Successful Cervical MR Scan in a Patient Several Hours after Pacemaker Implantation
Recent data showed that patients with electrical implanted devices may under certain conditions be scanned safely by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The device must have been in place preferably for at least 4–8 weeks [Correction added after online publication 31‐Aug‐2009: number of weeks has been...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pacing and clinical electrophysiology 2009-10, Vol.32 (10), p.1355-1356 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1356 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1355 |
container_title | Pacing and clinical electrophysiology |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | GOLDSHER, DORITH JAHSHAN, SHADY ROGUIN, ARIEL |
description | Recent data showed that patients with electrical implanted devices may under certain conditions be scanned safely by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The device must have been in place preferably for at least 4–8 weeks [Correction added after online publication 31‐Aug‐2009: number of weeks has been updated.] prior to MR imaging to allow healing and pacemaker pocket formation. We report on a patient with quadriplegia and suspected epidural hematoma referred for MR scan a day after he had a pacemaker implantation. The patient was also pacemaker‐dependent. After considering the risk/benefit ratio in this patient, it was decided to perform the scan. The pacemaker was reprogrammed. MRI was performed under strict monitoring. A spinal cord contusion at the level of C1–3 was diagnosed. Based on the imaging findings no invasive procedure was done. Device interrogation found no change in sensing or pacing parameters or in the pacemaker's battery. At the end of the scan, the device was reprogrammed back to the initial settings. In this population, each scan should be discussed thoroughly and the risks to benefit ratio should be considered. Given appropriate precautions, in well‐experienced imaging centers, MRI may be safely performed in patients with permanent cardiac electronic implantable devices. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02497.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734068329</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21081368</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4667-a048b6aee2aa3bf63c95950c32b4e1233a40f6a714ccf5a51624928e58d6c2b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtKxDAUhoMoOo6-gmSlq9bcmiYbQYbxAori6Dqk8RQ69jImrZe3N3UG3YnZ5MD_nXOSDyFMSUrjOV2mNBMkUTTTKSNEp4QJnacfW2jyE2yjCaEiTxRXeg_th7AkhEgisl20R3XOGZd6ghaLwTkIoRxqPAP_Vjlb49sHvHC2xVWLLb63fQVtjxfwBj6GV93gA7ZlDz5mDhr7EqvrZlXbto9s1x6gndLWAQ439xQ9XcwfZ1fJzd3l9ez8JnFCyjyxRKhCWgBmLS9KyZ3OdEYcZ4UAyji3gpTS5lQ4V2Y2ozJ-kinI1LN0rKB8ik7Wc1e-ex0g9KapgoM6PgS6IZicCyIVZzqSx3-SjBJFeWSnSK1B57sQPJRm5avG-k9DiRnVm6UZDZvRsBnVm2_15iO2Hm12DEUDz7-NG9cROFsD71UNn_8ebO7PZ_Ox5F9cwJFq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21081368</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Successful Cervical MR Scan in a Patient Several Hours after Pacemaker Implantation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>GOLDSHER, DORITH ; JAHSHAN, SHADY ; ROGUIN, ARIEL</creator><creatorcontrib>GOLDSHER, DORITH ; JAHSHAN, SHADY ; ROGUIN, ARIEL</creatorcontrib><description>Recent data showed that patients with electrical implanted devices may under certain conditions be scanned safely by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The device must have been in place preferably for at least 4–8 weeks [Correction added after online publication 31‐Aug‐2009: number of weeks has been updated.] prior to MR imaging to allow healing and pacemaker pocket formation. We report on a patient with quadriplegia and suspected epidural hematoma referred for MR scan a day after he had a pacemaker implantation. The patient was also pacemaker‐dependent. After considering the risk/benefit ratio in this patient, it was decided to perform the scan. The pacemaker was reprogrammed. MRI was performed under strict monitoring. A spinal cord contusion at the level of C1–3 was diagnosed. Based on the imaging findings no invasive procedure was done. Device interrogation found no change in sensing or pacing parameters or in the pacemaker's battery. At the end of the scan, the device was reprogrammed back to the initial settings. In this population, each scan should be discussed thoroughly and the risks to benefit ratio should be considered. Given appropriate precautions, in well‐experienced imaging centers, MRI may be safely performed in patients with permanent cardiac electronic implantable devices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-8389</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02497.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19732369</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Aged, 80 and over ; Burns, Electric - etiology ; Burns, Electric - prevention & control ; Evidence-Based Medicine - trends ; Humans ; imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - adverse effects ; Male ; MRI ; Neck - pathology ; neurology ; pacemaker ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - trends ; quadriplegia ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; safety</subject><ispartof>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 2009-10, Vol.32 (10), p.1355-1356</ispartof><rights>2009, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4667-a048b6aee2aa3bf63c95950c32b4e1233a40f6a714ccf5a51624928e58d6c2b13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4667-a048b6aee2aa3bf63c95950c32b4e1233a40f6a714ccf5a51624928e58d6c2b13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8159.2009.02497.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8159.2009.02497.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19732369$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GOLDSHER, DORITH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JAHSHAN, SHADY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROGUIN, ARIEL</creatorcontrib><title>Successful Cervical MR Scan in a Patient Several Hours after Pacemaker Implantation</title><title>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</title><addtitle>Pacing Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><description>Recent data showed that patients with electrical implanted devices may under certain conditions be scanned safely by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The device must have been in place preferably for at least 4–8 weeks [Correction added after online publication 31‐Aug‐2009: number of weeks has been updated.] prior to MR imaging to allow healing and pacemaker pocket formation. We report on a patient with quadriplegia and suspected epidural hematoma referred for MR scan a day after he had a pacemaker implantation. The patient was also pacemaker‐dependent. After considering the risk/benefit ratio in this patient, it was decided to perform the scan. The pacemaker was reprogrammed. MRI was performed under strict monitoring. A spinal cord contusion at the level of C1–3 was diagnosed. Based on the imaging findings no invasive procedure was done. Device interrogation found no change in sensing or pacing parameters or in the pacemaker's battery. At the end of the scan, the device was reprogrammed back to the initial settings. In this population, each scan should be discussed thoroughly and the risks to benefit ratio should be considered. Given appropriate precautions, in well‐experienced imaging centers, MRI may be safely performed in patients with permanent cardiac electronic implantable devices.</description><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Burns, Electric - etiology</subject><subject>Burns, Electric - prevention & control</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine - trends</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>MRI</subject><subject>Neck - pathology</subject><subject>neurology</subject><subject>pacemaker</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - trends</subject><subject>quadriplegia</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>safety</subject><issn>0147-8389</issn><issn>1540-8159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtKxDAUhoMoOo6-gmSlq9bcmiYbQYbxAori6Dqk8RQ69jImrZe3N3UG3YnZ5MD_nXOSDyFMSUrjOV2mNBMkUTTTKSNEp4QJnacfW2jyE2yjCaEiTxRXeg_th7AkhEgisl20R3XOGZd6ghaLwTkIoRxqPAP_Vjlb49sHvHC2xVWLLb63fQVtjxfwBj6GV93gA7ZlDz5mDhr7EqvrZlXbto9s1x6gndLWAQ439xQ9XcwfZ1fJzd3l9ez8JnFCyjyxRKhCWgBmLS9KyZ3OdEYcZ4UAyji3gpTS5lQ4V2Y2ozJ-kinI1LN0rKB8ik7Wc1e-ex0g9KapgoM6PgS6IZicCyIVZzqSx3-SjBJFeWSnSK1B57sQPJRm5avG-k9DiRnVm6UZDZvRsBnVm2_15iO2Hm12DEUDz7-NG9cROFsD71UNn_8ebO7PZ_Ox5F9cwJFq</recordid><startdate>200910</startdate><enddate>200910</enddate><creator>GOLDSHER, DORITH</creator><creator>JAHSHAN, SHADY</creator><creator>ROGUIN, ARIEL</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200910</creationdate><title>Successful Cervical MR Scan in a Patient Several Hours after Pacemaker Implantation</title><author>GOLDSHER, DORITH ; JAHSHAN, SHADY ; ROGUIN, ARIEL</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4667-a048b6aee2aa3bf63c95950c32b4e1233a40f6a714ccf5a51624928e58d6c2b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Burns, Electric - etiology</topic><topic>Burns, Electric - prevention & control</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine - trends</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>MRI</topic><topic>Neck - pathology</topic><topic>neurology</topic><topic>pacemaker</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - trends</topic><topic>quadriplegia</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>safety</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GOLDSHER, DORITH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JAHSHAN, SHADY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROGUIN, ARIEL</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GOLDSHER, DORITH</au><au>JAHSHAN, SHADY</au><au>ROGUIN, ARIEL</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Successful Cervical MR Scan in a Patient Several Hours after Pacemaker Implantation</atitle><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Pacing Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><date>2009-10</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1355</spage><epage>1356</epage><pages>1355-1356</pages><issn>0147-8389</issn><eissn>1540-8159</eissn><abstract>Recent data showed that patients with electrical implanted devices may under certain conditions be scanned safely by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The device must have been in place preferably for at least 4–8 weeks [Correction added after online publication 31‐Aug‐2009: number of weeks has been updated.] prior to MR imaging to allow healing and pacemaker pocket formation. We report on a patient with quadriplegia and suspected epidural hematoma referred for MR scan a day after he had a pacemaker implantation. The patient was also pacemaker‐dependent. After considering the risk/benefit ratio in this patient, it was decided to perform the scan. The pacemaker was reprogrammed. MRI was performed under strict monitoring. A spinal cord contusion at the level of C1–3 was diagnosed. Based on the imaging findings no invasive procedure was done. Device interrogation found no change in sensing or pacing parameters or in the pacemaker's battery. At the end of the scan, the device was reprogrammed back to the initial settings. In this population, each scan should be discussed thoroughly and the risks to benefit ratio should be considered. Given appropriate precautions, in well‐experienced imaging centers, MRI may be safely performed in patients with permanent cardiac electronic implantable devices.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>19732369</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02497.x</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0147-8389 |
ispartof | Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 2009-10, Vol.32 (10), p.1355-1356 |
issn | 0147-8389 1540-8159 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734068329 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Aged, 80 and over Burns, Electric - etiology Burns, Electric - prevention & control Evidence-Based Medicine - trends Humans imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging - adverse effects Male MRI Neck - pathology neurology pacemaker Practice Patterns, Physicians' - trends quadriplegia Risk Assessment Risk Factors safety |
title | Successful Cervical MR Scan in a Patient Several Hours after Pacemaker Implantation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T15%3A44%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Successful%20Cervical%20MR%20Scan%20in%20a%20Patient%20Several%20Hours%20after%20Pacemaker%20Implantation&rft.jtitle=Pacing%20and%20clinical%20electrophysiology&rft.au=GOLDSHER,%20DORITH&rft.date=2009-10&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1355&rft.epage=1356&rft.pages=1355-1356&rft.issn=0147-8389&rft.eissn=1540-8159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02497.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21081368%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21081368&rft_id=info:pmid/19732369&rfr_iscdi=true |