Does switching between strategies within the same task involve a cost?

In two experiments, participants had to switch regularly between two cognitive strategies of a different complexity in the context of a numerosity judgement task. Expt 1 comprised bivalent stimuli (i.e. allowing the application of the two strategies), whereas Expt 2 involved univalent stimuli (i.e....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The British journal of psychology 2009-11, Vol.100 (4), p.753-771
Hauptverfasser: Luwel, Koen, Schillemans, Viki, Onghena, Patrick, Verschaffel, Lieven
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 771
container_issue 4
container_start_page 753
container_title The British journal of psychology
container_volume 100
creator Luwel, Koen
Schillemans, Viki
Onghena, Patrick
Verschaffel, Lieven
description In two experiments, participants had to switch regularly between two cognitive strategies of a different complexity in the context of a numerosity judgement task. Expt 1 comprised bivalent stimuli (i.e. allowing the application of the two strategies), whereas Expt 2 involved univalent stimuli (i.e. allowing the application of only one strategy). Both experiments revealed that switching between strategies entailed a cognitive cost that was reflected in longer response times on switch compared to non‐switch trials but not in reduced accuracy. The size of this switch cost did not differ as a function of strategy complexity but tended to diminish as a strategy became more appropriate for solving a particular problem. We discuss the extent to which current theories of task switching can account for these findings.
doi_str_mv 10.1348/000712609X402801
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734049713</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1856419901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5749-737251ef87c27686e031a4cf6bad58922347ff02f1358fa68faa9a3a35efffba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1PVDEUxRsjkWF078q8mKirp7dfr-2KKMqHIYCKH7umU26h8OY9eO0w8t_TyUwwYeEsmi7O79xz20PISwrvKRf6AwAoyhowfwQwDfQJGTEQotbMyKdktJDroptNspXSJQClRplnZJMaxo3iMCK7n3tMVZrH7C9id15NMM8RuyrlwWU8j0UsWpGqfIFVclOssktXVexu-_YWK1f5PuXt52QjuDbhi9U9Jj93v5zu7NeHx3sHOx8Pay-VMLXiikmKQSvPVKMbBE6d8KGZuDOpDWNcqBCABcqlDq4pxxnHHZcYQpg4PibvlnOvh_5mhinbaUwe29Z12M-SVVyAMIryQr79LykVp7LRei1YVgbgmq4FGZTgprxhTF4_Ai_72dCVf7HUGGlA0kUsLCE_9CkNGOz1EKduuLMU7KJc-7jcYnm1mjubTPHsn2HVZgHerACXvGvD4Dof0wPHqNEg2IKTS24eW7xbG2w_fT0-4dQUX730xZTx74PPDVe2KdVK-_toz56efD_68eubsILfA2tTyDE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199590518</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does switching between strategies within the same task involve a cost?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Luwel, Koen ; Schillemans, Viki ; Onghena, Patrick ; Verschaffel, Lieven</creator><creatorcontrib>Luwel, Koen ; Schillemans, Viki ; Onghena, Patrick ; Verschaffel, Lieven</creatorcontrib><description>In two experiments, participants had to switch regularly between two cognitive strategies of a different complexity in the context of a numerosity judgement task. Expt 1 comprised bivalent stimuli (i.e. allowing the application of the two strategies), whereas Expt 2 involved univalent stimuli (i.e. allowing the application of only one strategy). Both experiments revealed that switching between strategies entailed a cognitive cost that was reflected in longer response times on switch compared to non‐switch trials but not in reduced accuracy. The size of this switch cost did not differ as a function of strategy complexity but tended to diminish as a strategy became more appropriate for solving a particular problem. We discuss the extent to which current theories of task switching can account for these findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1269</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-8295</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1348/000712609X402801</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19239730</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJSGAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Attention ; Biological and medical sciences ; Choice Behavior ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognition. Intelligence ; Cognitive psychology ; Cognitive strategies ; Color Perception ; Experimental psychology ; Experiments ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Judgment ; Male ; Mathematical Concepts ; Miscellaneous ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; Problem Solving ; Psychological effects ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time ; Reaction times ; Response time ; Reversal Learning ; Sociological analysis ; Task analysis ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The British journal of psychology, 2009-11, Vol.100 (4), p.753-771</ispartof><rights>2009 The British Psychological Society</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright British Psychological Society Nov 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5749-737251ef87c27686e031a4cf6bad58922347ff02f1358fa68faa9a3a35efffba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5749-737251ef87c27686e031a4cf6bad58922347ff02f1358fa68faa9a3a35efffba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1348%2F000712609X402801$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1348%2F000712609X402801$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,30999,31000,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21980420$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19239730$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Luwel, Koen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schillemans, Viki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onghena, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verschaffel, Lieven</creatorcontrib><title>Does switching between strategies within the same task involve a cost?</title><title>The British journal of psychology</title><addtitle>Br J Psychol</addtitle><description>In two experiments, participants had to switch regularly between two cognitive strategies of a different complexity in the context of a numerosity judgement task. Expt 1 comprised bivalent stimuli (i.e. allowing the application of the two strategies), whereas Expt 2 involved univalent stimuli (i.e. allowing the application of only one strategy). Both experiments revealed that switching between strategies entailed a cognitive cost that was reflected in longer response times on switch compared to non‐switch trials but not in reduced accuracy. The size of this switch cost did not differ as a function of strategy complexity but tended to diminish as a strategy became more appropriate for solving a particular problem. We discuss the extent to which current theories of task switching can account for these findings.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognition. Intelligence</subject><subject>Cognitive psychology</subject><subject>Cognitive strategies</subject><subject>Color Perception</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mathematical Concepts</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>Psychological effects</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Reaction times</subject><subject>Response time</subject><subject>Reversal Learning</subject><subject>Sociological analysis</subject><subject>Task analysis</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0007-1269</issn><issn>2044-8295</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1PVDEUxRsjkWF078q8mKirp7dfr-2KKMqHIYCKH7umU26h8OY9eO0w8t_TyUwwYeEsmi7O79xz20PISwrvKRf6AwAoyhowfwQwDfQJGTEQotbMyKdktJDroptNspXSJQClRplnZJMaxo3iMCK7n3tMVZrH7C9id15NMM8RuyrlwWU8j0UsWpGqfIFVclOssktXVexu-_YWK1f5PuXt52QjuDbhi9U9Jj93v5zu7NeHx3sHOx8Pay-VMLXiikmKQSvPVKMbBE6d8KGZuDOpDWNcqBCABcqlDq4pxxnHHZcYQpg4PibvlnOvh_5mhinbaUwe29Z12M-SVVyAMIryQr79LykVp7LRei1YVgbgmq4FGZTgprxhTF4_Ai_72dCVf7HUGGlA0kUsLCE_9CkNGOz1EKduuLMU7KJc-7jcYnm1mjubTPHsn2HVZgHerACXvGvD4Dof0wPHqNEg2IKTS24eW7xbG2w_fT0-4dQUX730xZTx74PPDVe2KdVK-_toz56efD_68eubsILfA2tTyDE</recordid><startdate>200911</startdate><enddate>200911</enddate><creator>Luwel, Koen</creator><creator>Schillemans, Viki</creator><creator>Onghena, Patrick</creator><creator>Verschaffel, Lieven</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>British Psychological Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200911</creationdate><title>Does switching between strategies within the same task involve a cost?</title><author>Luwel, Koen ; Schillemans, Viki ; Onghena, Patrick ; Verschaffel, Lieven</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5749-737251ef87c27686e031a4cf6bad58922347ff02f1358fa68faa9a3a35efffba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognition. Intelligence</topic><topic>Cognitive psychology</topic><topic>Cognitive strategies</topic><topic>Color Perception</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mathematical Concepts</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>Psychological effects</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Reaction times</topic><topic>Response time</topic><topic>Reversal Learning</topic><topic>Sociological analysis</topic><topic>Task analysis</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luwel, Koen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schillemans, Viki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onghena, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verschaffel, Lieven</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The British journal of psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luwel, Koen</au><au>Schillemans, Viki</au><au>Onghena, Patrick</au><au>Verschaffel, Lieven</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does switching between strategies within the same task involve a cost?</atitle><jtitle>The British journal of psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Psychol</addtitle><date>2009-11</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>753</spage><epage>771</epage><pages>753-771</pages><issn>0007-1269</issn><eissn>2044-8295</eissn><coden>BJSGAE</coden><abstract>In two experiments, participants had to switch regularly between two cognitive strategies of a different complexity in the context of a numerosity judgement task. Expt 1 comprised bivalent stimuli (i.e. allowing the application of the two strategies), whereas Expt 2 involved univalent stimuli (i.e. allowing the application of only one strategy). Both experiments revealed that switching between strategies entailed a cognitive cost that was reflected in longer response times on switch compared to non‐switch trials but not in reduced accuracy. The size of this switch cost did not differ as a function of strategy complexity but tended to diminish as a strategy became more appropriate for solving a particular problem. We discuss the extent to which current theories of task switching can account for these findings.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>19239730</pmid><doi>10.1348/000712609X402801</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1269
ispartof The British journal of psychology, 2009-11, Vol.100 (4), p.753-771
issn 0007-1269
2044-8295
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734049713
source MEDLINE; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Access via Wiley Online Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Accuracy
Attention
Biological and medical sciences
Choice Behavior
Cognition & reasoning
Cognition. Intelligence
Cognitive psychology
Cognitive strategies
Color Perception
Experimental psychology
Experiments
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Judgment
Male
Mathematical Concepts
Miscellaneous
Pattern Recognition, Visual
Problem Solving
Psychological effects
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Reaction Time
Reaction times
Response time
Reversal Learning
Sociological analysis
Task analysis
Young Adult
title Does switching between strategies within the same task involve a cost?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T01%3A13%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20switching%20between%20strategies%20within%20the%20same%20task%20involve%20a%20cost?&rft.jtitle=The%20British%20journal%20of%20psychology&rft.au=Luwel,%20Koen&rft.date=2009-11&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=753&rft.epage=771&rft.pages=753-771&rft.issn=0007-1269&rft.eissn=2044-8295&rft.coden=BJSGAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1348/000712609X402801&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1856419901%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199590518&rft_id=info:pmid/19239730&rfr_iscdi=true