Lessons From the Modern Battlefield: Successful Upper Extremity Injury Reconstruction in the Subacute Period
BACKGROUND:Reconstructive techniques and protocols for limb salvage of upper extremity battlefield injuries remains poorly defined. Our study describes the types of flaps, the timing of reconstruction, and success rates of war upper extremity reconstruction during a 30-month period using the Bethesd...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care injury, infection, and critical care, 2009-10, Vol.67 (4), p.752-757 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 757 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 752 |
container_title | The Journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care |
container_volume | 67 |
creator | Kumar, Anand R. Grewal, Navanjun S. Chung, Thomas L. Bradley, James P. |
description | BACKGROUND:Reconstructive techniques and protocols for limb salvage of upper extremity battlefield injuries remains poorly defined. Our study describes the types of flaps, the timing of reconstruction, and success rates of war upper extremity reconstruction during a 30-month period using the Bethesda limb salvage protocol.
METHODS:Soldiers with significant upper extremity injuries with complex open fractures from Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom—Afghanistan who underwent tissue transfer flaps were reviewed (n = 26, free flaps n = 6). Data analysis included mechanism of injury, associated injuries, types of flap, postoperative complications, wound infection rates, and outcome data.
RESULTS:The cause of injury consisted of improvised explosive device (61%), rocket-propelled grenades (15%), motor vehicle crash (8%), land mine (8%), and gunshot wound (4%). Mean age was 25 years. Mean number of prereconstructive washouts was six (range, 3–22). Forty-six percent of wounds were culture positive at admission (75% were Acinetobacter species). All patients had other coexisting extremity, trunk or facial injuries. Average time to flap reconstruction was 31 days (range, 9–161). In 66% of the cases, a fasciocutaneous flap was used, and in the remaining cases, muscle (19%) and adipofascial (15%) flaps were performed. Flap success rate was 96%, with one flap loss because of venous congestion (managed with limb shortening). Infection rate was 8%. Complete coverage was achieved in all upper extremity wounds and early occupational therapy resulted in improved return to function.
CONCLUSIONS:Despite massive bone and soft tissue defects, high preoperative wound colonization, and delays in definitive reconstruction, devastating war wounds can be successfully reconstructed in the subacute period with low flap failure, infection, and amputation rates. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181808115 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734081776</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>734081776</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3825-98c89210cd4905fa9ccefafd96261dfad81e9493efa6a3cb4cc3338605bab2103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LHDEUhoNUdKv-gkLJTenVaD7mI-ndKmqFFUXX6yGTOWHHZibbfGD33ze6SwUvenXg8LzPObwIfaHklBLZnC3np6QjlAOnggoiKK320IxWTBZCEPkJzQhhrKiYYIfocwjPhJCy5OIAHVIhaFU1fIbsAkJwU8BX3o04rgDfuh78hM9VjBbMALb_gR-T1pkzyeKn9Ro8vvwTPYxD3OCb6Tn5DX4AnS3RJx0HN-FhenM9pk7pFAHfgx9cf4z2jbIBTnbzCD1dXS4vfhaLu-ubi_mi0FywqpBCC8ko0X0pSWWUzMeNMr2sWU17o3pBQZaS52WtuO5KrTnnoiZVp7qc40fo-9a79u53ghDbcQgarFUTuBTahpe5rqapM8m3pPYuBA-mXfthVH7TUtK-ttwu5-3HlnPq686fuhH698yu1gx82wEqaGWNV5Mewj-OMUJq2bw-2my5F2cj-PDLphfw7QqUjav_vvAXBQyYTw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734081776</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lessons From the Modern Battlefield: Successful Upper Extremity Injury Reconstruction in the Subacute Period</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Kumar, Anand R. ; Grewal, Navanjun S. ; Chung, Thomas L. ; Bradley, James P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Anand R. ; Grewal, Navanjun S. ; Chung, Thomas L. ; Bradley, James P.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:Reconstructive techniques and protocols for limb salvage of upper extremity battlefield injuries remains poorly defined. Our study describes the types of flaps, the timing of reconstruction, and success rates of war upper extremity reconstruction during a 30-month period using the Bethesda limb salvage protocol.
METHODS:Soldiers with significant upper extremity injuries with complex open fractures from Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom—Afghanistan who underwent tissue transfer flaps were reviewed (n = 26, free flaps n = 6). Data analysis included mechanism of injury, associated injuries, types of flap, postoperative complications, wound infection rates, and outcome data.
RESULTS:The cause of injury consisted of improvised explosive device (61%), rocket-propelled grenades (15%), motor vehicle crash (8%), land mine (8%), and gunshot wound (4%). Mean age was 25 years. Mean number of prereconstructive washouts was six (range, 3–22). Forty-six percent of wounds were culture positive at admission (75% were Acinetobacter species). All patients had other coexisting extremity, trunk or facial injuries. Average time to flap reconstruction was 31 days (range, 9–161). In 66% of the cases, a fasciocutaneous flap was used, and in the remaining cases, muscle (19%) and adipofascial (15%) flaps were performed. Flap success rate was 96%, with one flap loss because of venous congestion (managed with limb shortening). Infection rate was 8%. Complete coverage was achieved in all upper extremity wounds and early occupational therapy resulted in improved return to function.
CONCLUSIONS:Despite massive bone and soft tissue defects, high preoperative wound colonization, and delays in definitive reconstruction, devastating war wounds can be successfully reconstructed in the subacute period with low flap failure, infection, and amputation rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-8809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181808115</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18815573</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Afghan Campaign 2001 ; Amputation - statistics & numerical data ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Fractures, Bone - surgery ; General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation ; Humans ; Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine ; Iraq War, 2003-2011 ; Limb Salvage - methods ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Metacarpal Bones - injuries ; Military Personnel ; Multiple Trauma - surgery ; Radius Fractures - surgery ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures ; Soft Tissue Injuries - surgery ; Surgical Flaps ; Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology ; Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents ; Ulna Fractures - surgery ; United States ; Upper Extremity - injuries ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The Journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care, 2009-10, Vol.67 (4), p.752-757</ispartof><rights>2009 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3825-98c89210cd4905fa9ccefafd96261dfad81e9493efa6a3cb4cc3338605bab2103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3825-98c89210cd4905fa9ccefafd96261dfad81e9493efa6a3cb4cc3338605bab2103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22006970$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18815573$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Anand R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grewal, Navanjun S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Thomas L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, James P.</creatorcontrib><title>Lessons From the Modern Battlefield: Successful Upper Extremity Injury Reconstruction in the Subacute Period</title><title>The Journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care</title><addtitle>J Trauma</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:Reconstructive techniques and protocols for limb salvage of upper extremity battlefield injuries remains poorly defined. Our study describes the types of flaps, the timing of reconstruction, and success rates of war upper extremity reconstruction during a 30-month period using the Bethesda limb salvage protocol.
METHODS:Soldiers with significant upper extremity injuries with complex open fractures from Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom—Afghanistan who underwent tissue transfer flaps were reviewed (n = 26, free flaps n = 6). Data analysis included mechanism of injury, associated injuries, types of flap, postoperative complications, wound infection rates, and outcome data.
RESULTS:The cause of injury consisted of improvised explosive device (61%), rocket-propelled grenades (15%), motor vehicle crash (8%), land mine (8%), and gunshot wound (4%). Mean age was 25 years. Mean number of prereconstructive washouts was six (range, 3–22). Forty-six percent of wounds were culture positive at admission (75% were Acinetobacter species). All patients had other coexisting extremity, trunk or facial injuries. Average time to flap reconstruction was 31 days (range, 9–161). In 66% of the cases, a fasciocutaneous flap was used, and in the remaining cases, muscle (19%) and adipofascial (15%) flaps were performed. Flap success rate was 96%, with one flap loss because of venous congestion (managed with limb shortening). Infection rate was 8%. Complete coverage was achieved in all upper extremity wounds and early occupational therapy resulted in improved return to function.
CONCLUSIONS:Despite massive bone and soft tissue defects, high preoperative wound colonization, and delays in definitive reconstruction, devastating war wounds can be successfully reconstructed in the subacute period with low flap failure, infection, and amputation rates.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Afghan Campaign 2001</subject><subject>Amputation - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Fractures, Bone - surgery</subject><subject>General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</subject><subject>Iraq War, 2003-2011</subject><subject>Limb Salvage - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Metacarpal Bones - injuries</subject><subject>Military Personnel</subject><subject>Multiple Trauma - surgery</subject><subject>Radius Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Soft Tissue Injuries - surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Flaps</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><subject>Ulna Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Upper Extremity - injuries</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0022-5282</issn><issn>1529-8809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LHDEUhoNUdKv-gkLJTenVaD7mI-ndKmqFFUXX6yGTOWHHZibbfGD33ze6SwUvenXg8LzPObwIfaHklBLZnC3np6QjlAOnggoiKK320IxWTBZCEPkJzQhhrKiYYIfocwjPhJCy5OIAHVIhaFU1fIbsAkJwU8BX3o04rgDfuh78hM9VjBbMALb_gR-T1pkzyeKn9Ro8vvwTPYxD3OCb6Tn5DX4AnS3RJx0HN-FhenM9pk7pFAHfgx9cf4z2jbIBTnbzCD1dXS4vfhaLu-ubi_mi0FywqpBCC8ko0X0pSWWUzMeNMr2sWU17o3pBQZaS52WtuO5KrTnnoiZVp7qc40fo-9a79u53ghDbcQgarFUTuBTahpe5rqapM8m3pPYuBA-mXfthVH7TUtK-ttwu5-3HlnPq686fuhH698yu1gx82wEqaGWNV5Mewj-OMUJq2bw-2my5F2cj-PDLphfw7QqUjav_vvAXBQyYTw</recordid><startdate>200910</startdate><enddate>200910</enddate><creator>Kumar, Anand R.</creator><creator>Grewal, Navanjun S.</creator><creator>Chung, Thomas L.</creator><creator>Bradley, James P.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200910</creationdate><title>Lessons From the Modern Battlefield: Successful Upper Extremity Injury Reconstruction in the Subacute Period</title><author>Kumar, Anand R. ; Grewal, Navanjun S. ; Chung, Thomas L. ; Bradley, James P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3825-98c89210cd4905fa9ccefafd96261dfad81e9493efa6a3cb4cc3338605bab2103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Afghan Campaign 2001</topic><topic>Amputation - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Fractures, Bone - surgery</topic><topic>General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</topic><topic>Iraq War, 2003-2011</topic><topic>Limb Salvage - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Metacarpal Bones - injuries</topic><topic>Military Personnel</topic><topic>Multiple Trauma - surgery</topic><topic>Radius Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Soft Tissue Injuries - surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Flaps</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</topic><topic>Ulna Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Upper Extremity - injuries</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Anand R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grewal, Navanjun S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Thomas L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, James P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kumar, Anand R.</au><au>Grewal, Navanjun S.</au><au>Chung, Thomas L.</au><au>Bradley, James P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lessons From the Modern Battlefield: Successful Upper Extremity Injury Reconstruction in the Subacute Period</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care</jtitle><addtitle>J Trauma</addtitle><date>2009-10</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>752</spage><epage>757</epage><pages>752-757</pages><issn>0022-5282</issn><eissn>1529-8809</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND:Reconstructive techniques and protocols for limb salvage of upper extremity battlefield injuries remains poorly defined. Our study describes the types of flaps, the timing of reconstruction, and success rates of war upper extremity reconstruction during a 30-month period using the Bethesda limb salvage protocol.
METHODS:Soldiers with significant upper extremity injuries with complex open fractures from Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom—Afghanistan who underwent tissue transfer flaps were reviewed (n = 26, free flaps n = 6). Data analysis included mechanism of injury, associated injuries, types of flap, postoperative complications, wound infection rates, and outcome data.
RESULTS:The cause of injury consisted of improvised explosive device (61%), rocket-propelled grenades (15%), motor vehicle crash (8%), land mine (8%), and gunshot wound (4%). Mean age was 25 years. Mean number of prereconstructive washouts was six (range, 3–22). Forty-six percent of wounds were culture positive at admission (75% were Acinetobacter species). All patients had other coexisting extremity, trunk or facial injuries. Average time to flap reconstruction was 31 days (range, 9–161). In 66% of the cases, a fasciocutaneous flap was used, and in the remaining cases, muscle (19%) and adipofascial (15%) flaps were performed. Flap success rate was 96%, with one flap loss because of venous congestion (managed with limb shortening). Infection rate was 8%. Complete coverage was achieved in all upper extremity wounds and early occupational therapy resulted in improved return to function.
CONCLUSIONS:Despite massive bone and soft tissue defects, high preoperative wound colonization, and delays in definitive reconstruction, devastating war wounds can be successfully reconstructed in the subacute period with low flap failure, infection, and amputation rates.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>18815573</pmid><doi>10.1097/TA.0b013e3181808115</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-5282 |
ispartof | The Journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care, 2009-10, Vol.67 (4), p.752-757 |
issn | 0022-5282 1529-8809 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734081776 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adult Afghan Campaign 2001 Amputation - statistics & numerical data Anesthesia Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Biological and medical sciences Diseases of the osteoarticular system Fractures, Bone - surgery General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation Humans Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine Iraq War, 2003-2011 Limb Salvage - methods Male Medical sciences Metacarpal Bones - injuries Military Personnel Multiple Trauma - surgery Radius Fractures - surgery Reconstructive Surgical Procedures Soft Tissue Injuries - surgery Surgical Flaps Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents Ulna Fractures - surgery United States Upper Extremity - injuries Young Adult |
title | Lessons From the Modern Battlefield: Successful Upper Extremity Injury Reconstruction in the Subacute Period |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T05%3A48%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lessons%20From%20the%20Modern%20Battlefield:%20Successful%20Upper%20Extremity%20Injury%20Reconstruction%20in%20the%20Subacute%20Period&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20trauma,%20injury,%20infection,%20and%20critical%20care&rft.au=Kumar,%20Anand%20R.&rft.date=2009-10&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=752&rft.epage=757&rft.pages=752-757&rft.issn=0022-5282&rft.eissn=1529-8809&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181808115&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E734081776%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734081776&rft_id=info:pmid/18815573&rfr_iscdi=true |