A randomized, controlled comparison of warm water infusion in lieu of air insufflation versus air insufflation for aiding colonoscopy insertion in sedated patients undergoing colorectal cancer screening and surveillance

Background Pilot studies using a novel water method to perform screening colonoscopy allowed patients to complete colonoscopy without sedation medications and also significantly increased the cecal intubation success rate. Objective To perform a randomized, controlled trial comparing air insufflatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2009-09, Vol.70 (3), p.505-510
Hauptverfasser: Leung, Joseph W., MD, FRCP, FACG, FACP, FASGE, Mann, Surinder K., MD, FACG, Siao-Salera, Rodelei, RN, Ransibrahmanakul, Kanat, MD, Lim, Brian, MD, Cabrera, Hazel, RN, Canete, Wilhemina, RN, Barredo, Paul, LVN, Gutierrez, Rebeck, RN, Leung, Felix W., MD, FACG
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Pilot studies using a novel water method to perform screening colonoscopy allowed patients to complete colonoscopy without sedation medications and also significantly increased the cecal intubation success rate. Objective To perform a randomized, controlled trial comparing air insufflation (conventional method) and water infusion in lieu of air insufflation(study method) colonoscopy in minimally sedated patients. Hypothesis Compared with the conventional method, patients examined by the study method had lower pain scores and required less medication but had a similar cecal intubation rate and willingness to undergo colonoscopy in the future. Setting Outpatient colonoscopy in a single Veterans Affairs hospital. Methods After informed consent and standard bowel preparation, patients received premedications administered as 0.5-increments of fentanyl (25 μg) and 0.5-increments of Versed (midazolam) (1 mg) plus 50 mg of diphenhydramine. The conventional and the study methods for colonoscopy were implemented as previously described. Additional pain medications were administered at the patients' request. Main Outcome Measurements Increments of medications, pain scores, cecal intubation, and willingness to repeat colonoscopy. Results Increments of medications used before reaching the cecum (1.6 ± 0.2 vs 2.4 ± 0.2, P < .0027), total increments used (1.8 ± 0.2 vs 2.5 ± 0.2, P < .014), and the maximum pain scores (1.3 ± 0.3 vs 4.1 ± 0.6, P < .0002) were significantly lower with the water method. Cecal intubation rate (100%) and willingness to undergo a repeat colonoscopy (96%) were similar. Limitations Single Veterans Affairs hospital, older male population. Conclusion Water infusion in lieu of air insufflation is superior to air insufflation during colonoscopy in the minimally sedated patients ( ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00785889 ).
ISSN:0016-5107
1097-6779
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2008.12.253