Sonographic biometrical normograms and estimation of fetal weight in the baboon (Papio anubis)

Background In order to consider the non‐human primate as an adequate model for studying prenatal diagnosis and therapy, comparative data on fetal growth should be available. Methods Sixty ultrasound scans were performed in 22 baboons between 14 and 167 days of gestation. Measurements included grea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Journal of medical primatology 2009-10, Vol.38 (5), p.321-327
Hauptverfasser:	Van Calsteren, K., De Catte, L., Devlieger, R., Chai, D.C., Amant, F.
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Animals Biometry Female Fetal Weight Humans Models, Animal Papio anubis Pregnancy Pregnancy, Animal prenatal ultrasound Ultrasonography, Prenatal
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	327
container_issue	5
container_start_page	321
container_title	Journal of medical primatology
container_volume	38
creator	Van Calsteren, K. De Catte, L. Devlieger, R. Chai, D.C. Amant, F.
description	Background In order to consider the non‐human primate as an adequate model for studying prenatal diagnosis and therapy, comparative data on fetal growth should be available. Methods Sixty ultrasound scans were performed in 22 baboons between 14 and 167 days of gestation. Measurements included greatest length, head circumference, biparietal diameter (BPD), transcerebellar diameter, abdominal circumference (AC), femur length (FL), and amniotic fluid index. For all parameters growth curves were established and compared with human curves. In 18 animals, birth weight and placental weight were determined. Different equations described in the literature for estimating the human fetal weight were tested in the baboon. Results The fetal and placental growth pattern in the baboon was comparable with humans. The best predictor of fetal weight was the formula presented by Combs: 0.23966 × AC2 × FL + 1.623 × BPD3. Conclusions A high similarity between baboon and human growth charts is shown. The best equation for estimating the baboon fetal weight is proposed.
doi_str_mv	10.1111/j.1600-0684.2009.00365.x
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734041646</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>734041646</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4715-6db1b80fac1576499275f692fa31f13aa62a05c6e3772bb4095f94f177c02b363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9vFCEYh4nR2LX6FQw39TDjy_BvSbyY1nbbVG2ixqQHCcxCl3VmWGE23X57me6mXuUCye_3vMCDECZQk7Ler2siACoQc1Y3AKoGoILXuydo9hg8RTMAJquGC36EXuS8htJiij1HR0RxxYRgM_TrWxzibTKbVWixDbF3Ywqt6fAQUz8FfcZmWGKXx9CbMcQBR4-9G0vlzoXb1YjDgMeVw9bYWNK312YTYmG2NuR3L9Ezb7rsXh32Y_Tj7NP3k0V19fX84uTjVdUySXgllpbYOXjTEi4FU6qR3AvVeEOJJ9QY0RjgrXBUysZaBop7xTyRsoXGUkGP0Zv93E2Kf7blsboPuXVdZwYXt1lLyoARwabmfN9sU8w5Oa83qfws3WsCepKr13pyqCeHepKrH-TqXUFfHy7Z2t4t_4EHm6XwYV-4C527_-_B-vLzdTkUvNrjIY9u94ib9FsLSSXXP7-c68sztThd3NxoRv8CcsuW2w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734041646</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sonographic biometrical normograms and estimation of fetal weight in the baboon (Papio anubis)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Van Calsteren, K. ; De Catte, L. ; Devlieger, R. ; Chai, D.C. ; Amant, F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Van Calsteren, K. ; De Catte, L. ; Devlieger, R. ; Chai, D.C. ; Amant, F.</creatorcontrib><description>Background In order to consider the non‐human primate as an adequate model for studying prenatal diagnosis and therapy, comparative data on fetal growth should be available. Methods Sixty ultrasound scans were performed in 22 baboons between 14 and 167 days of gestation. Measurements included greatest length, head circumference, biparietal diameter (BPD), transcerebellar diameter, abdominal circumference (AC), femur length (FL), and amniotic fluid index. For all parameters growth curves were established and compared with human curves. In 18 animals, birth weight and placental weight were determined. Different equations described in the literature for estimating the human fetal weight were tested in the baboon. Results The fetal and placental growth pattern in the baboon was comparable with humans. The best predictor of fetal weight was the formula presented by Combs: 0.23966 × AC2 × FL + 1.623 × BPD3. Conclusions A high similarity between baboon and human growth charts is shown. The best equation for estimating the baboon fetal weight is proposed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2565</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0684</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0684.2009.00365.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19594664</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biometry ; Female ; Fetal Weight ; Humans ; Models, Animal ; Papio anubis ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy, Animal ; prenatal ultrasound ; Ultrasonography, Prenatal</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical primatology, 2009-10, Vol.38 (5), p.321-327</ispartof><rights>2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4715-6db1b80fac1576499275f692fa31f13aa62a05c6e3772bb4095f94f177c02b363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4715-6db1b80fac1576499275f692fa31f13aa62a05c6e3772bb4095f94f177c02b363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1600-0684.2009.00365.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1600-0684.2009.00365.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19594664$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van Calsteren, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Catte, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devlieger, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chai, D.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amant, F.</creatorcontrib><title>Sonographic biometrical normograms and estimation of fetal weight in the baboon (Papio anubis)</title><title>Journal of medical primatology</title><addtitle>J Med Primatol</addtitle><description>Background In order to consider the non‐human primate as an adequate model for studying prenatal diagnosis and therapy, comparative data on fetal growth should be available. Methods Sixty ultrasound scans were performed in 22 baboons between 14 and 167 days of gestation. Measurements included greatest length, head circumference, biparietal diameter (BPD), transcerebellar diameter, abdominal circumference (AC), femur length (FL), and amniotic fluid index. For all parameters growth curves were established and compared with human curves. In 18 animals, birth weight and placental weight were determined. Different equations described in the literature for estimating the human fetal weight were tested in the baboon. Results The fetal and placental growth pattern in the baboon was comparable with humans. The best predictor of fetal weight was the formula presented by Combs: 0.23966 × AC2 × FL + 1.623 × BPD3. Conclusions A high similarity between baboon and human growth charts is shown. The best equation for estimating the baboon fetal weight is proposed.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biometry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetal Weight</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Models, Animal</subject><subject>Papio anubis</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy, Animal</subject><subject>prenatal ultrasound</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</subject><issn>0047-2565</issn><issn>1600-0684</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE9vFCEYh4nR2LX6FQw39TDjy_BvSbyY1nbbVG2ixqQHCcxCl3VmWGE23X57me6mXuUCye_3vMCDECZQk7Ler2siACoQc1Y3AKoGoILXuydo9hg8RTMAJquGC36EXuS8htJiij1HR0RxxYRgM_TrWxzibTKbVWixDbF3Ywqt6fAQUz8FfcZmWGKXx9CbMcQBR4-9G0vlzoXb1YjDgMeVw9bYWNK312YTYmG2NuR3L9Ezb7rsXh32Y_Tj7NP3k0V19fX84uTjVdUySXgllpbYOXjTEi4FU6qR3AvVeEOJJ9QY0RjgrXBUysZaBop7xTyRsoXGUkGP0Zv93E2Kf7blsboPuXVdZwYXt1lLyoARwabmfN9sU8w5Oa83qfws3WsCepKr13pyqCeHepKrH-TqXUFfHy7Z2t4t_4EHm6XwYV-4C527_-_B-vLzdTkUvNrjIY9u94ib9FsLSSXXP7-c68sztThd3NxoRv8CcsuW2w</recordid><startdate>200910</startdate><enddate>200910</enddate><creator>Van Calsteren, K.</creator><creator>De Catte, L.</creator><creator>Devlieger, R.</creator><creator>Chai, D.C.</creator><creator>Amant, F.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200910</creationdate><title>Sonographic biometrical normograms and estimation of fetal weight in the baboon (Papio anubis)</title><author>Van Calsteren, K. ; De Catte, L. ; Devlieger, R. ; Chai, D.C. ; Amant, F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4715-6db1b80fac1576499275f692fa31f13aa62a05c6e3772bb4095f94f177c02b363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biometry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetal Weight</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Models, Animal</topic><topic>Papio anubis</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy, Animal</topic><topic>prenatal ultrasound</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van Calsteren, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Catte, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devlieger, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chai, D.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amant, F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical primatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van Calsteren, K.</au><au>De Catte, L.</au><au>Devlieger, R.</au><au>Chai, D.C.</au><au>Amant, F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sonographic biometrical normograms and estimation of fetal weight in the baboon (Papio anubis)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical primatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Primatol</addtitle><date>2009-10</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>321</spage><epage>327</epage><pages>321-327</pages><issn>0047-2565</issn><eissn>1600-0684</eissn><abstract>Background In order to consider the non‐human primate as an adequate model for studying prenatal diagnosis and therapy, comparative data on fetal growth should be available. Methods Sixty ultrasound scans were performed in 22 baboons between 14 and 167 days of gestation. Measurements included greatest length, head circumference, biparietal diameter (BPD), transcerebellar diameter, abdominal circumference (AC), femur length (FL), and amniotic fluid index. For all parameters growth curves were established and compared with human curves. In 18 animals, birth weight and placental weight were determined. Different equations described in the literature for estimating the human fetal weight were tested in the baboon. Results The fetal and placental growth pattern in the baboon was comparable with humans. The best predictor of fetal weight was the formula presented by Combs: 0.23966 × AC2 × FL + 1.623 × BPD3. Conclusions A high similarity between baboon and human growth charts is shown. The best equation for estimating the baboon fetal weight is proposed.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>19594664</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1600-0684.2009.00365.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0047-2565
ispartof	Journal of medical primatology, 2009-10, Vol.38 (5), p.321-327
issn	0047-2565 1600-0684
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_734041646
source	MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects	Animals Biometry Female Fetal Weight Humans Models, Animal Papio anubis Pregnancy Pregnancy, Animal prenatal ultrasound Ultrasonography, Prenatal
title	Sonographic biometrical normograms and estimation of fetal weight in the baboon (Papio anubis)
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T06%3A28%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sonographic%20biometrical%20normograms%20and%20estimation%20of%20fetal%20weight%20in%20the%20baboon%20(Papio%20anubis)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20primatology&rft.au=Van%20Calsteren,%20K.&rft.date=2009-10&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=321&rft.epage=327&rft.pages=321-327&rft.issn=0047-2565&rft.eissn=1600-0684&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1600-0684.2009.00365.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E734041646%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734041646&rft_id=info:pmid/19594664&rfr_iscdi=true