Lessons From the Modern Battlefield: Successful Upper Extremity Injury Reconstruction in the Subacute Period

BACKGROUND:Reconstructive techniques and protocols for limb salvage of upper extremity battlefield injuries remains poorly defined. Our study describes the types of flaps, the timing of reconstruction, and success rates of war upper extremity reconstruction during a 30-month period using the Bethesd...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care injury, infection, and critical care, 2009-10, Vol.67 (4), p.752-757
Hauptverfasser: Kumar, Anand R., Grewal, Navanjun S., Chung, Thomas L., Bradley, James P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 757
container_issue 4
container_start_page 752
container_title The Journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care
container_volume 67
creator Kumar, Anand R.
Grewal, Navanjun S.
Chung, Thomas L.
Bradley, James P.
description BACKGROUND:Reconstructive techniques and protocols for limb salvage of upper extremity battlefield injuries remains poorly defined. Our study describes the types of flaps, the timing of reconstruction, and success rates of war upper extremity reconstruction during a 30-month period using the Bethesda limb salvage protocol. METHODS:Soldiers with significant upper extremity injuries with complex open fractures from Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom—Afghanistan who underwent tissue transfer flaps were reviewed (n = 26, free flaps n = 6). Data analysis included mechanism of injury, associated injuries, types of flap, postoperative complications, wound infection rates, and outcome data. RESULTS:The cause of injury consisted of improvised explosive device (61%), rocket-propelled grenades (15%), motor vehicle crash (8%), land mine (8%), and gunshot wound (4%). Mean age was 25 years. Mean number of prereconstructive washouts was six (range, 3–22). Forty-six percent of wounds were culture positive at admission (75% were Acinetobacter species). All patients had other coexisting extremity, trunk or facial injuries. Average time to flap reconstruction was 31 days (range, 9–161). In 66% of the cases, a fasciocutaneous flap was used, and in the remaining cases, muscle (19%) and adipofascial (15%) flaps were performed. Flap success rate was 96%, with one flap loss because of venous congestion (managed with limb shortening). Infection rate was 8%. Complete coverage was achieved in all upper extremity wounds and early occupational therapy resulted in improved return to function. CONCLUSIONS:Despite massive bone and soft tissue defects, high preoperative wound colonization, and delays in definitive reconstruction, devastating war wounds can be successfully reconstructed in the subacute period with low flap failure, infection, and amputation rates.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181808115
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734081776</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>734081776</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3825-98c89210cd4905fa9ccefafd96261dfad81e9493efa6a3cb4cc3338605bab2103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LHDEUhoNUdKv-gkLJTenVaD7mI-ndKmqFFUXX6yGTOWHHZibbfGD33ze6SwUvenXg8LzPObwIfaHklBLZnC3np6QjlAOnggoiKK320IxWTBZCEPkJzQhhrKiYYIfocwjPhJCy5OIAHVIhaFU1fIbsAkJwU8BX3o04rgDfuh78hM9VjBbMALb_gR-T1pkzyeKn9Ro8vvwTPYxD3OCb6Tn5DX4AnS3RJx0HN-FhenM9pk7pFAHfgx9cf4z2jbIBTnbzCD1dXS4vfhaLu-ubi_mi0FywqpBCC8ko0X0pSWWUzMeNMr2sWU17o3pBQZaS52WtuO5KrTnnoiZVp7qc40fo-9a79u53ghDbcQgarFUTuBTahpe5rqapM8m3pPYuBA-mXfthVH7TUtK-ttwu5-3HlnPq686fuhH698yu1gx82wEqaGWNV5Mewj-OMUJq2bw-2my5F2cj-PDLphfw7QqUjav_vvAXBQyYTw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734081776</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lessons From the Modern Battlefield: Successful Upper Extremity Injury Reconstruction in the Subacute Period</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Kumar, Anand R. ; Grewal, Navanjun S. ; Chung, Thomas L. ; Bradley, James P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Anand R. ; Grewal, Navanjun S. ; Chung, Thomas L. ; Bradley, James P.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:Reconstructive techniques and protocols for limb salvage of upper extremity battlefield injuries remains poorly defined. Our study describes the types of flaps, the timing of reconstruction, and success rates of war upper extremity reconstruction during a 30-month period using the Bethesda limb salvage protocol. METHODS:Soldiers with significant upper extremity injuries with complex open fractures from Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom—Afghanistan who underwent tissue transfer flaps were reviewed (n = 26, free flaps n = 6). Data analysis included mechanism of injury, associated injuries, types of flap, postoperative complications, wound infection rates, and outcome data. RESULTS:The cause of injury consisted of improvised explosive device (61%), rocket-propelled grenades (15%), motor vehicle crash (8%), land mine (8%), and gunshot wound (4%). Mean age was 25 years. Mean number of prereconstructive washouts was six (range, 3–22). Forty-six percent of wounds were culture positive at admission (75% were Acinetobacter species). All patients had other coexisting extremity, trunk or facial injuries. Average time to flap reconstruction was 31 days (range, 9–161). In 66% of the cases, a fasciocutaneous flap was used, and in the remaining cases, muscle (19%) and adipofascial (15%) flaps were performed. Flap success rate was 96%, with one flap loss because of venous congestion (managed with limb shortening). Infection rate was 8%. Complete coverage was achieved in all upper extremity wounds and early occupational therapy resulted in improved return to function. CONCLUSIONS:Despite massive bone and soft tissue defects, high preoperative wound colonization, and delays in definitive reconstruction, devastating war wounds can be successfully reconstructed in the subacute period with low flap failure, infection, and amputation rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-8809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181808115</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18815573</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Afghan Campaign 2001 ; Amputation - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Fractures, Bone - surgery ; General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation ; Humans ; Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine ; Iraq War, 2003-2011 ; Limb Salvage - methods ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Metacarpal Bones - injuries ; Military Personnel ; Multiple Trauma - surgery ; Radius Fractures - surgery ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures ; Soft Tissue Injuries - surgery ; Surgical Flaps ; Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology ; Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents ; Ulna Fractures - surgery ; United States ; Upper Extremity - injuries ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The Journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care, 2009-10, Vol.67 (4), p.752-757</ispartof><rights>2009 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc.</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3825-98c89210cd4905fa9ccefafd96261dfad81e9493efa6a3cb4cc3338605bab2103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3825-98c89210cd4905fa9ccefafd96261dfad81e9493efa6a3cb4cc3338605bab2103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22006970$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18815573$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Anand R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grewal, Navanjun S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Thomas L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, James P.</creatorcontrib><title>Lessons From the Modern Battlefield: Successful Upper Extremity Injury Reconstruction in the Subacute Period</title><title>The Journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care</title><addtitle>J Trauma</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:Reconstructive techniques and protocols for limb salvage of upper extremity battlefield injuries remains poorly defined. Our study describes the types of flaps, the timing of reconstruction, and success rates of war upper extremity reconstruction during a 30-month period using the Bethesda limb salvage protocol. METHODS:Soldiers with significant upper extremity injuries with complex open fractures from Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom—Afghanistan who underwent tissue transfer flaps were reviewed (n = 26, free flaps n = 6). Data analysis included mechanism of injury, associated injuries, types of flap, postoperative complications, wound infection rates, and outcome data. RESULTS:The cause of injury consisted of improvised explosive device (61%), rocket-propelled grenades (15%), motor vehicle crash (8%), land mine (8%), and gunshot wound (4%). Mean age was 25 years. Mean number of prereconstructive washouts was six (range, 3–22). Forty-six percent of wounds were culture positive at admission (75% were Acinetobacter species). All patients had other coexisting extremity, trunk or facial injuries. Average time to flap reconstruction was 31 days (range, 9–161). In 66% of the cases, a fasciocutaneous flap was used, and in the remaining cases, muscle (19%) and adipofascial (15%) flaps were performed. Flap success rate was 96%, with one flap loss because of venous congestion (managed with limb shortening). Infection rate was 8%. Complete coverage was achieved in all upper extremity wounds and early occupational therapy resulted in improved return to function. CONCLUSIONS:Despite massive bone and soft tissue defects, high preoperative wound colonization, and delays in definitive reconstruction, devastating war wounds can be successfully reconstructed in the subacute period with low flap failure, infection, and amputation rates.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Afghan Campaign 2001</subject><subject>Amputation - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Fractures, Bone - surgery</subject><subject>General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</subject><subject>Iraq War, 2003-2011</subject><subject>Limb Salvage - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Metacarpal Bones - injuries</subject><subject>Military Personnel</subject><subject>Multiple Trauma - surgery</subject><subject>Radius Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Soft Tissue Injuries - surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Flaps</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><subject>Ulna Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Upper Extremity - injuries</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0022-5282</issn><issn>1529-8809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LHDEUhoNUdKv-gkLJTenVaD7mI-ndKmqFFUXX6yGTOWHHZibbfGD33ze6SwUvenXg8LzPObwIfaHklBLZnC3np6QjlAOnggoiKK320IxWTBZCEPkJzQhhrKiYYIfocwjPhJCy5OIAHVIhaFU1fIbsAkJwU8BX3o04rgDfuh78hM9VjBbMALb_gR-T1pkzyeKn9Ro8vvwTPYxD3OCb6Tn5DX4AnS3RJx0HN-FhenM9pk7pFAHfgx9cf4z2jbIBTnbzCD1dXS4vfhaLu-ubi_mi0FywqpBCC8ko0X0pSWWUzMeNMr2sWU17o3pBQZaS52WtuO5KrTnnoiZVp7qc40fo-9a79u53ghDbcQgarFUTuBTahpe5rqapM8m3pPYuBA-mXfthVH7TUtK-ttwu5-3HlnPq686fuhH698yu1gx82wEqaGWNV5Mewj-OMUJq2bw-2my5F2cj-PDLphfw7QqUjav_vvAXBQyYTw</recordid><startdate>200910</startdate><enddate>200910</enddate><creator>Kumar, Anand R.</creator><creator>Grewal, Navanjun S.</creator><creator>Chung, Thomas L.</creator><creator>Bradley, James P.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200910</creationdate><title>Lessons From the Modern Battlefield: Successful Upper Extremity Injury Reconstruction in the Subacute Period</title><author>Kumar, Anand R. ; Grewal, Navanjun S. ; Chung, Thomas L. ; Bradley, James P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3825-98c89210cd4905fa9ccefafd96261dfad81e9493efa6a3cb4cc3338605bab2103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Afghan Campaign 2001</topic><topic>Amputation - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Fractures, Bone - surgery</topic><topic>General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</topic><topic>Iraq War, 2003-2011</topic><topic>Limb Salvage - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Metacarpal Bones - injuries</topic><topic>Military Personnel</topic><topic>Multiple Trauma - surgery</topic><topic>Radius Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Soft Tissue Injuries - surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Flaps</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</topic><topic>Ulna Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Upper Extremity - injuries</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Anand R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grewal, Navanjun S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Thomas L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, James P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kumar, Anand R.</au><au>Grewal, Navanjun S.</au><au>Chung, Thomas L.</au><au>Bradley, James P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lessons From the Modern Battlefield: Successful Upper Extremity Injury Reconstruction in the Subacute Period</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care</jtitle><addtitle>J Trauma</addtitle><date>2009-10</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>752</spage><epage>757</epage><pages>752-757</pages><issn>0022-5282</issn><eissn>1529-8809</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND:Reconstructive techniques and protocols for limb salvage of upper extremity battlefield injuries remains poorly defined. Our study describes the types of flaps, the timing of reconstruction, and success rates of war upper extremity reconstruction during a 30-month period using the Bethesda limb salvage protocol. METHODS:Soldiers with significant upper extremity injuries with complex open fractures from Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom—Afghanistan who underwent tissue transfer flaps were reviewed (n = 26, free flaps n = 6). Data analysis included mechanism of injury, associated injuries, types of flap, postoperative complications, wound infection rates, and outcome data. RESULTS:The cause of injury consisted of improvised explosive device (61%), rocket-propelled grenades (15%), motor vehicle crash (8%), land mine (8%), and gunshot wound (4%). Mean age was 25 years. Mean number of prereconstructive washouts was six (range, 3–22). Forty-six percent of wounds were culture positive at admission (75% were Acinetobacter species). All patients had other coexisting extremity, trunk or facial injuries. Average time to flap reconstruction was 31 days (range, 9–161). In 66% of the cases, a fasciocutaneous flap was used, and in the remaining cases, muscle (19%) and adipofascial (15%) flaps were performed. Flap success rate was 96%, with one flap loss because of venous congestion (managed with limb shortening). Infection rate was 8%. Complete coverage was achieved in all upper extremity wounds and early occupational therapy resulted in improved return to function. CONCLUSIONS:Despite massive bone and soft tissue defects, high preoperative wound colonization, and delays in definitive reconstruction, devastating war wounds can be successfully reconstructed in the subacute period with low flap failure, infection, and amputation rates.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>18815573</pmid><doi>10.1097/TA.0b013e3181808115</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-5282
ispartof The Journal of trauma, injury, infection, and critical care, 2009-10, Vol.67 (4), p.752-757
issn 0022-5282
1529-8809
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734081776
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Afghan Campaign 2001
Amputation - statistics & numerical data
Anesthesia
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Diseases of the osteoarticular system
Fractures, Bone - surgery
General anesthesia. Technics. Complications. Neuromuscular blocking. Premedication. Surgical preparation. Sedation
Humans
Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine
Iraq War, 2003-2011
Limb Salvage - methods
Male
Medical sciences
Metacarpal Bones - injuries
Military Personnel
Multiple Trauma - surgery
Radius Fractures - surgery
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
Soft Tissue Injuries - surgery
Surgical Flaps
Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology
Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents
Ulna Fractures - surgery
United States
Upper Extremity - injuries
Young Adult
title Lessons From the Modern Battlefield: Successful Upper Extremity Injury Reconstruction in the Subacute Period
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T05%3A48%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lessons%20From%20the%20Modern%20Battlefield:%20Successful%20Upper%20Extremity%20Injury%20Reconstruction%20in%20the%20Subacute%20Period&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20trauma,%20injury,%20infection,%20and%20critical%20care&rft.au=Kumar,%20Anand%20R.&rft.date=2009-10&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=752&rft.epage=757&rft.pages=752-757&rft.issn=0022-5282&rft.eissn=1529-8809&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181808115&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E734081776%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734081776&rft_id=info:pmid/18815573&rfr_iscdi=true