Population-based screening for colorectal cancer: Australian research and implementation
Australia is one of the first countries in the world to implement an organized whole‐of‐population screening program for colorectal cancer (CRC). Australians have made broad contributions to CRC in general ranging from primary prevention through genetics, secondary prevention and treatment, to palli...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology 2009-10, Vol.24 (s3), p.S33-S42 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | S42 |
---|---|
container_issue | s3 |
container_start_page | S33 |
container_title | Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Young, Graeme P |
description | Australia is one of the first countries in the world to implement an organized whole‐of‐population screening program for colorectal cancer (CRC). Australians have made broad contributions to CRC in general ranging from primary prevention through genetics, secondary prevention and treatment, to palliation. This overview focuses on some of the contributions of direct relevance to population‐based screening, stretching from technology development to population‐based controlled studies and health services research. In terms of simple screening tests in a two‐step screening strategy, the evidence is overwhelming that fecal immunochemical tests for hemoglobin (FITs) improve detection and are more acceptable. FIT‐based screening is clearly acceptable to Australians and it has been demonstrated that a national organized screening program is feasible. In terms of benefit for Australians, with full roll out and high uptake by the population we could see the number of cases dying from CRC halved by this strategy. To this will be added the extra‐screening benefits of improved diagnosis, improved treatment and improved public awareness, all benefits of other screening programs. CRC screening has progressed from a matter of irrelevance and distaste, to commonwealth government policy in the context of an organized program for all Australians. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06069.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734071282</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>734071282</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4569-64b97d482f0f2f0f419f538f3a2ddfe7b147f799770f0cfe7d4a7bc4b350f2b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFv2yAYhlG1qc26_oWK2072wGAwlXaoojXZVm09bGrVC8L4o3WG7QxsNf33w03UXYeE-ATv8wEPQpiSnKbxcZNTzklGJRd5QYjKiSBC5bsjtHg9eIMWpKJlphhVJ-hdjBtCCCeyPEYnVEmlhBILdHczbCdvxnbos9pEaHC0AaBv-wfshoDt4IcAdjQeW9NbCBf4copjML41PQ4QwQT7iE3f4LbbeuigH1-6vUdvnfERzg7rKfp19fnncp1d_1h9WV5eZ5aXQmWC10o2vCoccfPkVLmSVY6ZomkcyJpy6dJjpSSO2LTRcCNry2tWJqCm7BR92PfdhuHPBHHUXRsteG96GKaoJUt_pkVVpGS1T9owxBjA6W1oOxOeNSV61qo3eranZ3t61qpftOpdQs8Pl0x1B80_8OAxBT7tA0-th-f_bqy_rtZzlfhsz7dxhN0rb8JvLSSTpb79vtJiff_tRi5XmrG_QPGWyw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734071282</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Population-based screening for colorectal cancer: Australian research and implementation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Young, Graeme P</creator><creatorcontrib>Young, Graeme P</creatorcontrib><description>Australia is one of the first countries in the world to implement an organized whole‐of‐population screening program for colorectal cancer (CRC). Australians have made broad contributions to CRC in general ranging from primary prevention through genetics, secondary prevention and treatment, to palliation. This overview focuses on some of the contributions of direct relevance to population‐based screening, stretching from technology development to population‐based controlled studies and health services research. In terms of simple screening tests in a two‐step screening strategy, the evidence is overwhelming that fecal immunochemical tests for hemoglobin (FITs) improve detection and are more acceptable. FIT‐based screening is clearly acceptable to Australians and it has been demonstrated that a national organized screening program is feasible. In terms of benefit for Australians, with full roll out and high uptake by the population we could see the number of cases dying from CRC halved by this strategy. To this will be added the extra‐screening benefits of improved diagnosis, improved treatment and improved public awareness, all benefits of other screening programs. CRC screening has progressed from a matter of irrelevance and distaste, to commonwealth government policy in the context of an organized program for all Australians.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0815-9319</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-1746</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06069.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19799696</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Publishing Asia</publisher><subject>Australia - epidemiology ; behavior ; Colonography, Computed Tomographic ; colorectal cancer ; Colorectal Neoplasms - complications ; Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Colorectal Neoplasms - economics ; Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Colorectal Neoplasms - prevention & control ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; early detection ; Early Detection of Cancer ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - etiology ; Humans ; Mass Screening - economics ; Mass Screening - methods ; National Health Programs ; Occult Blood ; Patient Selection ; Population Surveillance ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Program Development ; screening ; Sigmoidoscopy</subject><ispartof>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2009-10, Vol.24 (s3), p.S33-S42</ispartof><rights>2009 The Author. Journal compilation © 2009 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4569-64b97d482f0f2f0f419f538f3a2ddfe7b147f799770f0cfe7d4a7bc4b350f2b13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4569-64b97d482f0f2f0f419f538f3a2ddfe7b147f799770f0cfe7d4a7bc4b350f2b13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1440-1746.2009.06069.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1440-1746.2009.06069.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19799696$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Young, Graeme P</creatorcontrib><title>Population-based screening for colorectal cancer: Australian research and implementation</title><title>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</title><addtitle>J Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><description>Australia is one of the first countries in the world to implement an organized whole‐of‐population screening program for colorectal cancer (CRC). Australians have made broad contributions to CRC in general ranging from primary prevention through genetics, secondary prevention and treatment, to palliation. This overview focuses on some of the contributions of direct relevance to population‐based screening, stretching from technology development to population‐based controlled studies and health services research. In terms of simple screening tests in a two‐step screening strategy, the evidence is overwhelming that fecal immunochemical tests for hemoglobin (FITs) improve detection and are more acceptable. FIT‐based screening is clearly acceptable to Australians and it has been demonstrated that a national organized screening program is feasible. In terms of benefit for Australians, with full roll out and high uptake by the population we could see the number of cases dying from CRC halved by this strategy. To this will be added the extra‐screening benefits of improved diagnosis, improved treatment and improved public awareness, all benefits of other screening programs. CRC screening has progressed from a matter of irrelevance and distaste, to commonwealth government policy in the context of an organized program for all Australians.</description><subject>Australia - epidemiology</subject><subject>behavior</subject><subject>Colonography, Computed Tomographic</subject><subject>colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - complications</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - economics</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - prevention & control</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>early detection</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - etiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mass Screening - economics</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>National Health Programs</subject><subject>Occult Blood</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Population Surveillance</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Program Development</subject><subject>screening</subject><subject>Sigmoidoscopy</subject><issn>0815-9319</issn><issn>1440-1746</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEFv2yAYhlG1qc26_oWK2072wGAwlXaoojXZVm09bGrVC8L4o3WG7QxsNf33w03UXYeE-ATv8wEPQpiSnKbxcZNTzklGJRd5QYjKiSBC5bsjtHg9eIMWpKJlphhVJ-hdjBtCCCeyPEYnVEmlhBILdHczbCdvxnbos9pEaHC0AaBv-wfshoDt4IcAdjQeW9NbCBf4copjML41PQ4QwQT7iE3f4LbbeuigH1-6vUdvnfERzg7rKfp19fnncp1d_1h9WV5eZ5aXQmWC10o2vCoccfPkVLmSVY6ZomkcyJpy6dJjpSSO2LTRcCNry2tWJqCm7BR92PfdhuHPBHHUXRsteG96GKaoJUt_pkVVpGS1T9owxBjA6W1oOxOeNSV61qo3eranZ3t61qpftOpdQs8Pl0x1B80_8OAxBT7tA0-th-f_bqy_rtZzlfhsz7dxhN0rb8JvLSSTpb79vtJiff_tRi5XmrG_QPGWyw</recordid><startdate>200910</startdate><enddate>200910</enddate><creator>Young, Graeme P</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Asia</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200910</creationdate><title>Population-based screening for colorectal cancer: Australian research and implementation</title><author>Young, Graeme P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4569-64b97d482f0f2f0f419f538f3a2ddfe7b147f799770f0cfe7d4a7bc4b350f2b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Australia - epidemiology</topic><topic>behavior</topic><topic>Colonography, Computed Tomographic</topic><topic>colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - complications</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - economics</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - prevention & control</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>early detection</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - etiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mass Screening - economics</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>National Health Programs</topic><topic>Occult Blood</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Population Surveillance</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Program Development</topic><topic>screening</topic><topic>Sigmoidoscopy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Young, Graeme P</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Young, Graeme P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Population-based screening for colorectal cancer: Australian research and implementation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><date>2009-10</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>s3</issue><spage>S33</spage><epage>S42</epage><pages>S33-S42</pages><issn>0815-9319</issn><eissn>1440-1746</eissn><abstract>Australia is one of the first countries in the world to implement an organized whole‐of‐population screening program for colorectal cancer (CRC). Australians have made broad contributions to CRC in general ranging from primary prevention through genetics, secondary prevention and treatment, to palliation. This overview focuses on some of the contributions of direct relevance to population‐based screening, stretching from technology development to population‐based controlled studies and health services research. In terms of simple screening tests in a two‐step screening strategy, the evidence is overwhelming that fecal immunochemical tests for hemoglobin (FITs) improve detection and are more acceptable. FIT‐based screening is clearly acceptable to Australians and it has been demonstrated that a national organized screening program is feasible. In terms of benefit for Australians, with full roll out and high uptake by the population we could see the number of cases dying from CRC halved by this strategy. To this will be added the extra‐screening benefits of improved diagnosis, improved treatment and improved public awareness, all benefits of other screening programs. CRC screening has progressed from a matter of irrelevance and distaste, to commonwealth government policy in the context of an organized program for all Australians.</abstract><cop>Melbourne, Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Asia</pub><pmid>19799696</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06069.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0815-9319 |
ispartof | Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2009-10, Vol.24 (s3), p.S33-S42 |
issn | 0815-9319 1440-1746 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734071282 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Australia - epidemiology behavior Colonography, Computed Tomographic colorectal cancer Colorectal Neoplasms - complications Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis Colorectal Neoplasms - economics Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology Colorectal Neoplasms - prevention & control Cost-Benefit Analysis early detection Early Detection of Cancer Evidence-Based Medicine Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - etiology Humans Mass Screening - economics Mass Screening - methods National Health Programs Occult Blood Patient Selection Population Surveillance Predictive Value of Tests Program Development screening Sigmoidoscopy |
title | Population-based screening for colorectal cancer: Australian research and implementation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T10%3A55%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Population-based%20screening%20for%20colorectal%20cancer:%20Australian%20research%20and%20implementation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gastroenterology%20and%20hepatology&rft.au=Young,%20Graeme%20P&rft.date=2009-10&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=s3&rft.spage=S33&rft.epage=S42&rft.pages=S33-S42&rft.issn=0815-9319&rft.eissn=1440-1746&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06069.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E734071282%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734071282&rft_id=info:pmid/19799696&rfr_iscdi=true |