Evaluation of effects on bone tissue of different osteotomy techniques

The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the response of bone tissue after osteotomy carried out with either rotating cutters or with piezoelectric terminals.Bioptic samples of bone tissue were taken during operations with rotating burs and piezoelectric terminals to increase bone volume bef...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of craniofacial surgery 2009-09, Vol.20 (5), p.1424-1429
Hauptverfasser: Tetè, Stefano, Vinci, Raffaele, Zizzari, Vincenzo, Cingano, Luciano, Bollero, Raffaele, D'Apolito, Giuseppe, Benzo, Luisa, Dolci, Alessandro, Mortellaro, Carmen, Gherlone, Enrico
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1429
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1424
container_title The Journal of craniofacial surgery
container_volume 20
creator Tetè, Stefano
Vinci, Raffaele
Zizzari, Vincenzo
Cingano, Luciano
Bollero, Raffaele
D'Apolito, Giuseppe
Benzo, Luisa
Dolci, Alessandro
Mortellaro, Carmen
Gherlone, Enrico
description The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the response of bone tissue after osteotomy carried out with either rotating cutters or with piezoelectric terminals.Bioptic samples of bone tissue were taken during operations with rotating burs and piezoelectric terminals to increase bone volume before implantology. Samples first underwent histomorphometric analysis. Subsequently, osteoblastic cells, obtained from different samples, were placed in culture and allowed to proliferate to in vitro evaluate the time to initiate growth and to reach confluence. Finally, a molecular biologic study by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction was performed to evaluate the expression of typical osteoblastic molecular markers, such as osteoprotegerin and osteopontin.Histomorphometric analysis showed that the width of necrotic line on the osteotomic margins from samples taken using different techniques did not vary significantly. Moreover, the times of initial growth and of confluence in cells from the 2 groups did not show any statistically significant differences. However, a highly significant correlation was revealed between the age of the patient and the initial growth time and the confluence. Similarly, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction showed that the osteoprotegerin and osteopontin expression levels did not change significantly according to the surgical technique used.In conclusion, osteotomies carried out with either instrument do not seem to substantially influence the vitality of the bone tissue. The variability of the expression levels of typical osteoblastic markers seems to be linked more to other factors than to the surgical technique used.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181aee3d3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734079514</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>734079514</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-633f0c6a72beada63f5b75f417dc14baa2a5dbe7cfccffe6c7e32b539871c9f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEFLw0AQhRdRbK3-A5HcPKXu7CS7zVFKW4WCh-o57G5mMZJka3Yj9N-b0oLgaWZ4782Dj7F74HPghXraLXdzbjggISxAE2GFF2wKOcoUFYrLcedZkQqh8gm7CeGLcwEg5DWbQLEAKZSYsvXqRzeDjrXvEu8Sco5sDMl4Gd9REusQBjoqVT1KPXUx8SGSj749JJHsZ1d_DxRu2ZXTTaC785yxj_XqffmSbt82r8vnbWqRy5hKRMet1EoY0pWW6HKjcpeBqixkRmuh88qQss7asU5aRShMjsVCgS2cwBl7PP3d9_7YG8u2DpaaRnfkh1AqzLgqcshGZ3Zy2t6H0JMr933d6v5QAi-PAMsRYPkf4Bh7OBcMpqXqL3Qmhr8m9G-A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734079514</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of effects on bone tissue of different osteotomy techniques</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Tetè, Stefano ; Vinci, Raffaele ; Zizzari, Vincenzo ; Cingano, Luciano ; Bollero, Raffaele ; D'Apolito, Giuseppe ; Benzo, Luisa ; Dolci, Alessandro ; Mortellaro, Carmen ; Gherlone, Enrico</creator><creatorcontrib>Tetè, Stefano ; Vinci, Raffaele ; Zizzari, Vincenzo ; Cingano, Luciano ; Bollero, Raffaele ; D'Apolito, Giuseppe ; Benzo, Luisa ; Dolci, Alessandro ; Mortellaro, Carmen ; Gherlone, Enrico</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the response of bone tissue after osteotomy carried out with either rotating cutters or with piezoelectric terminals.Bioptic samples of bone tissue were taken during operations with rotating burs and piezoelectric terminals to increase bone volume before implantology. Samples first underwent histomorphometric analysis. Subsequently, osteoblastic cells, obtained from different samples, were placed in culture and allowed to proliferate to in vitro evaluate the time to initiate growth and to reach confluence. Finally, a molecular biologic study by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction was performed to evaluate the expression of typical osteoblastic molecular markers, such as osteoprotegerin and osteopontin.Histomorphometric analysis showed that the width of necrotic line on the osteotomic margins from samples taken using different techniques did not vary significantly. Moreover, the times of initial growth and of confluence in cells from the 2 groups did not show any statistically significant differences. However, a highly significant correlation was revealed between the age of the patient and the initial growth time and the confluence. Similarly, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction showed that the osteoprotegerin and osteopontin expression levels did not change significantly according to the surgical technique used.In conclusion, osteotomies carried out with either instrument do not seem to substantially influence the vitality of the bone tissue. The variability of the expression levels of typical osteoblastic markers seems to be linked more to other factors than to the surgical technique used.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-2275</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-3732</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181aee3d3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19816272</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Biopsy ; Cell Proliferation ; Cell Survival - physiology ; Cells, Cultured ; Child ; Dentistry ; Electrosurgery - instrumentation ; Electrosurgery - methods ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Mandible - pathology ; Mandible - surgery ; Middle Aged ; Necrosis ; Osteoblasts - pathology ; Osteopontin - analysis ; Osteoprotegerin - analysis ; Osteotomy - instrumentation ; Osteotomy - methods ; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Rotation ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 2009-09, Vol.20 (5), p.1424-1429</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-633f0c6a72beada63f5b75f417dc14baa2a5dbe7cfccffe6c7e32b539871c9f23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-633f0c6a72beada63f5b75f417dc14baa2a5dbe7cfccffe6c7e32b539871c9f23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19816272$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tetè, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vinci, Raffaele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zizzari, Vincenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cingano, Luciano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bollero, Raffaele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Apolito, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benzo, Luisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolci, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mortellaro, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gherlone, Enrico</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of effects on bone tissue of different osteotomy techniques</title><title>The Journal of craniofacial surgery</title><addtitle>J Craniofac Surg</addtitle><description>The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the response of bone tissue after osteotomy carried out with either rotating cutters or with piezoelectric terminals.Bioptic samples of bone tissue were taken during operations with rotating burs and piezoelectric terminals to increase bone volume before implantology. Samples first underwent histomorphometric analysis. Subsequently, osteoblastic cells, obtained from different samples, were placed in culture and allowed to proliferate to in vitro evaluate the time to initiate growth and to reach confluence. Finally, a molecular biologic study by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction was performed to evaluate the expression of typical osteoblastic molecular markers, such as osteoprotegerin and osteopontin.Histomorphometric analysis showed that the width of necrotic line on the osteotomic margins from samples taken using different techniques did not vary significantly. Moreover, the times of initial growth and of confluence in cells from the 2 groups did not show any statistically significant differences. However, a highly significant correlation was revealed between the age of the patient and the initial growth time and the confluence. Similarly, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction showed that the osteoprotegerin and osteopontin expression levels did not change significantly according to the surgical technique used.In conclusion, osteotomies carried out with either instrument do not seem to substantially influence the vitality of the bone tissue. The variability of the expression levels of typical osteoblastic markers seems to be linked more to other factors than to the surgical technique used.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Cell Proliferation</subject><subject>Cell Survival - physiology</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Electrosurgery - instrumentation</subject><subject>Electrosurgery - methods</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mandible - pathology</subject><subject>Mandible - surgery</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Necrosis</subject><subject>Osteoblasts - pathology</subject><subject>Osteopontin - analysis</subject><subject>Osteoprotegerin - analysis</subject><subject>Osteotomy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Osteotomy - methods</subject><subject>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1049-2275</issn><issn>1536-3732</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEFLw0AQhRdRbK3-A5HcPKXu7CS7zVFKW4WCh-o57G5mMZJka3Yj9N-b0oLgaWZ4782Dj7F74HPghXraLXdzbjggISxAE2GFF2wKOcoUFYrLcedZkQqh8gm7CeGLcwEg5DWbQLEAKZSYsvXqRzeDjrXvEu8Sco5sDMl4Gd9REusQBjoqVT1KPXUx8SGSj749JJHsZ1d_DxRu2ZXTTaC785yxj_XqffmSbt82r8vnbWqRy5hKRMet1EoY0pWW6HKjcpeBqixkRmuh88qQss7asU5aRShMjsVCgS2cwBl7PP3d9_7YG8u2DpaaRnfkh1AqzLgqcshGZ3Zy2t6H0JMr933d6v5QAi-PAMsRYPkf4Bh7OBcMpqXqL3Qmhr8m9G-A</recordid><startdate>200909</startdate><enddate>200909</enddate><creator>Tetè, Stefano</creator><creator>Vinci, Raffaele</creator><creator>Zizzari, Vincenzo</creator><creator>Cingano, Luciano</creator><creator>Bollero, Raffaele</creator><creator>D'Apolito, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Benzo, Luisa</creator><creator>Dolci, Alessandro</creator><creator>Mortellaro, Carmen</creator><creator>Gherlone, Enrico</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200909</creationdate><title>Evaluation of effects on bone tissue of different osteotomy techniques</title><author>Tetè, Stefano ; Vinci, Raffaele ; Zizzari, Vincenzo ; Cingano, Luciano ; Bollero, Raffaele ; D'Apolito, Giuseppe ; Benzo, Luisa ; Dolci, Alessandro ; Mortellaro, Carmen ; Gherlone, Enrico</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-633f0c6a72beada63f5b75f417dc14baa2a5dbe7cfccffe6c7e32b539871c9f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Cell Proliferation</topic><topic>Cell Survival - physiology</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Electrosurgery - instrumentation</topic><topic>Electrosurgery - methods</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mandible - pathology</topic><topic>Mandible - surgery</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Necrosis</topic><topic>Osteoblasts - pathology</topic><topic>Osteopontin - analysis</topic><topic>Osteoprotegerin - analysis</topic><topic>Osteotomy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Osteotomy - methods</topic><topic>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tetè, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vinci, Raffaele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zizzari, Vincenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cingano, Luciano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bollero, Raffaele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Apolito, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benzo, Luisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolci, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mortellaro, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gherlone, Enrico</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of craniofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tetè, Stefano</au><au>Vinci, Raffaele</au><au>Zizzari, Vincenzo</au><au>Cingano, Luciano</au><au>Bollero, Raffaele</au><au>D'Apolito, Giuseppe</au><au>Benzo, Luisa</au><au>Dolci, Alessandro</au><au>Mortellaro, Carmen</au><au>Gherlone, Enrico</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of effects on bone tissue of different osteotomy techniques</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of craniofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Craniofac Surg</addtitle><date>2009-09</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1424</spage><epage>1429</epage><pages>1424-1429</pages><issn>1049-2275</issn><eissn>1536-3732</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the response of bone tissue after osteotomy carried out with either rotating cutters or with piezoelectric terminals.Bioptic samples of bone tissue were taken during operations with rotating burs and piezoelectric terminals to increase bone volume before implantology. Samples first underwent histomorphometric analysis. Subsequently, osteoblastic cells, obtained from different samples, were placed in culture and allowed to proliferate to in vitro evaluate the time to initiate growth and to reach confluence. Finally, a molecular biologic study by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction was performed to evaluate the expression of typical osteoblastic molecular markers, such as osteoprotegerin and osteopontin.Histomorphometric analysis showed that the width of necrotic line on the osteotomic margins from samples taken using different techniques did not vary significantly. Moreover, the times of initial growth and of confluence in cells from the 2 groups did not show any statistically significant differences. However, a highly significant correlation was revealed between the age of the patient and the initial growth time and the confluence. Similarly, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction showed that the osteoprotegerin and osteopontin expression levels did not change significantly according to the surgical technique used.In conclusion, osteotomies carried out with either instrument do not seem to substantially influence the vitality of the bone tissue. The variability of the expression levels of typical osteoblastic markers seems to be linked more to other factors than to the surgical technique used.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>19816272</pmid><doi>10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181aee3d3</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1049-2275
ispartof The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 2009-09, Vol.20 (5), p.1424-1429
issn 1049-2275
1536-3732
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734079514
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Biopsy
Cell Proliferation
Cell Survival - physiology
Cells, Cultured
Child
Dentistry
Electrosurgery - instrumentation
Electrosurgery - methods
Equipment Design
Female
Humans
Male
Mandible - pathology
Mandible - surgery
Middle Aged
Necrosis
Osteoblasts - pathology
Osteopontin - analysis
Osteoprotegerin - analysis
Osteotomy - instrumentation
Osteotomy - methods
Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
Rotation
Young Adult
title Evaluation of effects on bone tissue of different osteotomy techniques
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T05%3A36%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20effects%20on%20bone%20tissue%20of%20different%20osteotomy%20techniques&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20craniofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Tet%C3%A8,%20Stefano&rft.date=2009-09&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1424&rft.epage=1429&rft.pages=1424-1429&rft.issn=1049-2275&rft.eissn=1536-3732&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181aee3d3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E734079514%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734079514&rft_id=info:pmid/19816272&rfr_iscdi=true