Successful Cervical MR Scan in a Patient Several Hours after Pacemaker Implantation

Recent data showed that patients with electrical implanted devices may under certain conditions be scanned safely by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The device must have been in place preferably for at least 4–8 weeks [Correction added after online publication 31‐Aug‐2009: number of weeks has been...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pacing and clinical electrophysiology 2009-10, Vol.32 (10), p.1355-1356
Hauptverfasser: GOLDSHER, DORITH, JAHSHAN, SHADY, ROGUIN, ARIEL
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1356
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1355
container_title Pacing and clinical electrophysiology
container_volume 32
creator GOLDSHER, DORITH
JAHSHAN, SHADY
ROGUIN, ARIEL
description Recent data showed that patients with electrical implanted devices may under certain conditions be scanned safely by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The device must have been in place preferably for at least 4–8 weeks [Correction added after online publication 31‐Aug‐2009: number of weeks has been updated.] prior to MR imaging to allow healing and pacemaker pocket formation. We report on a patient with quadriplegia and suspected epidural hematoma referred for MR scan a day after he had a pacemaker implantation. The patient was also pacemaker‐dependent. After considering the risk/benefit ratio in this patient, it was decided to perform the scan. The pacemaker was reprogrammed. MRI was performed under strict monitoring. A spinal cord contusion at the level of C1–3 was diagnosed. Based on the imaging findings no invasive procedure was done. Device interrogation found no change in sensing or pacing parameters or in the pacemaker's battery. At the end of the scan, the device was reprogrammed back to the initial settings. In this population, each scan should be discussed thoroughly and the risks to benefit ratio should be considered. Given appropriate precautions, in well‐experienced imaging centers, MRI may be safely performed in patients with permanent cardiac electronic implantable devices.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02497.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734068329</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21081368</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4667-a048b6aee2aa3bf63c95950c32b4e1233a40f6a714ccf5a51624928e58d6c2b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtKxDAUhoMoOo6-gmSlq9bcmiYbQYbxAori6Dqk8RQ69jImrZe3N3UG3YnZ5MD_nXOSDyFMSUrjOV2mNBMkUTTTKSNEp4QJnacfW2jyE2yjCaEiTxRXeg_th7AkhEgisl20R3XOGZd6ghaLwTkIoRxqPAP_Vjlb49sHvHC2xVWLLb63fQVtjxfwBj6GV93gA7ZlDz5mDhr7EqvrZlXbto9s1x6gndLWAQ439xQ9XcwfZ1fJzd3l9ez8JnFCyjyxRKhCWgBmLS9KyZ3OdEYcZ4UAyji3gpTS5lQ4V2Y2ozJ-kinI1LN0rKB8ik7Wc1e-ex0g9KapgoM6PgS6IZicCyIVZzqSx3-SjBJFeWSnSK1B57sQPJRm5avG-k9DiRnVm6UZDZvRsBnVm2_15iO2Hm12DEUDz7-NG9cROFsD71UNn_8ebO7PZ_Ox5F9cwJFq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21081368</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Successful Cervical MR Scan in a Patient Several Hours after Pacemaker Implantation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>GOLDSHER, DORITH ; JAHSHAN, SHADY ; ROGUIN, ARIEL</creator><creatorcontrib>GOLDSHER, DORITH ; JAHSHAN, SHADY ; ROGUIN, ARIEL</creatorcontrib><description>Recent data showed that patients with electrical implanted devices may under certain conditions be scanned safely by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The device must have been in place preferably for at least 4–8 weeks [Correction added after online publication 31‐Aug‐2009: number of weeks has been updated.] prior to MR imaging to allow healing and pacemaker pocket formation. We report on a patient with quadriplegia and suspected epidural hematoma referred for MR scan a day after he had a pacemaker implantation. The patient was also pacemaker‐dependent. After considering the risk/benefit ratio in this patient, it was decided to perform the scan. The pacemaker was reprogrammed. MRI was performed under strict monitoring. A spinal cord contusion at the level of C1–3 was diagnosed. Based on the imaging findings no invasive procedure was done. Device interrogation found no change in sensing or pacing parameters or in the pacemaker's battery. At the end of the scan, the device was reprogrammed back to the initial settings. In this population, each scan should be discussed thoroughly and the risks to benefit ratio should be considered. Given appropriate precautions, in well‐experienced imaging centers, MRI may be safely performed in patients with permanent cardiac electronic implantable devices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-8389</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02497.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19732369</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Aged, 80 and over ; Burns, Electric - etiology ; Burns, Electric - prevention &amp; control ; Evidence-Based Medicine - trends ; Humans ; imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - adverse effects ; Male ; MRI ; Neck - pathology ; neurology ; pacemaker ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - trends ; quadriplegia ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; safety</subject><ispartof>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 2009-10, Vol.32 (10), p.1355-1356</ispartof><rights>2009, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4667-a048b6aee2aa3bf63c95950c32b4e1233a40f6a714ccf5a51624928e58d6c2b13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4667-a048b6aee2aa3bf63c95950c32b4e1233a40f6a714ccf5a51624928e58d6c2b13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8159.2009.02497.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8159.2009.02497.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19732369$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GOLDSHER, DORITH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JAHSHAN, SHADY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROGUIN, ARIEL</creatorcontrib><title>Successful Cervical MR Scan in a Patient Several Hours after Pacemaker Implantation</title><title>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</title><addtitle>Pacing Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><description>Recent data showed that patients with electrical implanted devices may under certain conditions be scanned safely by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The device must have been in place preferably for at least 4–8 weeks [Correction added after online publication 31‐Aug‐2009: number of weeks has been updated.] prior to MR imaging to allow healing and pacemaker pocket formation. We report on a patient with quadriplegia and suspected epidural hematoma referred for MR scan a day after he had a pacemaker implantation. The patient was also pacemaker‐dependent. After considering the risk/benefit ratio in this patient, it was decided to perform the scan. The pacemaker was reprogrammed. MRI was performed under strict monitoring. A spinal cord contusion at the level of C1–3 was diagnosed. Based on the imaging findings no invasive procedure was done. Device interrogation found no change in sensing or pacing parameters or in the pacemaker's battery. At the end of the scan, the device was reprogrammed back to the initial settings. In this population, each scan should be discussed thoroughly and the risks to benefit ratio should be considered. Given appropriate precautions, in well‐experienced imaging centers, MRI may be safely performed in patients with permanent cardiac electronic implantable devices.</description><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Burns, Electric - etiology</subject><subject>Burns, Electric - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine - trends</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>MRI</subject><subject>Neck - pathology</subject><subject>neurology</subject><subject>pacemaker</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - trends</subject><subject>quadriplegia</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>safety</subject><issn>0147-8389</issn><issn>1540-8159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtKxDAUhoMoOo6-gmSlq9bcmiYbQYbxAori6Dqk8RQ69jImrZe3N3UG3YnZ5MD_nXOSDyFMSUrjOV2mNBMkUTTTKSNEp4QJnacfW2jyE2yjCaEiTxRXeg_th7AkhEgisl20R3XOGZd6ghaLwTkIoRxqPAP_Vjlb49sHvHC2xVWLLb63fQVtjxfwBj6GV93gA7ZlDz5mDhr7EqvrZlXbto9s1x6gndLWAQ439xQ9XcwfZ1fJzd3l9ez8JnFCyjyxRKhCWgBmLS9KyZ3OdEYcZ4UAyji3gpTS5lQ4V2Y2ozJ-kinI1LN0rKB8ik7Wc1e-ex0g9KapgoM6PgS6IZicCyIVZzqSx3-SjBJFeWSnSK1B57sQPJRm5avG-k9DiRnVm6UZDZvRsBnVm2_15iO2Hm12DEUDz7-NG9cROFsD71UNn_8ebO7PZ_Ox5F9cwJFq</recordid><startdate>200910</startdate><enddate>200910</enddate><creator>GOLDSHER, DORITH</creator><creator>JAHSHAN, SHADY</creator><creator>ROGUIN, ARIEL</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200910</creationdate><title>Successful Cervical MR Scan in a Patient Several Hours after Pacemaker Implantation</title><author>GOLDSHER, DORITH ; JAHSHAN, SHADY ; ROGUIN, ARIEL</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4667-a048b6aee2aa3bf63c95950c32b4e1233a40f6a714ccf5a51624928e58d6c2b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Burns, Electric - etiology</topic><topic>Burns, Electric - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine - trends</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>MRI</topic><topic>Neck - pathology</topic><topic>neurology</topic><topic>pacemaker</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - trends</topic><topic>quadriplegia</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>safety</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GOLDSHER, DORITH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JAHSHAN, SHADY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROGUIN, ARIEL</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GOLDSHER, DORITH</au><au>JAHSHAN, SHADY</au><au>ROGUIN, ARIEL</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Successful Cervical MR Scan in a Patient Several Hours after Pacemaker Implantation</atitle><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Pacing Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><date>2009-10</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1355</spage><epage>1356</epage><pages>1355-1356</pages><issn>0147-8389</issn><eissn>1540-8159</eissn><abstract>Recent data showed that patients with electrical implanted devices may under certain conditions be scanned safely by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The device must have been in place preferably for at least 4–8 weeks [Correction added after online publication 31‐Aug‐2009: number of weeks has been updated.] prior to MR imaging to allow healing and pacemaker pocket formation. We report on a patient with quadriplegia and suspected epidural hematoma referred for MR scan a day after he had a pacemaker implantation. The patient was also pacemaker‐dependent. After considering the risk/benefit ratio in this patient, it was decided to perform the scan. The pacemaker was reprogrammed. MRI was performed under strict monitoring. A spinal cord contusion at the level of C1–3 was diagnosed. Based on the imaging findings no invasive procedure was done. Device interrogation found no change in sensing or pacing parameters or in the pacemaker's battery. At the end of the scan, the device was reprogrammed back to the initial settings. In this population, each scan should be discussed thoroughly and the risks to benefit ratio should be considered. Given appropriate precautions, in well‐experienced imaging centers, MRI may be safely performed in patients with permanent cardiac electronic implantable devices.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>19732369</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02497.x</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0147-8389
ispartof Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 2009-10, Vol.32 (10), p.1355-1356
issn 0147-8389
1540-8159
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734068329
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Aged, 80 and over
Burns, Electric - etiology
Burns, Electric - prevention & control
Evidence-Based Medicine - trends
Humans
imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - adverse effects
Male
MRI
Neck - pathology
neurology
pacemaker
Practice Patterns, Physicians' - trends
quadriplegia
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
safety
title Successful Cervical MR Scan in a Patient Several Hours after Pacemaker Implantation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T15%3A44%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Successful%20Cervical%20MR%20Scan%20in%20a%20Patient%20Several%20Hours%20after%20Pacemaker%20Implantation&rft.jtitle=Pacing%20and%20clinical%20electrophysiology&rft.au=GOLDSHER,%20DORITH&rft.date=2009-10&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1355&rft.epage=1356&rft.pages=1355-1356&rft.issn=0147-8389&rft.eissn=1540-8159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02497.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21081368%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21081368&rft_id=info:pmid/19732369&rfr_iscdi=true