucalyptol ; Gutta-Percha ; gutta-percha removal ; Humans ; Incisor ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Monoterpenes ; Retreatment ; Root Canal Filling Materials ; Root Canal Preparation - methods ; scanning electron microscopy ; Solvents</subject><ispartof>International endodontic journal, 2009-11, Vol.42 (11), p.1032-1038</ispartof><rights>2009 International Endodontic Journal</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4066-26477a7499cd560b3e682dec3bb86733862b9849dbb73173e1a6088ca7746aad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4066-26477a7499cd560b3e682dec3bb86733862b9849dbb73173e1a6088ca7746aad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2591.2009.01616.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2591.2009.01616.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19825038$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Horvath, S. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altenburger, M. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naumann, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolkewitz, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schirrmeister, J. F.</creatorcontrib><title>Cleanliness of dentinal tubules following gutta-percha removal with and without solvents: a scanning electron microscopic study</title><title>International endodontic journal</title><addtitle>Int Endod J</addtitle><description>Aim  To determine the influence of solvents on gutta‐percha and sealer remaining on root canal walls and in dentinal tubules. Methodology  The root canals of 70 teeth were prepared chemomechanically to apical size 40. In group 1 (n = 10; control group), the canals remained unfilled. In groups 2–4 (n = 20 each), the canals were filled using lateral compaction with gutta‐percha and sealer. Removal of root fillings was undertaken after 2 weeks using Gates Glidden burs and hand files without solvent (group 2), with eucalyptol (60 μL; group 3) and with chloroform (60 μL; group 4) to size 50. After further irrigation using sodium hypochlorite and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, the roots were split, photographed and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed. The number of filled dentinal tubules (SEM) and the surface covered by root filling remnants (photographs) were evaluated for the coronal, middle and apical third of each root half. Statistical analysis was performed via mixed model for clustered data followed by Tukey’s test. Results  After pooling the results of all thirds of the canal, open tubules were more prevalent in the control group, followed by the nonsolvent group, the eucalyptol group and the chloroform group (P &lt; 0.05 between all groups). Less surface was covered by root filling remnants in the nonsolvent group than in the eucalyptol group and the chloroform group (P &lt; 0.05); again, fewer remnants were found in the control group than in all other groups (P &lt; 0.05). Conclusions  Solvents led to more gutta‐percha and sealer remnants on root canal walls and inside dentinal tubules.</description><subject>Chloroform</subject><subject>Cuspid</subject><subject>Cyclohexanols</subject><subject>Dental Debonding - methods</subject><subject>Dental Pulp Cavity - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Dentin - ultrastructure</subject><subject>dentinal tubules</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>endodontic retreatment</subject><subject>eucalyptol</subject><subject>Gutta-Percha</subject><subject>gutta-percha removal</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incisor</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>Monoterpenes</subject><subject>Retreatment</subject><subject>Root Canal Filling Materials</subject><subject>Root Canal Preparation - methods</subject><subject>scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Solvents</subject><issn>0143-2885</issn><issn>1365-2591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEFv2yAYhtG0aU27_YWJ2072wNiAJ-0wRW3WLmqlatOOCOMvLRmGzOAmOfWv126i7louvBLv833oQQhTktPxfFnnlPEqK6qa5gUhdU4opzzfvUGzl4e3aEZoybJCyuoEnca4JoRUhNH36ITWshijnKHHuQPtnfUQIw4r3IJP1muH09AMDiJeBefC1vo7fDekpLMN9OZe4x668DDWtjbdY-3b5xCGhGNwD-OM-BVrHI32fkLBgUl98Lizpg_RhI01OKah3X9A71baRfh4vM_Q74vzX_Mf2fJmcTn_vsxMSTjPCl4KoUVZ16atOGkYcFm0YFjTSC4Yk7xoalnWbdMIRgUDqjmR0mghSq51y87Q58PcTR_-DRCT6mw04Jz2EIaoBCuJZDUjY1MemtNPYw8rteltp_u9okRN9tVaTZLVJFlN9tWzfbUb0U_HJUPTQfsfPOoeC98Oha11sH_1YHV5fjWlkc8OvI0Jdi-87v-q0YKo1J_rhfp5u6C3y_pazdkTYrGk3A</recordid><startdate>200911</startdate><enddate>200911</enddate><creator>Horvath, S. D.</creator><creator>Altenburger, M. J.</creator><creator>Naumann, M.</creator><creator>Wolkewitz, M.</creator><creator>Schirrmeister, J. F.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200911</creationdate><title>Cleanliness of dentinal tubules following gutta-percha removal with and without solvents: a scanning electron microscopic study</title><author>Horvath, S. D. ; Altenburger, M. J. ; Naumann, M. ; Wolkewitz, M. ; Schirrmeister, J. F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4066-26477a7499cd560b3e682dec3bb86733862b9849dbb73173e1a6088ca7746aad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Chloroform</topic><topic>Cuspid</topic><topic>Cyclohexanols</topic><topic>Dental Debonding - methods</topic><topic>Dental Pulp Cavity - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Dentin - ultrastructure</topic><topic>dentinal tubules</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>endodontic retreatment</topic><topic>eucalyptol</topic><topic>Gutta-Percha</topic><topic>gutta-percha removal</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incisor</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>Monoterpenes</topic><topic>Retreatment</topic><topic>Root Canal Filling Materials</topic><topic>Root Canal Preparation - methods</topic><topic>scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Solvents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Horvath, S. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altenburger, M. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naumann, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolkewitz, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schirrmeister, J. F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International endodontic journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Horvath, S. D.</au><au>Altenburger, M. J.</au><au>Naumann, M.</au><au>Wolkewitz, M.</au><au>Schirrmeister, J. F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cleanliness of dentinal tubules following gutta-percha removal with and without solvents: a scanning electron microscopic study</atitle><jtitle>International endodontic journal</jtitle><addtitle>Int Endod J</addtitle><date>2009-11</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1032</spage><epage>1038</epage><pages>1032-1038</pages><issn>0143-2885</issn><eissn>1365-2591</eissn><abstract>Aim  To determine the influence of solvents on gutta‐percha and sealer remaining on root canal walls and in dentinal tubules. Methodology  The root canals of 70 teeth were prepared chemomechanically to apical size 40. In group 1 (n = 10; control group), the canals remained unfilled. In groups 2–4 (n = 20 each), the canals were filled using lateral compaction with gutta‐percha and sealer. Removal of root fillings was undertaken after 2 weeks using Gates Glidden burs and hand files without solvent (group 2), with eucalyptol (60 μL; group 3) and with chloroform (60 μL; group 4) to size 50. After further irrigation using sodium hypochlorite and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, the roots were split, photographed and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed. The number of filled dentinal tubules (SEM) and the surface covered by root filling remnants (photographs) were evaluated for the coronal, middle and apical third of each root half. Statistical analysis was performed via mixed model for clustered data followed by Tukey’s test. Results  After pooling the results of all thirds of the canal, open tubules were more prevalent in the control group, followed by the nonsolvent group, the eucalyptol group and the chloroform group (P &lt; 0.05 between all groups). Less surface was covered by root filling remnants in the nonsolvent group than in the eucalyptol group and the chloroform group (P &lt; 0.05); again, fewer remnants were found in the control group than in all other groups (P &lt; 0.05). Conclusions  Solvents led to more gutta‐percha and sealer remnants on root canal walls and inside dentinal tubules.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>19825038</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01616.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0143-2885
ispartof International endodontic journal, 2009-11, Vol.42 (11), p.1032-1038
issn 0143-2885
1365-2591
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734083930
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Chloroform
Cuspid
Cyclohexanols
Dental Debonding - methods
Dental Pulp Cavity - ultrastructure
Dentin - ultrastructure
dentinal tubules
Dentistry
endodontic retreatment
eucalyptol
Gutta-Percha
gutta-percha removal
Humans
Incisor
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
Monoterpenes
Retreatment
Root Canal Filling Materials
Root Canal Preparation - methods
scanning electron microscopy
Solvents
title Cleanliness of dentinal tubules following gutta-percha removal with and without solvents: a scanning electron microscopic study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T15%3A32%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cleanliness%20of%20dentinal%20tubules%20following%20gutta-percha%20removal%20with%20and%20without%20solvents:%20a%20scanning%20electron%20microscopic%20study&rft.jtitle=International%20endodontic%20journal&rft.au=Horvath,%20S.%20D.&rft.date=2009-11&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1032&rft.epage=1038&rft.pages=1032-1038&rft.issn=0143-2885&rft.eissn=1365-2591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01616.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E734083930%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734083930&rft_id=info:pmid/19825038&rfr_iscdi=true