Minding Feeling
In this commentary on Jørgen Dines Johansen’s paper, ‘Feelings in Literature’, an expanded approach to feeling is sketched, relying on the work of Susanne Langer. Without challenging the central and valuable insights presented by Johansen, this commentary attempts to develop and refine the notion of...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Integrative psychological & behavioral science 2010-09, Vol.44 (3), p.197-207 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 207 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 197 |
| container_title | Integrative psychological & behavioral science |
| container_volume | 44 |
| creator | Innis, Robert E. |
| description | In this commentary on Jørgen Dines Johansen’s paper, ‘Feelings in Literature’, an expanded approach to feeling is sketched, relying on the work of Susanne Langer. Without challenging the central and valuable insights presented by Johansen, this commentary attempts to develop and refine the notion of feeling beyond that found in Johansen and to focus on the heuristic power of images, especially artistic images, to reveal the deep structures of minding. Langer’s work is rooted in a nuanced philosophical psychology and biology, but she looks for her guide to exploring these domains to the ‘import of art.’ Her approach to the semiotics of art offers a set of powerful analytical tools that reveal the universal scope of aesthetic reflection and its relevance for the sciences of mind. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12124-010-9131-x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733989749</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A383459436</galeid><sourcerecordid>A383459436</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-cc9b055614e08d8af71bee862882c3e3e42d43c5d2f7b7cdf118e05f90c5c6cd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1Lw0AQhhdRbK3i2YsIHsRD6n4mu8dSrBYqgh_nJdmdDSlpUrMJ1H_v1lShIDKHGWaed2DmReiC4DHBOLnzhBLKI0xwpAgj0eYADYliccREnBx-1zTiAtMBOvF-ibGQsWLHaEAxV1gJPkTnT0Vliyq_mgGUIZ-iI5eWHs52eYTeZ_dv08do8fwwn04WkeGct5ExKsNCxIQDllamLiEZgIyplNQwYMCp5cwIS12SJcY6QiRg4RQ2wsTGshG66feum_qjA9_qVeENlGVaQd15nTCmpEq4CuR1T-ZpCbqoXN02qdnSesIk40JxFgdq_AcVwsKqMHUFrgj9PcHtniAwLWzaPO281_PXl32W9Kxpau8bcHrdFKu0-dQE660TundCByf01gm9CZrL3YFdtgL7q_h5fQBoD_gwqnJo9LLumio8_Z-tX9kcj28</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733989749</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Minding Feeling</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Innis, Robert E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Innis, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><description>In this commentary on Jørgen Dines Johansen’s paper, ‘Feelings in Literature’, an expanded approach to feeling is sketched, relying on the work of Susanne Langer. Without challenging the central and valuable insights presented by Johansen, this commentary attempts to develop and refine the notion of feeling beyond that found in Johansen and to focus on the heuristic power of images, especially artistic images, to reveal the deep structures of minding. Langer’s work is rooted in a nuanced philosophical psychology and biology, but she looks for her guide to exploring these domains to the ‘import of art.’ Her approach to the semiotics of art offers a set of powerful analytical tools that reveal the universal scope of aesthetic reflection and its relevance for the sciences of mind.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-4502</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-3567</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12124-010-9131-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20490954</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Anthropology ; Awareness ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Child ; Commentary ; Emotions - physiology ; Esthetics ; Female ; Humans ; Literature ; Mental Processes ; Mother-Child Relations ; Psychology ; Psychophysiology ; Sociology</subject><ispartof>Integrative psychological & behavioral science, 2010-09, Vol.44 (3), p.197-207</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-cc9b055614e08d8af71bee862882c3e3e42d43c5d2f7b7cdf118e05f90c5c6cd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-cc9b055614e08d8af71bee862882c3e3e42d43c5d2f7b7cdf118e05f90c5c6cd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12124-010-9131-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12124-010-9131-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20490954$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Innis, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><title>Minding Feeling</title><title>Integrative psychological & behavioral science</title><addtitle>Integr. psych. behav</addtitle><addtitle>Integr Psychol Behav Sci</addtitle><description>In this commentary on Jørgen Dines Johansen’s paper, ‘Feelings in Literature’, an expanded approach to feeling is sketched, relying on the work of Susanne Langer. Without challenging the central and valuable insights presented by Johansen, this commentary attempts to develop and refine the notion of feeling beyond that found in Johansen and to focus on the heuristic power of images, especially artistic images, to reveal the deep structures of minding. Langer’s work is rooted in a nuanced philosophical psychology and biology, but she looks for her guide to exploring these domains to the ‘import of art.’ Her approach to the semiotics of art offers a set of powerful analytical tools that reveal the universal scope of aesthetic reflection and its relevance for the sciences of mind.</description><subject>Anthropology</subject><subject>Awareness</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Commentary</subject><subject>Emotions - physiology</subject><subject>Esthetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Literature</subject><subject>Mental Processes</subject><subject>Mother-Child Relations</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><issn>1932-4502</issn><issn>1936-3567</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1Lw0AQhhdRbK3i2YsIHsRD6n4mu8dSrBYqgh_nJdmdDSlpUrMJ1H_v1lShIDKHGWaed2DmReiC4DHBOLnzhBLKI0xwpAgj0eYADYliccREnBx-1zTiAtMBOvF-ibGQsWLHaEAxV1gJPkTnT0Vliyq_mgGUIZ-iI5eWHs52eYTeZ_dv08do8fwwn04WkeGct5ExKsNCxIQDllamLiEZgIyplNQwYMCp5cwIS12SJcY6QiRg4RQ2wsTGshG66feum_qjA9_qVeENlGVaQd15nTCmpEq4CuR1T-ZpCbqoXN02qdnSesIk40JxFgdq_AcVwsKqMHUFrgj9PcHtniAwLWzaPO281_PXl32W9Kxpau8bcHrdFKu0-dQE660TundCByf01gm9CZrL3YFdtgL7q_h5fQBoD_gwqnJo9LLumio8_Z-tX9kcj28</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Innis, Robert E.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>Minding Feeling</title><author>Innis, Robert E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-cc9b055614e08d8af71bee862882c3e3e42d43c5d2f7b7cdf118e05f90c5c6cd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Anthropology</topic><topic>Awareness</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Commentary</topic><topic>Emotions - physiology</topic><topic>Esthetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Literature</topic><topic>Mental Processes</topic><topic>Mother-Child Relations</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Innis, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Integrative psychological & behavioral science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Innis, Robert E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Minding Feeling</atitle><jtitle>Integrative psychological & behavioral science</jtitle><stitle>Integr. psych. behav</stitle><addtitle>Integr Psychol Behav Sci</addtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>197</spage><epage>207</epage><pages>197-207</pages><issn>1932-4502</issn><eissn>1936-3567</eissn><abstract>In this commentary on Jørgen Dines Johansen’s paper, ‘Feelings in Literature’, an expanded approach to feeling is sketched, relying on the work of Susanne Langer. Without challenging the central and valuable insights presented by Johansen, this commentary attempts to develop and refine the notion of feeling beyond that found in Johansen and to focus on the heuristic power of images, especially artistic images, to reveal the deep structures of minding. Langer’s work is rooted in a nuanced philosophical psychology and biology, but she looks for her guide to exploring these domains to the ‘import of art.’ Her approach to the semiotics of art offers a set of powerful analytical tools that reveal the universal scope of aesthetic reflection and its relevance for the sciences of mind.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>20490954</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12124-010-9131-x</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-4502 |
| ispartof | Integrative psychological & behavioral science, 2010-09, Vol.44 (3), p.197-207 |
| issn | 1932-4502 1936-3567 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733989749 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Anthropology Awareness Behavioral Science and Psychology Child Commentary Emotions - physiology Esthetics Female Humans Literature Mental Processes Mother-Child Relations Psychology Psychophysiology Sociology |
| title | Minding Feeling |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A39%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Minding%20Feeling&rft.jtitle=Integrative%20psychological%20&%20behavioral%20science&rft.au=Innis,%20Robert%20E.&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=197&rft.epage=207&rft.pages=197-207&rft.issn=1932-4502&rft.eissn=1936-3567&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12124-010-9131-x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA383459436%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733989749&rft_id=info:pmid/20490954&rft_galeid=A383459436&rfr_iscdi=true |