Population-based screening for colorectal cancer: Australian research and implementation

Australia is one of the first countries in the world to implement an organized whole‐of‐population screening program for colorectal cancer (CRC). Australians have made broad contributions to CRC in general ranging from primary prevention through genetics, secondary prevention and treatment, to palli...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology 2009-10, Vol.24 (s3), p.S33-S42
1. Verfasser: Young, Graeme P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S42
container_issue s3
container_start_page S33
container_title Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology
container_volume 24
creator Young, Graeme P
description Australia is one of the first countries in the world to implement an organized whole‐of‐population screening program for colorectal cancer (CRC). Australians have made broad contributions to CRC in general ranging from primary prevention through genetics, secondary prevention and treatment, to palliation. This overview focuses on some of the contributions of direct relevance to population‐based screening, stretching from technology development to population‐based controlled studies and health services research. In terms of simple screening tests in a two‐step screening strategy, the evidence is overwhelming that fecal immunochemical tests for hemoglobin (FITs) improve detection and are more acceptable. FIT‐based screening is clearly acceptable to Australians and it has been demonstrated that a national organized screening program is feasible. In terms of benefit for Australians, with full roll out and high uptake by the population we could see the number of cases dying from CRC halved by this strategy. To this will be added the extra‐screening benefits of improved diagnosis, improved treatment and improved public awareness, all benefits of other screening programs. CRC screening has progressed from a matter of irrelevance and distaste, to commonwealth government policy in the context of an organized program for all Australians.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06069.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734071282</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>734071282</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4569-64b97d482f0f2f0f419f538f3a2ddfe7b147f799770f0cfe7d4a7bc4b350f2b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFv2yAYhlG1qc26_oWK2072wGAwlXaoojXZVm09bGrVC8L4o3WG7QxsNf33w03UXYeE-ATv8wEPQpiSnKbxcZNTzklGJRd5QYjKiSBC5bsjtHg9eIMWpKJlphhVJ-hdjBtCCCeyPEYnVEmlhBILdHczbCdvxnbos9pEaHC0AaBv-wfshoDt4IcAdjQeW9NbCBf4copjML41PQ4QwQT7iE3f4LbbeuigH1-6vUdvnfERzg7rKfp19fnncp1d_1h9WV5eZ5aXQmWC10o2vCoccfPkVLmSVY6ZomkcyJpy6dJjpSSO2LTRcCNry2tWJqCm7BR92PfdhuHPBHHUXRsteG96GKaoJUt_pkVVpGS1T9owxBjA6W1oOxOeNSV61qo3eranZ3t61qpftOpdQs8Pl0x1B80_8OAxBT7tA0-th-f_bqy_rtZzlfhsz7dxhN0rb8JvLSSTpb79vtJiff_tRi5XmrG_QPGWyw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734071282</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Population-based screening for colorectal cancer: Australian research and implementation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Young, Graeme P</creator><creatorcontrib>Young, Graeme P</creatorcontrib><description>Australia is one of the first countries in the world to implement an organized whole‐of‐population screening program for colorectal cancer (CRC). Australians have made broad contributions to CRC in general ranging from primary prevention through genetics, secondary prevention and treatment, to palliation. This overview focuses on some of the contributions of direct relevance to population‐based screening, stretching from technology development to population‐based controlled studies and health services research. In terms of simple screening tests in a two‐step screening strategy, the evidence is overwhelming that fecal immunochemical tests for hemoglobin (FITs) improve detection and are more acceptable. FIT‐based screening is clearly acceptable to Australians and it has been demonstrated that a national organized screening program is feasible. In terms of benefit for Australians, with full roll out and high uptake by the population we could see the number of cases dying from CRC halved by this strategy. To this will be added the extra‐screening benefits of improved diagnosis, improved treatment and improved public awareness, all benefits of other screening programs. CRC screening has progressed from a matter of irrelevance and distaste, to commonwealth government policy in the context of an organized program for all Australians.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0815-9319</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-1746</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06069.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19799696</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Publishing Asia</publisher><subject>Australia - epidemiology ; behavior ; Colonography, Computed Tomographic ; colorectal cancer ; Colorectal Neoplasms - complications ; Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Colorectal Neoplasms - economics ; Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Colorectal Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; early detection ; Early Detection of Cancer ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - etiology ; Humans ; Mass Screening - economics ; Mass Screening - methods ; National Health Programs ; Occult Blood ; Patient Selection ; Population Surveillance ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Program Development ; screening ; Sigmoidoscopy</subject><ispartof>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2009-10, Vol.24 (s3), p.S33-S42</ispartof><rights>2009 The Author. Journal compilation © 2009 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4569-64b97d482f0f2f0f419f538f3a2ddfe7b147f799770f0cfe7d4a7bc4b350f2b13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4569-64b97d482f0f2f0f419f538f3a2ddfe7b147f799770f0cfe7d4a7bc4b350f2b13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1440-1746.2009.06069.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1440-1746.2009.06069.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19799696$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Young, Graeme P</creatorcontrib><title>Population-based screening for colorectal cancer: Australian research and implementation</title><title>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</title><addtitle>J Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><description>Australia is one of the first countries in the world to implement an organized whole‐of‐population screening program for colorectal cancer (CRC). Australians have made broad contributions to CRC in general ranging from primary prevention through genetics, secondary prevention and treatment, to palliation. This overview focuses on some of the contributions of direct relevance to population‐based screening, stretching from technology development to population‐based controlled studies and health services research. In terms of simple screening tests in a two‐step screening strategy, the evidence is overwhelming that fecal immunochemical tests for hemoglobin (FITs) improve detection and are more acceptable. FIT‐based screening is clearly acceptable to Australians and it has been demonstrated that a national organized screening program is feasible. In terms of benefit for Australians, with full roll out and high uptake by the population we could see the number of cases dying from CRC halved by this strategy. To this will be added the extra‐screening benefits of improved diagnosis, improved treatment and improved public awareness, all benefits of other screening programs. CRC screening has progressed from a matter of irrelevance and distaste, to commonwealth government policy in the context of an organized program for all Australians.</description><subject>Australia - epidemiology</subject><subject>behavior</subject><subject>Colonography, Computed Tomographic</subject><subject>colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - complications</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - economics</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>early detection</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - etiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mass Screening - economics</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>National Health Programs</subject><subject>Occult Blood</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Population Surveillance</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Program Development</subject><subject>screening</subject><subject>Sigmoidoscopy</subject><issn>0815-9319</issn><issn>1440-1746</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEFv2yAYhlG1qc26_oWK2072wGAwlXaoojXZVm09bGrVC8L4o3WG7QxsNf33w03UXYeE-ATv8wEPQpiSnKbxcZNTzklGJRd5QYjKiSBC5bsjtHg9eIMWpKJlphhVJ-hdjBtCCCeyPEYnVEmlhBILdHczbCdvxnbos9pEaHC0AaBv-wfshoDt4IcAdjQeW9NbCBf4copjML41PQ4QwQT7iE3f4LbbeuigH1-6vUdvnfERzg7rKfp19fnncp1d_1h9WV5eZ5aXQmWC10o2vCoccfPkVLmSVY6ZomkcyJpy6dJjpSSO2LTRcCNry2tWJqCm7BR92PfdhuHPBHHUXRsteG96GKaoJUt_pkVVpGS1T9owxBjA6W1oOxOeNSV61qo3eranZ3t61qpftOpdQs8Pl0x1B80_8OAxBT7tA0-th-f_bqy_rtZzlfhsz7dxhN0rb8JvLSSTpb79vtJiff_tRi5XmrG_QPGWyw</recordid><startdate>200910</startdate><enddate>200910</enddate><creator>Young, Graeme P</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Asia</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200910</creationdate><title>Population-based screening for colorectal cancer: Australian research and implementation</title><author>Young, Graeme P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4569-64b97d482f0f2f0f419f538f3a2ddfe7b147f799770f0cfe7d4a7bc4b350f2b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Australia - epidemiology</topic><topic>behavior</topic><topic>Colonography, Computed Tomographic</topic><topic>colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - complications</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - economics</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>early detection</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - etiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mass Screening - economics</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>National Health Programs</topic><topic>Occult Blood</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Population Surveillance</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Program Development</topic><topic>screening</topic><topic>Sigmoidoscopy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Young, Graeme P</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Young, Graeme P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Population-based screening for colorectal cancer: Australian research and implementation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><date>2009-10</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>s3</issue><spage>S33</spage><epage>S42</epage><pages>S33-S42</pages><issn>0815-9319</issn><eissn>1440-1746</eissn><abstract>Australia is one of the first countries in the world to implement an organized whole‐of‐population screening program for colorectal cancer (CRC). Australians have made broad contributions to CRC in general ranging from primary prevention through genetics, secondary prevention and treatment, to palliation. This overview focuses on some of the contributions of direct relevance to population‐based screening, stretching from technology development to population‐based controlled studies and health services research. In terms of simple screening tests in a two‐step screening strategy, the evidence is overwhelming that fecal immunochemical tests for hemoglobin (FITs) improve detection and are more acceptable. FIT‐based screening is clearly acceptable to Australians and it has been demonstrated that a national organized screening program is feasible. In terms of benefit for Australians, with full roll out and high uptake by the population we could see the number of cases dying from CRC halved by this strategy. To this will be added the extra‐screening benefits of improved diagnosis, improved treatment and improved public awareness, all benefits of other screening programs. CRC screening has progressed from a matter of irrelevance and distaste, to commonwealth government policy in the context of an organized program for all Australians.</abstract><cop>Melbourne, Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Asia</pub><pmid>19799696</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06069.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0815-9319
ispartof Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2009-10, Vol.24 (s3), p.S33-S42
issn 0815-9319
1440-1746
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734071282
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Australia - epidemiology
behavior
Colonography, Computed Tomographic
colorectal cancer
Colorectal Neoplasms - complications
Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis
Colorectal Neoplasms - economics
Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology
Colorectal Neoplasms - prevention & control
Cost-Benefit Analysis
early detection
Early Detection of Cancer
Evidence-Based Medicine
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - etiology
Humans
Mass Screening - economics
Mass Screening - methods
National Health Programs
Occult Blood
Patient Selection
Population Surveillance
Predictive Value of Tests
Program Development
screening
Sigmoidoscopy
title Population-based screening for colorectal cancer: Australian research and implementation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T10%3A55%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Population-based%20screening%20for%20colorectal%20cancer:%20Australian%20research%20and%20implementation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gastroenterology%20and%20hepatology&rft.au=Young,%20Graeme%20P&rft.date=2009-10&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=s3&rft.spage=S33&rft.epage=S42&rft.pages=S33-S42&rft.issn=0815-9319&rft.eissn=1440-1746&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06069.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E734071282%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734071282&rft_id=info:pmid/19799696&rfr_iscdi=true